Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
108613915 by hvannere @ 2021-07-26 10:12 | 1 | 2022-08-11 00:40 | Andy L MTB ♦1 | This a bridleway not a footpath |
2 | 2022-08-15 20:41 | hvannere | Hi Andy,Thanks for reviewing my changeset and providing with the feedback. I have modified footpath to bridleway based on your suggestion. Thanks again, looking forward to learn more from you.Best Regards,hvannere | |
83194199 by hvannere @ 2020-04-07 11:23 | 1 | 2020-12-12 19:30 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,Just to let you know I've shifted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7375217752 etc. north because it looks offset. I think you might have used ESRI as the main source here, and you can see that it is offset if you compare the access road on OS OpenData StreetView with it.Best Regar... |
2 | 2020-12-14 12:56 | hvannere | Thanks for checking the edits. I had made the edits as per the available imagery. thanks for the improvisation. always happy to learn from the community. | |
88409254 by hvannere @ 2020-07-23 14:19 | 1 | 2020-08-06 23:31 | GinaroZ ♦1,281 | I've fixed your edit as you had added a turning circle node instead of a proper roundabout.Please also be careful as the new Bing imagery is out of alignment with the current roads (which are aligned to ESRI clarity) |
2 | 2020-08-07 07:05 | hvannere | thanks for checking into our edits. I have mistakenly added the turning circle in place of round about. Thanks for your corrections. Always happy to learn from the community | |
79247569 by hvannere @ 2020-01-06 12:10 | 1 | 2020-07-08 16:12 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | HiWhy would you consider paths with in cemetery to be private? Kind of defeats the object.Cheers Phil |
2 | 2020-07-09 16:15 | hvannere | Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the private access based on the gates and the roads are acting as a shortcut between two major roads. please let me know if it is contradicting with the ground reality and suggest me with the necessary modifications. always happy to learn from the co... | |
3 | 2020-07-09 19:08 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Firstly by adding access=private you are making all map users go around the long way, this includes most importantly pedestrians. Remember to consider other uses as OSM is not just a map for motor vehicles, it was founded by walkers and cyclists.The most likely access tag here is simply motor_vehi... | |
4 | 2020-07-10 13:43 | hvannere | thanks for your inputs. please find the changeset(87820216) for the suggested modifications.always happy to learn from the community | |
5 | 2020-07-10 15:16 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Thank you | |
85620816 by hvannere @ 2020-05-22 15:44 | 1 | 2020-05-22 19:11 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, just wondering why you removed this driveway? It is very visible on imagery.Cheers Phil |
2 | 2020-05-25 07:49 | hvannere | Thanks for checking into our edits. I was unsure of the existence of the driveway as it was partly covered by the vegetation. Apologies, after your suggestion, I have cross verified the edits and made the necessary modifications. please find the changeset(85707379). Thanks for the corrections, alway... | |
79514574 by hvannere @ 2020-01-13 11:57 | 1 | 2020-01-13 23:40 | ndm ♦889 | I've removed a service road segment that doesn't appear to exist. |
2 | 2020-01-21 13:16 | hvannere | Hi ndm,Thanks for looking into the edit. I had made this edit partially based upon the GPS trace of our delivery partner. I would be happy in case local knowledge can improve this edit. I am always happy to learn from the local community. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion.regar... | |
79006007 by hvannere @ 2019-12-30 09:05 | 1 | 2019-12-30 12:41 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong, you have deleted and not replaced surveyed imformation.Most importantly you have simply deleted Coracle Close, which had been added by a local mapper by going and having a look. Whilst it wasn't perfectly mapped, it was not wrong and was added befo... |
2 | 2019-12-30 13:47 | hvannere | Hi trigpoint,Thanks for looking into my edit. As per the latest aerial image and the private aerial image(Digital Globe) the road added doesn't exists. Hence deleted the road and didnt add the road name to the new added road as there is no proper evidence from the street view. Could you ple... | |
3 | 2019-12-30 15:26 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | This is a new development, it was only built about a year ago, street names do not change and it is fairly obvious that the original mapper had the location slightly wrong. Maybe he only knew it was just off the roundabout by the Shrewsbury Club.It is 100% Coracle CloseCheers Phil | |
4 | 2019-12-31 06:12 | hvannere | Hi trigpoint,Made the necessary changes. Please refer the changeset(79042965) for the modifications done.Regards,hvannere. |