| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 166083139 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-05-10 19:15 | 1 | 2025-05-10 19:16 | marczoutendijk | "south" should be "east" |
| 162573775 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-02-16 14:49 | 1 | 2025-02-16 15:09 | marczoutendijk | Zie ook: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162572704#map=18/52.189104/5.444364 |
| 162572704 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-02-16 14:22 | 1 | 2025-02-16 14:30 | marczoutendijk | Deze wijzigingen hebben vooral betrekking op de situatie die is ontstaan na het verplaatsen van de parkeerplaats langs de Nijkerkerstraat. De gebiedsbeheerder heeft een aantal paden parallel aan de Nijkerkerstraat, vanaf het bos achter huisnummer 26 en richting het noorden, ontoegankelijk gemaakt g... |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 14:34 | marczoutendijk | Laakespad = Laaksepad! | |
| 3 | 2025-02-16 14:36 | marczoutendijk | Op OSM stond de naam van het pad foutief. Gecorrigeerd naar Laaksepad. | |
| 162509253 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-02-14 16:14 | 1 | 2025-02-14 16:16 | marczoutendijk | Also including highways and solar panels. |
| 161704121 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-01-24 09:30 | 1 | 2025-01-24 09:31 | marczoutendijk | This is Landuse west of Cortes de Baza! |
| 160795661 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-12-30 14:53 | 1 | 2024-12-30 18:48 | Thierry1030 ♦248 | iemand van Domaine l'Ecuriel beweert dat dit pad niet bestaat > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4569351graag uw kijk op de zaak ... :-) |
| 2 | 2024-12-30 20:05 | marczoutendijk | Het pad bestaat, maar is privé.De DWG is in contact met de eigenaar.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 3 | 2025-01-14 16:43 | marczoutendijk | Na hernieuwd contact met Domaine l'Ecuriel en overleg van foto's is besloten het pad (direct langs het Domaine) met access=no aan te merken. Wandelaars kunnen het pad direct langs de Ourthe vrij gebruiken.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 159968637 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-12-05 18:45 | 1 | 2024-12-05 19:14 | Tatfahren ♦278 | It looks like amenity=fuel was already set before your edit, you just changed the building value to "yes".Which building value should be used to specify that it is a fuel station building (in the case it's not longer used as one, (in the one you changed it's most likely a roo... |
| 2 | 2024-12-05 19:20 | marczoutendijk | Thanks for your reply.I changed a lot of the same error, and sometimes the amenity=fuel was indeed already set.I just wanted to show that building=fuel_station is not correct (it's not a valid entry in the wiki) and that it always needs the company of the amenity=fuel, next to the building=... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-05 20:05 | Tatfahren ♦278 | Because you say "building=fuel_station" is not correct, how would you tag a fuel station building, that is not longer in service, so "amenity=fuel" can't be used to mark it.I found a video of some guy who converted a old fuel station into a house, where he can live. ht... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-05 20:20 | marczoutendijk | disused:amenity=fuelis all that is needed for such objects.See this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefixWhat I try to change is wrong spelling of tags or wrong use.I cannot see if something is not in use anymore, but therefor we need local mappers (but with the right tool... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-05 21:06 | Tatfahren ♦278 | I think that means that the wiki page for "building=yes" should be updated, that it also counts as a specified type, if the building type can be taken by reading other tags, also such that uses any of all of those different lifecycle prefix prefixes.Today the wiki site says "used ... | |
| 159783679 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:25 | 1 | 2024-12-05 19:08 | marczoutendijk | See:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 |
| 159783671 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:24 | 1 | 2024-12-05 19:08 | marczoutendijk | See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 |
| 159783663 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:24 | 1 | 2024-12-05 19:08 | marczoutendijk | see: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 |
| 159783656 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:24 | 1 | 2024-12-05 19:08 | marczoutendijk | See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 |
| 159844965 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-12-02 14:13 | 1 | 2024-12-02 14:14 | marczoutendijk | fixed: building=yes |
| 159783643 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:23 | 1 | 2024-12-01 08:34 | flohoff ♦2,368 | Hi,i dont think all your changes are correct.People tagging buildings as pavillon when they have non fixed roofs - as a pavillon.The osm wiki using "pavilion" describes a completely different building type.So its not a typo but a different meaning.Could you point me to th... |
| 2 | 2024-12-01 12:13 | marczoutendijk | I assumed that people using "pavillon" instead of "pavilion" simply made a typing mistake.E.g. using "railway_staton" deliberately to describe something different then a "railway_station" is an example of bad practice in my opinion.And btw. it wasn'... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-01 12:19 | marczoutendijk | I have added a page to the wiki to describe my action.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:building%3Dpavilion#Typing_error_with_name | |
| 4 | 2024-12-01 13:46 | flohoff ♦2,368 | I disagree on this "correction". "pavilion" as a building type is pretty uncommon in Germany, and would mostly associated with sports. It is much more common to name Kiosk type buildings in parks as "pavillon", or building structures without a fixed roof - tent ... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-01 13:50 | flohoff ♦2,368 | I created a community forum thread to get some light into this and other opinions:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 | |
| 6 | 2024-12-01 14:08 | R0bst3r ♦1,094 | @marczoutendijk, your misunderstanding ist described at the bottom of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dpavilion | |
| 7 | 2024-12-01 16:32 | marczoutendijk | If one searches in the OSM wiki for "pavillon", you are being asked: do you mean "pavilion"?If one searches in the OSM wiki for "pavillion", you are being asked: do you mean "pavilion"?If (and it might be true) that there is an other type of building, name... | |
| 159717700 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-28 19:51 | 1 | 2024-11-28 22:12 | jb54osm ♦179 | Dag Marc,Dat was een 'leuke' vertikking 🥴.Groetjes,Jan |
| 67250996 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-16 11:02 | 1 | 2019-02-16 11:10 | marczoutendijk | La "highway=milestone" tag debe estar conectada a la propia carretera. He añadido un "fixme" para explicar eso.¡Yo reparé algunas, pero es demasiado trabajo hacerlas todas!Además, "pk=*" ya no es compatible y debería (podría)... |
| 2 | 2024-11-07 06:19 | kapazao ♦911 | I think we could remove fixme and highway:position tags in these elements.I do not understand what highway:position does nor I have seen any documentation about this tag.We can read in wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=milestone): "...the node can be placed either dire... | |
| 158825587 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-06 16:32 | 1 | 2024-11-06 16:33 | marczoutendijk | Should be v17. |
| 157641048 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-10-08 18:34 | 1 | 2024-10-08 18:34 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154650054, 154650122, 154650157, 156273260, 156273359, 157383710, 157384651, 157385342, 157385605, 157386063, 157386195, 157386259, 157386331, 157387692, 157388008, 157388010, 157424822, 157425254, 157425609, 157425751, 157425834, 157426101... |
| 155606656 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-08-22 13:38 | 1 | 2024-08-22 14:16 | marczoutendijk | Date should be 31-12-2021 (see source) |
| 154379652 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-07-25 07:37 | 1 | 2024-07-25 07:38 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154126718, 154126854, 154126911, 154127221, 154127270, 154127469, 154127550, 154127680, 154127758, 154127803, 154128000, 154128209, 154128621, 154128715, 154129042, 154129070, 154133305, 154133428, 154133631, 154168594, 154168699, 154168734... |
| 154379345 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-07-25 07:28 | 1 | 2024-07-25 07:29 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154126718, 154126854, 154126911, 154127221, 154127270, 154127469, 154127550, 154127680, 154127758, 154127803, 154128000, 154128209, 154128621, 154128715, 154129042, 154129070, 154133305, 154133428, 154133631, 154168594, 154168699, 154168734... |
| 154340586 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-07-24 09:30 | 1 | 2024-07-24 09:30 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154126718, 154126854, 154126911, 154127221, 154127270, 154127469, 154127550, 154127680, 154127758, 154127803, 154128000, 154128209, 154128621, 154128715, 154129042, 154129070, 154133305, 154133428, 154133631. |
| 153859194 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-07-12 14:42 | 1 | 2024-07-12 14:49 | marczoutendijk | Should be (v3) |
| 152347341 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-06-06 19:37 | 1 | 2024-06-06 19:39 | marczoutendijk | Ik heb de weg over deze brug tijdelijk op construction gezet. Ik hou in de gaten hoelang het gaat duren. |
| 2 | 2024-06-07 08:52 | dvdhoven ♦924 | Ik heb bicycle=no vervangen door access=no anders heb ik een permanente foutmelding in knooppuntnet.En naar mijn idee kan niemand voorlopig over de brug, dus access=no is - naar mijn idee - ook toepasselijk.Vriendelijke groeten,Dick van den Hoven | |
| 3 | 2024-06-07 18:45 | marczoutendijk | Uitstekende oplossing Dick! | |
| 4 | 2024-07-02 19:41 | marczoutendijk | De brug wordt binnenkort provisorisch hersteld. Een datum daarvoor is nog niet bekend. Ik hou het in de gaten. | |
| 5 | 2024-07-06 06:10 | dvdhoven ♦924 | Nav een note vanmorgen en ook een notitie in de editor van FB heb ik de brug weer opengesteld De notitie van FB heb ik in de note tekst gekopieerd ipv de oorspronkelijke tekst | |
| 6 | 2024-07-07 12:00 | marczoutendijk | Dank Dick! | |
