| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180635176 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-03-30 15:13 ~ 20 days ago | 1 | ~ 23 hours ago | conifermapper ♦60 | Quina vergonha i va un autre tròç de cultura e patrimòni occitans… |
| 2 | ~ 18 hours ago | conifermapper ♦60 | amagament intencional se poiriá dire. Se rend quitament pas sus cap de calc de mapa! De segur que podriam al mens estilizar de noms coma FR/OC amb lo francés primièr dins una etiqueta de nom... | |
| 181062784 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-04-08 17:45 ~ 11 days ago | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | goedegazelle ♦252 | En wat is er mis met landuse=scrub?O, niet afgesproken.Hoeveel mensen maken zulke afspraken?En hoeveel mensen werken er aan de kaart?Dus hoeveel zwaarder weegt dat laatste? |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | marczoutendijk | landuse=scrub komt 768 keer voor.natural=scrub komt 5433670 keer voor.Dat was de stand op 2-4-2026.Ik probeer zoveel mogelijk type/tagfouten te verwijderen en te vervangen door de juiste tags die goed worden gerenderd en begrepen.scrub is geen landuse maar een natuurlijke vorm van vegetatie ... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 days ago | goedegazelle ♦252 | De tag wordt onder andere gebruikt voor gronden die door de gemeente zijn beplant en worden onderhouden. De planten die er staan zijn gekweekt en vaak van een gekruist ras.In de wiki staat overduidelijk dat automatische edits ten strengste worden afgeraden. Beetje lullig om dat aan een doorgewin... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 days ago | marczoutendijk | Het waren geen automatische edits, ik heb ze een voor een bekijken en wijzigingen doorgevoerd indien dat uit het oogpunt van de gebruikte tags nodig was. (en daar ben ik nog steeds mee bezig).En gronden die door gemeenten worden beplant (en onderhouden) kun je onmogelijk als "natuurlijk"... | |
| 5 | ~ 6 days ago | marczoutendijk | Een voorbeeld van de controle die ik uitvoer bij het wijzigen van landuse=scrub naar natural=scrub zie je in deze changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802665984#map=5/59.92/17.63Het vervangen van landuse door natural zou een conflict geven met natural=wood. Dat heb ik dus gewoon laten s... | |
| 181160507 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-04-10 17:36 ~ 9 days ago | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 180772774, 181027892, 181028637, 181037611, 181040337, 181056642, 181084034, 181092054, 181104258. |
| 180517961 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-03-27 19:11 ~ 23 days ago | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | Wildsharky ♦346 | Reverted of 180435211 |
| 180598619 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-03-29 18:31 ~ 21 days ago | 1 | ~ 21 days ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 180584343, 180584636, 180585068, 180592072, 180592510, 180592822. |
| 180532215 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-03-28 08:21 ~ 22 days ago | 1 | ~ 22 days ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 180034047, 180034283, 180034286, 180063342. |
| 180519108 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-03-27 19:49 ~ 23 days ago | 1 | ~ 23 days ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 180077491, 180116985, 180275558, 180275865, 180322089, 180322629, 180324026, 180324041, 180433420, 180470822, 180472929, 180479969, 180480034. |
| 180077000 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-03-18 19:55 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 179811072, 179811762, 179811960, 179812020, 179812075, 179812133, 179812177, 179812231, 179812294, 179812363, 179812403, 179812448, 179812513, 179812572, 179812631, 179812679, 179812715, 179812787, 179812839, 179812908, 179812950, 179813001... |
| 179461169 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-03-06 19:24 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | marczoutendijk | Omdat het commentaar hierboven niet langer kan nog even dit:Het betreffende pad is nauwelijks als pad waarneembaar en er staat geen enkele aanwijzing op het fietspad langs de Leemculeweg (waar het een aftakking van moet zijn).Eenmaal op het echte fietspad is het door mijn gewijzigde pad ook nauw... |
| 178550767 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-02-14 16:12 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | marczoutendijk | Moraca = Mora! |
| 177609709 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-01-23 13:34 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | maybe this undiscussed import by raimundosbc should be reverted altogether instead? |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | marczoutendijk | See:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19675 | |
| 177491670 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-01-20 19:19 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | marczoutendijk | Highways = Landuse!!! |
| 176747591 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-01-02 15:02 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | marczoutendijk | Fixing tags: natural=path is supposed to be highway=path. Nature doesn't create a path by itself |
| 176747626 by marczoutendijk @ 2026-01-02 15:02 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | marczoutendijk | Fixing tags: natural=path is supposed to be highway=path. Nature doesn't create a path by itself |
| 176662499 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-12-31 09:05 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Dillen GJ ♦51 | Haha je bent me net 2 uur voor !Zocht me een ongeluk , had ik het helemaal rond en wilde de object def erop zetten ben je voor ! Top ! |
| 176562294 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-12-29 07:39 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | rempshaener ♦1,437 | Hello,you are editing objects with the comment „tagfixing: area=yes is not needed on landuse/natural/landcover.“You are right: this is unnecessary for the tags you mentioned. However, please note that other tags may also be attached to this objects, such as highway=pedestrian here.... |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | marczoutendijk | You are right also, so I have restored it! However, it is also better to tag a pedestrian area as a separate entity and not combine it with other landuses. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | rempshaener ♦1,437 | Thank you, you are absolutely right. | |
| 176581887 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-12-29 14:51 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | marczoutendijk | west -> east ! |
| 175560498 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-12-05 18:53 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Sylabowy Kot ♦397 | Ok but you could separate these two countries per changeset. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | marczoutendijk | Yes, I can! It was simply a mistake at my side leaving another cs open in JOSM! | |
| 128049858 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-25 17:25 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | watmildon ♦301 | Hilariously enough this revert caught this place node that actually does have the name Pond! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/153647080/historyI've patched it up as part of a bigger cleanup but thought you may find it amusing. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | watmildon ♦301 | 2 years later and I found one more. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174713660Amusing to me. I hope you are well. Happy mapping. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | marczoutendijk | Waiting for the next one! | |
| 172481923 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-09-26 11:58 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | marczoutendijk | not (v78) but (v8) |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | danieldegroot2 ♦707 | Hey Marc,I see you are adding version numbers to your changeset comments. Could you explain if there is a specific reason and/or use case for this, please?Regards,Daniel | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | marczoutendijk | Yes, to keep track of the very many changesets I sometimes do in the same region.Marc | |
| 174302833 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-11-06 18:49 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | marczoutendijk | Should be Landuse! |
| 172920622 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-10-06 15:25 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | marczoutendijk | Source: PNOA |
| 172394885 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-09-24 13:32 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | marczoutendijk | The source should be PNOA.I updated the landuse that I had made here in 2013. |
| 171215494 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-08-30 08:30 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | joost schouppe ♦1,427 | oeps; bedankt voor de fix! |
| 171649649 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-09-08 18:03 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | marczoutendijk | guset_house should read as guest_house! |
| 171265729 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-08-31 11:58 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | marczoutendijk | swomming -> swimming |
| 171265773 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-08-31 11:59 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | marczoutendijk | swomming -> swimming |
| 171265689 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-08-31 11:58 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | marczoutendijk | swomming -> swimming |
| 170739900 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-08-20 17:38 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Sylabowy Kot ♦397 | You've made a mistake - the greenery and fountaints were no longer visible because of lack of multipolygon. Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170823293 |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | marczoutendijk | Sorry for that mistake and thanks for restoring it and using the correct area! | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | Rogoyski ♦251 | There are still a mistakes. Areas of steps must not be part of a pedestrian area (nor of a `area:highway=footway`). | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | marczoutendijk | Are you going to fix those? | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | Rogoyski ♦251 | Yeah, I will fix. | |
| 170785431 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-08-21 15:12 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | HeiligerHein112 ♦11 | New ways on the ground - not the old ones as seen on google maps! |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | marczoutendijk | I see what you mean, but I only changed the 4-years old situation based on Bing, not on Google.But using the Hesse DOP20 aerial pictures I see that the whole area needs some redoing!Do you have the time to do that?Marc. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | HeiligerHein112 ♦11 | I try. Mike | |
| 170244317 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-08-10 12:55 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | marczoutendijk | Voor alle duidelijkheid: de namen staan in hoofdletters op de gevel. Om die reden zijn ze ook in hoofdletters op OSM opgenomen. |
| 166083139 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-05-10 19:15 ~ 11 months ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | marczoutendijk | "south" should be "east" |
| 162573775 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-02-16 14:49 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Zie ook: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162572704#map=18/52.189104/5.444364 |
| 162572704 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-02-16 14:22 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Deze wijzigingen hebben vooral betrekking op de situatie die is ontstaan na het verplaatsen van de parkeerplaats langs de Nijkerkerstraat. De gebiedsbeheerder heeft een aantal paden parallel aan de Nijkerkerstraat, vanaf het bos achter huisnummer 26 en richting het noorden, ontoegankelijk gemaakt g... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Laakespad = Laaksepad! | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Op OSM stond de naam van het pad foutief. Gecorrigeerd naar Laaksepad. | |
| 162509253 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-02-14 16:14 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Also including highways and solar panels. |
| 161704121 by marczoutendijk @ 2025-01-24 09:30 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | This is Landuse west of Cortes de Baza! |
| 160795661 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-12-30 14:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Thierry1030 ♦269 | iemand van Domaine l'Ecuriel beweert dat dit pad niet bestaat > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4569351graag uw kijk op de zaak ... :-) |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Het pad bestaat, maar is privé.De DWG is in contact met de eigenaar.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Na hernieuwd contact met Domaine l'Ecuriel en overleg van foto's is besloten het pad (direct langs het Domaine) met access=no aan te merken. Wandelaars kunnen het pad direct langs de Ourthe vrij gebruiken.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 159968637 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-12-05 18:45 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Tatfahren ♦336 | It looks like amenity=fuel was already set before your edit, you just changed the building value to "yes".Which building value should be used to specify that it is a fuel station building (in the case it's not longer used as one, (in the one you changed it's most likely a roo... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Thanks for your reply.I changed a lot of the same error, and sometimes the amenity=fuel was indeed already set.I just wanted to show that building=fuel_station is not correct (it's not a valid entry in the wiki) and that it always needs the company of the amenity=fuel, next to the building=... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Tatfahren ♦336 | Because you say "building=fuel_station" is not correct, how would you tag a fuel station building, that is not longer in service, so "amenity=fuel" can't be used to mark it.I found a video of some guy who converted a old fuel station into a house, where he can live. ht... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | disused:amenity=fuelis all that is needed for such objects.See this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefixWhat I try to change is wrong spelling of tags or wrong use.I cannot see if something is not in use anymore, but therefor we need local mappers (but with the right tool... | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | Tatfahren ♦336 | I think that means that the wiki page for "building=yes" should be updated, that it also counts as a specified type, if the building type can be taken by reading other tags, also such that uses any of all of those different lifecycle prefix prefixes.Today the wiki site says "used ... | |
| 159783679 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:25 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | See:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 |
| 159783671 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:24 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 |
| 159783663 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:24 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | see: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 |
| 159783656 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:24 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 |
| 159844965 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-12-02 14:13 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | fixed: building=yes |
| 159783643 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-30 18:23 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | flohoff ♦2,466 | Hi,i dont think all your changes are correct.People tagging buildings as pavillon when they have non fixed roofs - as a pavillon.The osm wiki using "pavilion" describes a completely different building type.So its not a typo but a different meaning.Could you point me to th... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | I assumed that people using "pavillon" instead of "pavilion" simply made a typing mistake.E.g. using "railway_staton" deliberately to describe something different then a "railway_station" is an example of bad practice in my opinion.And btw. it wasn'... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | I have added a page to the wiki to describe my action.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:building%3Dpavilion#Typing_error_with_name | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | flohoff ♦2,466 | I disagree on this "correction". "pavilion" as a building type is pretty uncommon in Germany, and would mostly associated with sports. It is much more common to name Kiosk type buildings in parks as "pavillon", or building structures without a fixed roof - tent ... | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | flohoff ♦2,466 | I created a community forum thread to get some light into this and other opinions:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416 | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | R0bst3r ♦1,095 | @marczoutendijk, your misunderstanding ist described at the bottom of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dpavilion | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | If one searches in the OSM wiki for "pavillon", you are being asked: do you mean "pavilion"?If one searches in the OSM wiki for "pavillion", you are being asked: do you mean "pavilion"?If (and it might be true) that there is an other type of building, name... | |
| 159717700 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-28 19:51 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | jb54osm ♦208 | Dag Marc,Dat was een 'leuke' vertikking 🥴.Groetjes,Jan |
| 67250996 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-02-16 11:02 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | marczoutendijk | La "highway=milestone" tag debe estar conectada a la propia carretera. He añadido un "fixme" para explicar eso.¡Yo reparé algunas, pero es demasiado trabajo hacerlas todas!Además, "pk=*" ya no es compatible y debería (podría)... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | kapazao ♦1,001 | I think we could remove fixme and highway:position tags in these elements.I do not understand what highway:position does nor I have seen any documentation about this tag.We can read in wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=milestone): "...the node can be placed either dire... | |
| 158825587 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-11-06 16:32 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Should be v17. |
| 157641048 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-10-08 18:34 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154650054, 154650122, 154650157, 156273260, 156273359, 157383710, 157384651, 157385342, 157385605, 157386063, 157386195, 157386259, 157386331, 157387692, 157388008, 157388010, 157424822, 157425254, 157425609, 157425751, 157425834, 157426101... |
| 155606656 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-08-22 13:38 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Date should be 31-12-2021 (see source) |
| 154379652 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-07-25 07:37 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154126718, 154126854, 154126911, 154127221, 154127270, 154127469, 154127550, 154127680, 154127758, 154127803, 154128000, 154128209, 154128621, 154128715, 154129042, 154129070, 154133305, 154133428, 154133631, 154168594, 154168699, 154168734... |
