| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84770203 by hemasvn @ 2020-05-06 15:55 | 1 | 2020-12-28 09:55 | user_5121 ♦11 | Reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2183218 for details. |
| 2 | 2020-12-30 16:10 | hemasvn | Hi user_5121, As mentioned in the note as there is a sign board at the gate stating "Rear Gate entry to the house is from Aston Lane" I have modified the highway tag. Thanks for improving the edit as per ground reality. Always Happy to learn from the community. Advance Happy New year!... | |
| 92906367 by hemasvn @ 2020-10-22 15:41 | 1 | 2020-10-22 15:51 | limes11 ♦900 | Why did you remove the oneway=yes tag? |
| 2 | 2020-10-25 11:12 | limes11 ♦900 | Please elaborate on your actions. I will revert otherwise. | |
| 3 | 2020-10-26 04:07 | hemasvn | Hi Limes11,Apologies for the delay in reply, I have made the edit based on available Mapillary overlay (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=a9-qjdOw5LYZOEzZUdFPlw&focus=photo) according to the sign board the directions apply from the junction. also the Previous oneway was restricting right tu... | |
| 4 | 2020-10-26 15:59 | limes11 ♦900 | Hello, I don't quite understand what this Mapillary photo has to do with the situation. It shows that way 134243092 is oneway and that 642621824 is oneway. Formally, 861070474 is not oneway but entry is forbidden for cars since both turning right from Wilhelmsstrasse and turning left from... | |
| 5 | 2020-10-26 16:01 | limes11 ♦900 | It's funny, one step back on Mapillary, on picture https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=yqrH-NPXPgLHEGXLC7HunA&focus=photo&lat=50.67753088795761&lng=7.19443064344894&z=17you can see a silver car that goes from left to right illegally !! | |
| 6 | 2020-10-27 04:20 | hemasvn | Hi Limes, Thanks for your detailed feedback. As mentioned by you formally 861070474 is not a one way. but based on lane markings the entry is prohibited, So would you suggest us to make a small part one way in these situations or should we add relations of " No left turn" or "No rig... | |
| 7 | 2020-10-27 07:52 | limes11 ♦900 | Ok. So, I put that small one-way piece back in, maybe 2 meters. I think this is by far the easiest solution to handle this also because it offers a nice solution for the bicycle situation using oneway:bicycle=no. Thank you and best, Limes | |
| 85234754 by hemasvn @ 2020-05-15 05:07 | 1 | 2020-06-13 12:41 | ma-rt-in ♦1,754 | Hello,the thing you changed on the one was good before. But it would be even more gratifying if you knew what exactly is signposted on site. What feedback did you get from your driver? |
| 2 | 2020-06-15 05:41 | hemasvn | Hi,Thanks for checking into our edits. We have received the feedback from our driver that the road is accessible by motor vehicles, cross verified the same with the available resources and made the edit. We are not sure of the exact sign board, we left a note to the community asking for the addit... | |
| 83371997 by hemasvn @ 2020-04-10 15:21 | 1 | 2020-04-12 15:14 | ACarlotti ♦158 | I think the tagging in use prior to this changeset was probably more accurate (and the description at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack agrees). I guess that you made this change because the rendering looked funny with a track leading to a driveway, but the correct way to fix t... |
| 2 | 2020-04-13 13:06 | hemasvn | appreciating your time for looking into our edits. We are making our edits based on our driver feedback and valuable suggestions from the community. Please go through the changeset (83478739) for the suggested edits. Do let me know in case of any further changes required. always happy to learn from ... | |
| 82067896 by hemasvn @ 2020-03-11 15:31 | 1 | 2020-03-11 20:17 | ndm ♦889 | Think this should be reverted - there was already a bollard blocking the roads - as show in Bing imagery. Just adding a "path" probably doesn't help foot and cycle routing. |
| 2 | 2020-03-12 11:29 | hemasvn | Hi ndm,Thanks for your time for checking our edits. We have added a path since there is no proper evidence to specify as it as foot/cycle path. Can you suggest any possible resolution in these kind of cases. Please let me know in case of any further edits.Regards,hemasvn | |
| 3 | 2020-03-12 19:20 | ndm ♦889 | If you are changing the map based on incomplete data you should at least add a Map Note (note+ icon on the website) so that local mappers know that it needs a detailed survey!I'm going to review satellite imagery and will probably edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/780235136 | |
| 4 | 2020-03-13 12:39 | hemasvn | "Thanks for your response. We just cross verified osm wiki again to improve our edits regarding paths . it was mentioned as "" highway=path is a generic path, either multi-use or unspecified usage, open to all non-motorized vehicles and not intended for motorized vehicles unless tagg... | |
| 5 | 2020-03-13 19:26 | ndm ♦889 | Unless you have a better mechanism to communicate with mappers in the locality that your changes are "best effort" and not from a survey, then I think you need to add a note, especially where the situation is ambiguous. | |
