| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84514672 by madnikhi @ 2020-05-02 10:17 | 1 | 2023-01-30 08:29 | walking_daily ♦3 | Hi, this is an interesting path. I'm not sure that it's the route of the Llangollen round though. I think the route is slightly to the East of this path, using the public footpath in Carrog forest. I've seen markers for the round heading that way. Maybe the route has varied over time?... |
| 2 | 2023-01-31 09:56 | achsaw ♦12 | Hi walking_daily,Thank You for looking into the changeset. We have made the service road using the available resources. Don't have enough proof like street view or drivers feedback to validate the path and make changes. Thanks again, looking forward to learn more.Regards,achsaw | |
| 110917117 by madnikhi @ 2021-09-08 12:23 | 1 | 2021-09-09 07:11 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo madnikhi,dahttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980922995/historyfehlt noch einaccess=privatDorthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9073790914/historysoll ein Tor sein. Ich kann auf keinem der Luftbilder dort ein Tor sehen.Grüße |
| 2 | 2021-09-10 11:03 | madnikhi | Hello PT-53, Thanks for getting back to me. I have not added access=private as the driveways leads to other unknown entities. However, I have changed the access tag as per your suggestion. About the gate, I could see a barrier in Bing aerial imagery. Please let me know if there are any furthe... | |
| 3 | 2021-09-10 11:15 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Das ist vielleicht eine Wasserrinne im Boden, aber keine Schranke !Grüße | |
| 4 | 2021-09-10 12:06 | madnikhi | Hi PT-53, Thanks for checking into my edits. I have made the suggested changes as a part of changeset(111021108). Happy to learn from you. Regards,madnikhi | |
| 109918555 by madnikhi @ 2021-08-19 08:50 | 1 | 2021-08-20 08:33 | SafetyIng ♦349 | How could be a road, that leads to a human settlement, a "track"? Please chekc the definition on the wiki! And correct these here. |
| 2 | 2021-08-20 11:13 | madnikhi | Hello SafetyIng, Thanks for checking this. I have now changed the geometry as per aerial imagery. Kindly look into the changeset(109981716) with modifications and please let me know if there is any miss from my end. Regards,madnikhi | |
| 109854115 by madnikhi @ 2021-08-18 07:23 | 1 | 2021-08-18 11:40 | SafetyIng ♦349 | How could be this road a hw=track?Please look at the wiki when and when not to use hw=track. |
| 2 | 2021-08-20 11:10 | madnikhi | Hello SafetyIng,Thanks for checking this. I have now changed the highway classification that suits the vicinity. Kindly look into the changeset (109981570 )with modifications and please let me know if there is any miss from my end. Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107482131 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-06 08:37 | 1 | 2021-07-06 12:14 | SafetyIng ♦349 | Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-08 06:54 | madnikhi | Hello SaftetyIng, Thanks for bringing up this to me. It is a genuine miss from my end. I have now changed the tag to driveway. Please have a look into the changeset (107608918) with suggested modifications. Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107233861 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 02:12 | 1 | 2021-07-02 19:18 | ndm ♦889 | Redrawing - I think you've put the road through a building (on Bing). |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 06:32 | madnikhi | Hi ndm, Apologies for the genuine miss from my end. The building was quite not clear from the aerial imagery and I mistook it to be a heavy vehicle as there is no photo overlay. Thanks for correcting my edit. Good day!Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107236364 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 04:13 | 1 | 2021-07-01 07:43 | SafetyIng ♦349 | Ich würde gerne mal an "service=driveway" erinnern.Und wie kann ein parking_aisle existieren, ohne dass dort ein Parkplatz ist? |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 12:18 | madnikhi | Hi Safetying, Apologies for the misinterpretation of the driveway here. I have now changed the highway tag to driveway. About the parking_aisle, I have added it as there seems to be a parking lot visible in Bing and Esri imagery. Please let me know your inputs regarding the parking_aisle. Happy to... | |
| 107243872 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 07:13 | 1 | 2021-07-01 09:14 | SafetyIng ♦349 | I would remind to service=driveway |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:49 | madnikhi | Hi, I have not added service=driveway, as the segment leads to multiple entities. Thanks for the feedback, I have added service=driveway as suggested. Please find the changeset with modifications. Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107240048 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 05:51 | 1 | 2021-07-01 09:07 | SafetyIng ♦349 | I would remind to service=driveway |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:48 | madnikhi | Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for looking into my edits. I have now added highway=service as suggested. Please find the changeset with modifications (107299344). Happy to learn from you. Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107240703 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 06:04 | 1 | 2021-07-01 09:09 | SafetyIng ♦349 | I would remind to service=driveway |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:47 | madnikhi | Hi SafetyIng, Apologies for the inconvenience. I have now added service=driveway as per the suggestion. Thanks for the feedback.Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107241387 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 06:18 | 1 | 2021-07-01 09:07 | SafetyIng ♦349 | I would remind to service=driveway |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:46 | madnikhi | Hello SafetyIng, Apologies for this genuine miss from my end. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Thanks for looking into my edits. Happy to learn from you. Regards, madnikhi | |
| 107237740 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 04:53 | 1 | 2021-07-01 08:59 | SafetyIng ♦349 | Way 959970703 is no residential hw. This is a private way (Access via walkway with lowered kerb) - so this is more a driveway |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:44 | madnikhi | Hello, Sorry for the inconvenience. I have now changed the highway classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset ( 107299134) with changes made. Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107238672 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 05:18 | 1 | 2021-07-01 08:53 | SafetyIng ♦349 | I would remind to serive=driveway |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:43 | madnikhi | Hi SafetyIng, Very sorry for the inconvenience. I have now modified the highway tag to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107299060) with suggested modifications. Happy to learn from you. Good day!Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107239042 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 05:27 | 1 | 2021-07-01 08:50 | SafetyIng ♦349 | I would remind to service=driveway |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:41 | madnikhi | Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for looking into my edits. I have now added highway=service as suggested. Please find the changeset with modifications (107298990). Happy to learn from you. Regards, madnikhi | |
| 107237252 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 04:40 | 1 | 2021-07-01 08:05 | SafetyIng ♦349 | Do you know amenity=driveway? |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:39 | madnikhi | Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for checking my edits. I have added service=driveway tag as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107298892) with suggested modifications. Regards, madnikhi | |
| 107237417 by madnikhi @ 2021-07-01 04:44 | 1 | 2021-07-01 07:44 | SafetyIng ♦349 | driveway? |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 08:37 | madnikhi | Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for looking into my edits. I have now added highway=service as suggested. Please find the changeset with modifications (107298782). Happy to learn from you. Regards,madnikhi | |
| 107054827 by madnikhi @ 2021-06-28 01:43 | 1 | 2021-06-28 07:57 | SafetyIng ♦349 | Is this realy a alley? Not more a driveway? |
| 2 | 2021-06-29 09:48 | madnikhi | Hello Safetying,I have added service=alley, as the parent segment is an alley. I was reluctant to change the parent segment to driveway as I am not aware of local conditions. Please provide me your inputs on changing the way IDs (958721146) and (71934808) to a driveway. Always happy to l... | |
| 82419544 by madnikhi @ 2020-03-20 07:17 | 1 | 2020-04-11 18:08 | tomhukins ♦245 | What's the reason for this change? Given that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222071788 is a private track and it's the only way of reaching these two tracks, why does it make sense to remove "access=private" from them both? |
| 2 | 2020-04-13 10:10 | madnikhi | Thanks for your time for checking our edits. We are unsure of addition of access tags without any evidence, hence deleted it. However, we are continuously working to improve our editing quality in addition of access tags. we are enhancing our editing etiquette from the community feedback. Please fin... | |
| 3 | 2020-04-14 09:46 | tomhukins ♦245 | Thank you. I think it's important to look at the surrounding map whenever you make your edits. In this case it seems strange to have a non-private track only reachable by a private track, so I'm pleased you have fixed this. Also, there's no need to create a new way when you could e... | |
| 78143052 by madnikhi @ 2019-12-09 10:07 | 1 | 2019-12-09 10:37 | johnmcr ♦1 | This road would be better discribed as a service road, it's the drive way to large house. Private access only. Bing imagery is way out of date. |
| 2 | 2019-12-10 06:27 | madnikhi | Hi johnmcr,Thanks for looking into my edit. Made the changes as per the suggestion given. Please refer the changeset (78187729) for the modifications done. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from local community.Regards,madnikhi. |