| 154379345 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-07-25 07:28 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154126718, 154126854, 154126911, 154127221, 154127270, 154127469, 154127550, 154127680, 154127758, 154127803, 154128000, 154128209, 154128621, 154128715, 154129042, 154129070, 154133305, 154133428, 154133631, 154168594, 154168699, 154168734... |
| 154340586 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-07-24 09:30 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154126718, 154126854, 154126911, 154127221, 154127270, 154127469, 154127550, 154127680, 154127758, 154127803, 154128000, 154128209, 154128621, 154128715, 154129042, 154129070, 154133305, 154133428, 154133631. |
| 153859194 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-07-12 14:42 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Should be (v3) |
| 152347341 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-06-06 19:37 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Ik heb de weg over deze brug tijdelijk op construction gezet. Ik hou in de gaten hoelang het gaat duren. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | dvdhoven ♦957 | Ik heb bicycle=no vervangen door access=no anders heb ik een permanente foutmelding in knooppuntnet.En naar mijn idee kan niemand voorlopig over de brug, dus access=no is - naar mijn idee - ook toepasselijk.Vriendelijke groeten,Dick van den Hoven | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Uitstekende oplossing Dick! | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | De brug wordt binnenkort provisorisch hersteld. Een datum daarvoor is nog niet bekend. Ik hou het in de gaten. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | dvdhoven ♦957 | Nav een note vanmorgen en ook een notitie in de editor van FB heb ik de brug weer opengesteld De notitie van FB heb ik in de note tekst gekopieerd ipv de oorspronkelijke tekst | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | marczoutendijk | Dank Dick! | |
| 150346838 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-04-22 13:16 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Op'tRad ♦59 | Architecture, ja, prima. De naam van de kunstenaar had ik ook al wel gevonden en ingevuld maar dat was dus weg. Ik zie wel dat bij De Beuk het comment weer is verschenen. Daar staat letterlijk, dat Holten en Rijssen hun naam te danken hebben aan omgewaaide bomen. Ook al staat dat op de website van h... |
| 150087920 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-04-16 14:23 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Op'tRad ♦59 | Goedendag,Ik heb daar gisteren of eergisteren zelf net outer/inner aan geplakt, dus het zal nog wel niet renderen. Dus ik begrijp niet goed wat u toe hebt gevoegd, maar goed.Groet,Op'tRad |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | Je had de eigenschappen van de MP niet op de MP zelf gezet maar op de outer. Dat is niet correct. En de inner was geen onderdeel van de MP, dus dat renderde ook niet.Je moet niet alleen een outer/inner ergens aan vast plakken, de hele structuur moet kloppen, en dat was dus niet het geval.https:/... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | En ik zie ook dat je met iD werkt, en daarmee is het niet goed mogelijk om relaties en MP's goed te bewerken. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Op'tRad ♦59 | Dat dat lastig is, had ik al gemerkt ...Hebt u anders meer rechten dat u ziet wie wat bewerkt en zelfs waarmee? Ik zie dat van een ander niet | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | Met de JOSM editor kun je altijd zien wie wat heeft bewerkt.Je kunt echter (zonder JOSM) ook op de historie van een changeset/node/way/relatie klikken.Onder dit bericht zie je bv. staan: Wegen (1)en Relaties (2)als je dan op de daarin genoemde onderdelen klikt bv. op 1743719, v2dan zie... | |
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | Weet je dat er een uitgebreid forum is waar je met vragen terecht kunt?https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43 | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | Op'tRad ♦59 | Dat weet ik. Ik zal nog eens een keer kijken maar tot nu toe heb ik niet ontdekt hoe je met de iD editor kunt zien wie precies iets doet | |
| 149782709 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-04-09 15:29 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | East of Pozo Alcón is a better description of this changeset... |
| 148981812 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-03-21 19:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | The huge area in this edit is a mistake! |
| 148025711 by marczoutendijk @ 2024-02-28 19:29 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | Comment should read: Highways west of Castillejar! |
| 75426728 by marczoutendijk @ 2019-10-08 18:37 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | Resturtered = Restored |
| 144380701 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-11-23 18:59 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | NieWnen ♦1,244 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=long%20jumpIt's not an error, just an old tagging scheme. You should probably change the wiki page first.I see it's finally standardized:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dathletics#Field_events |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | But has long_jump=pit ever been a serious choice? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | NieWnen ♦1,244 | On that wiki page, yes. Probably I couldn't find anything better 3 years ago :D.But finally I can change tags (and I will) for long_jump pits which I mapped in the neighborhood using the new scheme.Thanks for catching it anyway! | |
| 143986146 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-11-13 20:29 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | voltairovicz ♦243 | Exactly this must have been this kind of mistake during editing. Thanks for the correction |
| 143913717 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-11-11 20:15 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212125120https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212125121Let je op de juiste schrijfwijze voor meadow (dus niet maedow), Hendrikklaas?Als source vermeld je ook "survey", maar als je daar niet zelf bent geweest, dan kun je beter vermelden dat je je gebas... |
| 143437152 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-10-31 18:23 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ElliottPlack ♦937 | 25,000!! Congratulations on the milestone. I appreciate your dedication to the project and to the DWG. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | Thanks! | |
| 138633828 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-07-17 18:21 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | !El Camino del Turillo fue designado carril bici con un límite máximo de velocidad de 90 km/h! Se trata de un curioso error que ha pasado desapercibido durante 4 años. Hoy lo he vuelto a cambiar a higway=unclassified. |
| 137832216 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-06-27 11:48 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is v22 (not v12) |
| 133452570 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-03-08 19:05 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Glassman ♦5,828 | Why did you add access=no and service=driveway to Coons Road? As well as change the existing unname service road into a driveway? I live in this area and neither are correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133452570 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | The DWG ticket for this change contained this message:"Coons Road, off SR-9, Sedro Woolley, WA, is a private drive way. It isNOT a public road. There are Jersey blocks at the intersection of thetee blocking off the north portion, which serves several houses. Bothsouthern legs are 100%... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Glassman ♦5,828 | I'm seeing mappers delete driveways or mark them private when they have no markings or gates. The accepted practice in the US is that driveways are private but should only be tagged with access=private if they are marked or have a gate.Looking at street level imagery also doesn't show ... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Received comment:"Commenter is simply incorrect about signs. I just looked at Google street view. Signs indicating private property start at the large stump on the right hand side of the driveway just out of sight from the Google street view.. There are MULTIPLE signs at that location and ... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Hi Glassman,Do you have any more comments on the reaction quoted above?Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | Glassman ♦5,828 | I haven't had a chance to drive up there to see what is currently posted although I do plan to head up there. Private to me means that it is privately maintained. If the road is posted as no trespassing or something similar then I agree that it should be access=private. | |
| 132850318 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-02-21 19:25 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | The typo was landcover=tress (should have been trees) |
| 132726287 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-02-18 19:14 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | source=PNOA |
| 131781720 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-01-27 17:11 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | source=https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface |
| 131277249 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-01-14 19:35 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦620 | Hvad er det?Det skal have et fysisk tag. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | I fixed the incorrect landuse=paving_stones. There is a roof on the map:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070522808.It doesn't show quite well on the aerial pictures. | |
| 130734052 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-12-31 21:44 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Sandal man ♦410 | Hoi Marc nu heeft het geen tag meer?Jan |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Goed opgemerkt en bedankt.Het is nu natural=heath.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dheathhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131337019 | |
| 131150653 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-01-11 15:17 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Het vlak van de brug én het pad over de brug waren met elkaar verknoopt. Die heb ik opgeschoond in dezelfde changeset als waarin ik de pier heb bewerkt. |
| 130716466 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-12-31 11:19 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,217 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130794204 where the changeset comment is: DWG reverting incorrect CS |
| 130741879 by marczoutendijk @ 2023-01-01 10:08 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,217 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130793535 where the changeset comment is: DWG reverting incorrect CS |
| 130388367 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-12-22 18:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Kovoschiz ♦2,858 | Why would you directly delete this named PoI which is clearly more informative, and in fact correct? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,217 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130410287 where the changeset comment is: Correcting invalid tag fix | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Kovoschitz: I reverted that mistake! | |
| 130212656 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-12-18 13:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | highways -> landuse |
| 129488600 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-28 19:00 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Diógenes de Sinope ♦187 | 👍🏿 |
| 129198209 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-21 13:49 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opendcc ♦1,570 | Hello,please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129200760. I had a discussion with the mapper (mainly about name-tagging), she/he is not willing to cooperate. |
| 129055540 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-17 18:46 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | highways=landuse |
| 128806012 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-12 09:57 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | source=PNOA Spain; Catastro - BU.Building, CP.CadastralParcel; |
| 128721841 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-10 08:49 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦499 | Hello, I don't get it. The shop's name is House. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | I fixed it. It was a mistake because there are 1000's of name=House where building=house was meant.Also there are many brand:House shops that are located in a building=retail + shop=clothes location where the building shouldn't cary a name because that is already in the brand. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Anyway, I fixed all the brand=House tags to also include name=House!Thanks for pointing me to this. | |
| 128690195 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-09 14:19 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | There are many incorrect uses of the name=* tag related to buildings.We see often name=house where building=house should have been used.I'm fixing those errors, sometimes using larger bounding boxes to prevent creating 3500+ changesets each with just one fix! |
| 128690116 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-09 14:17 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | There are many incorrect uses of the name=* tag related to buildings.We see often name=house where building=house should have been used.I'm fixing those errors, sometimes using larger bounding boxes to prevent creating 3500+ changesets each with just one fix! |
| 128690238 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-09 14:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | There are many incorrect uses of the name=* tag related to buildings.We see often name=house where building=house should have been used. I'm fixing those errors, sometimes using larger bounding boxes to prevent creating 3500+ changesets each with just one fix! |
| 128499474 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-04 20:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | topius ♦61 | What do you mean by "fake"? These buildings might not be visible on the older Bing imagery, but they are there on the newer Maxar imagery. I reinstated them. Please check all available imagery (especially the most recent ones)! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Sorry for that! You'r right indeed that Maxar shows the buildings. But you are the first one that is able to draw properly squared buildings with the correct tags. Please check the history for that. | |
| 128405948 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:33 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128405956 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:33 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128405984 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:34 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128405990 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:34 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128406001 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:34 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128406016 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:35 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128406027 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:35 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 128406063 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-11-02 18:36 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source=JOSM! |
| 127999541 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-24 14:16 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | seejahin ♦1 | মুন্সিগঞ্জ |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This tagging had more errors. I now have completely retagged it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128077280Is your comment the name of that pond? | |
| 128049928 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-25 17:27 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | oba510 ♦274 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150963254/history appears to be a valid place name. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Thanks for notifying me. Restored.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128067101 | |
| 127970716 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-23 19:14 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Sorry for the huge bounding box! Another changeset at the other side of the ocean was still open... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,484 | Curiously, no ford=0 but there are 154 ford=no in the database. several checked in Italy these are on ways *before* reaching water, one like 1km long, another combined with bridge=yes. The wonders that are in the DB database. :O))) | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | I found 570 times ford=no! | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | And also 231 times ford=ford!! | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | And we have 56 times ford=boat?? | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | ElliottPlack ♦937 | We also have yes=no 🤔 | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | ElliottPlack ♦937 | https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/no=yes | |
| 127853142 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-20 19:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Removed landuse and replaced with individual tree. |
| 127850681 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-20 18:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Should be landuse! |
| 127712229 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-18 08:40 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Made a mistake: Landuse -> Highways |
| 127606823 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-16 09:42 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Commentaar moet zijn:Website rustpunt Koffie- en Theeschenkerij Kafoep aangepast aan opgave van rustpunt.nu |
| 126133442 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-09-13 13:01 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 126132640, 126132707, 126132740, 126132794, 126132855. |
| 125241795 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-22 19:21 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125219641, 125219712, 125219788, 125219865, 125219947, 125219992, 125228645, 125228680, 125228713, 125228735, 125228767. |
| 125150763 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-20 14:42 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125146687, 125146717, 125146761, 125146792, 125146824. |
| 125146811 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-20 13:04 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125145785, 125145831, 125145870, 125145926, 125145967. |
| 125133469 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-20 05:28 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125112258, 125112314, 125112388, 125112452, 125112506. |
| 125105055 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-19 12:23 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125104460, 125104495, 125104536, 125104582, 125104626. |
| 125075432 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-18 18:34 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124560102, 124560189, 124560368, 124560473, 124560819, 124560940, 124561085, 124561330, 124561878. |
| 125073968 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-18 18:01 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125072613, 125072702, 125072772, 125072838, 125072896, 125072934, 125073014, 125073057, 125073147, 125073202, 125073239, 125073288, 125073342, 125073394, 125073454, 125073529, 125073608, 125073661. |
