12 changesets created by hkkollip have been discussed with 9 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
65539666
by hkkollip
@ 2018-12-17 06:27
12018-12-19 00:29bye12
♦34
Imagery is out of date, you put a service road through a building
22019-07-10 11:28hkkollip Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Thanks for reverting the changes.

We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
hkkollip.
65555695
by hkkollip
@ 2018-12-17 16:41
12018-12-19 01:12bye12
♦34
This Changeset created duplicate ways ontop of ways this bot created in a different changeset
22019-07-10 11:23hkkollip Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. I didn't notice the duplicate roads while creating. Thanks for correcting them.

We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
hkkollip.
66298496
by hkkollip
@ 2019-01-14 11:27
12019-01-14 12:29MikeN
♦355
Hi, South Carolina allows turns across double yellow lines. Normally they do place a break in double yellow lines for intersections, but not this one.I don't know the story on why this intersection has no break, but normally they would add signs for a turn restriction.
22019-07-10 11:19hkkollip Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit and apologies for the delayed response. I have removed the turn restrictions as per your suggestion.

Regards,
hkkollip
67578250
by hkkollip
@ 2019-02-26 11:01
12019-03-03 18:20robert
♦234
Did you mean to remove the name from Manor Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171367033/history#2)? It broke a match against OS Locator https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=481742
22019-07-10 11:13hkkollip Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. I have added the name back to the road.

Regards,
hkkollop
67553217
by hkkollip
@ 2019-02-25 15:54
12019-03-03 18:43robert
♦234
So, the problem here is that you've based your changes on Bing imagery that's from 2011 when there was a large industrial building here. It is now housing estate. You've removed at least one feature ("Fairlane Drive" https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl...
22019-03-03 18:49robert
♦234
Sorry I've had to revert this in my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67744561
32019-07-10 11:05hkkollip Hi Robert,

Thanks for looking into the edit. Its a complete mistake from my end. I somehow missed checking the latest image. Going forward will make sure that these kind of errors wont happen.

Thanks for reverting the change set.

Regards,
hkkollip.
67581362
by hkkollip
@ 2019-02-26 12:45
12019-03-03 19:21robert
♦234
Again, you're basing this on 2011 imagery and you're managed to remove the name "Norbreck Avenue", breaking https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=989747 . The south west of this area looks to have been turned into a new residential area that doesn't a...
22019-07-10 11:05hkkollip Hi Robert,

Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. I have made the changes as per the latest imagery.

Regards,
hkkollip
71641526
by hkkollip
@ 2019-06-26 15:15
12019-06-28 21:39ndm
♦889
Maybe you could try adjusting your imagery offset to match what's already mapped.

This area has been carefully mapped -- and you've just drawn a driveway straight through a building!
22019-07-10 10:56hkkollip Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit. As per your suggestions going forward I will use Imagery Offset and create/align the road segments.

Regards,
hkkollip
71561716
by hkkollip
@ 2019-06-24 13:31
12019-07-05 16:01SomeoneElse
♦13,404
Hello,
It looks like your addition of the motor_vehicle=yes tag to qqq may have the same issue as previously discussed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71673099 ? Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?
Best Regards,
An...
22019-07-09 09:49hkkollip Hi Andy,As per your suggestion the motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads have been reverted. I checked all these type of edits and reverted wherever necessary. Thanks for your insights. Changeset-72046616.

Regards,
hkkollip
32019-07-09 09:57SomeoneElse
♦13,404
Hello hkkollip,
Thanks for that.
Best Regards,
Andy
71673099
by hkkollip
@ 2019-06-27 13:31
12019-06-28 14:26SomeoneElse
♦13,404
Hello,
What was the source for your changes to the access tags here?

Best Regards,
Andy
22019-07-01 10:19hkkollip Hi Andy,With reference to the motor vehicles parked in the satellite imagery added motor_vehicle access tags to this road. But as per community request reverting my changes. Do let me know if you have any further questions.
changeset-71778873
Regards,
hkkollip
32019-07-01 10:56SomeoneElse
♦13,404
Hello,
Thanks for that.
Best Regards,
Andy.
67574596
by hkkollip
@ 2019-02-26 08:54
12019-03-03 19:03robert
♦234
But in doing this you've got rid of the extra information the local mapper has added, including the name ("Imperial Gardens", breaking https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=398754) and the surface type.
22019-06-03 14:05jguthula
♦65
Hi Robert,

Sorry for failing to respond to this comment previously. I went ahead and added back the features that got deleted. Since the edits were made long back I failed to back track the exact reason for the deletion of this attributes but going forward will take measures to not repeat such er...
67761079
by hkkollip
@ 2019-03-04 10:13
12019-03-04 11:29DaveF
♦1,568
This is incorrect. It's a walled off playground not a car park. Please remove

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674384373#map=19/51.31903/-2.21564

This isn't a looped roundabout. It's just a set of garages. Please amend.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674384375
22019-03-05 06:18jguthula
♦65
Hi DaveF,

Thanks for looking into this edit. As per you comment reverted the changes (changeset: 67792068). The parking aisle was added considering the parked vehicles in this location. Going forward we will not add parking aisles unless there are payed markings on the road. The second segment w...
67590303
by hkkollip
@ 2019-02-26 17:36
12019-02-27 12:48trigpoint
♦2,375
Hi, I think you had this right first time. This is a driveway into a school which is obviously private, you should not expect public access here.
Cheers Phil
22019-02-28 14:51jguthula
♦65
Hi Phil,

Thanks for looking into this edit. I reverted the changes as per your suggestion (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67653875). Going forward will ask my team to be a bit more careful before making such edits.

Do let us know if there are any other issues from our end. We are loo...