| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168085045 by multimob @ 2025-06-25 09:18 | 1 | 2025-06-25 10:27 | BarathéonR ♦2 | Yes Sorry, after checking, name change after first september 2025 |
| 2 | 2025-06-25 11:38 | multimob | We know this.This comment should not be placed under this changeset, which is the fix, but under yours. | |
| 167990791 by multimob @ 2025-06-23 08:36 | 1 | 2025-06-24 14:21 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! I change your aaaaa to fixme (see https://www.osm.org/node/12946128088) |
| 2 | 2025-06-25 06:36 | multimob | Thanks, we can remove this tag entirely; I run a home-made script to push new stops into JOSM before uploading and use this "aaaaa" key to easily review them before uploading. On this changeset I forgot to remove it before uploading. Thanks for the help. | |
| 165879654 by multimob @ 2025-05-06 08:21 | 1 | 2025-05-06 09:17 | wwwouaiebe ♦14 | Il doit y avoir une erreur... j'ai deux noeud différents avec la ref:TECN N501pla(1092386573 et 1092386679) |
| 2 | 2025-05-06 12:31 | multimob | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1092386573/history est corrigé | |
| 159089160 by multimob @ 2024-11-13 12:22 | 1 | 2025-02-09 14:48 | M!dgard ♦782 | Hoi, kun je ook de stop_position van de baan weghalen? Merci! |
| 2 | 2025-02-10 09:53 | multimob | Done | |
| 146282689 by multimob @ 2024-01-15 13:33 | 1 | 2025-02-04 23:46 | M!dgard ♦782 | Hoi, hier is iets raars gebeurd bij Sint-Niklaas Grote Markt. Een bushokje dat ik niet kan zien op de luchtbeelden heeft een extreme hoek. Kun je daar even naar kijken? |
| 2 | 2025-02-05 13:00 | multimob | Het is nu in orde, bedankt. | |
| 145879308 by multimob @ 2024-01-04 12:44 | 1 | 2025-01-28 17:17 | philippec ♦742 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4605513#map=19/51.013738/2.809436&layers=ND |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 14:55 | multimob | Deze changeset was enkel om de "route_ref:De_Lijn" tag aan te passen, maar bedankt voor de info.De locatie van de haltes Oudekapelle Kerk is ondertussen aangepast. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-29 23:07 | philippec ♦742 | Het probleem hier was dat de locatie van de AED naar de bushalte verwees. Hulpverleners zouden dus naar de verkeerde plaats kunnen lopen. Dat is typisch voor Mapcomplete. | |
| 161446409 by multimob @ 2025-01-17 08:55 | 1 | 2025-01-17 20:24 | DCools ♦7 | De GTFS 01/2025 is niet correct en wordt aan de hand van een omleidingsbericht gecorrigeerd. Vanaf 03/2025 definitieve correctie. Bussen rijden in de praktijk niét via de Vermeylenstraat, Ringlaan en Van Glabekeplein ... |
| 2 | 2025-01-20 13:21 | multimob | OK, dit wordt dus aangepast om de tijdelijke reisweg te volgen. | |
| 160913992 by multimob @ 2025-01-02 15:41 | 1 | 2025-01-02 17:39 | DCools ♦7 | De route 213 Torhout > Wingene verloopt via de Bassinstraat en Rijselstraat en niét via de Tinnenburgstraat (= verboden voor bussen in de richting oost>west). https://prod.geo6.be/app/hastus/check/map/wvl/5213/11/01 |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 09:21 | multimob | Bedankt voor de opmerking. Ik zie in the History dat deze fout er sinds 2019 bestaat. De reisweg is nu aangepast. | |
| 160568195 by multimob @ 2024-12-24 09:40 | 1 | 2024-12-24 23:13 | Leo Slager ♦3,187 | De route lijkt niet compleet te zijn.De bushaltes staan er in maar de wegen zijn niet volledig.Geldt ook voor de route in de tegenrichting. |
| 2 | 2024-12-27 19:33 | multimob | The relations are now complete with all the ways.I suppose you only wanted to warn us. We know the problem. The situation now: we have about 800 relations to regenerate or review, for the January changes. Getting relation tags and the stops in the right order is easy, but adding ways to build the ... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-27 23:39 | Leo Slager ♦3,187 | Indeed, just a heads up.I check the route relation with OSM inspector on a daily basis:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=6.46762&lat=52.36963&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cpt... | |
| 159470148 by multimob @ 2024-11-22 18:03 | 1 | 2024-11-22 20:39 | Le_Sharkoïste ♦60 | Merci. |
| 154730255 by multimob @ 2024-08-02 10:54 | 1 | 2024-11-15 21:51 | Thibault Rommel ♦77 | Bussen rijden niet in twee richtingen over het Stationsplein. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218837985 |
| 2 | 2024-11-15 21:53 | Thibault Rommel ♦77 | Oneway werd intussen weggenomen, tijdelijke maatregel is voorbij | |
| 3 | 2024-11-18 10:16 | multimob | OK bedankt voor de opvolging. | |
| 149185244 by multimob @ 2024-03-26 16:13 | 1 | 2024-08-05 10:36 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Hi multimob,Just curious: what made you decide which parts of the network in Charleroi is metro and which is tram? Curiously, just a small part of the "metro leger" stops are marked as subway, and none of its lines are... |
