| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71097701 by mdnade @ 2019-06-10 10:57 | 1 | 2019-07-05 15:59 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,It looks like the addition of the motor_vehicle=yes tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696118542/history#map=18/53.22652/-0.89972 has the same problem as previously discussed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71682640 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_veh... |
| 71682640 by mdnade @ 2019-06-27 18:16 | 1 | 2019-06-28 15:20 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,What was the source of the access tag change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-06-30 09:54 | mdnade | Hi Andy,The motor_vehicle tag was added based on the vehicles presence in the satellite imagery. Based on this source the motor_vehicle = yes tag was added to this road. As per community feedback on not to add "motor_vehicle=yes" tag until complete evidence is available, reverting the ... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-01 07:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello mdnade,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 68517165 by mdnade @ 2019-03-25 18:08 | 1 | 2019-03-25 22:42 | TZorn ♦108 | Hi mdnade,how can a residential road cross through a building? Please check your changes for plausibility. I believe the road has been demolished and you are using outdated aerials. Please check the latest aerials by the city of Cologne for your reference. |
| 2 | 2019-03-26 13:10 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi TZorn,Thanks for looking into the edit. The editor by mistake turned off the building layer in iD while editing and ended up making this error. This was identified in our review system and got fixed as well. Do let us know if there are any other such errors. We are looking forward to work... |