OSM changeset discussions of karmsudi

Changeset	#	Tmstmp UTC	Contributor	Comment
104034934 by karmsudi @ 2021-05-03 07:39	1	2024-11-14 20:26	Rainero ♦585	Hi karmsudi, due to a complaint of the property owner of the I surveyed the place. I really wonder why and based on which source you mapped this way. Please don't do such, if you aren't sure that it is a public way. Now I applied a correct tagging. Best regards, Rainer
106699564 by karmsudi @ 2021-06-21 07:54	1	2021-06-21 20:17	SafetyIng ♦348	The way is rather a driveway
	2	2021-06-22 16:33	karmsudi	Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for looking into my edit. Apologies for the misinterpretation of the driveway. I have now modified the segment to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106789109) with modifications. Regards, karmsudi
106698008 by karmsudi @ 2021-06-21 07:26	1	2021-06-21 20:15	SafetyIng ♦348	The way is rather a driveway
	2	2021-06-22 16:31	karmsudi	Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for looking into my edits. I have added highway=service as the segment was connecting several entities. I have changed the road class to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106789005) with modifications. Regards, karmsudi
106697055 by karmsudi @ 2021-06-21 07:10	1	2021-06-21 20:12	SafetyIng ♦348	The way is rather a driveway
	2	2021-06-22 16:27	karmsudi	Hi SafetyIng, Apologies for the misinterpretation of the road class here. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106788853) with modifications. Regards, karmsudi
106595048 by karmsudi @ 2021-06-18 14:57	1	2021-06-20 09:57	SafetyIng ♦348	Hey, is the tag "service=driveway" unknown? The insered way is a driveway...?
	2	2021-06-21 16:29	karmsudi	Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for looking into my edits. I have added highway=service as the driveway was connecting couple of entities. I was reluctant to add service=driveway as the nature of the buildings was unknown. Please suggest me if this can be added service=driveway in this scenario. Regards, ka...
	3	2021-06-21 17:41	SafetyIng ♦348	You can see in the aerial photograph that this is one ground. See on the wiki-page: A driveway is a minor service road leading to a specific property
	4	2021-06-22 16:22	karmsudi	Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for the valuable feedback. I have now changed the highway classification of the service road to driveway. Please find the changeset for suggested modification (#106788552). Regards, karmsudi
106593346 by karmsudi @ 2021-06-18 14:21	1	2021-06-20 09:54	SafetyIng ♦348	Hey, is the tag "service=driveway" unknown? The insered way is a driveway...?
	2	2021-06-21 16:40	karmsudi	Hi SafetyIng, Apologies for the misinterpretation of the road class here. I have now changed the classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (#106727631) with modifications. Good day! Regards Karmsudi
106537329 by karmsudi @ 2021-06-17 14:48	1	2021-06-17 16:11	PT-53 ♦3,642	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955360246/history falsche Zufahrt wieder gelöscht https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955360245/history Diese Straße existiert so nicht > gelöscht
	2	2021-06-18 16:43	karmsudi	Hi PT-53, Thanks for looking into our edits. I have added the roads (way ids: 955360245,955360246) based on Bing and Esri clarity imagery, as the path seemed clear to draw. Apologies for misalignment & wrong addition. Thanks for the quick correction. I will take this as a learning from the c...
106537737 by karmsudi @ 2021-06-17 14:54	1	2021-06-17 15:54	PT-53 ♦3,642	service=driveway ?
	2	2021-06-18 15:21	karmsudi	Hello PT-53, Thanks for looking into my edit. Apologies for the misinterpretation of the driveway. I have now modified the segment to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106596028) with modifications. Regards, karmsudi
106537600 by karmsudi @ 2021-06-17 14:52	1	2021-06-17 16:00	PT-53 ♦3,642	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955362190/history service =driveway ?
	2	2021-06-18 15:19	karmsudi	Hi PT-53, I have added a service road as the segment leads to more than a single entity. I have now changed the classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106595932) with suggested modifications. Regards, karmsudi
102034128 by karmsudi @ 2021-03-31 07:33	1	2021-04-01 22:45	aachso ♦242	Did you intentionally move the fire hydrant (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3685072190) ?
	2	2021-04-02 05:25	karmsudi	Hi aachso, Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have accidentally moved the feature. Thanks for the heads up, please find the changeset (#102161788) for the suggested modification. Always happy to learn from the community Thanks, karmsudi
98568298 by karmsudi @ 2021-02-02 10:02	1	2021-02-02 16:33	pbnoxious ♦156	Hi, the "unmaintained track road" you entered is just an ordinary residental street that was recently built. Please do also connect it reasonably, i.e. extend the existing "Kellersgraben" residential road until after the crossing.
	2	2021-02-04 10:34	karmsudi	Hi pbnoxious, I have added the track road from an existing track road. But yes, as per aerial imagery it is clearly paved. I have extended the road as per your suggestion and modified the highway tag of the other track to service(Changeset:98692628). Thanks for your constructive feedback. Happy ...
97180837 by karmsudi @ 2021-01-08 16:31	1	2021-01-09 07:31	PT-53 ♦3,642	service=driveway ???
	2	2021-01-09 07:33	PT-53 ♦3,642	Steht da wirklich ein Tor oder eine Schranke ?
	3	2021-01-11 11:26	karmsudi	Hi PT-53, Thanks for checking into our edits. I have misinterpreted the highway tag based on the vicinity and added the service road. Thanks for the suggestions. Please find the changeset #97302284 for the modifications. I have added the gate based on the available imagery. Please let me know if it...
97047184 by karmsudi @ 2021-01-06 11:59	1	2021-01-06 14:34	PT-53 ♦3,642	service=driveway ?
