| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72095178 by kasals @ 2019-07-10 13:18 | 1 | 2019-07-10 14:43 | tux67 ♦1,967 | Hi,There is a Gate close to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6602765260 preventing access.BRtux67 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72095178 |
| 2 | 2019-07-10 15:24 | kasals | Hi,Thanks for your response. Added gate at the node where you suggested me to add.Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.Regards,kasals | |
| 67437539 by kasals @ 2019-02-21 17:33 | 1 | 2019-07-05 14:52 | SomeoneElse ♦13,465 | Hello kasals,I think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672115925 has the same issue as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70743584 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-07-05 15:28 | kasals | Hi Andy,Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71936598Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.Regards, kasals | |
| 3 | 2019-07-05 15:44 | SomeoneElse ♦13,465 | Thanks. Can you check the others - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Kve will give you a list to look at.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2019-07-05 16:20 | kasals | Hi Andy,Thanks for your response. I will revert all my edits. We will work in reverting edits made by all others during the coming week.Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.Regards,Kasals | |
| 5 | 2019-07-05 17:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,465 | Thanks - I'll check again next week.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 70743584 by kasals @ 2019-05-29 18:16 | 1 | 2019-06-28 12:23 | SomeoneElse ♦13,465 | Hello,What is the evidence that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31282228 should have an access tag "motor_vehicle=yes"? It's signed as a public footpath to the west, and just looks like a private road to me, for use by people accessing the businesses by the (former) scrapyard.... |
| 2 | 2019-06-29 11:59 | kasals | Hi Andy,Thanks for your response. Since the service road is connecting to the track road and there are motor vehicles that are visible in Bing Satellite imagery, I added "motor_vehicle=yes" to this track roads. But since the road is having only public footpath access, working with my t... | |
| 3 | 2019-06-29 12:13 | SomeoneElse ♦13,465 | Hello,I don't think that there's any explicit vehicle signage at the west, but there may be "no parking" signs at the east (not sure currently - they come and go).You're correct that visitors to the businesses in the former scrapyard do use it. I suspect that something ... | |
| 4 | 2019-06-29 12:51 | kasals | Hi Andy,Thanks for your response. We completely agree with you on not adding "motor_vehicle=yes" until complete evidence is there. As per community request we are also working on reverting our past edits where "motor_vehicle=yes" is given for unmaintained track roads withou... | |
| 70817644 by kasals @ 2019-05-31 17:51 | 1 | 2019-06-03 14:54 | ma-rt-in ♦1,756 | Hallo,sicher das auf dem Weg Motorfahrzeuge erlaubt sind? |
| 2 | 2019-06-04 14:31 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. Here there is no proof to add Motor vehicle access to the track road. We will revert the edit. We will take care of these kind of edits going forward.We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.Regards,yaswap. |