| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72236232 by manikyal @ 2019-07-14 15:44 | 1 | 2019-07-14 16:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Thanks |
| 71364396 by manikyal @ 2019-06-18 12:36 | 1 | 2019-07-05 15:56 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,It looks like your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28668786/history has the same problem as previously discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71404029 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?Best... |
| 2 | 2019-07-06 09:12 | manikyal | Hi Andy,thanks for looking into my edits. Our team is working on reverting all the changes that we made on motor_vehicle access tags. Please give us a weeks time for fixing it. Regards,manikyal | |
| 3 | 2019-07-06 09:13 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Thanks - no problem. | |
| 71404029 by manikyal @ 2019-06-19 14:21 | 1 | 2019-06-28 12:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,Can you please explain why you added the tag "motor_vehicle=yes" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35049765 please? I'm familiar with the area and it really doesn't look like it is.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-07-01 10:24 | manikyal | Hi Andy,With reference to the motor vehicles parked in the satellite imagery added motor_vehicle access tag to these road. But as per community request reverting my changes. Do let me know if you have any further questions. change set number:71778713regards,manikyal | |
| 3 | 2019-07-01 10:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 67658449 by manikyal @ 2019-02-28 17:25 | 1 | 2019-02-28 19:56 | ndm ♦889 | This was well-aligned using ESRI clarity - I'll revert |
| 2 | 2019-03-05 06:01 | jguthula ♦65 | Thanks for looking into this ndm. How did you identify that Esri World Imagery is not aligned properly to real world? If there is an easier way I would love to learn and implement that into our mapping process as well.Regards,Jothirnadh | |
| 3 | 2019-03-05 20:40 | ndm ♦889 | ESRI Clarity is the same as the original Bing imagery (which is now changed) a lot of original tracing was done from first Bing - so it has the benefit of consistency. This is documented on the Bristol page on the wiki -- maybe elsewhere.Plus, if you move the roads you probably need to move the ... | |
| 4 | 2019-03-05 20:41 | ndm ♦889 | Bah, last para should be:If you want a definitive answer you need to download GPX tracks and move the imagery offset to match them -- the school doesn't have such tracks, but hopefully a nearby crossroads or similar does. Looking quickly in JOSM ESRI clarity seems a good match - ESRI is clo... | |
| 5 | 2019-03-07 13:27 | jguthula ♦65 | Thanks ndm, your inputs are valuable. We will also do a research on this and share our findings as well. | |
| 66632420 by manikyal @ 2019-01-25 13:46 | 1 | 2019-02-27 15:36 | Gwenj ♦24 | Hello,Please avoid modifying roads only from aerial views.This area is under heavy modifications for months and I have declassified this road precisely because it does not exist anymore.Aerial views are way out of date.Also, be careful with using (Google ?) Street View as a source, as it... |
| 2 | 2019-02-28 14:37 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi Gwenaël,Thanks for looking into this edit. We identified the aerial imagery in this region to be recent (2017+) and also didn't find the use of "disused:highway" tag in the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:) so considered it to be an edit made by m... | |
| 3 | 2019-02-28 15:15 | Gwenj ♦24 | Hello,Thanks for the comment.Actually the works have begin in 2018 and I don’t think there is any aerial view as recent as this (except Mapillary ?)I don’t have much time to work on this area but road modifications are planned at least to the year 2020, it will change a lot :-) and... | |
| 4 | 2019-02-28 18:07 | jguthula ♦65 | Sure, will make a note of your inputs. Thanks again.Happy Mapping!Regards,Jothirnadh |