| 150346838 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-04-22 13:16 | 1 | 2024-04-23 07:30 | Op'tRad ♦41 | Architecture, ja, prima. De naam van de kunstenaar had ik ook al wel gevonden en ingevuld maar dat was dus weg. Ik zie wel dat bij De Beuk het comment weer is verschenen. Daar staat letterlijk, dat Holten en Rijssen hun naam te danken hebben aan omgewaaide bomen. Ook al staat dat op de website van h... |
| 150087920 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-04-16 14:23 | 1 | 2024-04-17 06:47 | Op'tRad ♦41 | Goedendag,Ik heb daar gisteren of eergisteren zelf net outer/inner aan geplakt, dus het zal nog wel niet renderen. Dus ik begrijp niet goed wat u toe hebt gevoegd, maar goed.Groet,Op'tRad |
| 2 | 2024-04-17 07:36 | marczoutendijk | Je had de eigenschappen van de MP niet op de MP zelf gezet maar op de outer. Dat is niet correct. En de inner was geen onderdeel van de MP, dus dat renderde ook niet.Je moet niet alleen een outer/inner ergens aan vast plakken, de hele structuur moet kloppen, en dat was dus niet het geval.https:/... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-17 07:40 | marczoutendijk | En ik zie ook dat je met iD werkt, en daarmee is het niet goed mogelijk om relaties en MP's goed te bewerken. | |
| 4 | 2024-04-17 07:51 | Op'tRad ♦41 | Dat dat lastig is, had ik al gemerkt ...Hebt u anders meer rechten dat u ziet wie wat bewerkt en zelfs waarmee? Ik zie dat van een ander niet | |
| 5 | 2024-04-17 08:28 | marczoutendijk | Met de JOSM editor kun je altijd zien wie wat heeft bewerkt.Je kunt echter (zonder JOSM) ook op de historie van een changeset/node/way/relatie klikken.Onder dit bericht zie je bv. staan: Wegen (1)en Relaties (2)als je dan op de daarin genoemde onderdelen klikt bv. op 1743719, v2dan zie... | |
| 6 | 2024-04-17 08:30 | marczoutendijk | Weet je dat er een uitgebreid forum is waar je met vragen terecht kunt?https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43 | |
| 7 | 2024-04-20 13:24 | Op'tRad ♦41 | Dat weet ik. Ik zal nog eens een keer kijken maar tot nu toe heb ik niet ontdekt hoe je met de iD editor kunt zien wie precies iets doet | |
| 149782709 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-04-09 15:29 | 1 | 2024-04-09 15:38 | marczoutendijk | East of Pozo Alcón is a better description of this changeset... |
| 148981812 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-03-21 19:22 | 1 | 2024-03-22 15:00 | marczoutendijk | The huge area in this edit is a mistake! |
| 148025711 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-02-28 19:29 | 1 | 2024-02-28 21:11 | marczoutendijk | Comment should read: Highways west of Castillejar! |
| 75426728 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-10-08 18:37 | 1 | 2024-02-11 12:16 | marczoutendijk | Resturtered = Restored |
| 144380701 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-11-23 18:59 | 1 | 2023-11-23 19:26 | NieWnen ♦1,072 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=long%20jumpIt's not an error, just an old tagging scheme. You should probably change the wiki page first.I see it's finally standardized:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dathletics#Field_events |
| 2 | 2023-11-23 19:37 | marczoutendijk | But has long_jump=pit ever been a serious choice? | |
| 3 | 2023-11-23 19:43 | NieWnen ♦1,072 | On that wiki page, yes. Probably I couldn't find anything better 3 years ago :D.But finally I can change tags (and I will) for long_jump pits which I mapped in the neighborhood using the new scheme.Thanks for catching it anyway! | |
| 143986146 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-11-13 20:29 | 1 | 2023-11-14 13:24 | voltairovicz ♦204 | Exactly this must have been this kind of mistake during editing. Thanks for the correction |
| 143913717 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-11-11 20:15 | 1 | 2023-11-11 20:20 | marczoutendijk | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212125120https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212125121Let je op de juiste schrijfwijze voor meadow (dus niet maedow), Hendrikklaas?Als source vermeld je ook "survey", maar als je daar niet zelf bent geweest, dan kun je beter vermelden dat je je gebas... |
| 143437152 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-10-31 18:23 | 1 | 2023-11-01 20:42 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | 25,000!! Congratulations on the milestone. I appreciate your dedication to the project and to the DWG. |
| 2 | 2023-11-03 07:39 | marczoutendijk | Thanks! | |
| 128049858 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-25 17:25 | 1 | 2023-08-22 03:04 | watmildon ♦249 | Hilariously enough this revert caught this place node that actually does have the name Pond! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/153647080/historyI've patched it up as part of a bigger cleanup but thought you may find it amusing. |
| 138633828 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-07-17 18:21 | 1 | 2023-07-17 18:25 | marczoutendijk | !El Camino del Turillo fue designado carril bici con un límite máximo de velocidad de 90 km/h! Se trata de un curioso error que ha pasado desapercibido durante 4 años. Hoy lo he vuelto a cambiar a higway=unclassified. |
| 137832216 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-06-27 11:48 | 1 | 2023-06-27 13:44 | marczoutendijk | This is v22 (not v12) |
| 133452570 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-03-08 19:05 | 1 | 2023-03-09 00:49 | Glassman ♦5,258 | Why did you add access=no and service=driveway to Coons Road? As well as change the existing unname service road into a driveway? I live in this area and neither are correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133452570 |
| 2 | 2023-03-09 09:37 | marczoutendijk | The DWG ticket for this change contained this message:"Coons Road, off SR-9, Sedro Woolley, WA, is a private drive way. It isNOT a public road. There are Jersey blocks at the intersection of thetee blocking off the north portion, which serves several houses. Bothsouthern legs are 100%... | |
| 3 | 2023-03-09 17:35 | Glassman ♦5,258 | I'm seeing mappers delete driveways or mark them private when they have no markings or gates. The accepted practice in the US is that driveways are private but should only be tagged with access=private if they are marked or have a gate.Looking at street level imagery also doesn't show ... | |
| 4 | 2023-03-09 19:44 | marczoutendijk | Received comment:"Commenter is simply incorrect about signs. I just looked at Google street view. Signs indicating private property start at the large stump on the right hand side of the driveway just out of sight from the Google street view.. There are MULTIPLE signs at that location and ... | |
| 5 | 2023-03-18 20:11 | marczoutendijk | Hi Glassman,Do you have any more comments on the reaction quoted above?Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 6 | 2023-03-18 20:25 | Glassman ♦5,258 | I haven't had a chance to drive up there to see what is currently posted although I do plan to head up there. Private to me means that it is privately maintained. If the road is posted as no trespassing or something similar then I agree that it should be access=private. | |
| 132850318 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-02-21 19:25 | 1 | 2023-02-21 19:27 | marczoutendijk | The typo was landcover=tress (should have been trees) |
| 132726287 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-02-18 19:14 | 1 | 2023-02-18 19:17 | marczoutendijk | source=PNOA |
| 131781720 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-01-27 17:11 | 1 | 2023-01-27 17:12 | marczoutendijk | source=https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface |
| 131277249 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-01-14 19:35 | 1 | 2023-01-19 04:20 | Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦597 | Hvad er det?Det skal have et fysisk tag. |
| 2 | 2023-01-19 09:22 | marczoutendijk | I fixed the incorrect landuse=paving_stones. There is a roof on the map:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070522808.It doesn't show quite well on the aerial pictures. | |
| 130734052 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-12-31 21:44 | 1 | 2023-01-16 12:31 | Sandal man ♦391 | Hoi Marc nu heeft het geen tag meer?Jan |
| 2 | 2023-01-16 12:52 | marczoutendijk | Goed opgemerkt en bedankt.Het is nu natural=heath.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dheathhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131337019 | |
| 131150653 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-01-11 15:17 | 1 | 2023-01-11 15:43 | marczoutendijk | Het vlak van de brug én het pad over de brug waren met elkaar verknoopt. Die heb ik opgeschoond in dezelfde changeset als waarin ik de pier heb bewerkt. |
| 130716466 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-12-31 11:19 | 1 | 2023-01-02 16:17 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130794204 where the changeset comment is: DWG reverting incorrect CS |
| 130741879 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-01-01 10:08 | 1 | 2023-01-02 15:57 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130793535 where the changeset comment is: DWG reverting incorrect CS |
| 130388367 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-12-22 18:48 | 1 | 2022-12-23 08:21 | Kovoschiz ♦2,556 | Why would you directly delete this named PoI which is clearly more informative, and in fact correct? |
| 2 | 2022-12-23 09:30 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130410287 where the changeset comment is: Correcting invalid tag fix | |
| 3 | 2022-12-23 09:35 | marczoutendijk | Kovoschitz: I reverted that mistake! | |
| 130212656 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-12-18 13:32 | 1 | 2022-12-18 13:33 | marczoutendijk | highways -> landuse |
| 129488600 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-28 19:00 | 1 | 2022-12-03 21:25 | Diógenes de Sinope ♦187 | 👍🏿 |
| 129198209 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-21 13:49 | 1 | 2022-11-21 14:58 | opendcc ♦1,538 | Hello,please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129200760. I had a discussion with the mapper (mainly about name-tagging), she/he is not willing to cooperate. |
| 129055540 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-17 18:46 | 1 | 2022-11-17 18:47 | marczoutendijk | highways=landuse |
| 128806012 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-12 09:57 | 1 | 2022-11-12 09:58 | marczoutendijk | source=PNOA Spain; Catastro - BU.Building, CP.CadastralParcel; |
| 128721841 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-10 08:49 | 1 | 2022-11-10 12:41 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hello, I don't get it. The shop's name is House. |
