| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91021205 by mohapd @ 2020-09-17 05:53 | 1 | 2020-09-19 19:26 | stlmapper74 ♦22 | Just curious, is this from local knowledge? |
| 2 | 2020-09-21 07:33 | mohapd | Hi,Thanks for your response, we mostly rely on satellite images and street level images to make edits. This edit went slightly wrong, we will correct it based on private Maxar imagery available to us. We observed you have added name Mulberry Lane to residential road, but the point feature is contr... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-21 09:59 | stlmapper74 ♦22 | Yes, it appears to be a driveway. | |
| 4 | 2020-09-21 10:18 | mohapd | Hi, Thank you for the response and the information. I've made the changes accordingly under the changeset(91220659) .Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,mohapd. | |
| 78296531 by mohapd @ 2019-12-12 05:43 | 1 | 2019-12-13 08:39 | oba510 ♦256 | This looks like a private driveway rather than an actual street. |
| 2 | 2019-12-16 05:26 | mohapd | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under Changeset #78296531 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter.Regards,mohapd. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-16 05:27 | mohapd | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under Changeset 78452103 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter.Regards,mohapd. | |
| 74394909 by mohapd @ 2019-09-12 13:53 | 1 | 2019-09-12 18:02 | user_5359 ♦19,605 | Small hint: The combination of bridge and tunnel is extremely rare. Either you have a bridge and the river flows under (undiminished) or you have a "normal" road, under which the river flows through a tube. I have corrected both situations to a single bridge |
| 2 | 2019-09-13 14:13 | mohapd | Hi George,Thanks for the correction. Will ensure to consider this in my future edits.Looking forward to learning from you.Regards,mohapd | |
| 74132824 by mohapd @ 2019-09-05 12:52 | 1 | 2019-09-08 14:32 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello, the streets you modified here are tagged incorrectly. Did you mean to map them as not being under construction any more? Many of these streets still have construction=residential tags. If you mean to say construction has been completed, can you remove all construction tags? Thank you :) |
| 2 | 2019-09-08 14:33 | chachafish ♦462 | You can see the errors here: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-104.88871&lat=39.40094&zoom=16&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k,ways_with_empty_k,nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,node_tags_with_whitespace,way_tags_with_whitespace,node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-12 09:48 | mohapd | Hi chachafish,Apologies for the delay in response & the incomplete edit. I've made the edit using Bing & earthwatch imagery. As suggested, I've removed the tags in the changeset #74385207Regards,mohapd | |
| 4 | 2019-09-12 12:42 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello, thank you for your reply, however the construction tags are still here. They have not been removed. Can you remove them, please? Thanks :) | |
| 5 | 2019-09-12 13:37 | mohapd | Hi chachafish,As suggested I've removed the tags in the changeset#74394147Regards,mohapd | |
| 6 | 2019-09-12 13:42 | chachafish ♦462 | Thank you :) | |
| 63533550 by mohapd @ 2018-10-15 09:47 | 1 | 2018-10-17 06:23 | oba510 ♦256 | This could reasonably be considered either a driveway or a parking aisle, but it's certainly one of them. The service=driveway tag should not have been removed. |
| 2 | 2018-10-18 13:04 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Oba510,Thanks for your update. The latest imagery from bing shows that it is probably used as a dumpyard - https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=37.819572~-122.283719&lvl=17&dir=14.76&style=x&v=2&sV=1Would it not not be better to use this as a service road rather than a driveway?... | |
| 3 | 2018-10-24 08:59 | oba510 ♦256 | If it was really a junkyard than it probably shouldn't be mapped as a service way at all, I would think, since there wouldn't actually be a "way".Bing is several years old around here. If you look at one of the more recent layers (the Mapbox and DigitalGlobe layers tend to b... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-24 10:21 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Oba510,Thanks for the update. Makes sense. Just an add on query - OSM WIKI for driveway - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway states that "The main ways on the parking lot, connecting multiple service=parking_aisle should be mapped with highway=service, only. "... | |
| 5 | 2018-10-24 11:44 | oba510 ♦256 | That's referring to the main (often 2 or more lane) roads that you would typically find between individual parking lots in places like shopping centers or airports that have large complex parking arrangements. It is not really relevant to small driveways in a city. | |
| 6 | 2018-10-24 11:59 | gseethar ♦67 | Got it. Thanks for taking time to clarify.We will keep this in mind going forward.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 62963410 by mohapd @ 2018-09-27 03:15 | 1 | 2018-09-29 09:37 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | HI, this change has set access=no, but it has several cycle routes along it. Should it be motor_vehicle=no instead of access=no? Can you please review?Thanks,Mike |
| 2 | 2018-10-03 17:25 | charabor ♦6 | Hi Mike,Thanks for the update. Yes, the road should have access for cycles as per preceding and succeeding segments. Edits have been made as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are... |