| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91960148 by goltapan @ 2020-10-05 06:12 | 1 | 2020-10-05 08:12 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo goltapan,dieshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855251032/historyist mit Sicherheit keine Service-Straße, allenfals ein Waldweg (Track), vermutich aber nur eine Rückegasse.Ohne Ortskenntnisse sollten solche "Wege" nicht eingezeichnet werden! Grüße |
| 2 | 2020-10-06 07:45 | goltapan | thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have misinterpreted the road classification and added a service road. thanks for the heads up. please find the changeset(92028732) for the reversion. going forward, i will make sure to add the roads more cautiously in concurrence with the ground reali... | |
| 89564948 by goltapan @ 2020-08-18 09:36 | 1 | 2020-09-10 21:54 | skyper ♦871 | Hi goltapanDie Weg westlich der Tullastraße sind, wenn überhaupt, höchsten "driveway", auch passen sie zu keinem Luftbild und sind schlampig eingezeichnet.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838149340https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838149341Die Wege östlich... |
| 2 | 2020-09-11 17:55 | goltapan | Hi Skyper, Thanks for looking into my edit. I have edited based on the imagery which was slightly offset. I have modified the roads as per your suggestion (change set: 90771290 ). I Genuinely apologize for the miss from my end. I have added service roads based on point data and Building looks like... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-12 12:35 | skyper ♦871 | HiThe best aligned imagery concerning angles is Esri. It is usually the one with the least offset, as-well. Maxar and Bing are most of the time newer but of less quality. Additionally there is Maps4BW for building outlines and names, house numbers and more, which is quite accurate. But all that ... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-14 11:05 | goltapan | "hi skyper, thanks for the detailed explanation. we are talking with DWG to take a long term decision. We will be happy to implement the changes whatever that benefits the larger community, but want to make sure it is accepted by all the community members. In the past few community members in... | |
| 85074561 by goltapan @ 2020-05-12 09:05 | 1 | 2020-05-12 13:59 | wurzelast ♦1,560 | wird da gebaut oder warum nicht mehr bespielbar? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85074561 |
| 2 | 2020-05-13 06:35 | goltapan | Thanks for checking into our edits. This edit is partially based on our driver feedback and available resources. As per esri world imagery dated 2018, the area is well constructed. So, I have added a service road and made necessary modifications. Please let me know in case of any further modificatio... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-13 08:36 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | @goltapan: you have deleted a soccer field and left the area empty. wurzelast was asking if this is now a construction area, or what else is going on there which keeps people from playing soccer. | |
| 4 | 2020-05-13 09:40 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo,wie auf den Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)-Luftbildern zu sehen ist, stehen da jetzt 2 Gebäude.@goltapan:Warum hast Du nur die Zufahrt und nicht auch die Gebäude eingezeichnet?Grüße | |
| 5 | 2020-05-13 11:10 | ravsjith ♦18 | Hi,Replying on behalf of Goltapan. we have added the service road and building outline based on the latest available resources. please find the modifications in the changeset(85140849). always happy to learn from the community.Regards,Ravsjith | |
| 82572677 by goltapan @ 2020-03-24 13:23 | 1 | 2020-03-25 20:25 | Rainero ♦585 | Hallo goltapan,may I ask what is the source for this edit?This way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/784204894 is certainly not a hw=service, but a pure track for agricultural use, I would say tracktype=grade3.As you are mapping mapping for a company, please ensure to add the source for every ... |
| 2 | 2020-03-26 10:44 | goltapan | Thanks for looking into our edits. Please find the changeset (82655540) for the suggested modifications. I will make sure such mistakes will not be repeated. Please let me know in case of any further modifications required. Once again, thanks for your correction. | |
| 3 | 2020-03-26 17:57 | Rainero ♦585 | Hello goltapan,thank you for correcting the path.As I see at least on some of your today's edits, you have added the sources used for the changeset. Please continue in all changesets, that makes it really easier for other mappers to understand.Bye,Rainer | |
| 73872882 by goltapan @ 2019-08-29 09:28 | 1 | 2019-08-29 14:44 | BCNorwich ♦4,884 | Hi, Unfortunately you've drawn the service road as joined to and through a building. If you need help amending please just ask.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2019-08-30 13:35 | goltapan | Hi Bernard,Thanks for looking into my edit. I have understood the mistake and will take this as a lesson for my future edits. I have reverted the mistake and the new changeset id is #73923590. I look forward to add valuable data towards OSM. Let me know in case you have further suggestion. Will ... |