| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79106125 by dvvuyyur @ 2020-01-02 09:24 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | cyton ♦221 | that long way is not a hw=service, but a footway, i will fixed it. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | rababdul ♦26 | Hello cyton,Thank you for reviewing the changeset and changing the highway tag to footpath. Going forward, we will ensure to double-check all available resources and make precise edits. Thanks for your support.Best regards,Abdul Qader | |
| 70257383 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-05-15 02:29 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | BCNorwich ♦5,130 | Hi,I only just noticed this addition to OSM.The added Way: 690088314 is not a highway=residential it's a short graveled drive to a single house, the same as many along Unthank Road. Further you mapped it crossing a footpath with no join and also crossing the outline of the house.I think y... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi BC Norwich,Thanks for taking the time to review my edit and making necessary changes. We will make sure such mistakes will not be repeated. Please let me know in case of any more modifications. I am so grateful to learn from the community.Regards,dvvuyyur. | |
| 70496221 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-05-22 00:57 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | frosm ♦1,160 | bonjour,la route traverse 2 terrains de foot ?le bâtiments traversé à chaque extrémité n'a pas l'air non plus d'encore exister.cordialement. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | unnsyeda ♦13 | Hi frosm,Replying on behalf of dvvuyyur. Thanks for looking into the edit. Mapper has used Bing Aerial and Esri World Imagery as source to make these edits. I would request you to please make any further changes required to the edit performed by dvvuyyur as you have the local knowledge of the ar... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | frosm ♦1,160 | Hello,My remark was meant to be humorous to say that if the contributor noticed that a new road had been created, he probably also noticed that soccer pitchs were destroyed.so he could delete them, or if his professional orders don't allow him to spend time on it, make a note instead of t... | |
| 77969818 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-12-05 04:33 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lasagna ♦45 | I have not surveyed this area myself, but based on the available sources I believe that East Hughes Access Road is completely closed and unmaintained. The current combination of tags suggests that the road is open. To correct this, I propose to either:1. Remove highway=unclassified, leaving disuse... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi lasagna,Thanks for looking into my edit.Made the necessary changes as per the suggestions.Please refer the changeset (78042005) for the modification.Please let me know if anything needs to be added. Always happy to learn from community.Regards,dvvuyyur. | |
| 77115357 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-11-15 09:33 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ndm ♦889 | I've reverted these turn restrictions -- there is no evidence on Bing Streetside. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi ndm,Thanks for looking into my edit. Added turn restrictions as the new added road goes over the legal median as per the OSM Wiki (https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/lines-and-lane-markings-on-the-road.html). Please let me know if anythings needs to be changed. Always happy to learn from communi... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | ndm ♦889 | I think you need to understand that you can cross a painted meridian to turn -- if you are careful https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/lines-and-lane-markings-on-the-road.html#Please don't add any turn restrictions that conflict with the highway code. | |
| 76576604 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-11-04 08:34 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | DaveF ♦1,625 | HiIs there a reason you removed 'driveway'?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18936192 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi DaveF,Thanks for looking into my edit. Edited the highway tag of the driveway to service road as the road is leading to more than one entity. Please let me know if edits needs to be reverted as per the local knowledge . Always happy to learn from society.Thanks,dvvuyyur. | |
| 71384951 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-06-19 02:39 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,723 | Hello,It looks like the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63409424/history has the same issue as previously discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71660873 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?Best Re... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi Andy,As per your suggestion the motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads have been reverted. I checked all these type of edits and reverted wherever necessary. Thanks for your insights. Regards,dvvuyyur. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,723 | Hi dvvuyyur,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,723 | Hi dvvuyyur, Actually, I've just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585121283/history , which seems to be another example of the same thing. If you use the overpass query https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/KD8 you can see at least one other.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 5 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi Andy,Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.Changeset=72125820Regards,dvvuyyur | |
| 6 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,723 | Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 69510709 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-04-24 04:16 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Danysan95 ♦130 | Quando inserisci strade private come queste ricorda il tag access=private, o rischi che i navigatori che utilizzano OSM provino a mandare le persone in queste strade.L'ho corretto nel changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69552718 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMC... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. The services roads were added as per the latest imagery. Private tag was not added because there was no proof to add. Thanks for your suggestions. Going forward we will add these tags so that it wont be considered as a shortcut or thru road in routing. Pleas... | |
| 71587286 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-06-25 06:57 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | jpennycook ♦330 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159524164 is a private road, so "motor_vehicle=yes" is incorrect. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_tag_values "motor_vehicle=yes" means that any driver has a legal right of way on this track, which is not true. ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi,Thank you for providing feedback on the edit. The edit on "motor_vehicle=yes" attribute was made as vehicles were visible near the houses in the satellite imagery and from our delivery agent traces . As per community feedback on not to add "motor_vehicle=yes" tag until com... | |
| 71658243 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-06-27 04:53 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,631 | What sources have you used which would suggest that this is a public right of way for motor vehicles?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi Richard,Thank you for providing feedback on the edit. The edit on "motor_vehicle=yes" attribute was made as vehicles were visible near the houses in the satellite imagery and from our delivery agent traces . As per community feedback on not to add "motor_vehicle=yes" tag ... | |
| 71660873 by dvvuyyur @ 2019-06-27 07:00 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,723 | Hello,What was the source of the access change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | dvvuyyur | Hi,The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces and using satellite imageries. Reverted "motor_vehicle=yes" tag as per feedback from community.Changeset: 71732919Please let me know if there are any other suggestions Regards,dvvuyyur | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,723 | Hello dvvuyyur,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy |