| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 108012259 by mathpras @ 2021-07-15 04:37 | 1 | 2022-07-04 12:56 | Glitch-Hunter ♦32 | Ist die Zufahrt wirklich Privat?so das man nicht auf den Feldweg kommt? |
| 2 | 2022-07-06 02:48 | mathpras | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies, for the wrong modification of road. Going ahead, I'll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. I added Private access to the segment as it is leading to residential entities. Thanks again, Looking forward to learn more fro... | |
| 104168200 by mathpras @ 2021-05-05 07:51 | 1 | 2021-05-31 12:52 | skyper ♦871 | Hallo mathprasIst da nicht ein Stück Einbahnstraße direkt neben den Gleisen?Zwecks zusätzlichen Tags, Quellen und mehr siehe u.a. auch https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/97044150 und https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/97040854 sowie die dort erwähnten Diskussionen.Fr... |
| 2 | 2021-06-03 14:41 | mathpras | Hi Skyper,Thanks for the feedback. Can you please help me locating the oneway road you are talking about? As from the aerial view I am unable to figure out the exact road. Regards,mathpras. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-04 12:39 | skyper ♦871 | Hey mathprasIch habe auch nur die Luftbilder, jedoch war mir als ob der Weg zwischen Gleis und Nr. 4 nur eine Ausfahrt ist. Aber Du sprichst das Problem ja an. Dafür braucht es Vorort Informationen, daher lasse ich auch die Finger vom erstellen dieser Wege. Habe jetzt nicht auf Mapillary &am... | |
| 4 | 2021-06-07 14:28 | mathpras | Hi Skyper, Though the segment seems to be an exit, the Mapillary (dated 2016) and aerial view shows no clue of directionality for the segment. Hence, adding data based on assumption would not be appropriate and is against our editing policies. I look forward for the local community in improving th... | |
| 5 | 2021-06-14 13:18 | skyper ♦871 | Hi mathpras.Einen Weg neu einzutragen und dabei die Zugangsbeschränkungen zu vergessen (nichts anderes ist `oneway=*`) ist auch nicht das Gelbe vom Ei.Bei Zweifel gibt es mehrer Möglichkeiten diese zu verdeutlichen. Sei es durch `FIXME=*` oder auch per Note. Allerdings würde ich m... | |
| 6 | 2021-06-15 15:08 | mathpras | Hi skyper,Thanks for the constructive feedback. I will for sure keep these points in mind in my future edits and also post this information to my supervisor.Good day! | |
| 105959268 by mathpras @ 2021-06-07 09:20 | 1 | 2021-06-08 08:04 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | 2021-06-09 08:42 | mathpras | Hi, Thanks for checking my edit. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the segment to be a service road. I have modified the segment to driveway as per your suggestion (changeset: 106080378)Regards,mathpras | |
| 102625776 by mathpras @ 2021-04-09 08:59 | 1 | 2021-04-10 05:45 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | 2021-04-12 09:23 | mathpras | Hi PT-53,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added highway=service as I am not sure of the type of the entity it is leading to. Thanks for the feedback. please find the changeset(102789804) for the suggested modification. Always happy to learn from the communityRegards,mathpras | |
| 101909369 by mathpras @ 2021-03-29 09:41 | 1 | 2021-04-04 21:58 | Rainero ♦585 | Hallo mathpras,what is the source for this edit?Please add the source to each and every changeset!And in fact, this is not a highway=service.Best regards,Rainer |
| 2 | 2021-04-06 04:34 | mathpras | Hi Rainero,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the roads based on the driver feedback and available OSM resources. please let me know if it is contradicting with the ground reality. Kindly suggest me with the appropriate highway tag so that I can make the necessary changes. Always hap... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-07 06:40 | Rainero ♦585 | Hi mathpras,thank you for your quick answer.My concern is that your changeset does not include any source indication. I mean, you are a payed mapper and I am pretty sure that the company that you are working for, wants these edits to be done following the OSM rules. To indicate the source of the... | |
| 4 | 2021-04-07 07:56 | mathpras | Hi Rainero,Thanks for the response. I have used the bing imagery to make the edits. By "available OSM resources" we mean the Imagery's and street level imagery's available on OSM. If you are referring to the separate source section, currently we are adding source whenever we us... | |
| 5 | 2021-04-07 10:52 | Rainero ♦585 | Hi mathpras,unfortunately you continue to be unprecise. As aerial images have different age and often are shifted, other mappers need to know which one was used. The source section must be used for all edits.Bye,Rainer | |