| 125031618 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-17 18:57 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125029279, 125029310, 125029416, 125029445, 125029475, 125029569, 125029620, 125029724, 125029881, 125029923, 125029969, 125030068, 125030136, 125030225, 125030262, 125030298, 125030364, 125030401, 125030483, 125030507, 125030820, 125030851... |
| 125029621 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-17 18:03 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125016974, 125017097, 125017134, 125017170, 125017205. |
| 124566112 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-06 14:56 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Highways sshould read Landuse! |
| 124492484 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-08-04 18:17 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Checking for DWG |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Hello Marc? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Got it! (But not in my GoMap app!) | |
| 117730823 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-22 14:48 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | bosboer ♦6 | Mag ik vragen welke bron je gebruikt hebt om deze wijzigingen aan te brengen? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | 10 jaar geleden werd dit nog getagd met:landuse=farmlandfarmland=plant_nurseryde huidige (geprefereerde) tag is nu:landuse=plant_nurseryZie:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:landuse?uselang=nlen:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=plant%20nursery?uselang=nlIk h... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | bosboer ♦6 | Bedankt voor de duidelijke toelichting. | |
| 121911604 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-06-03 19:06 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Comment is wrong, should be: Added missing steps over river Schalesbach. Bicycles must dismount here. I passed this bridge on 3 june 2022 and had to take off all the lugage of my bicycle in order to pass this bridge. |
| 120715861 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-05-08 19:06 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Hezza Fezza ♦10 | Buenas tardes,it would be great if you could remove the source="EU CORINE land cover 2006" after completely fixing a landuse way. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Hello Hezza Fezza,Thanks for your commentI usually change the source to old_source="EU CORINE land cover 2006" and then add source=PNOA.Because I'm working on it right now, I'll do that after finishing in this region.Gracias por su comentarioNormalmente cambio source ... | |
| 120362762 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-29 19:53 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | krusefahrer ♦56 | Dear Marc,how would you tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703345532 (and the other village on the bottom right)? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | Areas where people live should be tagged with landuse=residential.Areas where people grow something have one of the many choices for landuse=*See our wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse | |
| 120345251 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-29 11:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | krusefahrer ♦56 | What's the name of this bakery? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | marczoutendijk | There is no bakery at all! But that's the whole point of this redaction. Someone used this node to add personal details to OSM.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 119546857 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-10 18:31 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,484 | Hi Marc,Not a typo, shows up top of the list when starting to key 'stock' in ID Editor. The pick lists fed by the N?? database needs lots of cleaning, lots. Some items appear 3-4 times in the drop down list... how is a casual mapper ever to know... as single word, with space, with unde... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Thanks for the comment rob, I'm aware of that iD editor issue. Indeed the main reason for so many different versions of the same objects.Marc. | |
| 119474817 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-08 14:58 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This should be east of Tomelloso! |
| 119435110 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-07 15:35 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Retired Account ♦104 | This change incorrectly removes the carpark building just for "fixing osmose" error. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Hi JalooooNz,That carpark seems to be below the other building and the swimming pool.Hence it should have layer=-1.The adjacent Tropez Residences seem to have the same problem.Apart from that the landuse with the name was duplicated.I tried some fixes. Please follow with me and check this ... | |
| 119314696 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 19:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | There was a worldwide typing error with residential=condomium (check out your dictionary to find out its meaning!)Fixed it in a few large areas: residential=condominium.Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 119314795 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 19:10 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | There was a worldwide typing error with residential=condomium (check out your dictionary to find out its meaning!)Fixed it in a few large areas: residential=condominium.Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 119314818 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 19:11 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | There was a worldwide typing error with residential=condomium (check out your dictionary to find out its meaning!)Fixed it in a few large areas: residential=condominium.Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 119314750 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 19:08 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | There was a worldwide typing error with residential=condomium (check out your dictionary to find out its meaning!) Fixed it in a few large areas: residential=condominium.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 119292190 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-04-04 08:27 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset . |
| 118522795 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-03-15 18:32 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is more around Casas de la Jaraba |
| 118395977 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-03-12 12:17 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is v3 |
| 118157058 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-03-06 12:38 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | The street is named Ewing Street according to this: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2920023618234508Don't change it back to fake names. Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 117728264 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-22 13:45 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Emilius123 ♦396 | Thank you.I really wonder if the person that did is is asleep right now. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117728264 |
| 117480423 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-16 14:55 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | In this changeset I changed an obvious typo and the choices were either pole or tower. Given the nearby other power=pole, my choice is clear (but could be wrong) |
| 117334825 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-12 20:18 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | haukep ♦50 | Hi! I'm not sure if this really qualifies as a "true" pitch for soccer / association football. Based on aerial images, it seems to be a plain grass field to me.Did you change this only because it popped up as a mistake in some tool? Or have you checked locally as well? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Hi haukep,It was tagged with leisure=soccer 4 years ago by a mapper who did not know the situation locally either. The tag leisure=soccer is wrong anyhow, because leisure=pitch is the valid tag, combined with sport=# for whatever sport is practiced at that pitch.To me it seemed grass also, but... | |
| 117017162 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-02-04 18:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Good guess, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/614778 reckons "fence and gate" :) |
| 116468998 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-22 15:00 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | DP24PH ♦418 | Here's the tip: If in case of concrete/wood, kindly use the "material=*" tagging on buildings and perimeter wall (if available).DP24 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Thanks for the tip. Used it in later versions where the source=* was used to indicate the material.Marc . | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116470810 | |
| 116469775 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-22 15:18 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Replaced source by materal=* |
| 115797743 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-05 13:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Baloo Uriza ♦2,404 | I wonder if this should really be landuse=industrial since it's basically cattle storage. landuse=commercial seems more oriented towards office buildings and business parks, no? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115797743 ... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Hi Baloo,You might have a point there. Do you change it to industrial? Seems a good choice to me.Marc. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Baloo Uriza ♦2,404 | Updated. | |
| 116153433 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-14 16:02 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source = PNOA; Catastro |
