| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 146429982 by kavig @ 2024-01-19 06:29 | 1 | 2024-01-22 06:28 | Saikat Maiti ♦24 | Hi kavig, thank you for your contribution to the OpenStreetMap. Please check the configuration near https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11530067525. Based on this junction configuration, anyone driving on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1240936197 can never reach https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2... |
| 145098949 by kavig @ 2023-12-14 07:04 | 1 | 2023-12-29 15:16 | Ti_Ru ♦20 | HiThis is an arterial road and was never closed for metro work. Won't you even spare a minute to verify before you make a change. This kind of vandalism is very wrong and unacceptable. Seeing a lot of this kind of maniacal edits from Swiggy. |
| 138601635 by kavig @ 2023-07-17 04:10 | 1 | 2023-07-17 05:08 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190085899 is not clearly visible from the imagery specified. If you are using local knowledge or GPS trace information can you add that as source. |
| 2 | 2023-07-17 09:14 | kavig | Thanks for highlighting this, our internal GPS traces (this cannot be shared) were leading to underground parking hence it was created, we are going to revert this edit. | |
| 3 | 2023-07-19 07:58 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | Can you update with URL of the changeset that reverted this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138601635 | |
| 4 | 2023-07-19 09:12 | kavig | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138601635 |