| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89012909 by kurugunk @ 2020-08-06 05:23 | 1 | 2021-07-21 12:59 | DUGA ♦549 | I'm not sure if your company requires you to map sidewalks or not. I don't think it is a thing with high priority. However, when mapping cosmetic objects like this, please check your imagery carefully as it may introduce more problem. |
| 2 | 2021-07-22 09:27 | kurugunk | Hi,Thanks for reviewing my changeset and for your inputs. We are currently not mapping paths/sidewalks in OSM, I initially added it as a service road. Which was an error from my end, when I realized my error instead deleting the data I have converted it into a path for pedestrians. Please let me... | |
| 85174322 by kurugunk @ 2020-05-14 04:46 | 1 | 2020-05-15 17:19 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,139 | Pretty incomplete and very, very obviously a public school. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85174322 |
| 2 | 2020-05-18 05:32 | kurugunk | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. According to our understanding, though school is publicly owned and maintained, it shouldn't be accessed by all the public due to child safety concerns. The access needs to be open for parents, children, school staff and deliveries who will have all the nec... | |
| 81497827 by kurugunk @ 2020-02-26 10:28 | 1 | 2020-02-26 16:06 | Allison P ♦1,140 | Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Please try to minimise the bounding box of your changesets by uploading before moving to a new area. This changeset shows up when looking for changes in Idaho or Wyoming and a host of other states, making it harder to view edits to the area. If you have a... |
| 2 | 2020-02-27 06:21 | kurugunk | Hi, Thanks for your response. This usually happens when iD editor doesn't respond while editing and we refresh the web-page. I was unaware of the change being saved. As suggested by you I shall follow restricting it to an area and avoid such long edits.Regards,kurugunk. | |
| 80768742 by kurugunk @ 2020-02-10 01:49 | 1 | 2020-02-10 14:40 | aweech ♦369 | Hi, what's your source for adding `access=private` to this way? You listed streetlevel imagery, but none of the publicly available ones that I could find have images for this area. |
| 2 | 2020-02-11 03:32 | kurugunk | Hi Aweech,Thanks for your response. OSM by default consumes the sources that I've verified for my edit. The private tag that I've added is because the road appears to be a driveway leading to an entity. Please let me know if that is inappropriate.Looking forward to learning from you.... | |
| 72588033 by kurugunk @ 2019-07-24 07:37 | 1 | 2019-07-28 08:14 | freebeer ♦1,598 | hello again amazon team - i am almost starting to recognise your mappers by how they work without any username additions...i just wrote in another comment, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72605960 , how that was the first flagged amazon edit i saw this morning - here is another similar c... |
| 2 | 2019-07-30 01:57 | freebeer ♦1,598 | re-visiting, i note now the pair of nodes at one intermediate location is included over three slots describing the way. (out of the ascending order one expects to see as assigned by the osm servers)this is, as i now expect, flagged for this reason as a self-intersecting part of the way.i sh... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-02 11:42 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,I have made the change as per your suggestion and we are also looking for patterns in the same.Regards,Ganesh |