| 115948849 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-09 16:07 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Thank you very much for the correction! I had warned your DWG that this user was making not only countless weird/flawed edits but also vandalism by deleting many paths which existed. Woodpeck didn't want to listen to me even though i had proven with photos, videos, etc. Later he created another... |
| 115987979 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 16:04 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | I used a larger area to correct 34 typing errors where surface=unp was used instead of surface=unpaved. |
| 115974039 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115974027 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973987 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:50 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973975 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:49 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973964 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:49 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973951 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:49 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973940 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:48 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973884 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:47 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973875 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:47 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973860 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:46 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973840 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:46 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973833 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:45 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973818 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:45 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973772 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:43 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973692 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:41 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115973665 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-10 09:40 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite. |
| 115949038 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-09 16:11 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Gopnik McBlyat ♦15 | scrub OR forest ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85693240/history |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | I don't know, the tagging surface=forest is wrong anyway. On the aerial I see forest and I think that the mapper of that made a mistake. So maybe forest is better. Will you change it? | |
| 115799055 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-05 13:59 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | linerider ♦8 | I noticed that dunes in this area are no longer rendered green but grey. The osm wiki says this: "dunes that are mostly covered by vegetation like grass or heath and are therefore no more moving and changing shape like an active dune - use natural=heath or natural=grassland instead."I th... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Indeed, it’s better to change that. Will you do it? I changed it because landuse=dune isn’t valid anyway. | |
| 115799509 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-05 14:11 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Gopnik McBlyat ♦15 | Hoi Marc,is leisure=park still relevant on this way? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | The original mapper has added that 5 years ago. To me that part of the ZOO doesn't really look like a park. As a matter of fact, it is included in the larger leisure=park for the whole of the ZOO.I shall remove it! Thanks for pointing this out. | |
| 115642060 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-01-01 16:04 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Arun Ganesh ♦5 | Dear marc,do you really think this mud and not just the muddy corner of a field? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Yes I think so, because muddy=yes is a tag that is not rendered nor understood by the dataconsumers. And if it is muddy, is it muddy all the time? Is it muddy because of recent rainfall? If not, then intermittent=yes should be added.Any tag you like is great, but if a tag is only used once, it is ... | |
| 115476036 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-28 15:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | TobiasFischer00 ♦254 | Thank you so much marczoutendijk for your edit. Yes, the tag was wrong and the 18 is the road number for this district. I just noticed this area now and I will edit all the road names in this area to the formal name/road numbers which will be XXX-XX.Thanks again and keep up the great work! |
| 115178685 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-20 19:16 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Zhytomyr ♦7 | Please don't change these nodes to landuse=forest. Changing to fixme=landuse or a complete deletion would be more sensible.--Dank u wel |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | What does landuse=fixme (0xab00 természetes tereptárgy) mean? See the history. Landuse always should be on an area, but the original mapper failed to do that. | |
| 115106194 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-18 18:59 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | tenzul ♦57 | An der Haltebucht steht ein riesiges Informationsschild zur Region. Wanderkarte oder sowas. Wahrscheinlich war das gemeint. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115106194 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Der ursprüngliche Mapper setzte dort natural=information ein (vor 6 Jahren), aber das ist kein gültiges Tag. Ich denke, tourism=information ist besser. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Corrected:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115128665 | |
| 115022405 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:35 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 115022454 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:37 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 115022523 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:40 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 115022582 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:41 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 115022700 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-16 19:45 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard |
| 114968909 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-15 15:19 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114746857, 114747248, 114747418, 114753636, 114755921, 114760605, 114760868, 114760946, 114760970, 114761145, 114761529, 114761831, 114763009, 114763489, 114763533, 114763931, 114785854, 114786496, 114787607, 114788242, 114788774, 114791269... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | The original reverted changeset spanned this huge area. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | ElliottPlack ♦937 | Looks good Marc- Elliott Plack OSM Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 114828622 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-11 19:34 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 111569320, 111569385, 112352816, 112353532, 112353714, 112354349, 112482386, 112720680, 112817263, 112817681, 112823863, 112892367, 112893299, 112893578, 112893811, 113307898, 113314745, 113315527, 113318170, 113342658, 113393087, 113393656... |
| 114702419 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-08 12:57 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 111918766, 111918923, 114409941, 114409991, 114459915, 114460033, 114460083, 114460356, 114460451, 114696355, 114696542, 114696724, 114699848. |
| 114651543 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-07 09:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114621556, 114621731, 114621918, 114622141, 114622419, 114622544, 114622617, 114622836, 114622891, 114623049, 114623115, 114623204, 114623284, 114623475, 114623577, 114623643, 114623755, 114623991, 114624120, 114624204, 114624303, 114624349... |
| 114650470 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-07 09:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114620555, 114620636, 114620661, 114620781, 114620857, 114620932, 114620977, 114621048, 114621143, 114621308, 114621407, 114621465, 114621488, 114621663, 114621800, 114621865, 114621951, 114622297, 114622335, 114622366, 114622443, 114622485... |
| 114619653 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-06 13:43 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114588754, 114588857, 114588950, 114589004, 114589091, 114589113, 114589167, 114589307, 114589345, 114589480, 114589539, 114589579, 114589692, 114589766, 114589829, 114589854, 114589882, 114589989, 114590019, 114590105, 114590196, 114590312... |
| 114618626 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-06 13:10 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114490867, 114490996, 114506386, 114541966, 114541984, 114562030, 114562148, 114562262, 114562278, 114562586, 114562800, 114562913, 114562931, 114563088, 114563265, 114563270. |
| 114578282 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-05 11:13 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114558134, 114558170, 114558288, 114558348, 114558381, 114558414, 114558467, 114558514, 114558573, 114558590, 114558608, 114558645, 114558676, 114558718, 114558808, 114558839, 114558905, 114559098, 114559130, 114559257, 114559312, 114559340... |
| 114554550 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-04 13:17 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114552809, 114553500, 114553607, 114553617, 114553645, 114553704, 114553794, 114553963, 114554131, 114554174, 114554238, 114554287. |
