| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 171690052 by edvac @ 2025-09-09 14:32 | 1 | 2025-09-10 13:57 | Rodrigo Rega ♦357 | A 26 metros al este había ya una pareada mapeada. ¿La que añadiste en este cambio será duplicada? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171690052 |
| 145445924 by edvac @ 2023-12-23 18:24 | 1 | 2023-12-28 16:14 | mmahmud ♦32 | Hi, your highway edits are overlapping a lot of buildings and creating a lot of issues. Also, you need to adjust imagery to the existing dataset before creating new highways or adjusting alignments. Kindly fix the issues. |
| 144266388 by edvac @ 2023-11-20 23:51 | 1 | 2023-11-21 00:16 | edvac | Les 3 points d'intérêt à Lonjamuzi, pas avenue de la Victoire. |
| 142592214 by edvac @ 2023-10-14 20:48 | 1 | 2023-10-15 18:33 | Monchinho ♦66 | Ola. Non estou 100% seguro que ese sexa o nome oficial, pois o artigo 1 do Estatuto de Autonomía de Galicia (non Estatuto de Autonomía da Comunidade Autónoma de Galicia, por certo) di "Galicia, nacionalidade histórica, constitúese en Comunidade Autónoma... |
| 138273309 by edvac @ 2023-07-08 18:25 | 1 | 2023-07-08 18:39 | edvac_repair ♦15 | Ce groupe de changements était le téléchargement, par erreur, d'une couche avec les limits des 25 avenues du Q. Bankoko, encore pas finies.L'annulation des modifications a été faite ici: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138273455 |
| 110044665 by edvac @ 2021-08-21 23:26 | 1 | 2021-09-04 14:07 | Jyunhou ♦132 | Hi edvac,You revert the changeset, and made the village (node/8138514813) which established by the Chinese government and inhabited by Chinese residents outside the border of China. Please answer positively why you did this. As a member of the DWG, it is quite SHAMEFUL to violate the file [https:... |
| 2 | 2021-09-04 14:30 | NM$L ♦88 | ==Copy from 94546363==devac您好， 我谢谢您的评论。 那根据所谓的“地上”原则，一个中国实控村——庞达村——是不是应该算在其他的国家里面呀😅？ 你是第二或第三个评论有关边界问题之人。我要是不懂... | |
| 3 | 2021-09-04 15:59 | FreedSky ♦181 | 有明确的道路数据可以证明控制归属，不理解阁下为何如此编辑？ | |
| 4 | 2021-09-05 07:13 | FreedSky ♦181 | There are a large number of Chinese-controlled roads in this area of Doklam, and Bhutan has almost no actual control nodes, but the entire area is returned to be displayed as Bhutanese territory; if you zoom in and look at the detailed OSM data, for example, the roads can find China to the dispute... | |
| 5 | 2021-09-06 03:23 | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦558 | 建議閣下仔細觀察您所修改的區域，在該區域中有明顯的由PRC實控的證明，按照在地原則，閣下的這次編輯是顯然不正確的。https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule | |
| 6 | 2021-09-24 07:39 | FreedSky ♦181 | [Ticket#2021090510000032] Re: Regarding the unreasonable border retrea [...]Data Working Group <data@otrs.openstreetmap.org>Hello,this is an automated reply. Your request has been recorded as Ticket#2021090510000032 and will be processed by one of the members of Data Working Group ... | |
| 7 | 2021-10-14 15:27 | NM$L ♦88 | 已经55天过去😅 | |
| 8 | 2022-08-27 09:44 | NM$L ♦88 | 😅 One year... | |
| 9792486 by edvac @ 2011-11-10 21:27 | 1 | 2022-07-24 17:03 | PierZen ♦275 | Buenos diaz RafealThe history of the relation for this long lake north of Quebec is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1839917/history It says that you did v1 using scanaerial and probably a less detailed Bing image than nowadays. (:Do you think that scanarerial is still working well and wo... |
| 61741920 by edvac @ 2018-08-17 10:41 | 1 | 2021-12-28 11:25 | ivanbranco ♦2,793 | Hi edvac,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1190135819/historyis a typo for place=village or just an error and place=hamlet needs to be restored? |
| 110858577 by edvac @ 2021-09-07 12:32 | 1 | 2021-09-12 08:17 | NM$L ♦88 | 问阁下，既然在该区域在接受调查，那么您为什么要先做出更改？Why did you make the change first when this area is under investigation? |
| 2 | 2021-09-24 07:51 | FreedSky ♦181 | DWG你们是调查还是拖延时间？眼见为实的道路以及 https://www.sentinel-hub.com/explore/sentinel-playground 可以搜索到的最新卫星图都是实打实的证据。 | |
| 61828669 by edvac @ 2018-08-20 16:16 | 1 | 2018-08-20 16:18 | edvac | La fuente de esos datos es, en realidad, PNOA y catastro. Puse local_knodledge por error. De hecho, la mayoría de objetos les añadí source, así que no hay problema. |
| 47045547 by edvac @ 2017-03-21 17:00 | 1 | 2017-03-22 14:17 | ChrissW-R1 ♦351 | Please have a look at this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/936498The tag shoal=coral_reef is inconsistent. |
| 2 | 2018-08-18 11:12 | edvac | Done | |
| 53959739 by edvac @ 2017-11-20 20:18 | 1 | 2018-03-31 19:19 | siffash ♦5 | Why is it boundary=administrative? |
| 2 | 2018-04-30 06:28 | ybon ♦5 | hi edvac, tagging boundary=administrative+admin_level=x on coastline ways seems weird to me. Seems to me those tags should only be set to the administrative relations.For example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18793204What do you think? :) | |
| 3 | 2018-08-11 22:08 | JMO-VE ♦1 | boundary = administrative + admin_level = 4 on coastline causes in the Navit (Navit is a open source (GPL) car navigation system with routing) part of the Iberian peninsula is flooded with water (blue color) which makes this map unusable. Please reverse this situation. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-12 09:22 | edvac | "Boundary ways should have boundary=administrative and the admin_level=* for the highest border".Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Way_tagsI've done many boundary imports in different countries so far. Everybody was happy with the proposed taggi... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-13 20:11 | siffash ♦5 | Hi edvac,Thank you for your contribution and detailed explanation.So far I haven't seen such tagging for coastlines, that's why it's seen very unusual and unexpected, and makes using OSM more difficult. The idea of OSM is to be flexible and at the same time very convenient to be u... | |
| 6 | 2018-08-18 00:13 | edvac | Hi all:As it is controversial, and in any case optional, I have deleted the tags boundary and admin_level from the coastline boundaries. This includes like 23 segments that aren't coastline in any case...I think this would need a discussion in the tagging list, and a modification in the cor... | |
| 53959330 by edvac @ 2017-11-20 20:01 | 1 | 2017-11-20 20:06 | edvac | 224 unset, quería decir. |
| 33625692 by edvac @ 2015-08-27 16:46 | 1 | 2015-08-27 16:52 | edvac | I forgot: corrected Miringa and Yawi wards too. |
| 33255952 by edvac @ 2015-08-11 00:21 | 1 | 2015-08-11 00:26 | edvac | And Zari ward also corrected (I forgot) |
| 33224968 by edvac @ 2015-08-09 18:44 | 1 | 2015-08-09 18:57 | edvac | And Koshebe ward also corrected (I forgot) |