| 2 | 2022-11-10 15:05 | marczoutendijk | I fixed it. It was a mistake because there are 1000's of name=House where building=house was meant.Also there are many brand:House shops that are located in a building=retail + shop=clothes location where the building shouldn't cary a name because that is already in the brand. | |
| 3 | 2022-11-10 16:00 | marczoutendijk | Anyway, I fixed all the brand=House tags to also include name=House!Thanks for pointing me to this. | |
| 128690195 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-09 14:19 | 1 | 2022-11-09 14:35 | marczoutendijk | There are many incorrect uses of the name=* tag related to buildings.We see often name=house where building=house should have been used.I'm fixing those errors, sometimes using larger bounding boxes to prevent creating 3500+ changesets each with just one fix! |
| 128690116 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-09 14:17 | 1 | 2022-11-09 14:35 | marczoutendijk | There are many incorrect uses of the name=* tag related to buildings.We see often name=house where building=house should have been used.I'm fixing those errors, sometimes using larger bounding boxes to prevent creating 3500+ changesets each with just one fix! |
| 128690238 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-09 14:20 | 1 | 2022-11-09 14:34 | marczoutendijk | There are many incorrect uses of the name=* tag related to buildings.We see often name=house where building=house should have been used. I'm fixing those errors, sometimes using larger bounding boxes to prevent creating 3500+ changesets each with just one fix! |
| 128499474 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-04 20:20 | 1 | 2022-11-05 11:22 | topius ♦58 | What do you mean by "fake"? These buildings might not be visible on the older Bing imagery, but they are there on the newer Maxar imagery. I reinstated them. Please check all available imagery (especially the most recent ones)! |
| 2 | 2022-11-05 13:26 | marczoutendijk | Sorry for that! You'r right indeed that Maxar shows the buildings. But you are the first one that is able to draw properly squared buildings with the correct tags. Please check the history for that. | |
| 128405948 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:33 | 1 | 2022-11-02 19:43 | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128405956 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:33 | 1 | 2022-11-02 19:43 | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128405984 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:34 | 1 | 2022-11-02 19:43 | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128405990 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:34 | 1 | 2022-11-02 19:43 | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128406001 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:34 | 1 | 2022-11-02 19:42 | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128406016 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:35 | 1 | 2022-11-02 19:42 | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128406027 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:35 | 1 | 2022-11-02 19:42 | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128406063 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:36 | 1 | 2022-11-02 19:42 | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 127999541 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-24 14:16 | 1 | 2022-10-26 10:14 | seejahin ♦1 | মুন্সিগঞ্জ |
| 2 | 2022-10-26 10:49 | marczoutendijk | This tagging had more errors. I now have completely retagged it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128077280Is your comment the name of that pond? | |
| 128049928 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-25 17:27 | 1 | 2022-10-26 05:58 | oba510 ♦256 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150963254/history appears to be a valid place name. |
| 2 | 2022-10-26 06:52 | marczoutendijk | Thanks for notifying me. Restored.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128067101 | |
| 127970716 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-23 19:14 | 1 | 2022-10-23 19:43 | marczoutendijk | Sorry for the huge bounding box! Another changeset at the other side of the ocean was still open... |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 10:58 | SekeRob ♦1,437 | Curiously, no ford=0 but there are 154 ford=no in the database. several checked in Italy these are on ways *before* reaching water, one like 1km long, another combined with bridge=yes. The wonders that are in the DB database. :O))) | |
| 3 | 2022-10-24 14:45 | marczoutendijk | I found 570 times ford=no! | |
| 4 | 2022-10-24 14:46 | marczoutendijk | And also 231 times ford=ford!! | |
| 5 | 2022-10-24 14:46 | marczoutendijk | And we have 56 times ford=boat?? | |
| 6 | 2022-10-24 21:08 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | We also have yes=no 🤔 | |
| 7 | 2022-10-24 21:13 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/no=yes | |
| 127853142 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-20 19:48 | 1 | 2022-10-20 19:51 | marczoutendijk | Removed landuse and replaced with individual tree. |
| 127850681 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-20 18:32 | 1 | 2022-10-20 18:33 | marczoutendijk | Should be landuse! |
| 127712229 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-18 08:40 | 1 | 2022-10-18 08:41 | marczoutendijk | Made a mistake: Landuse -> Highways |
| 127606823 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-16 09:42 | 1 | 2022-10-16 09:44 | marczoutendijk | Commentaar moet zijn:Website rustpunt Koffie- en Theeschenkerij Kafoep aangepast aan opgave van rustpunt.nu |
| 126133442 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-09-13 13:01 | 1 | 2022-09-13 13:01 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 126132640, 126132707, 126132740, 126132794, 126132855. |
| 125241795 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-22 19:21 | 1 | 2022-08-22 19:22 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125219641, 125219712, 125219788, 125219865, 125219947, 125219992, 125228645, 125228680, 125228713, 125228735, 125228767. |
| 125150763 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-20 14:42 | 1 | 2022-08-20 14:42 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125146687, 125146717, 125146761, 125146792, 125146824. |
| 125146811 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-20 13:04 | 1 | 2022-08-20 13:04 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125145785, 125145831, 125145870, 125145926, 125145967. |
| 125133469 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-20 05:28 | 1 | 2022-08-20 05:28 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125112258, 125112314, 125112388, 125112452, 125112506. |
| 125105055 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-19 12:23 | 1 | 2022-08-19 12:23 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125104460, 125104495, 125104536, 125104582, 125104626. |
| 125075432 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-18 18:34 | 1 | 2022-08-18 18:34 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124560102, 124560189, 124560368, 124560473, 124560819, 124560940, 124561085, 124561330, 124561878. |
| 125073968 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-18 18:01 | 1 | 2022-08-18 18:02 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125072613, 125072702, 125072772, 125072838, 125072896, 125072934, 125073014, 125073057, 125073147, 125073202, 125073239, 125073288, 125073342, 125073394, 125073454, 125073529, 125073608, 125073661. |
| 125031618 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-17 18:57 | 1 | 2022-08-17 18:58 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125029279, 125029310, 125029416, 125029445, 125029475, 125029569, 125029620, 125029724, 125029881, 125029923, 125029969, 125030068, 125030136, 125030225, 125030262, 125030298, 125030364, 125030401, 125030483, 125030507, 125030820, 125030851... |
| 125029621 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-17 18:03 | 1 | 2022-08-17 18:03 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125016974, 125017097, 125017134, 125017170, 125017205. |
| 124566112 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-06 14:56 | 1 | 2022-08-06 18:18 | marczoutendijk | Highways sshould read Landuse! |
| 124492484 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-04 18:17 | 1 | 2022-08-04 18:18 | marczoutendijk | Checking for DWG |
| 2 | 2022-08-04 18:22 | SomeoneElse ♦13,401 | Hello Marc? | |
| 3 | 2022-08-04 18:26 | marczoutendijk | Got it! (But not in my GoMap app!) | |
| 117730823 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-22 14:48 | 1 | 2022-06-11 09:37 | bosboer ♦6 | Mag ik vragen welke bron je gebruikt hebt om deze wijzigingen aan te brengen? |
| 2 | 2022-06-11 12:48 | marczoutendijk | 10 jaar geleden werd dit nog getagd met:landuse=farmlandfarmland=plant_nurseryde huidige (geprefereerde) tag is nu:landuse=plant_nurseryZie:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:landuse?uselang=nlen:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=plant%20nursery?uselang=nlIk h... | |
| 3 | 2022-06-11 13:30 | bosboer ♦6 | Bedankt voor de duidelijke toelichting. | |
| 121911604 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-06-03 19:06 | 1 | 2022-06-03 19:10 | marczoutendijk | Comment is wrong, should be: Added missing steps over river Schalesbach. Bicycles must dismount here. I passed this bridge on 3 june 2022 and had to take off all the lugage of my bicycle in order to pass this bridge. |
| 120715861 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-05-08 19:06 | 1 | 2022-05-08 19:23 | Hezza Fezza ♦10 | Buenas tardes,it would be great if you could remove the source="EU CORINE land cover 2006" after completely fixing a landuse way. |
| 2 | 2022-05-08 19:33 | marczoutendijk | Hello Hezza Fezza,Thanks for your commentI usually change the source to old_source="EU CORINE land cover 2006" and then add source=PNOA.Because I'm working on it right now, I'll do that after finishing in this region.Gracias por su comentarioNormalmente cambio source ... | |
| 120362762 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-29 19:53 | 1 | 2022-04-30 15:29 | krusefahrer ♦56 | Dear Marc,how would you tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703345532 (and the other village on the bottom right)? |
| 2 | 2022-05-01 06:34 | marczoutendijk | Areas where people live should be tagged with landuse=residential.Areas where people grow something have one of the many choices for landuse=*See our wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse | |
| 120345251 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-29 11:48 | 1 | 2022-04-29 14:29 | krusefahrer ♦56 | What's the name of this bakery? |
| 2 | 2022-04-29 18:54 | marczoutendijk | There is no bakery at all! But that's the whole point of this redaction. Someone used this node to add personal details to OSM.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 119546857 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-10 18:31 | 1 | 2022-04-10 18:58 | SekeRob ♦1,437 | Hi Marc,Not a typo, shows up top of the list when starting to key 'stock' in ID Editor. The pick lists fed by the N?? database needs lots of cleaning, lots. Some items appear 3-4 times in the drop down list... how is a casual mapper ever to know... as single word, with space, with unde... |
| 2 | 2022-04-11 12:35 | marczoutendijk | Thanks for the comment rob, I'm aware of that iD editor issue. Indeed the main reason for so many different versions of the same objects.Marc. | |
| 119474817 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-08 14:58 | 1 | 2022-04-08 15:00 | marczoutendijk | This should be east of Tomelloso! |
| 119435110 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-07 15:35 | 1 | 2022-04-08 12:07 | Retired Account ♦104 | This change incorrectly removes the carpark building just for "fixing osmose" error. |
| 2 | 2022-04-08 14:34 | marczoutendijk | Hi JalooooNz,That carpark seems to be below the other building and the swimming pool.Hence it should have layer=-1.The adjacent Tropez Residences seem to have the same problem.Apart from that the landuse with the name was duplicated.I tried some fixes. Please follow with me and check this ... | |
| 119314696 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 19:06 | 1 | 2022-04-04 19:16 | marczoutendijk | There was a worldwide typing error with residential=condomium (check out your dictionary to find out its meaning!)Fixed it in a few large areas: residential=condominium.Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 119314795 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 19:10 | 1 | 2022-04-04 19:15 | marczoutendijk | There was a worldwide typing error with residential=condomium (check out your dictionary to find out its meaning!)Fixed it in a few large areas: residential=condominium.Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 119314818 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 19:11 | 1 | 2022-04-04 19:15 | marczoutendijk | There was a worldwide typing error with residential=condomium (check out your dictionary to find out its meaning!)Fixed it in a few large areas: residential=condominium.Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 119314750 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 19:08 | 1 | 2022-04-04 19:14 | marczoutendijk | There was a worldwide typing error with residential=condomium (check out your dictionary to find out its meaning!) Fixed it in a few large areas: residential=condominium.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 119292190 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 08:27 | 1 | 2022-04-04 08:27 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset . |
| 118522795 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-03-15 18:32 | 1 | 2022-03-15 18:35 | marczoutendijk | This is more around Casas de la Jaraba |
| 118395977 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-03-12 12:17 | 1 | 2022-03-12 12:19 | marczoutendijk | This is v3 |
| 118157058 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-03-06 12:38 | 1 | 2022-03-06 13:00 | marczoutendijk | The street is named Ewing Street according to this: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2920023618234508Don't change it back to fake names. Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 117728264 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-22 13:45 | 1 | 2022-02-23 01:26 | Emilius123 ♦395 | Thank you.I really wonder if the person that did is is asleep right now. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117728264 |
| 117480423 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-16 14:55 | 1 | 2022-02-16 14:58 | marczoutendijk | In this changeset I changed an obvious typo and the choices were either pole or tower. Given the nearby other power=pole, my choice is clear (but could be wrong) |
| 117334825 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-12 20:18 | 1 | 2022-02-13 17:19 | haukep ♦50 | Hi! I'm not sure if this really qualifies as a "true" pitch for soccer / association football. Based on aerial images, it seems to be a plain grass field to me.Did you change this only because it popped up as a mistake in some tool? Or have you checked locally as well? |
| 2 | 2022-02-13 20:10 | marczoutendijk | Hi haukep,It was tagged with leisure=soccer 4 years ago by a mapper who did not know the situation locally either. The tag leisure=soccer is wrong anyhow, because leisure=pitch is the valid tag, combined with sport=# for whatever sport is practiced at that pitch.To me it seemed grass also, but... | |
| 117017162 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-04 18:06 | 1 | 2022-02-10 13:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,401 | Good guess, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/614778 reckons "fence and gate" :) |
| 116468998 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-22 15:00 | 1 | 2022-01-22 15:09 | DP24PH ♦418 | Here's the tip: If in case of concrete/wood, kindly use the "material=*" tagging on buildings and perimeter wall (if available).DP24 |
| 2 | 2022-01-22 15:25 | marczoutendijk | Thanks for the tip. Used it in later versions where the source=* was used to indicate the material.Marc . | |
| 3 | 2022-01-22 15:50 | marczoutendijk | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116470810 | |
| 116469775 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-22 15:18 | 1 | 2022-01-22 15:23 | marczoutendijk | Replaced source by materal=* |
| 115797743 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-05 13:23 | 1 | 2022-01-18 20:00 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,137 | I wonder if this should really be landuse=industrial since it's basically cattle storage. landuse=commercial seems more oriented towards office buildings and business parks, no? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115797743 ... |
| 2 | 2022-01-18 20:14 | marczoutendijk | Hi Baloo,You might have a point there. Do you change it to industrial? Seems a good choice to me.Marc. | |
| 3 | 2022-01-19 02:01 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,137 | Updated. | |
| 116153433 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-14 16:02 | 1 | 2022-01-14 16:05 | marczoutendijk | Source = PNOA; Catastro |
| 115948849 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-09 16:07 | 1 | 2022-01-13 14:34 | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Thank you very much for the correction! I had warned your DWG that this user was making not only countless weird/flawed edits but also vandalism by deleting many paths which existed. Woodpeck didn't want to listen to me even though i had proven with photos, videos, etc. Later he created another... |
| 115987979 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 16:04 | 1 | 2022-01-10 16:07 | marczoutendijk | I used a larger area to correct 34 typing errors where surface=unp was used instead of surface=unpaved. |
| 115974039 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:51 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:47 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115974027 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:51 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:47 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973987 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:50 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:47 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973975 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:49 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:47 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973964 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:49 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:47 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973951 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:49 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:47 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973940 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:48 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973884 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:47 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973875 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:47 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973860 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:46 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973840 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:46 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973833 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:45 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973818 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:45 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973772 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:43 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973692 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:41 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:45 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973665 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:40 | 1 | 2022-01-10 10:44 | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115949038 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-09 16:11 | 1 | 2022-01-09 16:27 | Gopnik McBlyat ♦15 | scrub OR forest ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85693240/history |
| 2 | 2022-01-09 16:46 | marczoutendijk | I don't know, the tagging surface=forest is wrong anyway. On the aerial I see forest and I think that the mapper of that made a mistake. So maybe forest is better. Will you change it? | |
| 115799055 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-05 13:59 | 1 | 2022-01-05 22:46 | linerider ♦8 | I noticed that dunes in this area are no longer rendered green but grey. The osm wiki says this: "dunes that are mostly covered by vegetation like grass or heath and are therefore no more moving and changing shape like an active dune - use natural=heath or natural=grassland instead."I th... |
| 2 | 2022-01-06 08:10 | marczoutendijk | Indeed, it’s better to change that. Will you do it? I changed it because landuse=dune isn’t valid anyway. | |
| 115799509 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-05 14:11 | 1 | 2022-01-05 15:00 | Gopnik McBlyat ♦15 | Hoi Marc,is leisure=park still relevant on this way? |
