| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 127693719 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-17 20:59 | 1 | 2024-10-22 07:58 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | do you have an idea why mapillary image in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3580650395/history is broken? |
| 127814304 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-20 01:06 | 1 | 2023-08-12 17:19 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Please don't duplicate charging stations. The node is for a group of chargers, not individual dispensers. I've removed the duplicates leaving one as it should be. |
| 2 | 2023-08-12 18:52 | Noen ♦316 | This changeset does as the changeset comment suggest, and only touch the «mapillary» tag. Gazer75's message should be directed to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116591570 | |
| 3 | 2023-08-12 19:01 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Of course, my bad... I find it hard to figure out who made the actual error. | |
| 127443700 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-13 03:09 | 1 | 2022-12-27 12:28 | Harel M ♦60 | The image left behind is not a valid link and it leads to no where.Can you please remove these invalid images? There are about 50 of those in different places in Israel. |
| 127565911 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-15 11:11 | 1 | 2022-12-21 20:28 | O Fim ♦20 | Não entendi o porque da mudança do link Mapillary pode explicar? |
| 127696877 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-17 22:56 | 1 | 2022-12-10 22:52 | andi9876 ♦295 | Hi.All Mapillary image links doesn't works.What can do?https://images.mapillary.com/vA3dj_aDGkyoWdi98jx69A/thumb-2048.jpg |
| 127789285 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-19 15:08 | 1 | 2022-10-19 22:30 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodaÅ‚eÅ› lub zmodyfikowaÅ‚eÅ› adres, który jest niepeÅ‚ny lub bÅ‚Ä™dny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porzÄ... |
| 127767897 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-19 08:57 | 1 | 2022-10-19 22:30 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodaÅ‚eÅ› lub zmodyfikowaÅ‚eÅ› adres, który jest niepeÅ‚ny lub bÅ‚Ä™dny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porzÄ... |
| 127352249 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-11 10:53 | 1 | 2022-10-11 12:28 | Marc_ch ♦277 | Hello,Thank you very much for the update.But could you provide me with the link to the discussion about this mass edition?drowning out the history with a per-object changeset is horrible and I highly doubt there was any agreement to do it that wayRegars,Marc |
| 2 | 2022-10-11 12:36 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hello Marc,The discussion on the mailing list is linked from the Wiki (I don't have it to hand right now).There was no input on how to accurately merge changes.The reason you see an per-object changeset is that there are quite a lot of objects with a unique id and the bot starts at ... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-12 05:56 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hello Marc,also, to add insult to injury, I have not found any pattern at to how they might habe been group geographically. So, if a CS contained, say, 50 objects, they might have been all over the globe resulting in CSs with large bounding boxes, something that's also detested by the OSM c... | |
| 4 | 2022-10-17 20:31 | Marc_ch ♦277 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Kmpoppe/Automated_Edits/Mapillary_Updatesaid A discussion on Tagging-ML lead to the vague idea that an automated would be in order.I read the whole thread.it's neither a request for an automated edit (that should be in talk ml and someone poste... | |
| 5 | 2022-10-18 06:14 | kmpoppe ♦97 | I honestly don't know how to respond to this. The only sensible idea on how to do this the next time came from the community post I made https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/begin-of-automated-edit-for-mapillary-key/3426/6.Me personally, I wouldn't use is_in because, as the wiki state... | |
| 127422458 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-12 15:13 | 1 | 2022-10-13 11:58 | maraf24 ♦5,269 | HelloThis edit left the image tag pointing to mapillary untouched.What should be done with it? |
| 2 | 2022-10-15 14:57 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hi maraf24,the user that created this object has the habit of adding the image URL - I guess there are quite a few that have mapillary images that don't work any longer.Whenever the "main" edit is done, I will ask everyone how the images tag shall be handled, thanks for remind... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-15 21:44 | maraf24 ♦5,269 | So the question is why didn't you changed image tag too?This one is working: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=843808052886916The node author has habit of adding image url because he is using openpoimap which shows the image of clicked poi. | |
| 4 | 2022-10-16 07:31 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hi,first of all I didn't "just" change that too, because it wasn't part of the discussion around this automated edit. There have been lots of discussions around the edit in the first place - whether to do it or not - and I am NOT going to simply change that without a proper c... | |
| 127480684 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-13 16:52 | 1 | 2022-10-13 17:10 | archie ♦1,304 | Hi, why link to your wikipage via descripiton-tag? The description-tag is not intended for this sort of information. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description) |
| 2 | 2022-10-13 17:15 | archie ♦1,304 | Oh, sorry, forget about it. It's in the meta-tagging! | |
| 127451922 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-13 07:17 | 1 | 2022-10-13 09:39 | GPar ♦44 | Hi, this pillar dosn't exist. Seem to be confused with a red new jersey .Pls check the script ...tks https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.202017&lng=7.6215050999984&z=17&pKey=823190782033515&focus=photo&dateTo=2022-10-13&dateFrom=2022-09-01&x=0.824504184769928... |
| 2 | 2022-10-13 09:50 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hi,you might be right, but there is nothing wrong with the script.The script does exactly one thing: Change the ID of the "mapillary" key from the old to the new ID. Somebody mistook the red thingy for a fire_hydrant and mapped it according to the picture (alas, it's unwise to... | |
| 127387501 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-12 01:18 | 1 | 2022-10-13 09:46 | GPar ♦44 | also this camera dosen't exist. There are 2 cameras in the opposite site of roundabout already mapped , even if not well placed. |
| 127104118 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-06 13:31 | 1 | 2022-10-10 07:02 | GPar ♦44 | This traffic light doesnt exist |
| 2 | 2022-10-10 07:11 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hi GPar, thanks for pointing this out.In the mapillary image from 2020, where this node was changed to a traffic light (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=642385810051599) there's still a traffic light to be seen, in photo from 2021 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=930665197502104) it lo... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-10 08:32 | GPar ♦44 | Hi Kmpoppe,yes I'm a local...there's one traffic light only on intersection with "via Ceretta inferiore" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/999168924#map=19/45.20129/7.62278 . And it's same showed on mapillary , in fact you can see that just few pictures before on "... | |
| 127268533 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-09 21:10 | 1 | 2022-10-10 07:01 | GPar ♦44 | This traffic light doesnt exist |
| 127178321 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-08 01:10 | 1 | 2022-10-08 01:46 | DP24PH ♦418 | Thank you very much for updating our Mapillary ID from v3 to v4, and upon checking, no issues were found.Note: Begin #WashingtonPlacePH x #MapillaryUpdateDP24 |
| 126982553 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-04 09:11 | 1 | 2022-10-04 17:03 | cxc ♦37 | please read this :https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Photo_linking |
| 2 | 2022-10-05 05:19 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Good morning,I don't see what you want to tell me with linking the wiki article.The article clearly shows that the key in question is supposed to have mapillary's image ID. This ID is now numerical instead of alpha-numerical, which this script changed.Please elaborate what your... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-05 13:16 | cxc ♦37 | I didn't know it had been changed.Regards |