| 2 | 2024-08-06 10:10 | multimob | Hi there!This is a fully underground station, like a metro station but the vehicles going here are trams. Picture herehttps://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marabout_(métro_léger_de_Charleroi)#/media/Fichier:Station_Marabout.JPGThere are 10 stations in Charleroi like this, station=subway ... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-06 14:49 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Thanks for the explanation! Looking at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapbox-labels-brussels-premetro-as-train-stations/103555/8 and https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$172285421141776uFktT:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=matrix.domainepublic.net&via=nitro.chat I think w... | |
| 148499417 by multimob @ 2024-03-11 10:40 | 1 | 2024-05-24 06:18 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, just to double check: the stop with DeLijn is called Merksem Rerum Novarum. https://www.delijn.be/fr/haltes/104104/Could you indicate why the name change to Rerum Novarum?Thank you in advance! |
| 2 | 2024-05-24 07:47 | multimob | Hi,Again, large cities like Antwerp , Brussels or Charleroi have dedicated network maps where the town prefix is not repeated on every stop.name=Rerum Novarumname:De_Lijn=Merksem Rerum NovarumWe follow the conventions explained on the osm wiki.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wiki... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-24 07:53 | multimob | Please make sure to always check whether name:De_Lijn is set before publicly flagging a changeset as incorrect (because it isn’t). If the name tag does not validate what you expect, name:De_Lijn should. It is missing, add it.We also work to improve TEC networks and the tag there is name:... | |
| 4 | 2024-06-25 12:39 | VLD549 ♦282 | Ok, thank you. | |
| 149607681 by multimob @ 2024-04-05 10:20 | 1 | 2024-05-12 15:04 | Le_Sharkoïste ♦60 | They're still here, and are used whenever the town center is blocked (e.g. for events) |
| 2 | 2024-05-12 15:04 | Le_Sharkoïste ♦60 | don't blindly rely on a premade map | |
| 3 | 2024-05-23 09:44 | multimob | OK, thanks for clarifying. Now that this information is mentioned in the note tag of the object, it would prevent accidental deletion in the future. ;-) | |
| 147139521 by multimob @ 2024-02-06 15:06 | 1 | 2024-03-28 13:29 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, just double checking: it seems that this stop doesn't exist anymore.https://www.delijn.be/nl/haltes/504074/Could you elaborate? Thank you. |
| 2 | 2024-03-28 13:48 | multimob | For the last time, please STOP harrassing me through changeset comments!This changeset is only there to perform a typo fix for the way Flex stops are presented.This changeset is not an in-depth analysis of each stop. Should there be mistakes in source data, please address your complaints to... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-04 13:20 | VLD549 ♦282 | Thank you for the information, very kind. | |
| 4 | 2024-05-03 17:30 | multimob | FYI, this bus stop still exists. What the website says is that "belbus" service which existed here has been discontinued in January. The "Flex" bus service is now operating from this location. The stop is still there, same location, but De Lijn renumbered it into 535933, see here... | |
| 146938226 by multimob @ 2024-02-01 09:41 | 1 | 2024-03-21 16:49 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, I can't tell from the site of Delijn whether the name change from Deurne Deurnebaan Albertkanaal to Deurnebaan Albertkanaal is correct. I can only see that since 06.01 the stop Deurne Deurnebaan Albertkanaal has changed.Thank you in advance. |
| 2 | 2024-03-26 18:54 | multimob | Hi there!Too bad you only said that "the stop has changed" and did not say what change exactly. You probably expected us do to all the homework to find out what you had in mind…The change on 06.01 you mention is only that a Flex bus service now uses this stop, in addition to... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-04 13:24 | VLD549 ♦282 | Thank you for the information. | |
| 148097704 by multimob @ 2024-03-01 13:55 | 1 | 2024-03-04 18:43 | DCools ♦7 | Not correct! https://www.delijn.be/nl/lijnen/5916/?richtingCode=0 |
| 2 | 2024-03-04 19:45 | multimob | Hi there!I get your point. We may have a real difficulty here because De Lijn provides detailed timetables through its GTFS files and they really drew the official itinerary there, and 100% of trips in the timetable found in those files (which are up-to-date, we regenerate them 3 times a week) s... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-29 11:01 | DCools ♦7 | The route Staden - Roeselarestraat - Zarren - Staatsbaan - Kortemark was temporary (since 2023) due to the works in the Bruggestraat you mentioned. It definitely ended 04/03/2024. Can you remove that route please? Thx! | |