| 2 | 2022-01-05 15:08 | marczoutendijk | The original mapper has added that 5 years ago. To me that part of the ZOO doesn't really look like a park. As a matter of fact, it is included in the larger leisure=park for the whole of the ZOO.I shall remove it! Thanks for pointing this out. | |
| 115642060 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-01 16:04 | 1 | 2022-01-01 18:01 | Arun Ganesh ♦5 | Dear marc,do you really think this mud and not just the muddy corner of a field? |
| 2 | 2022-01-01 18:13 | marczoutendijk | Yes I think so, because muddy=yes is a tag that is not rendered nor understood by the dataconsumers. And if it is muddy, is it muddy all the time? Is it muddy because of recent rainfall? If not, then intermittent=yes should be added.Any tag you like is great, but if a tag is only used once, it is ... | |
| 115476036 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-28 15:23 | 1 | 2021-12-28 20:01 | TobiasFischer00 ♦254 | Thank you so much marczoutendijk for your edit. Yes, the tag was wrong and the 18 is the road number for this district. I just noticed this area now and I will edit all the road names in this area to the formal name/road numbers which will be XXX-XX.Thanks again and keep up the great work! |
| 115178685 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-20 19:16 | 1 | 2021-12-20 19:27 | Zhytomyr ♦7 | Please don't change these nodes to landuse=forest. Changing to fixme=landuse or a complete deletion would be more sensible.--Dank u wel |
| 2 | 2021-12-20 20:21 | marczoutendijk | What does landuse=fixme (0xab00 természetes tereptárgy) mean? See the history. Landuse always should be on an area, but the original mapper failed to do that. | |
| 115106194 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-18 18:59 | 1 | 2021-12-19 00:29 | tenzul ♦56 | An der Haltebucht steht ein riesiges Informationsschild zur Region. Wanderkarte oder sowas. Wahrscheinlich war das gemeint. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115106194 |
| 2 | 2021-12-19 10:52 | marczoutendijk | Der ursprüngliche Mapper setzte dort natural=information ein (vor 6 Jahren), aber das ist kein gültiges Tag. Ich denke, tourism=information ist besser. | |
| 3 | 2021-12-19 14:56 | marczoutendijk | Corrected:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115128665 | |
| 115022405 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:35 | 1 | 2021-12-16 19:49 | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 115022454 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:37 | 1 | 2021-12-16 19:49 | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 115022523 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:40 | 1 | 2021-12-16 19:49 | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 115022582 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:41 | 1 | 2021-12-16 19:49 | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 115022700 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:45 | 1 | 2021-12-16 19:48 | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 114968909 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-15 15:19 | 1 | 2021-12-15 15:47 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114746857, 114747248, 114747418, 114753636, 114755921, 114760605, 114760868, 114760946, 114760970, 114761145, 114761529, 114761831, 114763009, 114763489, 114763533, 114763931, 114785854, 114786496, 114787607, 114788242, 114788774, 114791269... |
| 2 | 2021-12-15 16:01 | marczoutendijk | The original reverted changeset spanned this huge area. | |
| 3 | 2021-12-15 17:33 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Looks good Marc- Elliott Plack OSM Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 114828622 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-11 19:34 | 1 | 2021-12-11 19:46 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 111569320, 111569385, 112352816, 112353532, 112353714, 112354349, 112482386, 112720680, 112817263, 112817681, 112823863, 112892367, 112893299, 112893578, 112893811, 113307898, 113314745, 113315527, 113318170, 113342658, 113393087, 113393656... |
| 114702419 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-08 12:57 | 1 | 2021-12-08 12:58 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 111918766, 111918923, 114409941, 114409991, 114459915, 114460033, 114460083, 114460356, 114460451, 114696355, 114696542, 114696724, 114699848. |
| 114651543 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-07 09:28 | 1 | 2021-12-07 09:29 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114621556, 114621731, 114621918, 114622141, 114622419, 114622544, 114622617, 114622836, 114622891, 114623049, 114623115, 114623204, 114623284, 114623475, 114623577, 114623643, 114623755, 114623991, 114624120, 114624204, 114624303, 114624349... |
| 114650470 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-07 09:06 | 1 | 2021-12-07 09:07 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114620555, 114620636, 114620661, 114620781, 114620857, 114620932, 114620977, 114621048, 114621143, 114621308, 114621407, 114621465, 114621488, 114621663, 114621800, 114621865, 114621951, 114622297, 114622335, 114622366, 114622443, 114622485... |
| 114619653 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-06 13:43 | 1 | 2021-12-06 13:43 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114588754, 114588857, 114588950, 114589004, 114589091, 114589113, 114589167, 114589307, 114589345, 114589480, 114589539, 114589579, 114589692, 114589766, 114589829, 114589854, 114589882, 114589989, 114590019, 114590105, 114590196, 114590312... |
| 114618626 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-06 13:10 | 1 | 2021-12-06 13:11 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114490867, 114490996, 114506386, 114541966, 114541984, 114562030, 114562148, 114562262, 114562278, 114562586, 114562800, 114562913, 114562931, 114563088, 114563265, 114563270. |
| 114578282 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-05 11:13 | 1 | 2021-12-05 11:13 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114558134, 114558170, 114558288, 114558348, 114558381, 114558414, 114558467, 114558514, 114558573, 114558590, 114558608, 114558645, 114558676, 114558718, 114558808, 114558839, 114558905, 114559098, 114559130, 114559257, 114559312, 114559340... |
| 114554550 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-04 13:17 | 1 | 2021-12-04 13:17 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114552809, 114553500, 114553607, 114553617, 114553645, 114553704, 114553794, 114553963, 114554131, 114554174, 114554238, 114554287. |
| 114550822 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-04 10:56 | 1 | 2021-12-04 10:57 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114133389, 114133458, 114133666, 114133828, 114134078, 114134505, 114143481, 114143704, 114143968, 114144059, 114144510, 114144527, 114162629, 114162772, 114162827, 114162889, 114162955, 114163139, 114163186, 114164027, 114164080, 114164206... |
| 114453531 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-01 18:24 | 1 | 2021-12-01 18:24 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 57759430. |
| 114356074 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-29 10:47 | 1 | 2021-11-29 10:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 113958089. |
| 114295019 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-27 13:43 | 1 | 2021-11-27 13:43 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113334199, 113334286. |
| 114294663 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-27 13:32 | 1 | 2021-11-27 13:34 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113334521, 113609407, 113899054, 113899453, 113900005, 114182719, 114182964, 114183350. |
| 114196181 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-24 20:20 | 1 | 2021-11-24 20:25 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114140174, 114140436, 114140993, 114142085, 114142210, 114145851, 114147094, 114192560. |
| 114154271 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-23 19:35 | 1 | 2021-11-24 08:29 | caxton ♦1 | Why have you not merged the windmill node with the building outline? We are not in the address-node-loving Netherlands ;) |
| 2 | 2021-11-24 09:43 | marczoutendijk | Because I first only had added the mill as a node. I now have merged them.Why don't you start editing yourself? You have a useracoount now! With iD it is easy to do. And you should read some: https://www.openstreetmap.org/help | |
| 114133324 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-23 10:15 | 1 | 2021-11-23 15:03 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114119624, 114119652, 114119676, 114119724, 114119826, 114119868, 114119910, 114119989, 114120025, 114120077, 114120107, 114120150, 114120191, 114120230, 114120269, 114120311, 114120351, 114120397, 114120431, 114120487, 114120530. |
| 114139781 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-23 12:55 | 1 | 2021-11-23 15:03 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114119624, 114119652, 114119676, 114119724, 114119826, 114119868, 114119910, 114119989, 114120025, 114120077, 114120107, 114120150, 114120191, 114120230, 114120269, 114120311, 114120351, 114120397, 114120431, 114120487, 114120530. |
| 114093015 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-22 10:59 | 1 | 2021-11-22 11:01 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113921570, 113921630, 113921735, 113922017, 113922051, 113923516, 113923725, 113923893, 113923986, 113970058, 113970243, 113997437, 114015789, 114016211, 114016369, 114016432, 114016708, 114016856, 114016981, 114017130, 114017235, 114017387... |
| 114090153 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-22 09:54 | 1 | 2021-11-22 09:54 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 113847080. |
| 114089675 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-22 09:40 | 1 | 2021-11-22 09:41 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114077308, 114077365, 114077644, 114077978, 114078100, 114078556, 114078559, 114079100, 114079137, 114079169, 114079304, 114079602, 114080370, 114080491, 114080676, 114080734, 114080782, 114080991, 114081059, 114081270, 114083452, 114083536... |
| 113864448 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-16 18:39 | 1 | 2021-11-16 18:40 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113844637, 113846972, 113847306, 113848107, 113848914, 113851647. |
