| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95457283 by jyotkuma @ 2020-12-08 04:35 | 1 | 2023-03-06 00:51 | valhikes ♦16 | Why? Particularly along the part of the trail that includes bridges too narrow for anything but an (illegal) motorcycle and with trees across the railing and devolves into a bear tunnel near the creek? |
| 99431635 by jyotkuma @ 2021-02-17 07:49 | 1 | 2021-02-17 16:50 | aweech ♦369 | Hi,In this edit you changed oneway=no to oneway=yes. This was an incorrect change as there are no one-way signs and the road is not designed like a one-way. Also, it was already tagged as oneway=no. Also, in changeset 99430216 you also added oneway=yes incorrectly at an intersection. Please be sur... |
| 2 | 2021-02-19 07:23 | jyotkuma | Hi,Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of directions, will ensure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,jyotkuma. | |
| 92816709 by jyotkuma @ 2020-10-21 08:43 | 1 | 2020-10-21 16:39 | aweech ♦369 | Hi,What is your main source for this change? Do you have special knowledge from a survey? The Bing Streetside imagery shows that the fan at the end of Pleasant Street is bidirectional on both arms, and it looks like a place where the arms would be bidirectional, given my local knowledge. |
| 2 | 2020-10-22 09:24 | jyotkuma | Hi aweech,Thank you for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the wrong addition of the direction, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#861327969). Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,jyotkuma. | |
| 82596950 by jyotkuma @ 2020-03-25 04:33 | 1 | 2020-03-27 19:11 | Glassman ♦5,275 | way/784371047 is actually going through a newer development that is shown on the ESRI World Imagery. You can't always trust the facebook ML streets. It comes from fairly old imagery. This area has lots of new development. I removed it as I was adding in sidewalks. |
| 2 | 2020-03-30 05:05 | jyotkuma | Hi,Thanks for the correction and information. I shall pass on this to my internal team.Regards,jyotkuma | |
| 78908438 by jyotkuma @ 2019-12-27 05:03 | 1 | 2020-01-14 15:26 | skquinn ♦805 | It is not necessary to add turn restrictions where the entry is already prohibited by one-way traffic. In fact, at least Keep Right will flag this as an error (possibly other QA tools as well). |
| 2 | 2020-01-15 08:54 | jyotkuma | "Hi,Thanks for correcting the edit. Apologies for the error here. As suggested, I shall follow the directions for my future edits.Regards,jyotkuma | |
| 74134627 by jyotkuma @ 2019-09-05 13:26 | 1 | 2019-11-12 16:20 | grouper ♦62 | These new residential streets should not be tagged as service streets. |
| 2 | 2019-11-13 08:32 | jyotkuma | Hi,Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit,I will make sure not to repeat such errors again. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community and learn form them.Regards,jyotkuma | |
| 74891743 by jyotkuma @ 2019-09-25 07:21 | 1 | 2019-09-26 16:46 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | If you only added a driveway, why does this changeset cover half the United States? |
| 2 | 2019-09-30 07:12 | jyotkuma | “Hi 3Jane,I had edited a segment in Seattle but missed saving it before making the edit in Reading. It was an honest mistake. I will ensure that I save the edits in a single area. Thanks for your advice and let me know any other suggestions | |
| 3 | 2019-10-01 00:23 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | That makes sense. I've done that before, it happens. |