| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 117966694 by govvala @ 2022-03-01 05:57 | 1 | 2022-03-04 02:59 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,081 | You added a duplicate way in this changeset --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117966694 |
| 2 | 2022-03-04 08:03 | govvala | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the feedback.Apologies, for the adding a duplicate road segment as this error happened due to another mapper editing the same segment at the same time.Additionally, I have also fixed another duplicate road in the changeset #118082108.Than... | |
| 105958276 by govvala @ 2021-06-07 09:07 | 1 | 2021-06-07 15:49 | jleedev ♦299 | I find this change unlikely. While it's common in certain areas for street signs to omit the name's suffix, TIGER, USPS, and Allegheny County GIS are all in agreement that the street's proper name includes the suffix here. I've added it back. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 10:45 | abvincen ♦34 | Hi,Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit.I've edited the suffix of the Road name based on Driver feedback and streetsign imagery available on OSM.But going forward I'll keep the learning and add suffix as per Tiger data.Looking forward to learn more from... | |
| 76640161 by govvala @ 2019-11-05 10:57 | 1 | 2019-11-05 20:31 | user_5359 ♦19,605 | Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways).see realtion https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10254126 |
| 2 | 2019-11-06 05:47 | govvala | Hi,Apologies for the error.Thanks for your suggestion.I have fixed this changeset #: 76678164.Let me know if you have any other suggestions.Regards,govvala. | |
| 75419421 by govvala @ 2019-10-08 14:53 | 1 | 2019-10-08 17:26 | user_5359 ♦19,605 | Hello! A restriction relation must have three (or more) roles (from, to, via), see relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10089724. |
| 2 | 2019-10-10 10:25 | govvala | Hi,Apologies for the error.Thanks for your suggestion.I have fixed this changeset #75503871.Let me know if you have any other suggestions.Regards,govvala. | |
| 71584576 by govvala @ 2019-06-25 05:21 | 1 | 2019-06-26 01:02 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,139 | Not bad. name="County Road 2972" isn't as great as ref="CR 2972" instead, though (name is just the name). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71584576 |
| 2 | 2019-06-27 12:00 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi Paul Johnson,Thanks for looking into the edit. The name was given as per the tiger data. Please suggest which has to be prioritized name="County Road 2972" or ref="CR 2972". As per the naming convention adding name is fine.But do let us know if we are going anything wrong... | |
| 3 | 2019-06-27 23:57 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,139 | In the case of county roads (and other highways that only have a ref), the name should only be the name, so ref=CR 2971 is preferable with noname=yes being added. | |
| 4 | 2019-07-09 14:15 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for your suggestions.We will follow these going forward.Regards,yaswap |