| 100702233 by mathpras @ 2021-03-09 10:37 | 1 | 2021-03-09 12:19 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦727 | Hi mathpras,please add 'service=driveway' for driveways. Thanks!Greetings Roger |
| 2 | 2021-03-10 07:54 | mathpras | Hello,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edits based on the available OSM resources. I have not added driveway as I don't have enough evidence to validate the edit. Thanks for the confirmation. It is good to see the local community improvising our edits. Please find the chang... | |
| 3 | 2021-03-10 08:06 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦727 | Hi,If there is not enough information, then you should not make the mapping. highway=service suggests a mainly public road. We cannot map masses of private driveways as public roads in OSM. | |
| 4 | 2021-03-10 09:07 | mathpras | Hi,Thanks for your valuable feedback. I will make sure to implement your suggestions in our future edits. Always happy to learn from the community | |
| 100691068 by mathpras @ 2021-03-09 08:23 | 1 | 2021-03-09 12:30 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mathpras,kann man auf diesem "Weg" wirklich so fahren? Nein, da stehen doch Autos im Weg!Das ist eine Ausstellungsfläche des Autohauses.Bitte Weg wieder löschen. |
| 2 | 2021-03-09 13:13 | mathpras | Hello,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edits as per the available imagery. thanks for improving our edit quality with the local knowledge. please find the changeset(100713449) for the suggested edits. always happy to learn from the community | |
| 3 | 2021-03-09 13:38 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | In Ordnung. | |
| 100340289 by mathpras @ 2021-03-03 10:16 | 1 | 2021-03-03 15:27 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mathpras,diese "Straße" ist so nicht korrekt.Hat sich Eurer Fahrer verfahren ?Was war die Zieladresse ?Fragende Grüße |
| 2 | 2021-03-05 12:16 | mathpras | Hi, My sincere apologies for the miss from my end. I have added the segment based on Bing aerial imagery but missed the gate at the entry . I have re verified and added gate and access based on private maxar imagery. please find the changeset for your reference (100490897). Thanks for your valuabl... | |
| 3 | 2021-03-05 15:41 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mathpras, der von Dir eingezeichnete Weg verläuft über 2 Betriebsgrundstücke von 2 verschiedenen Firmen!Das ist so auf keinen Fall korrekt und nicht akzeptabel!Was haben Amazon-Fahrer überhaupt hinter den Gebäuden zu suchen ?Die Firmen-Eingänge sind vorn... | |
| 4 | 2021-03-08 08:06 | mathpras | Hello,We don't add roads in OSM based on our internal driver traces, but only use GPS traces to identify missing roads. We purely add roads based on imageries available in OSM. We do not wish to share our customer address in an open forum like this. We have added the road as per Bing aerial i... | |
| 5 | 2021-03-08 08:18 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Warum nur diese Wege einzeichnen und nicht alle ?Aber Achtung, die Wege können sich immer wieder ändern. Das ist schließlich ein Lagerplatz!Was hat Euer Fahrer dort hinten überhaupt verloren? Hat er sich verfahren? | |
| 6 | 2021-03-08 10:07 | mathpras | Hi, As per Bing aerial imagery there is a newly constructed entity (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912562338). We have added the segment to access the entity as per the latest imagery. In Bing Imagery it looks like there is a way to access the entity from (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3484... | |
| 99956040 by mathpras @ 2021-02-25 07:49 | 1 | 2021-02-25 15:45 | flohoff ♦2,368 | Moin,warum ist das ein track hier die Hauszufahrt? Da fahren doch sicherlich mehr Eltern die die Kinder zur Schule bringen als Trecker oder? Dann ist das kein TrackFlo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99956040 |
| 2 | 2021-02-26 04:55 | mathpras | Hi Flo, Thanks for looking into my edit. I have added a track road as per the parent road classification. But yes, As you have told there are entities and the road is suitable for other type of vehicles as well. I have modified the segments as per your suggestion(changeset:100017384). Always happ... | |
| 99567633 by mathpras @ 2021-02-19 06:26 | 1 | 2021-02-19 07:11 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | 2021-02-19 11:39 | mathpras | Hi,Thanks for checking onto our edits. I have added the service road as we not have enough evidence to change the highway tag. thanks for your feedback. its good to see the community improvising our edits. please find the changeset(99590128) with the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn ... | |