| 113120560 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 11:36 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113123397 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 12:46 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113122848 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 12:32 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113122263 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 12:18 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113121747 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 12:04 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113121184 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 11:50 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113119987 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 11:21 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113119315 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 11:07 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113118671 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 10:53 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113118046 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 10:38 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113117432 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 10:24 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113116075 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 09:54 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113116724 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 10:09 | 1 | 2021-10-29 12:51 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113028971 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-27 09:52 | 1 | 2021-10-27 09:58 | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 110598486, 110627977, 110652956, 110684477, 112756488, 112767725, 112771391, 112799329, 112863334, 113013897. |
| 112519123 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-14 20:13 | 1 | 2021-10-14 20:24 | marczoutendijk | By accident I included some part of the map I didn't want to edit. Hence the huge area outside Spain! |
| 112465062 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-13 14:29 | 1 | 2021-10-13 14:52 | marczoutendijk | Deze rotonde wordt geheel fietsvrij gemaakt, ze krijgen 2 eigen bruggen, waarvan er nu een (aan de spoorzijde) klaar is. Tot de definitieve werkzaamheden zijn afgerond (19-12-2021), wordt het fietspad aan de spoorzijde gebruikt door fietsers én wandelaars in 2 richtingen. Pas ter hoogte van ... |
| 19372778 by marczoutendijk @ 2013-12-10 09:12 | 1 | 2021-08-24 15:25 | Sandal man ♦391 | Hoi Marc, hopelijk weet jij nog wat dit grondgebruik is :-)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251127462#map=16/37.3268/-4.6302Groeten Jan |
| 2 | 2021-08-24 17:29 | marczoutendijk | Ja, dat weet ik! Het is hetzelfde als het omringende gebied: landuse=orchard.In die tijd gebruikte ik BING, maar PNOA is nu de norm. Ik heb het gecorrigeerd. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-24 18:09 | Sandal man ♦391 | Top, ook weer opgelost, ik probeer Spanje zo foutloos mogelijk te maken maar niet elke mapper reageerd zo snel als jij helaas.Maar blijf mijn best doen :-) | |
| 108578249 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-07-25 19:30 | 1 | 2021-07-25 19:31 | marczoutendijk | This is (v49) |
| 103520402 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-24 07:24 | 1 | 2021-04-24 07:28 | marczoutendijk | Deze (houten) brug wordt vervangen door een nieuw exemplaar van beton. De fietsroutes ter plekke worden NIET omgeleid. Vermoedelijk in juli 2021 gereed.https://www.ad.nl/den-bosch/vinkel-krijgt-nog-dit-jaar-nieuwe-fietsbrug~a54eb3d9/ |
| 2 | 2021-04-24 08:12 | dvdhoven ♦924 | Ik heb aan de zuidkant ook een kp 58 gemaakt, dat staat ook in Visit Brabant.De routes eindigen nu in de noordelijke en zuidelijke 58Als de brug gereed is, moet er nog een route 58-58 worden gemaakt.Tot die tijd loopt er geen fietsroute meer over de brug.Houdt jij in de gaten wanneer de brug... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-24 10:02 | marczoutendijk | Nee, wandelaars kunnen er ook niet langs want de hele brug is feitelijk verdwenen. Ik hou de nieuwe brug in de gaten!Groet,Marc. | |
| 4 | 2021-06-08 17:16 | marczoutendijk | Vandaag langs de brug gereden en hij is weer in gebruik!Alle routes kunnen worden hersteld. | |
| 105664557 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-06-01 08:22 | 1 | 2021-06-01 08:25 | marczoutendijk | Ik was hier op 31-5-2021 en het pad was bedekt met een soort gravel. Dat bleek echter een nieuw laagje over het oude asfalt te zijn. Dus weer teruggezet naar asfalt na bestudering van mijn eigen mapllarybeelden van die dag. Alhoewel vergelijking tussen 2017 en 2021 soms twijfel oproept... |
| 105372141 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-26 17:16 | 1 | 2021-05-26 18:15 | Xevi ♦36 | Thank you for closing the note! |
| 105310419 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-25 18:32 | 1 | 2021-05-25 19:54 | marczoutendijk | This is landuse NW of Tomelloso! |
| 105213212 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-24 09:36 | 1 | 2021-05-24 09:49 | marczoutendijk | This is not Villena but La Solana |
| 104867212 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-18 06:58 | 1 | 2021-05-18 09:02 | marczoutendijk | En esta zona un número de highway=track estaba duplicado como highway=path (o como highway=track pero con diferentes propiedades). He eliminado todos los duplicados. In this area a number of highway=track was duplicated as highway=path (or as highway=track but with different properties). ... |
| 104843544 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-17 18:31 | 1 | 2021-05-18 09:02 | marczoutendijk | En esta zona un número de highway=track estaba duplicado como highway=path (o como highway=track pero con diferentes propiedades). He eliminado todos los duplicados. In this area a number of highway=track was duplicated as highway=path (or as highway=track but with different properties). ... |
| 104835071 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-17 15:29 | 1 | 2021-05-18 09:02 | marczoutendijk | En esta zona un número de highway=track estaba duplicado como highway=path (o como highway=track pero con diferentes propiedades). He eliminado todos los duplicados. In this area a number of highway=track was duplicated as highway=path (or as highway=track but with different properties). ... |
| 103931135 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-30 18:52 | 1 | 2021-04-30 19:21 | marczoutendijk | This should be landuse east of Solana! |
| 103930838 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-30 18:42 | 1 | 2021-04-30 19:21 | marczoutendijk | This should be landuse east of Solana! |
| 103930080 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-30 18:20 | 1 | 2021-04-30 19:21 | marczoutendijk | This should be landuse east of Solana! |
| 102863746 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-13 11:38 | 1 | 2021-04-14 18:55 | marczoutendijk | This was not for kaashvi but for: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/virlgil%20van |
| 101936798 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-03-29 19:13 | 1 | 2021-03-29 19:14 | marczoutendijk | (V1) not (V10) |
| 101936441 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-03-29 19:04 | 1 | 2021-03-29 19:14 | marczoutendijk | Highways = Landuse! |
| 99850768 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 19:32 | 1 | 2021-02-25 13:10 | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 99851526 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 19:48 | 1 | 2021-02-25 13:10 | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 99852220 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 20:02 | 1 | 2021-02-25 13:10 | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 99852843 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 20:14 | 1 | 2021-02-25 13:10 | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 99853421 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 20:30 | 1 | 2021-02-25 13:10 | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 96557567 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-12-28 20:19 | 1 | 2020-12-28 20:28 | marczoutendijk | source=PDOK |
| 86260374 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-05 19:57 | 1 | 2020-12-03 03:09 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Hi Marc! I see this change comes via a DWG ticket. Just curious what that one was about? I surveyed the area four years back but did not see any signs about it being private. Certainly that could have changed now though. |
| 2 | 2020-12-03 10:22 | marczoutendijk | Hi Elliott, Yes, the track running from Loveton Farms Road is public, but from the crossing with the 2nd stream (on entering Pinewood Estates) it is (now) on private land, marked with signs. Hence the change. | |
| 3 | 2020-12-03 14:21 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Got it. Did a homeowner contact the DWG? I'm just curious how the feedback loop works, because I map a lot of trails don't usually get much feedback. I am not opposed to the change at all, glad you did it, just wondering about the process. Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2020-12-04 09:15 | marczoutendijk | Yes, the homeowner contacted the DWG.Cases like this happen more and more these days because the AllTrails app (used by many hikers) is based on OSM. Land owners are complaining about trespassers. | |
| 94522793 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-11-20 20:31 | 1 | 2020-11-20 20:51 | marczoutendijk | This is (v6) |
| 93721077 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-11-07 21:20 | 1 | 2020-11-07 21:20 | marczoutendijk | This is (V15) |
| 93560468 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-11-04 19:54 | 1 | 2020-11-04 19:55 | marczoutendijk | This is (v12) |
| 93502436 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-11-03 20:42 | 1 | 2020-11-03 20:53 | marczoutendijk | The method I used for this MP:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93680361with this touching inners:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866773514Is according to method 2 described at the talk page:the number (4) is the border shared by the farmland and the vineyard.2. Draw a closed way over ... |
| 92915344 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-10-22 19:09 | 1 | 2020-10-22 19:11 | marczoutendijk | This is version (v8). And this is landuse, not highways. |
| 92489835 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-10-14 19:22 | 1 | 2020-10-14 19:35 | marczoutendijk | Highways=landuse. |
| 92489560 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-10-14 19:14 | 1 | 2020-10-14 19:35 | marczoutendijk | Highways=Landuse! |
| 91992730 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-10-05 14:35 | 1 | 2020-10-05 14:37 | marczoutendijk | Name of town: Argamasilla de Alba |
| 91514218 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-09-25 13:51 | 1 | 2020-09-25 13:52 | marczoutendijk | A lo largo de la vía férrea abandonada Báeza-Utiel hay un sendero en la antigua vía férrea. La calidad es mixta: casi intransitable a buena. |
| 91318234 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-09-22 20:24 | 1 | 2020-09-22 20:26 | marczoutendijk | This is v18! |
| 89056355 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-08-06 20:13 | 1 | 2020-08-09 13:53 | FrankOverman ♦160 | AH, ik stond op punt de oude track langs de Oude Bosschebaan te verwijderen omdat het een breed fietspad is geworden. Ik heb er gisteren gefietst,Ik zie nu deze recente changeset van jouw hand.Ik kan me niet meteen herinneren dat er een breed genoeg pad noordelijk langs loopt dat als ruiterpad k... |
| 2 | 2020-08-09 14:01 | marczoutendijk | Er ligt een flink zandpad naast vol met paardenhoeven afdrukken. Ik heb ook mapillary beelden:https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.65006283666666&lng=5.211682151944444&z=17&tab=uploads&pKey=blCABvObPl9tHujKNjCjFJ&focus=photoIk denk dat de ruiter-info nog niet is aangebrach... | |
| 3 | 2020-08-09 14:23 | FrankOverman ♦160 | OK, ik wacht zonder meer ook even af ;)Bedankt voor de snelle reactie weer. | |
| 4 | 2020-08-09 14:54 | FrankOverman ♦160 | Trouwens, er mag nog wel een motor_vehicle = destination bij op de cycleway, want er staan borden met 'perceeleigenaren mogen wel' ;) | |
| 5 | 2020-08-11 13:39 | marczoutendijk | Vandaag opnieuw langsgefietst en er staan wel degelijk paaltjes voor de paarden (en een huifkar route). Het paardenpad loopt langs het gehele fietspad.https://tinyurl.com/yy3ynx8chttps://tinyurl.com/y23do46sOok heb ik de hele route er nog een keer opgezet maar nu van west naar oost. Die zal ... | |
| 6 | 2020-08-12 14:58 | FrankOverman ♦160 | Goed werk!Bedankt namens allen;) | |
| 89204756 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-08-10 14:37 | 1 | 2020-08-10 14:41 | marczoutendijk | DWG Edit: Trails on the property at 3423 Soundview Drive West had the wrong access tags. This is private property and all access tags are now set to access=no. Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 89161644 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-08-09 18:34 | 1 | 2020-08-09 18:36 | marczoutendijk | In this changeset one path (way 573659143) was badly aligned to older PNOA. I removed it and draw a new version; |
| 88249981 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-07-20 13:34 | 1 | 2020-07-20 13:36 | marczoutendijk | This nonexistent trail was reported by a user who tried to follow this trail. |
| 87535541 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-07-04 16:19 | 1 | 2020-07-04 16:21 | marczoutendijk | Again I deleted quite a few of the original imported tracks because it was faster to draw them again than to try to move all the wrong nodes from the import. |
| 87468477 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-07-02 19:29 | 1 | 2020-07-02 19:33 | marczoutendijk | Please note:The service road that previously connected Watford Road with Oakridge Avenue does not exist and must have been based on bad aerial imagery.The road in the north now runs into the wood, the road in the south ends at the gate of the property.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Found... |
| 87462130 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-07-02 15:54 | 1 | 2020-07-02 15:57 | marczoutendijk | For this changeset I had to delete a number of the previous tracks that were so badly aligned that it was faster to redraw them.I have asked jamesks why he is using such bad data and not doing any control/fine tuning over what he has added. Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Dat... |
| 87222506 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-27 10:10 | 1 | 2020-06-27 12:19 | marczoutendijk | Ik laat de naam "Poort van Heusden" nog even staan, de gemeente is niet eenduidig in het gebruik van de nieuwe naam. |
| 87100747 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-24 19:08 | 1 | 2020-06-24 19:28 | marczoutendijk | Survey 2021 moet survey 2020 zijn, ik kan nog niet inde toekomst kijken... |
| 86825699 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-18 12:29 | 1 | 2020-06-18 12:30 | marczoutendijk | This is V4! |
| 86783788 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-17 16:32 | 1 | 2020-06-17 16:35 | marczoutendijk | Dit smalle fietspad wordt vervangen door een 3 meter breed betonplaten pad voor 2 richtingen.Tijdelijke omleiding voor fietsers gaat via de Guldenberg. Ik heb het hele pad op highway=construction gezet.Werkzaamheden zijn op 15 juni begonnen en zijn eind juli klaar. Ik heb de route relaties allem... |
| 2 | 2020-06-18 11:41 | marczoutendijk | Zie ook:https://www.bd.nl/den-bosch-vught/straks-breeduit-fietsen-op-oude-bosschebaan-in-helvoirt-richting-loonse-en-drunense-duinen~a517463b9/ | |
| 82757367 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-03-28 16:13 | 1 | 2020-03-28 16:29 | marczoutendijk | DWG received a complaint from the landowner that some trails were running over their property. All relevant trails have been set to access=private.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 81903620 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-03-07 16:28 | 1 | 2020-03-07 16:38 | marczoutendijk | Some of the imported strava heatmap import (with highway=track) was so bad, that I completely removed those tracks and draw them again with PNOA as source. |
| 80657668 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-02-06 19:09 | 1 | 2020-02-06 20:23 | marczoutendijk | Circuelos must be Ciruelos |
| 80658063 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-02-06 19:24 | 1 | 2020-02-06 20:23 | marczoutendijk | Circuelos must be Ciruelos |
| 80659447 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-02-06 20:15 | 1 | 2020-02-06 20:22 | marczoutendijk | Circuelos must be Ciruelos |
| 80657545 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-02-06 19:04 | 1 | 2020-02-06 20:22 | marczoutendijk | Circuelos must be Ciruelos |
| 79559425 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-01-14 10:35 | 1 | 2020-01-14 10:37 | marczoutendijk | Valdecabañas = Valdecarábanos |
| 79523553 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-01-13 15:59 | 1 | 2020-01-13 16:03 | marczoutendijk | Correction: La Puebla de Almoradiel! |
| 79480497 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-01-12 16:27 | 1 | 2020-01-12 19:14 | marczoutendijk | This is NOT around Casa Viaja but south of Corral de Almaguër! |
| 79155421 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-01-03 12:42 | 1 | 2020-01-03 12:44 | marczoutendijk | Zie ook https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=55948 over het gebruik van building:part om het metrostation "onder de grond te houden". |
| 79120656 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-01-02 16:12 | 1 | 2020-01-02 16:43 | marczoutendijk | Zie forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68355 |
| 77393012 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-11-21 18:16 | 1 | 2019-11-21 18:22 | mariotomo ♦1,896 | thank you |
| 2 | 2019-11-21 18:22 | marczoutendijk | This revert was necessary because user mariotomo made a mistake while deleting the restriction:no_u_turn tagging on a number of highways. | |
| 77161805 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-11-16 11:15 | 1 | 2019-11-16 11:19 | marczoutendijk | (v35) moet V5) zijn. |
| 77161592 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-11-16 11:07 | 1 | 2019-11-16 11:19 | marczoutendijk | (v34) moet (v4) zijn. |
| 77094100 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-11-14 20:37 | 1 | 2019-11-14 20:43 | marczoutendijk | Note: the source is not what you see^I forgot to change it. |
| 76252174 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-10-26 20:26 | 1 | 2019-10-26 20:28 | marczoutendijk | User Md jins had added the name of his college (Netrokona) to all the nodes and ways he had added to the map. Hence there were numerous roads, buildings etc. with that name.I have changed that to source=Netrokona.Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 76248817 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-10-26 17:34 | 1 | 2019-10-26 17:36 | marczoutendijk | Note: the inclusion of Dubaha is from a different changeset that was still open.It wasn't effected in anyway. |
| 76206884 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-10-25 12:43 | 1 | 2019-10-25 12:45 | marczoutendijk | I reverted all the data added by user Md jins by accident in the following changesets:76060638,76062011,76063757,76063876,76063826,76064264,76064036,76064023,76064360,76063961,76064386,76067131,76075461,76075435,76075480,76076654,76076554,76076531,76076695,76076572,76076873,76076561,76076499,760... |
| 76205395 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-10-25 12:18 | 1 | 2019-10-25 12:26 | marczoutendijk | I reverted all data included in the following changesets by user Md Jins:76075490,76087945,76088032,76088149,76087991,76088189,76087917,76088047,76088204,76088134,76087958,76088084,76088124,76088174,76088230Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 73623790 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-08-22 13:07 | 1 | 2019-08-22 13:08 | marczoutendijk | This is (v2) |
| 72575365 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-07-23 20:33 | 1 | 2019-07-23 20:35 | marczoutendijk | This edit is part of a research for KV pairs that are very rare (maximum use = 3) or highly unusual or plain wrong. |
| 72210810 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-07-13 14:11 | 1 | 2019-07-13 15:16 | marczoutendijk | Not v40 but v4 |
| 72005389 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-07-08 09:50 | 1 | 2019-07-08 10:02 | marczoutendijk | De nieuwe situatie (per 1-7-2019) is op de luchtfoto's uiteraard nog niet terug te zien op dit moment.Ook zijn nog niet alle details met aansluiting definitief. Er wordt nog gewerkt en er worden nog borden geplaatst. De verbinding met de loopbrug over de A2 is nog provisorisch. |
| 71402512 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-06-19 13:39 | 1 | 2019-06-19 13:40 | marczoutendijk | This is (v3) not (v2) |
| 70121692 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-05-10 19:11 | 1 | 2019-05-10 19:15 | marczoutendijk | I have changed this area to natural=scrub as the tags being used before cannot be used togehter! If something is fell it means vegatation above the tree-line and hence it cannot be a forest!He cambiado esta área a natural = scrub ya que las etiquetas que se usan antes no se pueden usar ju... |