| 4 | 2024-03-29 11:43 | bxl-forever ♦2,471 | OK, thanks. Will do.Step 1: Retagging as disused:* = still in OSM but invisible to end-users. This is to make sure that other mappers will not recreate it if they copy from De Lijn GTFS data.Step 2: Once De Lijn GTFS data completely removes it, it can be entirely deleted from OSM. | |
| 5 | 2024-03-29 11:48 | multimob | All right, I’ve just made the change, thanks to both for the help. | |
| 148539978 by multimob @ 2024-03-12 09:32 | 1 | 2024-03-13 13:23 | Jean-Louis Stanus ♦19 | Hello, i added these tags manually spending a lot of time.I based my work on the following guideline https://osmand.net/blog/guideline-pt/so bad tags should definition should be discussed. |
| 2 | 2024-03-13 13:44 | multimob | Yes but you mixed highway=bus_stop (which is already there for the node beside the road) and public_transport=stop_position (which is for the node attached to the road).What you did is not what the guideline says. Look again, in PTv2 highway=bus_stop goes along with public_transport=platform, for... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-14 07:51 | Jean-Louis Stanus ♦19 | ok, you are right for the highway=busstop. The road is easy to check with disconnected line in JOSM.Whithout name, it's complicated to check that it's unordered. . But you removed the stop position name too. I re read the guideline, they use the for both stop position and platef... | |
| 4 | 2024-03-19 08:47 | Jean-Louis Stanus ♦19 | Hello Multimob, can you restore the names? then delete the bad tags? | |
| 147367238 by multimob @ 2024-02-12 13:25 | 1 | 2024-03-07 17:35 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi,There are many tasks that you created or worked on, that indicate Mouscron/Moeskroen shouldn't be capitalized completely. I think that is correct. However, the website seems to capitalize. Should we follow the source?Thank you! |
| 2 | 2024-03-07 18:08 | multimob | Hi there!The answer is no. We apply OSM standards and all-caps names are not to be used on OSM. Exactly for the same reason that we write street names normally even when street signs are all-caps. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-08 17:14 | VLD549 ♦282 | Ok, thanks for the explanation! | |
| 145407270 by multimob @ 2023-12-22 13:41 | 1 | 2024-02-27 16:31 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, I can't see in DeLijn that the name should only be 'Gent Dampoort'. There are many stops but all with A.. or B..Could you please elaborate? Thank you. |
| 2 | 2024-02-27 17:10 | multimob | Hi there.Gent Dampoort is the public name of all stops on the same spot, which is how PT operators present their stop to the public, e.g. on the network map or on outer displays of buses.Each bus stop node in OSM contains details about how to identify them, the stop code (ref:De_Lijn) and th... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-06 16:02 | VLD549 ♦282 | I see, thank you! | |
| 147402400 by multimob @ 2024-02-13 10:26 | 1 | 2024-03-05 10:20 | Jean-Louis Stanus ♦19 | Hello, osmose alerts me on the wrong side bus stops on relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5288324 and others .https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=16&lat=50.4697&lon=4.82911&item=xxxx&level=3&tags=public_transport&fixable=&username= |
| 2 | 2024-03-05 13:27 | multimob | Hi there!We are aware there are still hundreds of mistakes from the past, especially in this part of the country. This changeset aimed at fixing other relations; #5288324 was also modified but only because a way was split. We’ll try to investigate it in the next days. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-06 10:36 | Jean-Louis Stanus ♦19 | The direction are reverted actually.I collect some pictures about roadworks in front of the train station in namur. https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=map&map=16.23/50.470149/4.859964&speed=250Hope that can helps you.If you need i check on field some... | |
| 146997328 by multimob @ 2024-02-02 19:03 | 1 | 2024-02-07 15:13 | vjyblauw ♦10 | worden deze bushaltes terug gezet na de werken de werken aan het Sint-Jozefsplein Terkerkenlaan. zie https://staging.oudenaarde.be › nl › heraanleg-sint-jozefsplein-en-omgeving Of is dit een vaste verplaatsing. |
| 2 | 2024-02-08 17:58 | multimob | Hallo,Dit is een goede vraag. Volgens De Lijn is er geen verplaatsing (meer) voor die haltes.Volgens deze pagina (https://www.oudenaarde.be/nl/nieuws/werken-op-en-rond-het-sint-jozefsplein) zitten we nu in fase 2+3, en Bulkendreef is beschikbaar voor het algemene verkeer.Kan helaas niet overa... | |
