| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 179241314 by gscholz @ 2026-03-02 08:09 ~ 10 days ago | 1 | ~ 4 days ago | José Miguel Picazo Núñez ♦3 | Good afternoon. I noticed that you reverted my changeset 176372480 with yours (179241314). By doing this, you are keeping incorrect data. Relation 8841276 is wrong. The boundaries for postcode 02008 are those indicated by Correos España at: https://www.correos.es/es/es/herramientas/codigos-po... |
| 2 | ~ 3 days ago | gscholz | Hi José,thanks for your kind feedback. You are free to fix my errors and your errors as well of course. Please watch out not to leave broken relations behind.Guido | |
| 174404424 by gscholz @ 2025-11-09 07:15 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | Nakaner-repair ♦8,429 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179457471 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Alice Cerrato. This is proper cleanup after a couple of incomplete fixes by TomTom staff and user gscholz. |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | Nakaner ♦3,201 | Hi gscholz,thank you for your effort to fix issues reported by OSM Inspector.As already pointed out by woodpeck in October 2024 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157908804), I would like to ask you to be more careful when you work on issues reported by OSMI.OSMI runs a couple of v... | |
| 174496136 by gscholz @ 2025-11-11 07:14 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | Nakaner-repair ♦8,429 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179457471 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Alice Cerrato. This is proper cleanup after a couple of incomplete fixes by TomTom staff and user gscholz. |
| 174714912 by gscholz @ 2025-11-16 07:32 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | Nakaner-repair ♦8,429 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179457471 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Alice Cerrato. This is proper cleanup after a couple of incomplete fixes by TomTom staff and user gscholz. |
| 174714883 by gscholz @ 2025-11-16 07:31 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | Nakaner-repair ♦8,429 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179457471 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Alice Cerrato. This is proper cleanup after a couple of incomplete fixes by TomTom staff and user gscholz. |
| 178344568 by gscholz @ 2026-02-10 07:38 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | SekeRob repair ♦34 | Hi,You missed a stretch... and I still don't get how 1 has had 3 versions and the one below 12. How do they do this? Imports?ciao |
| 166014910 by gscholz @ 2025-05-09 07:41 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | fs_LT ♦124 | da ist jetzt jedenfalls Chaos weil den 1. Track (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323668229) gibt es seit 11 Jahren und den 2. neu gezeichneten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368648073) seit 11 Monaten;siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163764342Und was soll "Vom Tsche... |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | gscholz | Hallo fs_LT,kann es sein, dass du mit dieser Fragestellung den Falschen angeschrieben hast?Beste GrüßeGiodo | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | fs_LT ♦124 | Hi Giodo,jein, da du an der Bearbeitung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368648073 ja auch beteiligt warst und mit diesem CS den highway-Tag gelöscht hast und der way seither eigentlich ungültig ist.lg,Florian | |
| 177050438 by gscholz @ 2026-01-10 06:37 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Seyruun ♦13 | Thank you for fixing my mistake! |
| 176205625 by gscholz @ 2025-12-21 06:55 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,563 | restore invalidly deleted footway rooting linehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176250696 |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,563 | feel free to map platform as area if overlapping ways are a big problem for youbut this deletion made things worse, just to make QA error go away (deleting all data would bring it even lower!) | |
| 175141467 by gscholz @ 2025-11-26 08:01 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | trial ♦1,107 | Hallo, es kann nicht so sein. Der Weg geht natürlich über die Brücke!https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit&changeset=175141467#map=20/47.7482170/-3.3870810 |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Aber nicht doppelt, oder?GrußGuido | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | trial ♦1,107 | Wieso doppelt? Ein Pfad und eine Straße. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Vielleicht schaust du dir meine Änderung nochmal genauer an:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175141467Ich habe ein aufeinander liegendes Einbahnstraßen-Segment der D 465 voneinander getrennt. Der Fußweg hat bisher dort keine Brücke sondern einen Berührungs... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | trial ♦1,107 | Stimmt, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452594776/history/1 war schon falsch, D 465 damit zu verknüpfen macht es aber schlechter, nicht besser! | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Danke für den Hinweis (mit Ausrufezeichen!), aber wenn du einfach mal genau hinschaust, kannst du leicht erkennen, dass der Fußweg schon vor meiner Änderung doppelt mit der D 465 verbunden war! (mit Ausrufezeichen!). Bitte Kommentare dort hinterlassen, wo die Ursache liegt! | |
| 7 | ~ 3 months ago | Sébastien Pi ♦83 | Hallo gscholz,Sie haben Recht. Ursprünglich hat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13321752851 ein erstes Problem verursacht, indem es eine „Kreuzung” dort erstellt hat, wo sich eine Brücke befindet.Die in iD verfügbaren Bing StreetSide-Ansichten zeigen sehr gut, d... | |
| 8 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Hallo Sebastien,vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag. Für mich ist das Thema erledigt. Ob der Weg über eine Brücke oder ebenerdig verläuft, sollen die beurteilen, die die örtlichen Gegebenheiten kennen. Alles Weitere zum Thema dann hier:https://www.openstreetmap.org/cha... | |
| 9 | ~ 3 months ago | Sébastien Pi ♦83 | Hallo Guido,Sie haben sich geirrt. Ich glaube, Sie wollten diesen Link einfügen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174943069:)In einer solchen Situation ist es tatsächlich besser, den Nutzer zu kontaktieren, der https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452594776/history/1 erstell... | |
| 174770653 by gscholz @ 2025-11-17 12:54 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | JoaoPaixao ♦19 | Bom dia,Não percebi o motivo da remoção. Podes explicar esta alteração?Obrigado |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Hi JoaoPaixao,thanks for your response. The relation was pointed out to be wrong by OSMI:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-7.66023&lat=40.26185&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_mul... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | JoaoPaixao ♦19 | Olá,Bom, se existia algum tipo de erro que desconhecia e justamente ter perguntado.A abordagem deveria ser corrigir e não simplesmente apagar.Qual era o erro em si?Obrigado,João Paixão | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Hi João,the error reported by JOSM validator is as follows:"Role for multipolygon member should be inner or outer"OSMI shows the same error: "Role should be outer"These errors obviously refer to your labeling of the relation items "member".I have ... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Hi João, the broken relations are now nicely visible in OSMI:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-7.50013&lat=40.13444&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cinters... | |
| 174759013 by gscholz @ 2025-11-17 07:44 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | rik_ ♦93 | Hi @gscholz,kurze Nachfrage: gibt es einen bestimmten Grund, warum du den Waldweg hier gelöscht hast?Dieser ist vor Ort vorhanden[^1] und wird auch genutzt (Jagd).Viele Grüßerik[^1]: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/rik?lat=52.198839196984&lng=13.65287790076... |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Hallo Rik,siehe mein Kommentar "Fix overlapping ways", was zu Deutsch bedeutet, dass der Weg doppelt war. Diese Linie ist ja immer noch vorhanden:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111529160#map=17/52.198362/13.652545Oder brauchts du den Weg mehrfach?Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | rik_ ♦93 | Alles klar, das hatte ich in der Changeset-Visualisierung nicht gesehen. Sorry für die Störung! | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | rik_ ♦93 | Ich habe jetzt noch den Cutline-Way mit dem Track zusammengeführt.Nach deiner Änderung lagen da tatsächlich immer noch zwei Ways direkt übereinander.Viele Grüßerik | |
| 174770639 by gscholz @ 2025-11-17 12:54 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | JoaoPaixao ♦19 | Bom dia,Aplica-se a mesma questão feita à tua outra alteração recente no mesmo contexto. Porque eliminaste essas relações? Como assim "broken" ? Estavam broken em que sentido? E se estavam broken corrige-se e não elimina-se.Obrigado |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | gscholz | Hi João,the errors here were the same as in changeset 174770653.I have reverted this one here as well so you can fix it yourself.Kind regardsGuido | |