| 114550822 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-04 10:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114133389, 114133458, 114133666, 114133828, 114134078, 114134505, 114143481, 114143704, 114143968, 114144059, 114144510, 114144527, 114162629, 114162772, 114162827, 114162889, 114162955, 114163139, 114163186, 114164027, 114164080, 114164206... |
| 114453531 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-12-01 18:24 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 57759430. |
| 114356074 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-29 10:47 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 113958089. |
| 114295019 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-27 13:43 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113334199, 113334286. |
| 114294663 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-27 13:32 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113334521, 113609407, 113899054, 113899453, 113900005, 114182719, 114182964, 114183350. |
| 114196181 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-24 20:20 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114140174, 114140436, 114140993, 114142085, 114142210, 114145851, 114147094, 114192560. |
| 114154271 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-23 19:35 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | caxton ♦1 | Why have you not merged the windmill node with the building outline? We are not in the address-node-loving Netherlands ;) |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Because I first only had added the mill as a node. I now have merged them.Why don't you start editing yourself? You have a useracoount now! With iD it is easy to do. And you should read some: https://www.openstreetmap.org/help | |
| 114133324 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-23 10:15 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114119624, 114119652, 114119676, 114119724, 114119826, 114119868, 114119910, 114119989, 114120025, 114120077, 114120107, 114120150, 114120191, 114120230, 114120269, 114120311, 114120351, 114120397, 114120431, 114120487, 114120530. |
| 114139781 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-23 12:55 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114119624, 114119652, 114119676, 114119724, 114119826, 114119868, 114119910, 114119989, 114120025, 114120077, 114120107, 114120150, 114120191, 114120230, 114120269, 114120311, 114120351, 114120397, 114120431, 114120487, 114120530. |
| 114093015 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-22 10:59 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113921570, 113921630, 113921735, 113922017, 113922051, 113923516, 113923725, 113923893, 113923986, 113970058, 113970243, 113997437, 114015789, 114016211, 114016369, 114016432, 114016708, 114016856, 114016981, 114017130, 114017235, 114017387... |
| 114090153 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-22 09:54 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 113847080. |
| 114089675 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-22 09:40 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114077308, 114077365, 114077644, 114077978, 114078100, 114078556, 114078559, 114079100, 114079137, 114079169, 114079304, 114079602, 114080370, 114080491, 114080676, 114080734, 114080782, 114080991, 114081059, 114081270, 114083452, 114083536... |
| 113864448 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-11-16 18:39 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113844637, 113846972, 113847306, 113848107, 113848914, 113851647. |
| 113117432 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 10:24 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113123397 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 12:46 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113122848 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 12:32 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113122263 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 12:18 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113121747 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 12:04 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113121184 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 11:50 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113120560 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 11:36 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113119987 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 11:21 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113119315 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 11:07 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113118671 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 10:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113118046 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 10:38 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113116075 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 09:54 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113116724 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-29 10:09 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112868241, 112889904, 112889976, 112889984, 112889986, 112897682, 112936708, 112936736, 112936741, 112936744, 112936745, 112946976, 112946987, 112946990, 112946996, 112946998, 112947000, 112947002, 112947004, 113034841, 113034845, 113035170... |
| 113028971 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-27 09:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 110598486, 110627977, 110652956, 110684477, 112756488, 112767725, 112771391, 112799329, 112863334, 113013897. |
| 112519123 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-14 20:13 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | By accident I included some part of the map I didn't want to edit. Hence the huge area outside Spain! |
| 112465062 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-10-13 14:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Deze rotonde wordt geheel fietsvrij gemaakt, ze krijgen 2 eigen bruggen, waarvan er nu een (aan de spoorzijde) klaar is. Tot de definitieve werkzaamheden zijn afgerond (19-12-2021), wordt het fietspad aan de spoorzijde gebruikt door fietsers én wandelaars in 2 richtingen. Pas ter hoogte van ... |
| 19372778 by marczoutendijk @ 2013-12-10 09:12 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Sandal man ♦410 | Hoi Marc, hopelijk weet jij nog wat dit grondgebruik is :-)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251127462#map=16/37.3268/-4.6302Groeten Jan |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Ja, dat weet ik! Het is hetzelfde als het omringende gebied: landuse=orchard.In die tijd gebruikte ik BING, maar PNOA is nu de norm. Ik heb het gecorrigeerd. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Sandal man ♦410 | Top, ook weer opgelost, ik probeer Spanje zo foutloos mogelijk te maken maar niet elke mapper reageerd zo snel als jij helaas.Maar blijf mijn best doen :-) | |
| 108578249 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-07-25 19:30 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is (v49) |
| 103520402 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-24 07:24 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Deze (houten) brug wordt vervangen door een nieuw exemplaar van beton. De fietsroutes ter plekke worden NIET omgeleid. Vermoedelijk in juli 2021 gereed.https://www.ad.nl/den-bosch/vinkel-krijgt-nog-dit-jaar-nieuwe-fietsbrug~a54eb3d9/ |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | dvdhoven ♦957 | Ik heb aan de zuidkant ook een kp 58 gemaakt, dat staat ook in Visit Brabant.De routes eindigen nu in de noordelijke en zuidelijke 58Als de brug gereed is, moet er nog een route 58-58 worden gemaakt.Tot die tijd loopt er geen fietsroute meer over de brug.Houdt jij in de gaten wanneer de brug... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Nee, wandelaars kunnen er ook niet langs want de hele brug is feitelijk verdwenen. Ik hou de nieuwe brug in de gaten!Groet,Marc. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Vandaag langs de brug gereden en hij is weer in gebruik!Alle routes kunnen worden hersteld. | |
| 105664557 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-06-01 08:22 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | Ik was hier op 31-5-2021 en het pad was bedekt met een soort gravel. Dat bleek echter een nieuw laagje over het oude asfalt te zijn. Dus weer teruggezet naar asfalt na bestudering van mijn eigen mapllarybeelden van die dag. Alhoewel vergelijking tussen 2017 en 2021 soms twijfel oproept... |
| 105372141 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-26 17:16 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Xevi ♦39 | Thank you for closing the note! |
| 105310419 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-25 18:32 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is landuse NW of Tomelloso! |
| 105213212 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-24 09:36 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is not Villena but La Solana |
| 104867212 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-18 06:58 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | En esta zona un número de highway=track estaba duplicado como highway=path (o como highway=track pero con diferentes propiedades). He eliminado todos los duplicados. In this area a number of highway=track was duplicated as highway=path (or as highway=track but with different properties). ... |
| 104843544 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-17 18:31 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | En esta zona un número de highway=track estaba duplicado como highway=path (o como highway=track pero con diferentes propiedades). He eliminado todos los duplicados. In this area a number of highway=track was duplicated as highway=path (or as highway=track but with different properties). ... |
| 104835071 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-05-17 15:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | En esta zona un número de highway=track estaba duplicado como highway=path (o como highway=track pero con diferentes propiedades). He eliminado todos los duplicados. In this area a number of highway=track was duplicated as highway=path (or as highway=track but with different properties). ... |
