| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71695499 by mrfa @ 2019-06-28 06:34 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | sky-hub ♦21 | Hi mrfa,thanks for the new information.btw, I don't think the way of adding a "motor_vehicle=yes" tag to a "highway=track" is the best tagging solution, if vehicles or motor vehicles are allowed there, maybe it should be considered to upgrade the highway from 'hw=... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | sky-hub ♦21 | correction:(if* traffic_sign information is available)One additional question, what was/is the source of the data? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | mrfa | Hi sky-hub,Thanks for your suggestions. The main reason why I added motor_vehicle=yes tag is because track roads by default mean that motor vehicles should not be allowed. But from our delivery agents GPS traces we can see that motor vehicles can travel through this road and also that is verifie... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | sky-hub ♦21 | Hi mrfa,thanks for your thorough report.In the meantime I did a on-the-ground survey for that area and I added some changes based on it, see here:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71746339Regardssh | |
| 70505028 by mrfa @ 2019-05-22 08:21 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,749 | Hello,It looks like your addition of motor_vehicle=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691605434/history has some of the same issues that have been commented about elsewhere (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8476275 ). What was your source for adding this tag he... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | mrfa | Hi Andy,As per your suggestion the motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads have been reverted. I checked all these type of edits and reverted wherever necessary. Thanks for your insights.Regards,mrfa | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,749 | Hello mrfa,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 62918321 by mrfa @ 2018-09-25 15:55 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | oba510 ♦274 | Please don't delete the service=parking_aisle and service=driveway tags from parking aisles and driveways. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | mrfa | Hi, Thanks for the update and we apologize for the delayed response. As per the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle it was mentioned that "The main way(s) on the parking lot, for entering and connecting multiple parking_aisle, should be mapped with highw... | |
| 71704072 by mrfa @ 2019-06-28 11:20 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,749 | Hello,Can you explain how the surface of this road determines the access tag? I can thin of plenty of paved roads that aren't legally accessible and plenty of unpaved ones that are.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | mrfa | Hi Andy,Thanks for looking into my edit. Actually the edit was made based on the vehicles that are visible in the associated building and our delivery GPS traces. But as per the request from the community reverting these access tags.changeset#71794701Regards,mrfa | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,749 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 68804595 by mrfa @ 2019-04-02 17:33 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,662 | Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. You have added this service road through an existing building and commercial area. Please slow down and take your time editing, mapping is not a race. Often when adding new objects we need to tweak and improve existing objects.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | yaswap ♦68 | Hi Phil,Thanks for looking into the edit. Generally these type of errors wont happen. The editor might have turned off the building feature by mistake. We had a connect with the editor and explained it. We have edited the building feature as per the Bing Aerial imagery.Do let us know if there ... | |
| 67463987 by mrfa @ 2019-02-22 12:14 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Are you sure the parking aisle goes through the building? GPS track? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672292392 | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi ndm,Thanks for looking into this edit. This is a pure mistake from the auditor. Since the other end of the road is covered with grass the auditor assumed the road to be passing via building. I communicated not to make any edit in OSM unless we have a valid source. We also went ahead and fixed... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | No worries - I just wanted to make sure before I marked it as a building passage -- I couldn't be sure just looking at imagery. | |
| 67347065 by mrfa @ 2019-02-19 10:24 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Not sure service roads should go through a building - I'll adjust |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi ndm,Thanks for looking into this edit and fixing it. Do let us know if any of such errors coming through our team. Will make sure to improve our training process to remove such errors in future. We are trying our best identify data errors and fix them as quickly as possible.We are also lo... | |
| 65542783 by mrfa @ 2018-12-17 09:02 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | This is 2 adjacent driveways, not one service road. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | mvviveka ♦16 | Thanks for the update, ndm. made the edit as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them. | |
| 62041905 by mrfa @ 2018-08-27 14:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Is this residential or service? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | mrfa | modified the service road at galingale way as residential road |