| 174361685 by gscholz @ 2025-11-08 07:08 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | StC ♦405 | Hi,this changeset has broken the continuity of a hiking route that passes there. I'll take care of the fix. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | gscholz | Hi StC,thanks for your kind intervention.Guido | |
| 171519484 by gscholz @ 2025-09-05 22:07 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | Tómas Ingi ♦82 | Hi gscholz,The area of the river changes frequently - this shape is very roughly a "normal" size of the river, somewhere between its peak in late spring and its minimum in the autumn / winter. It could perhaps be tagged as intermittent, but I think retagging the area as entirely shingl... |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | gscholz | Hi Tómas,sorry for the late response.Can you actually prove the complete area is filled with water at a certain time? I understand this is area as a kind of "playground" for the water to cover more or less, but totally filled?It if is actually filled for - lets say some days... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | Tómas Ingi ♦82 | Hi,The Bing and Esri imagery shows the rivers essentially completely filling the areas.The Intermittent tag could well be applicable here. In that case I think one would have to be careful to mark the minimal size separately, since there’s always a decently large shape of water around ... | |
| 155007433 by gscholz @ 2024-08-09 06:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | nicola_yubo ♦1 | Sorry Gscholz, why do you have deleted this footway? It was very useful for tourists |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | gscholz | Sorry for the late response. The way had a self intersection, and also was not properly connected to the crossing service ways. It looked like a total error.The same issue we can now see here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154972468#map=17/42.777513/10.820722 | |
| 170323562 by gscholz @ 2025-08-12 06:25 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | dvdhoven ♦956 | Ik heb deze changeset reverted. Er waren 2 wandelroutes onderbroken terwijl dat niet nodig is. Het van het ZW komende pad heb ik los gemaakt en opnieuw aangesloten. Zo blijven de routes heel. De wandelroutes lopen vanuit het oosten naar het noorden.Bij overlappen altijd eerst kijken of en waar rou... |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | gscholz | That is OK for me. Sorry, JOSM did not show an error regarding the changed relations. | |
| 161264374 by gscholz @ 2025-01-12 08:36 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Hi! This is a special situation where the entrance of a service way is in front of a crossing. Since your edit, you created an isolated service island, so you broke the logic of the network in here and routing for 4 wheeled vehicles. I had added a note on the highway crossing saying: layer=1 added s... |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | gscholz | Hi SHARCRASH,thanks for your hint. I have fixed the unconnected service way. So the way can now be used for both: 4 wheeled vehicles and bicycles.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Thank you! | |
| 162419333 by gscholz @ 2025-02-12 08:23 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Nakaner ♦3,201 | Hallo,ich weiß nicht, was dich dazu bewogen hat, highway=path an den Bahnsteigen zu ergänzen. Da es falsch ist, habe ich es gelöscht. Es war sicherlich keine richtige Lösung, um irgendwelche OSMI-Warnungen zu beseitigen.Viele GrüßeMichael |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | gscholz | Danke für den Bescheid und die Reparataur. Bewogen hat mich offenbar eine falsche Vorauswahl bei JOSM, es hätte area=yes sein sollen.Guido | |
| 167380327 by gscholz @ 2025-06-09 06:34 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | GiovanniPen ♦7 | WTF? Now it’s completely incorrect. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | ivanbranco ♦2,845 | I have to agree with GiovanniPen here.I appreciate your contributions to OSM, but in this case, you've mapped features that don't exist: there are two separate staircases on the sides, not a single one in the center. Additionally, you changed a building:part=terrace area into a way, whic... | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | gscholz | Hi ivanbranco,thanks for your comment, I have reversed my changeset, so you can fix this strange staircase yourself.Guido | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | GiovanniPen ♦7 | Dear guido, se sei italiano cercami pure in pvt.You can find several images about those stairs on the relative Wikimedia Commons category. Feel free to map that correctly | |
| 165534176 by gscholz @ 2025-04-28 07:01 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | LouisXIV ♦36 | Why did you also deleted the `leisure=track` and `sport=cycling` tags ? I think they are appropriate here, it's not a simple bicycle path. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | gscholz | Hi Luis,no that is a misinterpretation. I fixed two ways positioned on top of each other. If you think,those tags are missing, please add them yourself.Kind regardsGuido | |
| 160000000 by gscholz @ 2024-12-06 15:50 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Francesco Zanaboni ♦34 | nice changeset id :) |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Yes indeed! | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | shu0410 ♦31 | congrat | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | kechan ♦57 | impressive | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ ♦73 | Congrats for changeset #160000000! | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | HugoC01 ♦52 | nice | |
| 156516427 by gscholz @ 2024-09-12 08:18 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦821 | Ciao.Hai inserito il tag network=lhnNon conosco la zona ma se si chiama chilometro verticale sarà probabilmente un route=hiking ma non può essere anche un percorso ippico!https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:network=lhnQual'è l'errore?Ivo |
| 162379573 by gscholz @ 2025-02-11 07:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Sorain ♦6 | The erroneous polygon was in the process of being corrected by me together with a team of OSM cartographer members from Romania. With your changeset rollback, streets and sidewalks created in that changeset were lost. Ask before you do something stupid like this. I see that you edit chaotically ever... |
| 159909458 by gscholz @ 2024-12-04 08:51 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | StC ♦405 | Bonjour,je ne suis pas sûr que détruire une rue et ajouter un tag à une frontière administrative soit une bonne manière de représenter des travaux. Entre autres effets cela a endommagé un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, m... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Hi StC ,thanks for this hint. I have reverted my changeset to give you the opportunity to clean up this mess of overlapping ways yourself.Kind regardsGuido | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | StC ♦405 | Thx! Will do. | |
| 159947360 by gscholz @ 2024-12-05 08:28 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | morgen1 ♦10 | Hallo Herr Scholz, ich finde es unpassend, einen Datensatz ohne Diskussion zu löschen, dessen Inhalt sie offensichtlich niemals vor Ort gesehen haben. Die vermeintliche Überschneidung ist keine. Es sieht nur in der 2 D Ansicht so aus. Tatsächlich führt der Fußweg durch ei... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Hallo,veilen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Keine Sorge meine Änderung ist vollkommen in Ordnung. Wenn ein Weg sich selbst überschneidet, dann liegt ein Fehler vor. Hier liegen die Weg-Segmente auf unterscheidlichen Ebenen, kollidieren aber in der Realität nicht miteinander. Bi... | |
| 157908804 by gscholz @ 2024-10-15 08:07 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | woodpeck ♦2,562 | Dear gscholz, in this changeset you have blindly "fixed" a self-intersection of a completely fictional airport that someone had added. Your modification makes it more difficult for other community members to revert the bad edit.It is good that you are looking out for OSM quality but pl... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Thank you for keeping me up to date here. However, I would like to point out that I find the tone you have chosen in this message rather disrespectful. Whether a newly added airport has any representation in reality or not cannot be judged without local knowledge. The term “blind” and t... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | woodpeck ♦2,562 | It appears to me that rather than being impolite, I was *too* polite and therefore didn't get my point across. What I wanted to say is: "fixes" that superficially fix something - like you did here - are unwanted and complicate the *real* fixing. They make OSM worse, not better. Yo... | |