| 81402081 by hemasvn @ 2020-02-24 11:02 | 1 | 2020-02-24 21:40 | ndm ♦889 | If you move a building you should probably move all POIs inside it. |
| 2 | 2020-02-25 14:27 | hemasvn | thanks for checking my edits. Modified the building position to avoid overlapping with the service road. Not sure of positioning the POI accurately without being supported by ground reality. it can be helpful if local knowledge can improve our edits. Please let me know in case of any further modific... | |
| 74633301 by hemasvn @ 2019-09-18 15:12 | 1 | 2019-09-19 13:38 | tux67 ♦1,945 | Not sure you recognized this is a school campus. While cars need to access the Parking area, I am not convinced that this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725888929 is intended to be used by motor_vehicles (even one of the Amazon drivers may have used it). --- ... |
| 2 | 2019-09-19 14:02 | hemasvn | Hi tux67,Thanks for looking into my edit. This edit was based upon the GPS trace of our driver partner. However, i understand your concern about this edit. Let me know in case I need to modify the edit as per the local knowledge. Looking forward to learn and add valuable data in the maps!Regar... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-19 16:04 | tux67 ♦1,945 | I have swiched this to a path until there is a better view. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74633301 | |
| 74672064 by hemasvn @ 2019-09-19 12:54 | 1 | 2019-09-19 13:25 | tux67 ♦1,945 | Hi, I see at least 2 gates on this added Service Road loop, indicating that this is not for public access! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74672064 |
| 2 | 2019-09-19 13:39 | hemasvn | Hi tux67,Thanks for looking into this. This is an honest mistake and i have corrected it as per your suggestion. I will be more careful going forward and would not repeat such errors. Let me know in case you have any more suggestions.Regardshemasvn | |
| 71967683 by hemasvn @ 2019-07-06 20:06 | 1 | 2019-07-07 09:26 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Are you sure this is a oneway? That makes it impossible to directly access the car park from Nordstraße. |
| 2 | 2019-07-07 09:28 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | See also https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/XuYHakCMjGycllepnVIltg | |
| 3 | 2019-07-07 15:59 | hemasvn | Hi kreuzschnabel, Thanks for looking into my edits. I have made this edit based on the satellite imagery which is not very clear. I looked into the mapillary where I identified a do not enter board but overlooked the road directionality. As per your suggestion I am reverting the change and will ... | |
| 4 | 2019-07-07 16:37 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | I would suggest to do routing-affecting edits (like this one) on reliable sources only, not just on aerial imagery. Mapillary is better but may be outdated, too – a few weeks ago, I came across a oneway the direction of which had been switched a year ago :) Still, OSM’s preferred source ... | |
| 5 | 2019-07-09 10:27 | hemasvn | Hi kreuzschnabel, Thanks for the update. We will follow as per your suggestion going forward. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.Regards,hemasvn | |
| 71282278 by hemasvn @ 2019-06-15 15:19 | 1 | 2019-07-05 15:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,The change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582038397/history looks like it's got the same issue that was previously discussed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70519397 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remo... |
| 2 | 2019-07-05 17:40 | hemasvn | Hi, Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.Changeset #71940643Regards,hemasvn | |
| 70519397 by hemasvn @ 2019-05-22 15:19 | 1 | 2019-06-28 12:30 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,What's the evidence that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31559827/history should have an access tag "motor_vehicle=yes"? I'm familiar with the area and it absolutely does not look publically accessible to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-07-03 09:54 | hemasvn | Hi,Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.Changeset #71851898Regards,hemasvn | |
| 3 | 2019-07-04 16:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 68794022 by hemasvn @ 2019-04-02 13:30 | 1 | 2019-04-03 07:40 | ToniE ♦1,237 | Hi,I guess, something went wrong with the edit.Seems that your new service roads have been uploaded/created twice, as well as two sections of the Viale del Lavaro.All Flixbus routes which pass the Viale del Lavaro are now broken.Kindly have a look athttps://www.openstreetmap.org/no... |
| 2 | 2019-04-05 09:01 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi ToniE,Thanks for looking into the edit.There was some issue while creating the segments. It got uploaded twice after saving the edits. We have removed the duplicate segments and retained the correct one.Do let us know if there are any other issues from our end. We are looking forward to colla... |