| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90093277 by harinikh @ 2020-08-28 17:24 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | skyper ♦871 | HalloWürdest Du mir bitte sagen wie Du Zugangsbeschränkungen nur mit Luftbildern eintragen kannst?Auch würde ich gerne wissen wer und wann dieser CS überprüft wurde.Da nicht alle Beitragende auf lokaler Ebene des Englisch mächtig sind bitte ich um ein Antwort ... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | harinikh | I have added the gate based on the blocker that is visible in the bing imagery. After toggling different imagery, it is evident that the gate is opened and closed in multiple imagery. Hence added the gate and gave access as private as per the learning's from the community. i have not added any... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | skyper ♦871 | Tach harinikhDanke, für die Erklärung.Warum hast Du dann bei dem anderen Weg direkt westlich davon komplett von Zugangsbeschränkungen abgesehen? Zumindest "permissive ist da wohl angebracht. Auch ein "FIXME" oder eine "note" als Hinweis, sind vielleicht ... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | harinikh | Hi skyper, Thanks for the detailed explanation. we are talking with DWG to take a long term decision. We will be happy to implement the changes whatever that benefits the larger community, but want to make sure it is accepted by all the community members. In the past , few community members inform... | |
| 90588083 by harinikh @ 2020-09-08 12:37 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Rainero ♦798 | Hello harinikh,To your edits I have some concerns/requests:1. No source is indicated in your change set; imagery_used is not the same and not sufficient. Is it based on survey or only on aerial pictures?2. It looks like you haven't checked the offset that the Revalstraße has here. I... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | harinikh | Thanks for checking into our edits.1.we are making the edits based on the aerial view and available OSM resources2.apologies, i have missed to make the edits with respect to offset feature. please find the changeset 90647928, for the necessary modifications.I will make sure to check the entire v... | |
| 90356210 by harinikh @ 2020-09-03 10:37 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | skyper ♦871 | HiWhere is the identification that this is a Amazon logistic Edit?Where is the #hashtag of the task?Where is the ground source as stated in the wiki?Reviewer?Chears skyper |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | harinikh | Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. as mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935.our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get it. Al... | |
| 90318801 by harinikh @ 2020-09-02 18:29 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | skyper ♦871 | HiWhere is the identification that this is a Amazon logistic Edit?Where is the #hashtag of the task?Where is the ground source as stated in the wiki?Reviewer?Chears skyper |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | harinikh | Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. as mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935. Our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get it. a... | |
| 83368275 by harinikh @ 2020-04-10 14:00 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,658 | Hi, what evidence do you have to change this to a track? Imagery and usage doesn't suggest that to me.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | harinikh | Thanks for your time in checking our edits. Made this change as the connecting road segment is added as a track road by community member previously. Reverting the change as per the suggestion and changing the connected road classification to service as well. Please find the changesets 83452876 and 8... | |
| 79513472 by harinikh @ 2020-01-13 11:29 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Looks like you can never leave? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | harinikh | Hi ndm,Thanks for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I understand the mistake now and will be more careful going forward. I've modified the directions as there wasn't sufficient information due to lack of street level imagery, please refer changeset ( 79595963). I would r... | |
| 74391153 by harinikh @ 2019-09-12 12:21 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding water way. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5118415972 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | harinikh | Hi user_5359,Thank you for looking into my edit. This was an honest mistake. I would be more craeful going forward and would not repeat it in future. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion.Regardsharinikh |