| 157782140 by gscholz @ 2024-10-12 07:14 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HLZR ♦11 | Neden Kapatıyorsun iyi değilsin sen kafana göre bilmediğin yeri düzenleme |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | This area was a mess and overlapping with a lot of other landuse areas. | |
| 125844661 by gscholz @ 2022-09-06 07:52 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AngocA ♦230 | Hi gsholzThank you for contributing to Colombia, but why did you put a roundabout where there is no such?https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/angoca?lat=4.573946961238363&lng=-74.24400540639522&z=17.452222743166697&pKey=881020655931564&focus=photoI am going to change this a... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Hi AngocA,thanks for your feedback. The circular way was invented here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125454869May be this user can answer your question.Kind regardsGuido | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | AngocA ♦230 | Thank you for this remark. I will contact the other mapper. | |
| 157025416 by gscholz @ 2024-09-24 07:31 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | JoaoPaixao ♦19 | The edit made doesn't make any sense, in this location the bridge doesn't connect to the stairs. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157025416 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Hi JoaoPaixao,thanks for your feedback. I have reverted this changeset so you can fix the way crossing here yourself. There are overlapping ways and ways on different layers which are connected to each other.Kind regardsGuido | |
| 156943105 by gscholz @ 2024-09-22 09:49 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Carlangas1978 ♦2 | thx |
| 155131624 by gscholz @ 2024-08-12 06:37 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | LegrandJ ♦3 | Why reverse ? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | To fix self intersecting lines:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.46033&lat=50.43393&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_wayKind regardsGuido | |
| 154918033 by gscholz @ 2024-08-07 05:50 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | h0rr0rrdrag0n ♦11 | Thank you for fix! :-) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154918033 |
| 154719586 by gscholz @ 2024-08-02 05:58 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | yvecai ♦80 | Bonjour,Pourquoi avoir supprimé cette piste mappée en area=yes ? En version 4, j'imagine qu'elle était pas trop mal mappée, si ? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Hi yvecai,thanks for your question, I have removed it, becaue it was not a valid relation. I have just reverted my changeset so you may like to fix this broken relation yourself?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16773043/history#map=15/45.5512/6.7309Kind regardsGuido | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Hi yvecai, this relation is still broken:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.72956&lat=45.54818&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segmen... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | yvecai ♦80 | Ah, yes, I'll have a look this evening. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | yvecai ♦80 | Done, wasn't that complicated, the two inner were member of another part of the piste that was probaly splitted in two sometime ago.That being said, when you have a warning from OSMI or whatever QA tool, it's better to try to fix instead of deleting just to get the warning away. | |
| 152706992 by gscholz @ 2024-06-15 06:18 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | fititnt ♦107 | Hello gscholz.I will merge the https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6174039439/history into your created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291811482 (refs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history)By the way, really thanks for several of your reviews in Brazil. You often react very... |
| 151837362 by gscholz @ 2024-05-26 06:34 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Bendita Moreira ♦47 | Mr.gscholz your need to fix large intersection of building. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151837362 |
| 151037246 by gscholz @ 2024-05-08 05:40 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Syl ♦1,040 | Hello, I restored the camera, it doesn't have the same tags as the others. |
| 150957637 by gscholz @ 2024-05-06 10:22 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | pyrog ♦415 | Hi (Gerhardt ?)You broke the relation route 17491494.See https://knooppuntnet.nl/de/analysis/route/17491494/maphttps://knooppuntnet.nl/de/analysis/changeset/150957637/6078016I will fix it.Best regards,Yves |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Hi Yves,thanks for being considerate.You can monitor this kind of errors here:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=6.04886&lat=45.96089&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edgesGuido | |
| 150431910 by gscholz @ 2024-04-24 08:33 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | StC ♦405 | Hi,this changeset has broken a hiking route relation. Could you look into it please?St. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | gscholz | Hi StC,error is fixed. Please feel free to fix these kind of errors yourself.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | pyrog test ♦1 | Hi Guido,FYI, node networks routes could be check with Knoppuntnet (alias KPN).https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/idIn this case, this is https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/17461943 that show the actual state of the route.The "menu" changes show all the change... | |
| 150069537 by gscholz @ 2024-04-16 07:16 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Enock4seth ♦614 | Danke! |
| 148410124 by gscholz @ 2024-03-09 06:37 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Enock4seth ♦614 | Hi,I have reverted this changeset to enable full revert of earlier changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148401632Thanks. |
| 147799900 by gscholz @ 2024-02-23 07:27 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | pyrog ♦415 | Hi,You broke the node network route.https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/147799900/5975134I fix it.Best regards,Yves |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Hi Yves,thanks for your activity.Guido | |
| 147284355 by gscholz @ 2024-02-10 08:48 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | CactiStaccingCrane ♦60 | happy tết! |
| 145912488 by gscholz @ 2024-01-05 09:11 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Manuele R ♦9 | Könntest du bitte nicht alle "meine" Buslinien kaputt machen? Es steht nirgends, dass die Kreisel nicht aufgebrochen werden dürfen, hingegen dürfen mit PTv2 nur wirklich befahrene Abschnitte zur Linie gehören.Danke und en Gruess aus der Schweiz |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Ich habe die Buslinien repariert und nicht kaputt genacht. Zudem habe ich die überlappenden Segmente an den Kreisverkehren entfernt. Es gibt keine Vorgabe, Kreisverkehre zu zersplitternund schon gar nicht, mehrere Segmente zu verdoppeln und diese übereinander zu legen.Siehe hier:ht... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Manuele R ♦9 | Ich weiss nicht wo du überlappende Segmente siehst (vielleicht ein Problem bei JOSM?). Der Kreisel ist in meiner Version aus mehrere Segmente (aber nicht doppelte oder überlappende Segmente) anstatt 1 Segment gebildet. Wie jede andere Strasse auch :-) | |
| 127979997 by gscholz @ 2022-10-24 05:36 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Anonix35 ♦67 | Are you sure that "Crêtes" is also a path for pedestrian ? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Hi Anonix35,I recommend to ask the inventor in this case:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127938057Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Anonix35 ♦67 | Hi Guido,Oh yes sorry, I didn't see. | |
| 145753610 by gscholz @ 2024-01-01 07:43 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Реdактор ♦20 | Ты адекватный?!! Зачем ты удалил луг который я очень долго делал? Я как лучше хочу вообще-то |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | HI Реdактор,thanks for your question. My comment for this changeset translated to russish means: Исправить самопересечениеThe view for the errors to be fixed is delivered by OSMI, which means "OSM Inspector":https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=are... | |
| 145524987 by gscholz @ 2023-12-26 09:23 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | pitfire ♦721 | Hallo gscholz,bitte schau dir nochmals deinen Änderungssatz: 145524987Fix self intersectionGeschlossen vor etwa einer Stunde von gscholz.Der Verlauf "Weg: 1233988345" kann so schräg nicht verlaufen!Stammt diese Interpretation aus persönlicher Ortskenntnis?VG pitf... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Danke für den Hinweis, ist repariert.GrußGuido | |
| 144891559 by gscholz @ 2023-12-08 07:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | D3yvison ♦1 | Thanks! 😊🙏 |
