| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106712916 by iggujja @ 2021-06-21 11:43 | 1 | 2022-09-26 01:19 | DUGA ♦550 | That does not exist.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/956557216#map=18/41.66090/-75.74508I do not believe any Amazon driver has ever been here, please carefully check what you are doing here. |
| 2 | 2022-10-31 12:07 | silakshm ♦21 | Hi,We apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect road digitization. It's an honest mistake from our end. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the iss... | |
| 95979903 by iggujja @ 2020-12-17 06:20 | 1 | 2021-02-12 18:12 | Allison P ♦1,141 | Some of the service roads added have an access of value of "customers`" (notice the backtick `). This is not recognized by most data consumers. Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you! |
| 2 | 2021-02-16 09:43 | iggujja | Hi,Thank you for looking into the edit, I've made the necessary changes in the changeset(99346586). Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,iggujja. | |
| 94258931 by iggujja @ 2020-11-17 08:50 | 1 | 2020-11-18 06:19 | Carnildo ♦905 | Where are you getting this service road from? It's not in any of the imagery, and I don't recall one in the area from the last time I visited. |
| 2 | 2020-11-19 05:47 | iggujja | Hi,Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the incorrect addition of road, missed to check the latest imagery. I've made the necessary changes under the changeset(#: 94411729). Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,iggujja | |
| 83256339 by iggujja @ 2020-04-08 13:23 | 1 | 2020-04-14 06:55 | iggujja | #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing |
| 81090699 by iggujja @ 2020-02-17 04:33 | 1 | 2020-03-09 14:54 | Adam Franco ♦163 | Hi iggujja, I'm not super local to this area, but from the satellite imagery it looks like Bonnyvale Road actually goes through this new road segment you added and the old alignment is now a dead-end? Is this something you can confirm? Whichever segment is continuing through to Guilford Center ... |
| 2 | 2020-03-10 05:48 | iggujja | Hi Adam,Thanks for identifying the error and responding. I've unintentionally added a service road here. Apologies for the edit, I've corrected the error under changeset #81992740Regards,iggujja | |
| 74139745 by iggujja @ 2019-09-05 14:58 | 1 | 2020-01-02 01:24 | Andrew Matheny ♦32 | Hi there-When mapping service roads, please don't add an access=private tag unless you know the on-the-ground conditions actually warrant it. Routers only use service ways to reach a destination along the service way and tagging this main driveway with access=private creates a mis-match wit... |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 10:46 | iggujja | Hi,Thank you for the response and detailed explanation. I shall follow these as inputs for my future edits. Thanks for correcting my edit.Regards,iggujja. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-03 12:31 | Andrew Matheny ♦32 | Thanks for being open to feedback! If you have the ability to share with everyone else at Amazon Logistics, it would be much appreciated. You're doing great work getting service driveways added to OSM so I want y'all to be the most effective. Thanks again,Andrew | |
| 4 | 2020-01-07 03:07 | iggujja | Hi Andrew,Sure, I have forwarded the feedback to our team. Thanks for the appreciation 🙂Regards,iggujja. | |
| 72133981 by iggujja @ 2019-07-11 12:38 | 1 | 2019-07-11 15:11 | user_5359 ♦20,055 | Welcome to OSM! Did you have any information that the highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703363713 isn't connect to the other highways (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10523418 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501109542)? |
| 2 | 2019-07-13 16:13 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi User_5359,(Responding on behalf of iggujja)Iggujja did not make the connections at the above mentioned points because the latest satellite imagery (ESRI World imagery - March 2018) shows presence of some barriers/gates.The roads could have been connected with an assumption that by july 20... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-17 16:36 | user_5359 ♦20,055 | if you take a closer look at the Esri aerial photograph, you can still see flexible obstacles at all three. These are not present in the Mazar Premium aerial photo. The picture seems to be from a more recent date, as some houses are finished, which are still under construction in Esri.But not ever... | |
| 4 | 2019-07-17 17:10 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Georg V,Thanks a lot for your update. As you suggested there is a little ambiguity/clarity in the aerial imageries.Thanks a lot for dropping notes. Looking forward to learning more from you.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 5 | 2019-07-18 18:28 | freebeer ♦1,598 | hallo georg,sorry that i commented on the notes you opened before i was aware of this changeset discussion.i would update the map to reflect the maxar imagery as it is the newest and probably itself some months old, so that some of the house outlines in the earth seen in maxar, may very well... | |
| 6 | 2019-07-22 09:34 | freebeer ♦1,598 | iggujja, gseethar, and anyone else who may be monitoring this discussion, sorry for the late follow-up here, but...in the case of barriers, temporary or permanent, the way of drawing the road in the esri imagery state, is not to leave a gap where a barrier is suspected, but to close and connect... | |
| 7 | 2019-07-25 12:59 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi freebeer,Thanks for the follow-up. I have connected the roads as per the latest digital globe imagery - July 2019 and connected the roads. Changeset #72643945Please let me know your suggestions.Regards,Ganesh |