| 103931135 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-30 18:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This should be landuse east of Solana! |
| 103930838 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-30 18:42 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This should be landuse east of Solana! |
| 103930080 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-30 18:20 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | marczoutendijk | This should be landuse east of Solana! |
| 102863746 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-04-13 11:38 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | This was not for kaashvi but for: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/virlgil%20van |
| 101936798 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-03-29 19:13 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | (V1) not (V10) |
| 101936441 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-03-29 19:04 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Highways = Landuse! |
| 99850768 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 19:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 99851526 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 19:48 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 99852220 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 20:02 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 99852843 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 20:14 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 99853421 by marczoutendijk @ 2021-02-23 20:30 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Galera=Calera |
| 96557567 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-12-28 20:19 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | source=PDOK |
| 86260374 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-05 19:57 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ElliottPlack ♦937 | Hi Marc! I see this change comes via a DWG ticket. Just curious what that one was about? I surveyed the area four years back but did not see any signs about it being private. Certainly that could have changed now though. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Hi Elliott, Yes, the track running from Loveton Farms Road is public, but from the crossing with the 2nd stream (on entering Pinewood Estates) it is (now) on private land, marked with signs. Hence the change. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | ElliottPlack ♦937 | Got it. Did a homeowner contact the DWG? I'm just curious how the feedback loop works, because I map a lot of trails don't usually get much feedback. I am not opposed to the change at all, glad you did it, just wondering about the process. Thanks! | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Yes, the homeowner contacted the DWG.Cases like this happen more and more these days because the AllTrails app (used by many hikers) is based on OSM. Land owners are complaining about trespassers. | |
| 94522793 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-11-20 20:31 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is (v6) |
| 93721077 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-11-07 21:20 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is (V15) |
| 93560468 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-11-04 19:54 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is (v12) |
| 93502436 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-11-03 20:42 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | The method I used for this MP:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93680361with this touching inners:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866773514Is according to method 2 described at the talk page:the number (4) is the border shared by the farmland and the vineyard.2. Draw a closed way over ... |
| 92915344 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-10-22 19:09 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is version (v8). And this is landuse, not highways. |
| 92489835 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-10-14 19:22 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Highways=landuse. |
| 92489560 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-10-14 19:14 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Highways=Landuse! |
| 91992730 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-10-05 14:35 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Name of town: Argamasilla de Alba |
| 91514218 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-09-25 13:51 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | A lo largo de la vía férrea abandonada Báeza-Utiel hay un sendero en la antigua vía férrea. La calidad es mixta: casi intransitable a buena. |
| 91318234 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-09-22 20:24 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is v18! |
| 89056355 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-08-06 20:13 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | FrankOverman ♦164 | AH, ik stond op punt de oude track langs de Oude Bosschebaan te verwijderen omdat het een breed fietspad is geworden. Ik heb er gisteren gefietst,Ik zie nu deze recente changeset van jouw hand.Ik kan me niet meteen herinneren dat er een breed genoeg pad noordelijk langs loopt dat als ruiterpad k... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Er ligt een flink zandpad naast vol met paardenhoeven afdrukken. Ik heb ook mapillary beelden:https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.65006283666666&lng=5.211682151944444&z=17&tab=uploads&pKey=blCABvObPl9tHujKNjCjFJ&focus=photoIk denk dat de ruiter-info nog niet is aangebrach... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | FrankOverman ♦164 | OK, ik wacht zonder meer ook even af ;)Bedankt voor de snelle reactie weer. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | FrankOverman ♦164 | Trouwens, er mag nog wel een motor_vehicle = destination bij op de cycleway, want er staan borden met 'perceeleigenaren mogen wel' ;) | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Vandaag opnieuw langsgefietst en er staan wel degelijk paaltjes voor de paarden (en een huifkar route). Het paardenpad loopt langs het gehele fietspad.https://tinyurl.com/yy3ynx8chttps://tinyurl.com/y23do46sOok heb ik de hele route er nog een keer opgezet maar nu van west naar oost. Die zal ... | |
| 6 | ~ 5 years ago | FrankOverman ♦164 | Goed werk!Bedankt namens allen;) | |
| 89204756 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-08-10 14:37 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | DWG Edit: Trails on the property at 3423 Soundview Drive West had the wrong access tags. This is private property and all access tags are now set to access=no. Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 89161644 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-08-09 18:34 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | In this changeset one path (way 573659143) was badly aligned to older PNOA. I removed it and draw a new version; |
| 88249981 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-07-20 13:34 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | This nonexistent trail was reported by a user who tried to follow this trail. |
| 87535541 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-07-04 16:19 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Again I deleted quite a few of the original imported tracks because it was faster to draw them again than to try to move all the wrong nodes from the import. |
| 87468477 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-07-02 19:29 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Please note:The service road that previously connected Watford Road with Oakridge Avenue does not exist and must have been based on bad aerial imagery.The road in the north now runs into the wood, the road in the south ends at the gate of the property.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Found... |
| 87462130 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-07-02 15:54 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | For this changeset I had to delete a number of the previous tracks that were so badly aligned that it was faster to redraw them.I have asked jamesks why he is using such bad data and not doing any control/fine tuning over what he has added. Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Dat... |
| 87222506 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-27 10:10 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Ik laat de naam "Poort van Heusden" nog even staan, de gemeente is niet eenduidig in het gebruik van de nieuwe naam. |
| 87100747 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-24 19:08 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Survey 2021 moet survey 2020 zijn, ik kan nog niet inde toekomst kijken... |
| 86825699 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-18 12:29 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | This is V4! |
| 86783788 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-06-17 16:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Dit smalle fietspad wordt vervangen door een 3 meter breed betonplaten pad voor 2 richtingen.Tijdelijke omleiding voor fietsers gaat via de Guldenberg. Ik heb het hele pad op highway=construction gezet.Werkzaamheden zijn op 15 juni begonnen en zijn eind juli klaar. Ik heb de route relaties allem... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | marczoutendijk | Zie ook:https://www.bd.nl/den-bosch-vught/straks-breeduit-fietsen-op-oude-bosschebaan-in-helvoirt-richting-loonse-en-drunense-duinen~a517463b9/ | |
| 82757367 by marczoutendijk @ 2020-03-28 16:13 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | marczoutendijk | DWG received a complaint from the landowner that some trails were running over their property. All relevant trails have been set to access=private.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |