| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68008610 by flevin @ 2019-03-11 04:32 | 1 | 2020-07-13 08:02 | Richard ♦220 | Hi - in this changeset you changed highway=bridleway to highway=service, which is fine, but by adding access=private you've broken bike/foot access. Bridleways in the UK permit bike and foot access. I've reinstated it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87908293 but you might want t... |
| 2 | 2020-07-13 08:02 | Richard ♦220 | *take note (not "not"!) | |
| 70098077 by flevin @ 2019-05-10 06:59 | 1 | 2019-12-14 08:31 | mingo23 ♦8 | Dear user, I came across this changeset where you modified the road geometry introducing a number of mistakes, for example you moved the road on top of a building. If you want to make further edits, I recommend - in addition to being careful - to use PCN 2012 as the base orthophoto, since this is ... |
| 71007970 by flevin @ 2019-06-07 02:43 | 1 | 2019-07-05 15:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,It looks like your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335769449/history has the same issue that was previously discussed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71697928 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?\... |
| 71881909 by flevin @ 2019-07-04 04:49 | 1 | 2019-07-04 22:37 | Paul Berry ♦124 | The service road you've drawn overlaps the park and no longer exists anyway. |
| 2 | 2019-07-05 07:31 | Paul Berry ♦124 | I've corrected this on changeset 71912629. I was in the area yesterday and about to map when I noticed your recent changes. | |
| 71697928 by flevin @ 2019-06-28 08:07 | 1 | 2019-06-28 14:22 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,What was the source for your change to the access here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 01:46 | flevin | Hi Andy,The edits were made based on the possibility of our delivery parter traveling through this road and the vehicles visible from satellite imagery. But with respect to the request from the community our team decided to revert all the access tags added by our team. Do let me know if you ha... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-02 11:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 70799935 by flevin @ 2019-05-31 08:34 | 1 | 2019-06-02 22:00 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Again, if there was a residential road here it would have been mapped a long time ago. Please stop and think when adding a single residential road. This again is a private driveway. Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2019-06-02 22:01 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693691365 | |
| 3 | 2019-07-02 01:51 | flevin | Hi Phil,Thanks for looking into my edits and making the changes. Do let me know if you have any other suggestions.Regards,flevin | |
| 70098149 by flevin @ 2019-05-10 07:03 | 1 | 2019-05-13 16:16 | Constable ♦1,294 | Hi flevin, are you sure about this node location?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1383687776I'm quite sure that hikers/cyclists coming from the trail, going southbound do not really cross any gate, for that reason I think the trail should connect to this road just next to the top sectio... |
| 2 | 2019-05-15 09:07 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi Constable,Thanks for looking into our edits. The edit was not completely done by our editor. The gate was added years ago by another user as lift_gate. In the aerial view it looks like it is the possible connection for the trail segment too.So It cannot be connected to the parking area that w... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-16 06:22 | Constable ♦1,294 | I'm pretty sure you don't have to get across the gate in order to access the trail, I've been there quite some times this past winter so I'm moving the trail connection a bit to the south, so that it does reflect the "on the ground situation".Thanks for your message! |