	2	2021-01-06 15:00	karmsudi	Hi PT-53, Thanks for your time for looking into our edits. I have added the service road as I am not aware of the type of the entity. Thanks for your constructive feedback. I have made the corrections as per your suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community. Regards, karmsudi
94987608 by karmsudi @ 2020-11-29 15:20	1	2020-12-07 20:19	tordans ♦415	Hi, thanks for this edit. FYI I changed it slightly at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95444189 and added the second part of the road that is visible on the areal image. In case you don’t agree with the tagging of a service way, please let me know. --- ...
	2	2020-12-08 16:15	karmsudi	Hi tordans, Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the highway tag based on the available imagery. It is good to see the community improvising our edit quality. It can be helpful if you can guide me to determine the highway tag more precisely based on the OSM resources. Always happy to l...
77628094 by karmsudi @ 2019-11-27 11:53	1	2020-09-28 00:03	DaveF ♦1,568	Hi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/750072299#map=19/57.44812/-4.22654 Esri World Imagery doesn't show any roads here. What evidence do you have that they exist?
	2	2020-09-29 13:35	karmsudi	Hi DaveF, Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have missed adding the source. I have used latest " private maxar imagery" to make this edit. Going forward, I will make sure to mention the source column for all such edits. Thanks for the heads up. Always happy to learn from ...
86762945 by karmsudi @ 2020-06-17 09:02	1	2020-06-17 13:51	hauke-stieler ♦318	Hi, you added a short "highway=track" here but that is not the correct tagging. Please use "highway=service" + "service=driveway" for actual driveways like this one. I changed it to a driveway. - Hauke
	2	2020-06-18 08:46	karmsudi	Hi Hauke, Thanks for checking into our edits. Going forward, I will stick to the driveways in this scenarios. Thanks for the quick correction. Always happy to learn form the community Thanks Karmsudi
81716275 by karmsudi @ 2020-03-03 08:13	1	2020-03-04 13:16	abrensch ♦674	Hi karmsudi, this one looks more then sloppy... you created a service-road behind a "no-exit" Node?? and left the existing residential-stub untouched, creating a mixed residential/service way with a no-exit node in between. And put private access, while on Bing you see public p...
	2	2020-03-04 13:43	karmsudi	Hi abrensch, Thanks for taking the time to review my edit. I had miscalculated barrier as gate and added the private access. Now, I have modified the geometry and edited the access tags as suggested using the private Maxar imagery. Please find the changeset(81777626) for suggested modifications. ...
77081895 by karmsudi @ 2019-11-14 15:13	1	2019-11-14 16:49	trigpoint ♦2,375	Hi, what does barrier=yes mean, please can yoo be a bit more specific. Cheers Phil
	2	2019-11-15 12:51	karmsudi	Hi trigpoint, Thanks for looking into my edit. It is a honest mistake from my part. I am relatively new to OSM and hence this mistake happened. I have discussed this with my supervisors who have educated me to add meaningful data towards OSM. Removing the barrier (Changeset no #77126641) which sh...
76492828 by karmsudi @ 2019-11-01 12:13	1	2019-11-01 21:21	ndm ♦889	I believe this is a footway, not a service road -- I've changed it after looking at Bing Streetside
	2	2019-11-04 13:36	karmsudi	Hi ndm, Thanks for looking into my edit.It was an honest mistake.Would take this as learning for the further edits.Please let me know if anything needs to be changed.Always happy to learn from community. Regards, karmsudi
73875674 by karmsudi @ 2019-08-29 10:38	1	2019-08-29 11:43	trigpoint ♦2,375	Hi, this edit has gone very wrong. It is highly unlikely that the mappers who have previously surveyed and mapped this are would have missed a road that cannot be seen on imagery. What evidence/souces have you used to determine that a road exists here? Cheers Phil
	2	2019-08-30 09:43	karmsudi	Hi trigpoint, Thanks for looking into my edit. This edit was based partially on the GPS trace of our driver partner. But upon investigation, I have found that the edit was wrong and have hence reverted the edit (new changeset 73912930). In future I will be more careful while adding data. Let me k...
	3	2019-08-31 12:25	trigpoint ♦2,375	Not necessarily totally wrong, the imagery indicates a footpath may be here. Was there a GPS trace here? What I suspect may have happened is that the GPS receiver is in the handheld device which the driver carries and the customer 'signs'. The driver walked through the footpath, rath...
	4	2019-09-03 14:37	karmsudi	HI trigpoint, Thanks for reverting. Yes the edit was based on the GPS trace of our delivery partner. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion. Regards Karmsudi
	5	2019-09-09 11:40	trigpoint ♦2,375	Hi Karmsudi I did not revert this. The gps trace is likely to be correct, but the assumption that it is a trace from driving was the mistake. There is a footway here, please use the trace to create a highway=footway here. Thanks Phil
	6	2019-09-10 09:21	karmsudi	Hi Phil, Thanks for the clarification. I am also aligned with your view. I have made the edit as per your suggestions (#74298269). Let me know in case you have any more suggestion. Regards Karmsudi
74251131 by karmsudi @ 2019-09-09 09:18	1	2019-09-09 09:41	trigpoint ♦2,375	Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. Please stop and think when assuming that residential roads are missing. It is very unlikely that the mapper who mapped this area would have missed a public road. This is a private shared driveway. 1. It is not shown in OS Opendata Streetview. 2. Imagery...
	2	2019-09-10 09:15	karmsudi	Hi Trigpoint, Thank you for looking into my edit. I understand the point you are trying to make and I am completely aligned with your view. As per your suggestion I have made the changes (#74298018). This is a learning for me and I will make use of it in my future edits. Let me know in case there...