| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90694200 by ksnghr @ 2020-09-10 10:14 | 1 | 2020-09-16 01:34 | naveenpf ♦714 | Welcome to OSM India.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IndiaTo join OSM India Telegram click on.https://t.me/OSMIndia --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90694200 |
| 74270490 by ksnghr @ 2019-09-09 15:34 | 1 | 2019-09-10 13:06 | mvexel ♦144 | Hi, Maxar Standard imagery does not show these roads as completed yet, if you have another source please specify it in the changeset tags, or mark the road as construction. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 14:25 | ksnghr | Hi Mvexel,I made the edit using latest Digital Globe imageries and missed mentioning it the changeset. We have clear imageries that the roads are well built and hence reverting it back to residential road (Changeset # - 74314475). Thanks for your update. Will definitely mention the source in the... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 18:32 | mvexel ♦144 | I looked at both regular and Maxar Premium but neither shows the roads as completed. Could you please share a screenshot that shows the roads are completed and accessible to the public? | |
| 4 | 2019-09-11 01:00 | freebeer ♦1,598 | martijn, do you have a way to determine the ages of the imageries you view? i'd expect a lag of months before the imageries open to osm go live for processing.except sentinel-2, have you checked that?i'm betting my last quatloos from the phrasing of the response this is amazon.\... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-11 13:06 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Mvexel,We have the latest imagery from July 2019. As freebeer suggested, there is a lag in the latest imageries being made available in OSM. Let me know in case you need any updates.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 6 | 2019-09-11 16:29 | mvexel ♦144 | This is what I see with publicly available imagery:* [Maxar Premium](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/mZ6S6Yr9pK8ePHG)* [Maxar Standard](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/xi4nPcjQAcEtdF7)* [Bing](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/MwNgcNLazJRgrqC)None of these images show the road as completed. My point is, unl... | |
| 7 | 2019-09-11 17:43 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Mvexel,We have the private stack of latest imageries from DigitalGlobe. The imagery is from July 2019 which clearly suggests that the construction are complete. If there are any local updates much recent from you, we will definitely go ahead revert the changes, Let me know your suggestion.\... | |
| 8 | 2019-09-11 20:59 | mvexel ♦144 | I see, so this is imagery that is not available to regular OSM mappers. Please understand that this makes it hard for the community to check your edits. It would help if you could be very specific in attributing your sources in the changeset comments, so the community at least is aware that you have... | |
| 9 | 2019-09-12 15:10 | @kevin_bullock ♦6 | Maxar (DigitalGlobe) licenses imagery to many organizations around the world. It might be worth coming up with a metadata tag convention to indicate that. In this case, KSNGHR has a license to fresh Maxar imagery that most OSMers don't have access too. I like still tagging Maxar but maybe we ne... | |
| 10 | 2019-09-12 15:14 | @kevin_bullock ♦6 | i.e. the imagery used was not literally the "Maxar Standard Imagery (Beta)", rather a newer vintage of Maxar imagery. | |
| 11 | 2019-09-12 15:29 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Mvexel, Kevin,Our editors generally tag the cases with "Source:Digital Globe". This editor has however missed doing it. I would definitely go ahead advise the editor to be careful and add the same. It does not reflect in the changeset but in the Way ID. Example where our editor used... | |
| 12 | 2019-09-12 17:37 | mvexel ♦144 | Ganesh -- source=Digital Globe is too generic to be useful. The entire OSM community has access to DG / Maxar imagery. As Kevin said, it would be useful to define some metadata that indicates that this is newer / private imagery that the general community does not (yet) has access to. Lacking that, ... | |
| 13 | 2019-09-12 17:45 | gseethar ♦67 | True. Makes sense. I will definitely take this up and deep dive if there are any specific patterns that is being followed in OSM and get back to you in a day or two. Thanks a lot Mvexel, Kevin for your inputs.Best regards,Ganesh | |
| 14 | 2019-09-13 17:06 | freebeer ♦1,598 | martijn, ganesh, i take it as a given that all amazon edits are powered by non-public gps traces, even though it's not stated explicitly here. it's not transparent to an arbitrary osm mapper-checker and probably should be stated explicitly.then again, the last edits i've made usi... | |
| 74265431 by ksnghr @ 2019-09-09 13:58 | 1 | 2019-09-09 15:54 | user_5359 ♦19,605 | Hello! Please check the relation https://www.osm.org/relation/10019793, you miss the role "from". |
| 2 | 2019-09-11 15:24 | ksnghr | Hi George,Thanks for your response. Apologies for the error. I've corrected the access under changeset #Regards,ksnghr --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74265431 |