| 68843038 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-04-03 14:54 | 1 | 2019-04-03 15:25 | marczoutendijk | This is (v2) |
| 68338574 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-20 14:34 | 1 | 2019-03-20 14:43 | marczoutendijk | I found about 2500+ highway=milestone markers in this region that were not connected to the highway itself. Making them useless because the routing software cannot read them. Also the use of the pk=* is not relevant anymore.(google translate):Encontré aproximadamente 2500 marcadores de hi... |
| 68258601 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-18 13:30 | 1 | 2019-03-18 18:58 | kapazao ♦911 | Thank you! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68258601 |
| 68205338 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-16 14:48 | 1 | 2019-03-17 12:40 | kapazao ♦911 | Thank you for your fix in street names. I will check it to fix some mistakes with orthography.I only want to tell you that I do not understand why did you add those notes indicating the same as you did in the changeset, it is not necessary.Regards --- Publ... |
| 2 | 2019-03-17 17:36 | marczoutendijk | That is because not all mappers do understand changeset comments. If some mapper was just editing a (single) highway in Cuevas del Campo he still could see what I did. This is especially helpfull for new mappers. BTW, I also did change the UPPERcase streetnames in Pozo Alcon.It was my intention to... | |
| 68143236 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-14 16:31 | 1 | 2019-03-14 18:52 | marczoutendijk | This is (v4a), not (v4) |
| 67858332 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-06 20:29 | 1 | 2019-03-06 20:44 | marczoutendijk | Yecla I meant. |
| 67858460 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-06 20:34 | 1 | 2019-03-06 20:44 | marczoutendijk | Villena I meant! |
| 67858712 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-06 20:43 | 1 | 2019-03-06 20:44 | marczoutendijk | Not in Yecla but in Villena I meant! |
| 67741005 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-03 16:22 | 1 | 2019-03-04 13:35 | marczoutendijk | I have solved this problem. |
| 67700044 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-03-01 21:00 | 1 | 2019-03-04 10:08 | kapazao ♦911 | Thanks for your changes!There is a lot of work to do with tracktypes. I only want to tell you to take care with tracktype tag, because it is not always grade2 and it would be good to check those changes. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/... |
| 2 | 2019-03-04 10:32 | marczoutendijk | Thanks kapazo for your comment.Yes, I know the difficulties with the tracktype. I'm very often in Spain (riding bicycle and collecting a lot of mapillary images too, mostly on tracks) and will be in the Granada region again in May this year.Most of the time tracktype 2 is more correct than ... | |
| 67645290 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-28 09:57 | 1 | 2019-02-28 10:02 | marczoutendijk | The name of a city/town/village/hamlet should NOT be put on the landuse=residential. We use the place=* tagging to give a place its name!El nombre de una "city/town/village/hamlet" NO se debe poner en el uso de la landuse=residential. Usamos el "place=*" etiquetado para dar a... |
| 67644070 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-28 09:10 | 1 | 2019-02-28 09:13 | marczoutendijk | No veo agua en el embalse en fotos aéreas recientes. Sin embargo, he puesto access = no en las carreteras dentro del embalse.I don't see any water in the embalse on recent aerial pictures. Nevertheless I have put access=no on the roads inside the embalse. |
| 67393362 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-20 14:13 | 1 | 2019-02-20 14:15 | marczoutendijk | From the wiki:Most landuse=residential objects in OSM are nameless, simply indicating general areas used for residences. However, housing estates and other specific residential areas are also often given their own landuse=residential area plus the correct name=*. "name" in that context i... |
| 67262041 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-16 20:05 | 1 | 2019-02-16 20:07 | marczoutendijk | In this changeset I changed the fixme text so that it didn't contain a reference to the pk tag, which is absent from this milestone. |
| 67191550 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-14 12:09 | 1 | 2019-02-14 20:22 | marczoutendijk | See:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential |
| 67191608 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-14 12:11 | 1 | 2019-02-14 20:21 | marczoutendijk | Please note: suburbs shouldn't use the principal name of the city they belong to on their name=* tag (if any).See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential |
| 66857384 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-02 14:52 | 1 | 2019-02-02 15:17 | marczoutendijk | Not around Nerpio but around Las Anorias. |
| 66709954 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-01-28 15:40 | 1 | 2019-01-28 15:51 | marczoutendijk | Sorry I meant west of Yecla! |
| 66710184 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-01-28 15:48 | 1 | 2019-01-28 15:50 | marczoutendijk | Sorry, I meant west of Yecla! |
| 55468671 by marczoutendijk @ 2018-01-15 17:00 | 1 | 2018-03-19 13:08 | krabbenborg ♦1 | beste Marc, hoe is het mogelijk dat onze streekkrant de Gelderlander en onze gemeente OostGelre momenteel nog kaarten van OSM gebruikt waarop Lievelde NIET wordt genoemd? Wat kunnen wij eraan doen dat Lievelde wel wordt genoemd?dear Marc, how is it possibloe that our region newspaper de Gelderland... |
| 2 | 2018-03-19 17:11 | marczoutendijk | Ik begrijp de vraag niet: Zie je Lievelde niet op de kaart staan (het staat nl. gewoon op de kaart, maar je moet wel inzoomen),of:gebruikt die krant een kaart van lang geleden waarop het (mogelijk) nog niet was vermeld? | |
| 46138942 by marczoutendijk @ 2017-02-16 14:45 | 1 | 2017-02-22 13:52 | de vries ♦123 | Hoi Marc, het grasland wat je hier hebt omgezet naar wetland is volgens mij een waterbergingsgebied en dus het grootste deel van het jaar is niet echt een wetland. De tag wetland is daarom discutabel, maar wat mij betreft wel acceptabel. Wel zou ik landuse=grasland terug plaatsten. Het is tenslotte ... |
| 2 | 2017-02-22 14:01 | marczoutendijk | Ja, ik zag dat je dat ook al in de Rijskampen hebt gedaan:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80760742#map=18/51.68096/5.26073Overigens is ook dat hele gebied nu een overloopgebied geworden (langs de Hondermorgensedijk), en dat wilde ik ook omzetten, maar moet nog een kleine verkenningsronde m... | |
| 45881659 by marczoutendijk @ 2017-02-07 10:50 | 1 | 2017-02-07 16:14 | Allroads ♦423 | En dan is de naam nog fout, Emmelhage.Ben er vandaag geweest, een welkomsbord van waarschijnlijk Gemeente, raar geen E.:emmelhage(h)eerlijk in de polderBrief gestuurd naar de Gemeente, om de officiële parken en namen aan te geven.En wat foto's geschoten |
| 2 | 2017-02-07 16:55 | marczoutendijk | Dan blijf ik toch die hoofdletter gebruiken, want op de website die je gaf staat wel Emmelhage!Ik zal de multi uitbreiden zodat ook de rechterhelft erbij gaat horen. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-07 17:08 | Allroads ♦423 | Ik denkt ook, dat we een regel binnen OSM moeten aanhouden, met hoofdletter beginnen. Uitzonderingen, de, van, etc.Waarom een polygon?., de bossage horen ook bij het gebied (park) zo ook het water.Die forest kan nooit inner zijn. | |
| 45888938 by marczoutendijk @ 2017-02-07 15:39 | 1 | 2017-02-07 16:35 | Allroads ♦423 | Deze rechterzijde behoort ook bij het park, nergens is de naam Emmelhagepark of Emmelhage park vernoemd.deze village green, onderdeel van de wijk Emmelhage (zijkant)http://emmelhage.nl/ |
| 44139660 by marczoutendijk @ 2016-12-03 15:45 | 1 | 2016-12-03 18:26 | alphensebezorger ♦393 | Hallo Marc,Volgens mij is het "boompjes-probleem" eenvoudiger op te lossen. De omvattende (multi)polygon (met de naam Clingenbosch) moet gewoon geen tag landuse=forest hebben. De erbinnen liggende stukjes hebben al de juiste tags (gras, bos, water) zo te zien. Dan is alleen nog de vraa... |
| 2 | 2016-12-03 18:37 | marczoutendijk | Dat heb ik geprobeerd, maar het leverde (nog) niet het gewenste resultaat op. De vermelding toponym (die er in het verleden opstond) werkt ook niet goed. Ik ben aan het werk ermee! | |
| 3 | 2016-12-03 19:04 | alphensebezorger ♦393 | Misschien dan toch maar leisure=park? Geeft wel een lelijke kleur groen in Mapnik, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36988583. | |
| 4 | 2016-12-03 19:41 | marczoutendijk | Ik heb nu de outer als forest, en alle inners die als forest stonden genoteerd, verwijderd. Ook de overige multi's gereduceerd. Even kijken hoed dat eruit ziet! | |
| 5 | 2016-12-03 20:22 | marczoutendijk | Het ziet er nu goed uit. Overigens is wel de vraag of de kleine perceeltjes gras die er nu nog staan, ook echt gras zijn. Vergeleken met cyclomedia zou ik zeggen: allemaal bos! | |
| 43930439 by marczoutendijk @ 2016-11-24 20:01 | 1 | 2016-11-24 20:19 | marczoutendijk | Test wijst inderdaad uit dat twee gelijksoortig getagde landuses die aan elkaar vastzitten, op de grens van die twee gebieden een dunne lijn op de kaart laten zien.Testgebied is weer verwijderd. |
| 31292718 by marczoutendijk @ 2015-05-19 18:43 | 1 | 2016-04-03 17:20 | alphensebezorger ♦393 | Hier zijn twee 'spellingen' voor de straatnaam in OSM aanwezig. Sander heeft de BAG-naam (met Dr.) aangepast naar Dokter J.W. etc. De straatnamen op de wegen (behalve een stukje bij de rotonde) gebruiken de afkorting. Zonder een edit-war te willen ontketenen: moet dit niet gelijk zijn? |
| 2 | 2016-04-03 20:43 | marczoutendijk | Ik zie op dit moment maar één spellingswijze op in totaal 5 segmenten van de Dr. J.W. Paltelaan. Ik reken de opritten naar de rotonde niet mee. In het verleden heeft Sander H sommige hernoemd naar Dokter, maar andere segmenten bleven gewoon Dr. heten. Uitgaande van "ground truth&q... | |
| 3 | 2016-04-04 16:51 | alphensebezorger ♦393 | Sorry, ik was niet erg duidelijk. Ik bedoel het verschil tussen de straatnaam (highway=*, name=Dr. J.W. etc.), en de naam in de adres-nodes (addr:street=Dokter etc.) van de panden. Voor mijn gevoel is het handiger (voor routers bv. ?) als die hetzelfde zijn. Welke we kiezen maakt mij niet erg veel ... | |
| 4 | 2016-04-04 18:08 | marczoutendijk | Ik zet het in het forum, want het duurt soms 2 jaar voor er hier iemand op een opmerking reageert (als dat al gebeurt...) | |
| 5 | 2016-04-04 19:15 | ligfietser ♦122 | Dr wordt Dokter of Doctor, zie stap 4B van http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport_via_ODS_plugin |