| 99357585 by mathpras @ 2021-02-16 07:36 | 1 | 2021-02-16 08:34 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mathpras,dashttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907638345/historyist die Zufahrt zu einem Wohnhaus (highway=service + service=driveway) und kein Feldweg (highway=track)Grüße |
| 2 | 2021-02-16 10:03 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | PS:Dieser Weghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219122816/history+https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762627892/historymüßte - bis zur Hauszufahrt !! - noch von track auf service umgestellt werden. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-18 04:13 | mathpras | Hello,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have not modified the existing tag as we don't have the supporting evidence to make the changes. thanks for your inputs. please find the changeset(99487866) for the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community | |
| 4 | 2021-02-18 08:02 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mathpras, ,Du hast jetzt hierhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762627892/history#map=18/47.97712/9.44018den gesamten Weg auf service hochgestuft. Das ist falsch !!Ich habe doch geschrieben, daß nur das Stück bis zur Hauszufahrt hochgestuft werden soll. Dazu muß dieser ... | |
| 5 | 2021-02-18 08:58 | mathpras | Hi,Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset(99507442) for the suggested modifications | |
| 6 | 2021-02-18 09:21 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mathpras, , Du hast jetzt des gesamten Wegabschnitt zurück geändert. Das ist wiederum falsch !!Warum trennst Du den Weg an der Hauszufahrt nicht auf ? | |
| 7 | 2021-02-18 09:32 | mathpras | Hi,Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset(99510137) for the suggested modifications | |
| 8 | 2021-02-18 11:39 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Jetzt paßts. | |
| 95273606 by mathpras @ 2020-12-04 07:12 | 1 | 2020-12-04 07:58 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mathpras,warum hast Du diesen Knotenhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8193110204/historyeingefügt ?Grüße |
| 2 | 2020-12-04 09:20 | mathpras | Hello, thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have accidentally added the node. please find the changeset for the suggested correction. going forward, I will make sure retain the existing features while adding new roads. always happy to learn from the communityNew Changeset- 95281679 | |
| 90692272 by mathpras @ 2020-09-10 09:45 | 1 | 2020-09-16 01:40 | naveenpf ♦714 | Welcome to OSM India.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IndiaTo join OSM India Telegram click on.https://t.me/OSMIndia --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90692272 |
| 2 | 2020-09-17 06:19 | mathpras | “Hi naveenpf, Thanks for the response. we are delighted to be a part of #hotosm-project and looking for more opportunities to work with you soon” | |
| 90510849 by mathpras @ 2020-09-07 07:08 | 1 | 2020-09-07 22:27 | JezCrow ♦150 | Hi mathpras,access=costumers is a strange way to describe people driving through this Covid19 test site! (not sure what the correct tag should be given that you have to pre-book your appointment)Happy mapping,Jez |
| 2 | 2020-09-08 06:19 | mathpras | Hi there, Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the customers tag based on the type of building it is leading to. Thanks for your valuable feedback. I am changing the access to private based on the community suggestion. Please find the changeset(90563171) for the suggested modifications. ... | |
| 87790136 by mathpras @ 2020-07-10 03:10 | 1 | 2020-07-10 10:31 | flohoff ♦2,368 | Hi,where does the access=private come from? Are there signs saying so? Otherwise please refrain from setting an access=private on driveways per se.Flo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87790136 |
| 2 | 2020-07-13 03:27 | mathpras | Hi,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added a driveway with private access as the road is leading to a house and as per the previous suggestions received from the community. please let me know if it is contradicting with the ground reality, so that i will make the necessary changes. always... | |
| 73571407 by mathpras @ 2019-08-21 09:38 | 1 | 2020-02-15 18:22 | ShadowFoxNixill ♦23 | Was there construction of some sort at the time you made this changeset? Orchard Lake isn't a one-way street. |
| 2 | 2020-02-17 06:38 | mathpras | Hi,Thanks for correcting the road direction. Apologies for incorrectly adding the direction to the secondary road. I shall be watchful of such edits hereafter.Thanks again for your correction & help!Looking forward to learning from you.Regards,mathpras. |