| 125654449 by gscholz @ 2022-09-01 12:36 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | tolioalessandro ♦35 | Ciao,una corsia ciclabile non è fisicamente separata dalla strada, pertanto non va disegnato un segmento a sè stante ma va semplicemente aggiunto il tag cycleway:both=lane o cycleway:right=lane al segmento esistente della strada.Grazie del tempo che dedichi al miglioramento delle m... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Hi Alessandro,thanks for your feedback, but this would have better been added to this changeset here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93000607#map=16/45.4879/12.2055https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93000607Kind regardsGuido | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | tolioalessandro ♦35 | Thank you! | |
| 143638740 by gscholz @ 2023-11-05 07:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | zstadler ♦1,114 | Hello gscholz,I'm afraid this edit conflicts with the revert of a massive vandalism in Israel.I had to revert it too.While the revert of the vandalism is on-going, it is advised to avoid important edits in Israel as they may be partially or fully reverted.Best regards,Zeev |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | OK, I thought the reverts were complete as the vandalism event happened two weeks ago.Guido | |
| 143414896 by gscholz @ 2023-10-31 11:05 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | PengualaHeadphones ♦22 | Thank you very much |
| 142786625 by gscholz @ 2023-10-18 23:29 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | PengualaHeadphones ♦22 | Thank you very much. |
| 142798463 by gscholz @ 2023-10-19 07:32 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | PengualaHeadphones ♦22 | Thank you very much. |
| 140305606 by gscholz @ 2023-08-24 06:48 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | High Guido,Dropped a note to the mapper of this few days ago, still does not render after your repairs. He did quite a bit of bad mapping so dropped him more comments, that stuff does render now including a vineyard that was actually a motocross pitch (must be looking at old imagery)ciao |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | PS uses JOSM 18622 so not sure how this got past the pre-save validator. | |
| 140162490 by gscholz @ 2023-08-21 05:57 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Curumaite ♦2 | Hello,I'd like to express my sincerest gratitude for that fix, it is indeed very helpful!Best regards,Pavel |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Hi Pavel,thanks for your response. If you are the author of this residential area relation, please keep in mind relations are not collections. Please keep things simple to make maintainability easy.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Curumaite ♦2 | Hi Guido,I'm not the original author, but will keep that in mind, thank you!Pavel | |
| 138321870 by gscholz @ 2023-07-10 06:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | HiA tunnel at layer=0 does not seem right. If it's an abandoned railway tunnel turned hike/bike way like we have quite a few here, it would need layer=-1 and the motorway tunnel below -2.Just me 2 centsciao |
| 137944233 by gscholz @ 2023-06-30 06:50 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Frans S ♦10,511 | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.Please use the tag 'track'not in urban areasAbout tagging of highwaysPlease read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.Decision tree, which tag to be used for roadshttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0Z... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Hi Frans S v,thanks for this hint,actually I am not interested in "mapping" there but in bug fixing, hence my comment:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=137944233Kind regardsGuido | |
| 137944261 by gscholz @ 2023-06-30 06:51 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | M Damour ♦1 | Thanks brother for mapping, try to change the shape of the building and the shape of the roads --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137944261 |
| 137773604 by gscholz @ 2023-06-26 05:04 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mapping_Madison ♦1 | You fixed something I made. |
| 137193659 by gscholz @ 2023-06-11 07:34 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | yelisey90 ♦416 | thnx! |
| 131758441 by gscholz @ 2023-01-27 06:49 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | parsewski ♦25 | hi! da sind zwei recht lange Wegabschnitte als Brücke ausgewiesen, wovon einer im Nichts endet. Stimmen die? mfg |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Kann ich dir nicht sagen, ich habe nur die überlappenden Wege repariert.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | parsewski ♦25 | Aha. Dachte, weil Version 1 | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Luzandro ♦984 | das bridge sollte offenbar nur für diesen way hier gelten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128250968der Weg, der im Nichts endet, geht laut basemap weiter bis zur Prechtlgasse, was sich auch am Luftbild erahnen lässt, also habe ich diese Verbindung auch eingetragen | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | parsewski ♦25 | Das hätte ich auch so korrigiert, habe allerdings gezögert wegen der Verbindung zur Prechtlgasse. Bist du dir sicher, dass es sich hierbei um eine Unterführung unter der Ybbstalbahn handelt? | |
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | Luzandro ♦984 | nach neuerlicher Betrachtung von Luft- und Geländebild sieht es mehr nach einem Übergang auf gleicher Ebene aus. Etwas gezögert hatte ich auch, weil der weitere Verlauf Richtung Prechtlgasse zwar etwas durch die Bäume durchscheint, aber auf der Strava Heatmap nicht erkennbar... | |
| 7 | ~ 2 years ago | parsewski ♦25 | Gut. Ich halte es darüber hinaus für sehr wahrscheinlich, dass der offizielle Übergang aufgelassen wurde und das verfügbare Kartenmaterial veraltet bzw im Falle Strava irreführend ist. Siehe dazu Kupferschmiedgasse#Ybbstalbahn. Ich hoffe demnächst mal wieder in die Gege... | |
| 8 | ~ 2 years ago | parsewski ♦25 | War dort und den Bahnübergang gibt es auch immer noch jedoch eingezäunt. Die Leute, die vom Fuchsbichl runterkommen dürften deswegen wohl auf den Bahngleisen entlang gehen, denn um zur Prechtlgasse zu kommen, müssten noch zwei weitere Zäune überwunden werden.Siehe Kom... | |
| 135960776 by gscholz @ 2023-05-11 06:05 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | fawkes2 ♦14 | Hello,I think this is about fixing a mistake I have made in the previous edit here.Could you tell me how did you discover this? Osm geofabrik inspector? Or some other method? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | fawkes2 ♦14 | I am just curious about how some of you are monitoring/discovering these issues. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Yes, OSM inspector does the job here:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=20.33151&lat=46.36456&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_wayThe views are updated... | |
| 135049352 by gscholz @ 2023-04-18 09:16 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Diógenes de Sinope ♦187 | 👍 |
| 134481054 by gscholz @ 2023-04-04 06:51 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,036 | Thank you! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157541366 |
| 90682123 by gscholz @ 2020-09-10 06:58 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | jfd553 ♦60 | way 845944238 and 598352848 have following tags:highway=pathpiste:difficulty=intermediatepiste:oneway=nopiste:type=nordicroute=pisteI'm from the area and I do not know any formal nordic/cross country ski trail there. I will remove these tags unless you prove me wrong. There... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Hi jfd553 ,you may like to direct this question/comment to the original author of the respective way and not to someone who fixes errors like overlapping ways.Kind regardsGuido | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | jfd553 ♦60 | My apologies. I used JOSM's history query to find the author of the first version of the ways. If it is not you, have you any idea on how to find him/her? | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz | Hi jfd553 ,I like to use achavi for this purpose:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90682123If you hover your mouse over the respective ways you can see what has changed. If a way is split there is a new version 1 but the other (older) part will get an increased version number as we... | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | jfd553 ♦60 | Thanks, I'm to get some training ;-) | |
| 129405396 by gscholz @ 2022-11-26 14:55 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | Hi,So you spent 4 sessions fixing this scrub relation, partially. I've done 2 more, nothing more is highlighting in Inspector. Herr felix maps in Spain, but does his change set commentary in German, Weltsprache, aber nicht gerade gruendlich. ;p)Tomorrow it's TGIF, in any language. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Thanks Robert,perfect work.Guido | |
| 129426094 by gscholz @ 2022-11-27 08:49 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | Valiant..., this one looks seriously borkt. Did another isolated area by same mapper south of this one. Seems many mappers have not read the book... areas that share a side with the outline of a greater area are not inner, to be treated as not part of the multipolygon relation.Maybe s/he will rea... |
| 132120834 by gscholz @ 2023-02-05 16:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ManualTagFixer ♦42 | Hello,I see that you have added some landuse=village_green. Please read:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_greenWould a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?Greetings Tjuro |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi Tjuro_Global,not really, have a look at the history here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137557694/historyhttps://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132120834Actually I have only fixed an error of something that was already there. So please redirect your question to the original a... | |
| 131216924 by gscholz @ 2023-01-13 07:31 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | operonmt ♦3 | Hello, It's true that in my changes I forgot to fix way intersections creating a connection node.On the other hand, to make a total of my changes without not not expecting myself and giving me time to correct my mistakes, I find this a little violent. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi operonmt,I recommend to have a look at your changeset north east of "Bokate":https://osmcha.org/changesets/131197783/This is not a small impact. But any how your are ofcourse free to revert my changeset and fix your "connection node".Guido | |
| 130710562 by gscholz @ 2022-12-31 07:05 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | StefanB ♦56 | Hey, the admin relations are not closed anymore. Can you please fix that?Thanks! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | StefanB ♦56 | Ah, sorry for the wrongful accusation on my part. It seems that they were broken before you touched them, fixing them partially as indicating in the changeset comment. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Please have a look here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130698589 | |
| 129771149 by gscholz @ 2022-12-06 08:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | HiThink the notation of construction:highway=secondary can be simplified to just construction=secondary (overpass 13K cases WW) versus construction:highway=* 4 cases WW I'd cut the roads at the blocks and tag them as access=no or permit ad interim.ciao |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi Robert,yes the local user must know what exactly is going on here. Overlapping construction is not valid, but a street in construction can still be accessible e.g. by traffic light regulation where only one direction can pass.Guido | |
| 129550806 by gscholz @ 2022-11-30 08:38 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi,this changeset caused several errors regarding self intersecting lines:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129490473I have reverted it to fix those issues.Guido |
| 129117292 by gscholz @ 2022-11-19 10:17 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Frans S ♦10,511 | Hello. Thanks for mapping hereA request.Here are hedges sometimes linked on nodes of the highway. Please disconnect them whenever you see those. (The validation tool should alert on these errors)Best regards and keep mapping |
| 129029458 by gscholz @ 2022-11-17 09:05 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | GerdP ♦2,819 | Moin!Kannst Du das bitte noch mal prüfen?Die Rad-Route hat jetzt ein Element mit bicycle=no. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hallo Gerd,danke für den Hinweis, ist erledigt. Wie sieht es mit dir aus, bist du in der Lage, den OSM Inspector zu bedienen? Wie wäre es mit einer Aufräumaktion bei den überlappenden Wegen:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.61819&lat=51.75693&... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | GerdP ♦2,819 | Ja, ich hätte das schon gemacht, aber dann habe ich doch lieber den Verursacher angeschrieben, weil das ja offensichtlich ein Bedienerproblem ist:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128320546 | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Ah, OK; das ist auf jeden Fall sehr löblich. Die Beantwortung der Frage scheint sich aber noch etwas hinzuziehen.Guido | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | GerdP ♦2,819 | Ich finde es tatsächlich fragwürdig, aus der Ferne zu entscheiden, wie die Wege denn tatsächlich getaggt werden sollten. Auf meinen letzten Hinweis an den gleichen User kam innerhalb von Minuten eine Antwort. Ein bis zwei Tage darf es aus meiner Sicht gerne dauern, wenn sich dann de... | |
| 128233639 by gscholz @ 2022-10-30 06:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | HiStill a veritable mess, seeing a miles long bridge on top of a miles long path which is mapped largely on top of a miles long path, the eldest, that ratrun mapped 3 years ago. Are you ready to use the reverter as moving a few nodes wont do it, Still flagged in OSMI.Ciao |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi Robert,I have just added a comment to this changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128210550May be this will help.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | Since I was wetting me knives, took care of the matter, judiciously removed the overlap sections and ways mapped by ruler and mapped a few dozen missing forest inner patches while there.There's just no replying from trail mappers seemingly anywhere in Italy. Going to search for the origins ... | |
| 128233484 by gscholz @ 2022-10-30 06:11 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1107950430 (one of three). What is the meaning of the tag d = Rwampara? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi user_5359,I don't know, please ask the original author who is accessible here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107950430/historyGuido | |
| 127764560 by gscholz @ 2022-10-19 07:59 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Jrachi ♦821 | Hai rotto la relazione 505B! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi Jrachi,thanks for this hint, is fixed now.Guido | |
| 127448094 by gscholz @ 2022-10-13 06:18 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hi Guido, thank you for reviewing the data here in Panama. do you think you could spend a few more words to explain what happened here, in particular what was the problem that you saw, and only briefly on how you fixed it? IIRC, MauCal created relations for waterways, it was part of a global effort ... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi Mario,OSMI reported self intersecting ways. But a closer look exposed as well rivers flowing uphill and every single node of those waterways had the tag "waterway=river".Guido --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127448094... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | rivers flowing uphill like up and down hills? or just the wrong way? https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/6 | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | ... and yes I forgot, some rivers were not connected downstream, which may still be the case for some of them as I did not check all rivers in this area.Guido | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | ... just the wrong way. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi Mario,the waterway view in OSMI shows some errors in your country regarding flow directions and missing connections. May this is a start for you to fix more errors:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=water&lon=-81.16025&lat=8.31118&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&... | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | shorter link, I don't know if it shows the same information as geofabrik, because I got lost in the details there.https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=8&lat=8.738&lon=-80.000&item=1220&level=1%2C2 | |
| 126805966 by gscholz @ 2022-09-30 05:46 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Diógenes de Sinope ♦187 | 👍🏽 |
| 124914540 by gscholz @ 2022-08-15 07:40 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Mannivu ♦258 | Sì, vero, la posta ciclabile era sovrapposta, ma era più corretto spostarla dalla strada, invece che eliminarla del tutto --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124914540 |
| 67218063 by gscholz @ 2019-02-15 07:30 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,563 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/670652126/history - what you meant by surface=interlock ? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | I have no clue, seems to be a typo.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,563 | Thanks for a quick response! | |
| 125761027 by gscholz @ 2022-09-04 06:54 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | Next up stitching all the Cammini di San Filippo Neri together into a super hiking relation. The hikers will explode. :O)) There's one who wrote to me he'd done L'Aquila to Termoli, 5 times (something like 300km.) He mapped it proper thru relations and adding many missing tracks and p... |
| 123177190 by gscholz @ 2022-07-04 07:50 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | gpserror ♦230 | Hi, thanks for trying to fix the overlap -- though still seems to need work. about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975501221 - I propose we delete this entirely to get rid of the overlap. Things like bike lanes should be marked in tags(like cycleway:right=lane) of the main road and not drawn as a... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi gpserror,please go ahead.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | gpserror ♦230 | Updated in changeset 125334652, should be a bit cleaner - no more overlapping way! | |
| 125168938 by gscholz @ 2022-08-21 05:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | 8:30, clicking on link in my daily OSMI summary list, staring and staring in edit view where on earth the self intersection is in the wood, none there. Merge a few outline members of the same MP, I hate that auto breaking by ID when merging adjacent simple polygons. and save. Then see you were alrea... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | ;-) | |
| 124954417 by gscholz @ 2022-08-16 06:09 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | HiIf you succeeded in deleting a duplicate line (node deletes suggest so), it was a triple. Underneath the service road was another track hidden. (YCMTU)I've dropped a note to the mapper as he named a way across the corner "Strada comunlae di servizio" which could just be a de... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Ciao Robert,you are free to fix any error I make ;-)Guido | |
| 124912062 by gscholz @ 2022-08-15 06:16 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | Thank for clearing. Normally I rely on the OSMI summary that Pascal Neis generates of daily issues I've left behind. Unfortunately the report has been broken since 2 weeks, so I use the Inspector map to look around, but I hardly do in my own back garden :O))). Yesterday fixed a large forest up ... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi SekeRob,thanks for your kind comment. I took this opportunity to send you a private message to help me with the overlapping ways issues the Italian map shows in general.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,472 | Tell me abour it, someone mapped a whole string of pedestrian ways on top of track, another mtb track top of roads. A historic hike route mapped as track on top of roads and ways. I try to clean them up when Osmose tags me as, "mistake you touched this object, may not be your fault, but this it... | |
| 123968865 by gscholz @ 2022-07-23 09:49 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | geow ♦451 | Hi gscholz, warum hast du denn jetzt die mtb-tags an highway!=path/track wiederhergestellt?War meine Begründung im CS-Kommentar und source in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63880697 für dich nicht nachvollziehbar? Danke,geow |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hallo geow,die "Begründung" war offenbar nur vorgeschoben, denn wie du wohl möglich erkannt hast, handelt es sich ja nicht um Amateure, die diese Tags an anderen typischerweise von Radfahrern/Mountanbikern genutzten Straßentypen angebracht haben. D.h. diese Leute haben si... | |
| 123548079 by gscholz @ 2022-07-13 07:11 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | you also removed the continental drainage divide... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81187016please recover that tag, or assist me with finding a better suitable one. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | I recovered them. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123582686 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123548079 | |
| 123500922 by gscholz @ 2022-07-12 06:14 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | thanks! Rick was alerted and advised to fix this, but he's not a JOSM user, so he asked me, and I could not find the errors, since you had already fixed them.https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama/15678 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Thanks for this information Mario,today I fixed some more details here. A person called "A. Rodriguez" has left his name there and the "drainage_divide" should possible be a relation too:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/611876336/history Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | ArielRod is the user name. we have a friend in common who tried to facilitate the contact. I'm not sure what stands in the way."drainage_divide", I'm using that for the continental divide. the QA tools seem to require it to be a closed area, as in drainage basin. IMO, the QA to... | |
| 123420001 by gscholz @ 2022-07-10 05:40 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | porfiriopaiz ♦127 | Hello gscholz,Thank you so much for your contributions and invaluable work doing quality assurance while fixing the errors and the issues left behind after some other contributions have been made by other contributors.The reason for this message is to apologize for the recent errors left and... |
| 121960074 by gscholz @ 2022-06-05 05:52 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | jimkats ♦76 | Hi, how was the relation broken with the "inner" ways? It worked find so far in any apps I used. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi jimkats,as fas I remember the inner areas were overplapping in a not OSM compliant way and only depicting the castle walls as the castle itself.By far the best tool to find broken relation is OSM Inspector:http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=23.29533&lat=37.30750&z... | |
| 122854927 by gscholz @ 2022-06-26 04:21 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | mueschel ♦6,960 | Please don't try to fix any issues with nodes and ways here. This is an undocumented import with many mistakes that most likely needs to be reverted in full. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Thanks for this hint, but it arrived too late.Guido | |
| 120866997 by gscholz @ 2022-05-12 04:58 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | What is it ?a relation waterway with only inner members ?Maybe you should read the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi Fred73000,good question:"What is it ?"I strongly recommend to learn the meaning of the word "politeness" and how to practice it. If you have finished your studies you can come back here and we will discuss how to find the author of an error.Kind regards and happy l... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | Hi,about this relation 9089, I made 3 comments at 3 different users.I can understand errors of the 2 others and I explained to them their mistakes.But, after your 9 changesets (version 73 to 81) with your comments "Fix broken river partly" or "Fix self intersection", the re... | |
| 122355294 by gscholz @ 2022-06-14 06:41 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,689 | Oops - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825490585 looked a bit of a mess here after this edit. I've reverted it to prior to 122327239 - hope things are OK now. |
| 120166112 by gscholz @ 2022-04-25 13:10 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1054727607 (one of three). What is the meaning of the tag sa = hi? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi user_5359,thanks for this hint, error is fixed.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hi Guido,you miss https://www.osm.org/way/1054637700, https://www.osm.org/way/1055098626.Same way? | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Errors are fixed.Guido | |
| 118802875 by gscholz @ 2022-03-23 05:36 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042621996. What ist the meaning of the tagsTIPO = Solarcronologia = 1742? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | gscholz | Hi,please ask the inventor of these attributes.Guido | |
| 68500806 by gscholz @ 2019-03-25 10:37 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679207419. Did you mean religion=christian ? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi user_5359,thanks for this hint. Error is fixed. Btw. you are free to fix such simple errors yourself.Guido | |
| 115827552 by gscholz @ 2022-01-06 09:08 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | thanks, I'm not used to the iD editor, I obviously keep overlooking the thick dots telling me that a node is not connected. |
| 47586611 by gscholz @ 2017-04-09 07:55 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | Hi,you try to fix or you create problems ?(OSMI = duplicate_segment in relation 6593189). lol |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi Fred73000,what is this about?Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | Just a joke : you fix a lot of things in osm (like me in fact : I use taginfo to find all bad values, e.g. laabel or oouter, and fix them all around the world).But in this one, your fix (with your comment "Fix duplicated segments" is in OSMI with the message "duplicate_segment in re... | |
| 114838761 by gscholz @ 2021-12-12 08:19 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | Hi,could you explain to me why you split all the relations into small ones ? Do you think it changes something because you write "Fix broken relation partly" when nothing is broken ? Could you stop this please ? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi Fred73000,yes, relations are not collections. Please keep OSM items small and easy to maintain. If there is one small error in your huge relations it will invalidate your whole collection setup as it was the case here. Can you please monitor your edits with the help of a quality tool like ... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | Ok, I will | |
| 113184290 by gscholz @ 2021-10-31 09:13 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | NunoCapeloCaldeira ♦565 | hello, this edit has been reverted. the building contains more than the university. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi NunoCaldeira,your changeset 113255161 excludes the building from the university because they are "inner" areas. But in reality they are part of the university and stand on its ground. Please read:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3DuniversityPlease also have a c... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | NunoCapeloCaldeira ♦565 | Hi, as written on the wiki, it implies to use the tag land use. This is the building lower levels and not the area of the university, which is already mapped as a point (which you deleted also). | |
| 87488514 by gscholz @ 2020-07-03 07:40 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Canal des Pangalanes ♦54 | But now https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3280936/history is gone without replacement. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi "Canal des Pangalanes",no, the results of changeset 85112300 do still exist.GuidoBtw. what does this mean "Canal des Pangalanes"? | |
| 55609473 by gscholz @ 2018-01-20 17:59 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hi Guido! it's actually quite hilarious, I don't know if you meant this as a provocation, marking some muddy area in a contaminated lake associated to the Cerro de Pasco mining city as "natural=wetland". I still wish to get in contact with other people interested in mapping the m... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi Mario,even high concentration of heavy metal salts may let some wetland plants grow.Guido | |
| 112055942 by gscholz @ 2021-10-04 04:38 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | but, Guido, this way the route does not go from terminal to terminal. also a mistake, and information loss. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Ok Mario. A route relation may be the better choice here.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | definitely, thank you for your patience. would you like to do that? or shall I put it on my todo list? | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi Mario,I did not find a support in JOSM for ferry routes. So I reverted my changeset and shifted the line slightly to the west. The ferry line added by changeset 67584935 still has open ends.Guido | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hola Guido, what do you think of this?https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112126234 | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | (knowing the local dynamics, it looks weird to me that you can go from one terminal in Almirante to two different terminals in Bocas Town). | |
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi Mario,looks OK for me.Guido | |
| 108479462 by gscholz @ 2021-07-23 09:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | wurzelast ♦1,560 | Istnote=Lt. Wikipedia kein amtlich benannter Ortsteil.noch irgendwie weierrecherchiert worden? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Keine Ahnung, ich bin demnächst wahrscheinlich zum Essen dort, dann kann ich den Wirt ja mal fragen. Aber was bedeutet dieses "amtlich"? Einwohnermeldeamtlich, bauamtlich, postamtlich, "vor-ort-beschildert-amtlich" und was resultiert aus dieser Information dann?Gruß\... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | wurzelast ♦1,560 | Einwandfrei. Mir ging's mehr um die offene Frage, man könnte note=* auf den verbliebenen place-Knoten legen, damit die Information erhalten bleibt, dass hier noch Recherebedarf da ist :-) | |
| 101546702 by gscholz @ 2021-03-23 06:10 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hi gscholz! what was the problem and what was the fix? can you help us in Panama identify or prevent similar mistakes in the future? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi mariotomo,thanks for your request. The errors were wrongly used relations. Those are not collections.You can defintively help avoiding and removing those kind of errors or even better errors of all kinds by using quality assurance tools on a regular base:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | Hi Guido, I've been using geofabrik to review/correct route relations. can you help me on a curious issue? "hail_and_ride", that's an admissible role, isn't it? (https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-80.32343&lat=8.55453&zoom=13&overlay... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi Mario,there is a proposal for hail_and_ride in the wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hail_and_rideSo it seems to be official but JOSM does not support it and OSMI doesn't know it as well.Guido | |
| 105868249 by gscholz @ 2021-06-05 05:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hi Guido! it's nice of you trying to help from remote, but would you agree that the subtle details that the local mapper are trying to put in the database should be mapped locally? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi mariotomo,if you can establish a bug fixing locally then please give it a go. Would be even less work for me.Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | our most active mappers in the area are Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez and Didiel Pimentel. I think a solution goes through teaming up with them. | |
| 55160040 by gscholz @ 2018-01-04 14:50 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Irma IRM-ED ♦127 | Hi gscholz, Thanks for your digitizing. water bank digitization is good, but imagery with a better resolution (Maxar Imagery) makes your digitization less relevant, so I'll realign it.Please check https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/25458889Thanks again :) |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | HI Irma,no worries! If you go out and just take images with a drone today the result will be even more precise/recent. Guido | |
| 77207342 by gscholz @ 2019-11-18 05:44 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/746543084/history: What is the meaning of the key street? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi user_5359,sorry, but I do not understand your question. Can you explain your issue more comprehensively?Guido | |
| 66650780 by gscholz @ 2019-01-26 09:07 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hi. can you help again? now it's the ways that don't close correctly. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gscholz | Hi mariotomo,there are hundreds of errors in this region but the relations seem to be OK. I have fixed some of the countles errors, but wich error are you refering to?Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | Hi Guido! I was reviewing so randomly in the area, and I saw several way:landuse which don't close. but you're right, enough work even just limiting to relations. I'll see which osmose selection will highlight what I found so by chance. | |
| 99205616 by gscholz @ 2021-02-13 08:53 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez ♦22 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906030739#map=19/8.07544/-80.90290 |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez ♦22 | Hello there!, I think what you did it is fine highway: service but you must add serice:driveway because they are entrance to houses. If you can improve de edition. Best. Carlos | |
| 99504093 by gscholz @ 2021-02-18 08:12 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hi. thank you for fixing the duplicate road error near Chitré. since it's a YouthMappers mistake, and since YouthMappers don't produce maps, but prepare mappers, maybe you could reach them with an explanation of the mistake, how to avoid, how to notice, how to correct? thank you. |
| 97809862 by gscholz @ 2021-01-20 05:54 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ZeLonewolf ♦576 | Thanks for fixing a broken boundary, do you maintain a list of boundary problems somewhere? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz | Hi Lonewolf,please make yourself familiar with OSM Inspector:http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-50.60193&lat=-16.72003&zoom=6Especially the "Areas" view gives a lot of insights to broken relations. I would be very happy if you could join me fixing those ... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | ZeLonewolf ♦576 | Thank you! | |
| 81773767 by gscholz @ 2020-03-04 12:16 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | tyr_asd ♦463 | Hi. I notices a few tags "sac_scale=hi" in this changeset which look like a typo for the correct value "hiking". Was this a mistake, I suppose?PS: This typo also appears in some of your other changesets (for example, but not limited to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz | Hi tyr_asd,thanks for this hint, yes those errors are typos - due to missing autocompletion - and "hiking" would be the correct tag. Please feel free to fix this.Guido | |
