| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143823733 by deshvais @ 2023-11-09 13:54 | 1 | 2023-11-10 21:46 | Udarian ♦437 | wouldn't "updated traffic signals" be a better commit message since it better describes what was done in the commit since it wasn't stop signs that were added rather traffic signals. |
| 2 | 2023-11-13 10:02 | pachpora ♦17 | Hi,Thank you for reviewing the edit and notifying us about the improper modifications. These changes were done by the editors in accordance with our internal SOP. We apologize for the incorrect edits flown into OSM from our end. I have investigated the edits and made the appropriate changes in the... | |
| 3 | 2023-11-17 02:36 | Udarian ♦437 | I dont know if I was misunderstood, it is preferable for the traffic_signals to be at the lines on the roads were the cars should stop, what this commit actually did was correct, my original message on this commit was to do with the change set comment on this. I felt that "Added Stop Sign.&qu... | |
| 4 | 2023-11-17 02:39 | Udarian ♦437 | I was not pointing out "improper modifications", just that the comment=* could have been better. | |
| 5 | 2023-11-17 04:57 | pachpora ♦17 | Hi,Thank you for notifying us about incorrect changeset comments. We will be more careful while adding comments based on what edits/modifications have been made in that particular changeset.Regards,pachpora | |
| 6 | 2023-11-18 01:37 | Udarian ♦437 | so, just to make sure we understand each other here; the edits on this commit (143823733) were good and should have been kept (I have since fixed the fact that this was reverted in a commit of my own), I had no issue with that. the only issue was with the fact that the change set comment (comment=*)... | |
| 7 | 2023-11-21 13:04 | pachpora ♦17 | Hi,We have understood your point of view and also given feedback to our editors on adding correct changeset comments based on what edits have been made.Regards,pachpora |