| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134305554 by khajurun @ 2023-03-30 13:39 | 1 | 2023-03-30 15:25 | Glassman ♦5,275 | This area is under construction. There is not parking anymore except for construction workers. Unfortunately the latest imagery doesn't so the construction. Please revert your edit. |
| 2 | 2023-03-31 11:25 | khajurun | Hi Glassman,Thank you for looking into my changeset and providing us with the information about the construction, we have reverted the changes here is the changeset 134340685 . Let us know if any other changes need to be made.Regards,khajurun | |
| 134159757 by khajurun @ 2023-03-27 05:52 | 1 | 2023-03-27 22:26 | skyper ♦871 | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131868190 |
| 2 | 2023-03-28 04:49 | khajurun | Hi Skyper,Going forward, I will ensure that I am mentioning the correct sources used for making the edits. Thank you for your suggestion. Always happy to learn from the community.Regards,khajurun | |
| 131868190 by khajurun @ 2023-01-30 08:10 | 1 | 2023-03-23 16:26 | skyper ♦871 | Hello khajurun,please, take a closer look at the images. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168141076 is not oneway but the exist from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121752656 to Handelstraße is prohibited.Regards skyper |
| 2 | 2023-03-27 06:09 | khajurun | Hi skyper,Thank you for reviewing our changeset and flagging out the issue. It's an honest mistake from our end. I have made the necessary changes in the changeset. I have reverted my edit and since we don't have enough evidence, I am refraining from editing https://www.openstreetmap.org... | |
| 3 | 2023-03-27 22:33 | skyper ♦871 | Hello khajurun,thanks for your change. Next time please mention the CSs which you correct in the commit message or the source. I did it in a comment now (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134159757).I still wonder about the source as in both CSs, this one and the fix, you have mentioned ... | |
| 4 | 2023-03-28 04:44 | khajurun | Hello Skyper,Apologies for missing out on mentioning the new changeset. I will follow your suggestion going further and will make sure to give the correct sources used. Thank you once again and looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,khajurun | |
| 133627559 by khajurun @ 2023-03-13 14:16 | 1 | 2023-03-13 22:46 | map per ♦1,305 | Hallo khajurun,whats the source for your edit? As far as I know there is no streetlevel imagery available in this area.Thanks and best regardsmap per |
| 2 | 2023-03-21 07:54 | rmksowmw ♦4 | Hi,The edit was made using Bing imagery, where a fish bone parking is clearly visible.The directions were made according to the fishbone structure, kindly let us know if any changes need to be made.Regards,rmksowmw. | |
| 3 | 2023-03-22 11:12 | map per ♦1,305 | Ok, thanks.Please don't add the tag "source=streetlevel imagery" to a changeset (see (1)) if you didn't use aerial imagerty(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133627559 | |
| 4 | 2023-03-22 11:19 | map per ♦1,305 | And I don't think that the fishbone structure is evidence enouth for a road being a oneway road. It's rather an indication.And it isn't a good idea to do armchair mapping (2) based on indications. You should only add data to the OSM database when you are certain the data is correct.... | |
| 5 | 2023-03-22 17:46 | deepikja ♦58 | Hi, Thank you for helping us with your insights on the sources to be updated for every changeset. We will surely take your suggestions on the addition of the correct sources into account while making the further edits.After reviewing all of the available aerial images, we notice that the parking... |