| 92839340 by gscholz @ 2020-10-21 14:24 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ToniE ♦1,253 | Hallo gscholz,müsste der Astener Eiszeit-Rundweg nicht als network=lwn getagged werden, da route=foot?Passt eigentlich ref=KA bei dem Namen?GrußToni |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz | Hallo Toni,danke für den Hnweis, ich habs nachgebessert.GrußGuido | |
| 80566002 by gscholz @ 2020-02-05 05:15 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Túllio ♦60 | O que aconteceu com "Linha: 769710197"?A vegetação está cortada pela metade. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz | Hi Túllio,you are asking the wrong person. The mess started here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80546660https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=80546660Kind RegardsGuido | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Túllio ♦60 | Olá. Ok, obrigado pelas informações! | |
| 86592928 by gscholz @ 2020-06-13 08:24 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | thank you. I've been asking the user to review his changes, but he seems unable to see the errors he makes. I am hinting him at either avoiding editing relations, or at learning JOSM first. with limited success. if you have hints, please share them in our Telegram Panama group. |
| 78082369 by gscholz @ 2019-12-07 09:37 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,974 | you delete two primary ways here |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz | Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,thanks for this hint, is fixed now.Guido | |
| 81649914 by gscholz @ 2020-03-01 17:35 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | :+1: |
| 75930299 by gscholz @ 2019-10-19 13:28 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | RajSarkar ♦4 | ok |
| 66650827 by gscholz @ 2019-01-26 09:10 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hola, te tengo una pregunta, es entre curiosidad e inquietud, lo estamos discutiendo en el grupo telegram de Panamá. porqué estamos extendiendo las provincias en el mar? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | ops, Entschuldigung, hatte `de` nicht aufgemerkt. in Panama we are wondering why the provinces extend into the sea. you have any idea? | |
| 72708973 by gscholz @ 2019-07-27 06:02 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | JJIglesias ♦1,238 | Hi. As far as I understand waterway=riverbank is a deprecated Tagging. That's why I changed from such tag to natural=water that's the preferred Tagging.In time I draw and keep updated several of those waterways; but in line with current practices I have been changing them to the "cu... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | gscholz | Hi, Iglesias,thanks for your feedback. Here you can find the current valid rules for taging riverbanks:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3DriverbankAccording to this page taging rivers as water is only a proposal with little support, which makes not much sense also for my un... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | JJIglesias ♦1,238 | Hi Guido. the Wiki is out of date and do not match the actual "rules" in ID. Currently ID mark all waterways=riverbank as deprecated tagging, and drive you to Tag them as natural=water and water=river. skipping Riverbanks.I worked a lot with the waterway=riverbank and them suddenly... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | JJIglesias ♦1,238 | As well I avoid as much as possible to create any kind of multipolygons with our rivers, because they change quite often the rivebank that do not make any sense to mark some areas as not wet inside the riverbank area. Some Island/Islets are permanent; but sand banks, beaches and other dry areas, are... | |
| 69196687 by gscholz @ 2019-04-14 08:59 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | santamariense ♦841 | Hi. Why did you delete it? To fix isn't the same as to delete. Ok, I know it wasn't correctly mapped because it was an incomplete multipolygon, but is a very specific information that comes from deep research on laws. It's so easy delete things in OSM compared to how hard is to find s... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | gscholz | Hi santamariense,if you enter broken data into the OSM database an you know this is the case, then I recommend to add a note like "This is only a temporary solution and will be fixed in short term" so every contributor has a chance to get aware of it. But better than to enter just error... | |
| 69332153 by gscholz @ 2019-04-18 06:34 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | opendcc ♦1,561 | Hallo,das ist ausgeschildert als Fußweg, Radfahrer frei. Servus Wolfgang |
| 66870989 by gscholz @ 2019-02-03 08:14 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Skippern ♦280 | Is there any particular reason you have deleted this relation? Was it duplicated, missing segments, or what? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66870989 |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | gscholz | Hi,yes the relation was broken. It was a collection and no relation.Guido | |
| 48475996 by gscholz @ 2017-05-07 14:01 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | opendcc ♦1,561 | Den ganzen Wald abgeholzt :-( |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | gscholz | Hallo Wolfgang,dass der Wald verschwunden ist, kann ich hier nicht erkennen, aber vielleicht war die Kontur nicht mehr geschlossen.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48475996Danke für die Reparatur.GrußGuido | |
| 64884589 by gscholz @ 2018-11-26 05:41 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | santamariense ♦841 | Why have you deleted the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8330236/history ?I don't know exactly how to map these letters, but they only make sense together. Another suggestion? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changes... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | gscholz | Hi santamariense,this is a misunderstanding. I did not delete a relation but fixed overlapping ways. See here:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64884589The lower horizontal bar of the "F" was a duplicate of two overlapping ways.RegardsGuido | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | gscholz | Ah sorry, indeed I also deleted the mentioned relation which was misused as a collection. Relations are not collections. There is no need for a relation here.RegardsGuido | |
| 61368113 by gscholz @ 2018-08-05 07:50 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | STEPHANE9111Cam ♦1 | Error en la delimitacion del parque intejurisdiccional marino costero Patagonia Austral. |
| 56475394 by gscholz @ 2018-02-18 22:41 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | JJIglesias ♦1,238 | Hi, and thanks for the correction.My question is how this happen, if a draw just 1 time the way.I have found the same in several places here in Bolivia, is it a JOSM or ID problem?BsRgdsJJ |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | gscholz | Hola JJ,sorry I don't know. I guess its kind of an operating error but its not clear to me how to reproduce it.SaludosGuido | |
| 47513597 by gscholz @ 2017-04-06 16:39 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | carciofo ♦186 | Hi there, could you please review your changes in this area? The roads you added already existed and now they are all overlapping existing feature (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126173422). Thanks in advance. |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | carciofo ♦186 | I've removed the duplicate roads. Make sure to check for existing features when uploading tracks :) Thanks & happy mapping! | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | gscholz | Sorry for the late reply, but I just found your comments. I did not add the complained streets, see here:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47513597Instead I changed an overlapping building/street segment.Kind regardsGuido | |
| 46605171 by gscholz @ 2017-03-05 20:04 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | opendcc ♦1,561 | Hallo Guido,Adresse 1+3+5 ist doch nicht wirklich schön. Und wirft auch einen Fehler beim OSM Inspektor :-( Warum zerlegst Du das Haus nicht vorher mit terracer? Servus Wolfgang |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | gscholz | Hallo Wolfgang,dein Kommentar scheint hier bei dem Changeset nicht richtig zu passen. Wenn, dann habe ich irgend einen schon vorhandenen Block mal temporär zerlegt. Gesammelte Hausnummern pflege ich nicht einzutragen.GrußGuido | |
| 47804741 by gscholz @ 2017-04-15 06:13 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | opendcc ♦1,561 | Hallo Guido,was war da kaputt? Wenn das ein Kreis ist, dann sind doch die Relationen über den Kreisverkehr hinweg an dieser Stelle defekt, da es immer einmal komplett rumgeht.Servus Wolfgang |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | gscholz | Hallo Wolfgang,ich habe gerade mehr zufällig (und sehr spät) deinen Kommentar entdeckt. Der ist irgendwie nicht bei mir direkt angekommen. Kreisverkehre bleiben bei Relationen immer als ein Stück erhalten. Bitte nicht zerlegen. Einfach mal bei JOSM in die Liste der Relationsmitgli... |