| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91813206 by mudunur @ 2020-10-01 08:56 | 1 | 2020-10-03 18:09 | MacLondon ♦224 | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778812607 is clearly incorrectly drawn as a service road by the AI and needs reviewing. |
| 2 | 2020-10-03 23:02 | Cebderby ♦313 | highway=service tag carelessly added to landuse way, tag removed. | |
| 3 | 2020-10-05 16:04 | mudunur | thanks for checking into our edits. my sincere apologies, i have mistakenly modified the land use feature. thanks for the quick correction. going forward, i will be very cautious while making the edits. once again, thanks for the quick correction. | |
| 82975905 by mudunur @ 2020-04-02 11:22 | 1 | 2020-04-07 09:55 | Chris Fleming ♦377 | HI - why do we think that this service road is one way, also it doesn't fully connect? |
| 2 | 2020-04-09 07:13 | ravsjith ♦18 | Hi Chris Fleming,Replying on behalf of Mudunur.thanks for your time in checking our edits. It was a mistake from our end. Reverting the changes as per the suggestion. Please find the changeset (83288832) for modifications. I'm always happy to learn from the community. Do let me know in cas... | |
| 72882607 by mudunur @ 2019-08-01 06:33 | 1 | 2019-08-01 19:11 | jpennycook ♦330 | Hello.You've added service roads across a country park - they have not existed for years. Please remove them.Jon |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 07:34 | mudunur | Hi Jon, Thanks for looking into my edit. I have understood the mistake and have deleted the segment. I have taken this as a learning and will use it in my future edits. Let me know in case you have any other suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community. Regardsmudunur | |
| 72936123 by mudunur @ 2019-08-02 11:51 | 1 | 2019-08-02 16:41 | jpennycook ♦330 | Thanks for deleting these two road segments.Jon |
| 71846634 by mudunur @ 2019-07-03 06:54 | 1 | 2019-07-18 21:48 | Paul Berry ♦135 | These ways don't exist so I'm going to remove them. |
| 2 | 2019-07-19 11:06 | mudunur | Hi Paul, Thanks for looking into the changeset. I edited this based on the digital globe imagery - dated July 2018. In case you have an access to a more recent source or local knowledge, please go ahead and revert the edit. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion. Always happy t... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-19 17:16 | Paul Berry ♦135 | That's OK. You weren't to know that this site is undergoing rapid development and that I come past here every day!Stay tuned for updates.Regards,Paul | |
| 4 | 2019-07-20 22:27 | Paul Berry ♦135 | Resolved on changeset #72470855. | |
| 71705354 by mudunur @ 2019-06-28 11:59 | 1 | 2019-07-05 16:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,Your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25640646/history looks like it has the same problem previously identified at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71708076 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?Best R... |
| 2 | 2019-07-09 09:30 | mudunur | Hi Andy,As per your suggestion the motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads have been reverted. I checked all these type of edits and reverted wherever necessary. Thanks for your insights. Changeset: 72045977Regardsmudunur | |
| 3 | 2019-07-09 09:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello mudunur,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 71708076 by mudunur @ 2019-06-28 13:25 | 1 | 2019-06-28 15:22 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,What was the source of the access tag change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 02:36 | mudunur | Hi Andy,Thanks for looking into the edit. Since the new roads added at Kirby Lane were classified as service roads and the connected road is mapped as a track road added motor_vehicle access tag. But as per the community request removing the motor_vehicle tag for this road.changeset#71804698... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-02 11:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 71674441 by mudunur @ 2019-06-27 14:08 | 1 | 2019-06-28 12:09 | trigpoint ♦2,503 | Please could you explain why you believe that this is public right of way for motor vehicles, despite existing tags saying that there isn't?The existing ways are tagged as designation=public_footpath which is a legal definition indicating that this is most definitely not a right of way for ... |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 02:16 | mudunur | Hi Phil,Thanks for looking into this edit. As per your suggestion I reverted the motor_vehicle tags added to these roads. My team is working on coming up with adding proper access tags to these roads. Thanks for your suggestions.changeset#71804490Regards,mudunur |