| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95457283 by jyotkuma @ 2020-12-08 04:35 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | valhikes ♦19 | Why? Particularly along the part of the trail that includes bridges too narrow for anything but an (illegal) motorcycle and with trees across the railing and devolves into a bear tunnel near the creek? |
| 99431635 by jyotkuma @ 2021-02-17 07:49 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | aweech ♦375 | Hi,In this edit you changed oneway=no to oneway=yes. This was an incorrect change as there are no one-way signs and the road is not designed like a one-way. Also, it was already tagged as oneway=no. Also, in changeset 99430216 you also added oneway=yes incorrectly at an intersection. Please be sur... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | jyotkuma | Hi,Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of directions, will ensure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,jyotkuma. | |
| 92816709 by jyotkuma @ 2020-10-21 08:43 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | aweech ♦375 | Hi,What is your main source for this change? Do you have special knowledge from a survey? The Bing Streetside imagery shows that the fan at the end of Pleasant Street is bidirectional on both arms, and it looks like a place where the arms would be bidirectional, given my local knowledge. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | jyotkuma | Hi aweech,Thank you for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the wrong addition of the direction, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#861327969). Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,jyotkuma. | |
| 82596950 by jyotkuma @ 2020-03-25 04:33 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Glassman ♦5,828 | way/784371047 is actually going through a newer development that is shown on the ESRI World Imagery. You can't always trust the facebook ML streets. It comes from fairly old imagery. This area has lots of new development. I removed it as I was adding in sidewalks. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | jyotkuma | Hi,Thanks for the correction and information. I shall pass on this to my internal team.Regards,jyotkuma | |
| 78908438 by jyotkuma @ 2019-12-27 05:03 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | skquinn ♦812 | It is not necessary to add turn restrictions where the entry is already prohibited by one-way traffic. In fact, at least Keep Right will flag this as an error (possibly other QA tools as well). |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | jyotkuma | "Hi,Thanks for correcting the edit. Apologies for the error here. As suggested, I shall follow the directions for my future edits.Regards,jyotkuma | |
| 74134627 by jyotkuma @ 2019-09-05 13:26 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | grouper ♦62 | These new residential streets should not be tagged as service streets. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | jyotkuma | Hi,Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit,I will make sure not to repeat such errors again. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community and learn form them.Regards,jyotkuma | |
| 74891743 by jyotkuma @ 2019-09-25 07:21 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Jessica12345 ♦15 | If you only added a driveway, why does this changeset cover half the United States? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | jyotkuma | “Hi 3Jane,I had edited a segment in Seattle but missed saving it before making the edit in Reading. It was an honest mistake. I will ensure that I save the edits in a single area. Thanks for your advice and let me know any other suggestions | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | Jessica12345 ♦15 | That makes sense. I've done that before, it happens. |