| 3 | 2024-02-09 09:24 | vjyblauw ♦10 | Vroeger stonden deze haltes aan de school V.T.I. Sint-Lucas Ter Eecken.Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2354594665#map=17/50.85297/3.61452Sint-Jozefsplein en Terkerkenlaan zijn niet toegankelijk. Er waren twee routes van V.T.I. Naar Sportcentrum via Ter Eecken, Terkerkenlaan, Vlaanderens... | |
| 146623571 by multimob @ 2024-01-24 10:35 | 1 | 2024-01-26 18:04 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, could you indicate what source was used exactly? Both Komen Overwinningstraat at De Lijn and Comines/Komen Rue de la Victoire/Overwinningstraat at Tec don't seem to exist. Thank you! |
| 2 | 2024-01-26 18:21 | multimob | There are two stops with this name in OSM. They are both operated by TEC.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2866610882, ref:TECH=H4co109bhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2866610883, ref:TECH=H4co109aname:TEC=Comines/Komen Rue de la Victoire/OverwinningstraatThose stops do exist. They... | |
| 3 | 2024-01-27 09:42 | VLD549 ♦282 | Thank you for your reply, no need to become offensive though. I really did not get search results on TEC's site.Thanks again. | |
| 146454242 by multimob @ 2024-01-19 18:46 | 1 | 2024-01-24 16:44 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, the site indicates the stop doesn't exist anymore. Could you share perhaps another source where the name change is mentioned the way you suggest it?https://www.delijn.be/nl/haltes/508193/Thank you! |
| 2 | 2024-01-24 17:08 | multimob | You are providing a web link to stop 508193 which no longer exists. That is true… but this changeset correctly deleted it, so what is the problem? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2778102142/historyPlease provide the exact reference (OSM object) of what you believe to be incorrect from... | |
| 145411185 by multimob @ 2023-12-22 15:37 | 1 | 2024-01-18 10:30 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, could you indicate what De Lijn according to you communicates? It seems that Gent Dampoort is not used anymore (and is on a different location anyway) and it doesn't explain what the name of the stop is on the location you indicate.Thank you! |
| 2 | 2024-01-18 16:47 | multimob | Hi there!Gent Dampoort stops are not only those near the station—the bus station was rearranged quite recently—but also some stops here near the canal.The 3 stops touched here appear to be correctly located, their ref details and location have a perfect match with official data a... | |
| 3 | 2024-01-24 16:31 | VLD549 ♦282 | Ok, thank you. | |
| 117296725 by multimob @ 2022-02-11 17:34 | 1 | 2023-08-27 15:51 | M!dgard ♦782 | Hi, the name:etymology:wikidata tag is only for Wikidata IDs. You can enter free text in name:etymology. |
| 2 | 2023-08-28 08:36 | multimob | Yes, true. We added etymology wikidata for hundreds of public transport stops, it was manual work, and apparently for this one I copied the name instead of the ID. Thanks for having changed it. | |
| 137685181 by multimob @ 2023-06-23 11:36 | 1 | 2023-06-23 20:19 | wwwouaiebe ♦14 | Hello,You reverted the Liège Guillemins station the "covered=yes" tag on the station platforms that I had removed because when this tag is present, the platforms are no longer visible on the map.I find it unfortunate that in doing so, you do not take into account people who simp... |
| 2 | 2023-06-23 21:14 | multimob | Hello wwwouaiebe,This is a known bug in osm-carto, there is a pending pull request aimed at solving it once and for all.https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/4797Most other layers, e.g. ÖPNVKarte, Transport Layer or ORM can perfectly show railway platforms that have... | |
| 137294312 by multimob @ 2023-06-13 16:33 | 1 | 2023-06-13 21:36 | squirrel15841089 ♦2 | Hello. There's no service between Brugsepoort and UZ since Sept 2022 and expected till June 2024. There is a 'pendeltram 4' between Gent-Sint-Pieters and UZ. Would it be worth it to remove the part of the route between Brugsepoort and GSP from the relation?See https://www.delijn.be/... |
| 2 | 2023-06-13 22:30 | multimob | For UZ, this is an interesting suggestion, I’ll try to see what I can do.Next time, please message me directly, do _not_ comment on random changesets, because it will mislead people into thinking that the changeset has a problem. | |
| 137251501 by multimob @ 2023-06-12 16:20 | 1 | 2023-06-12 20:27 | squirrel15841089 ♦2 | While this is indeed a temporary situation, there has been no tram service to Moscou since 2017 and some tracks in Ledebergstraat have been physically removed in 2018, as last verified this month.Wouldn't it be sensible to remove tracks that have been gone for 5 years and mark unused tracks b... |
| 2 | 2023-06-13 16:33 | multimob | Hi!2017, time flies, I didn’t realize it was so long. You are right. I restored the situation. My concern was that route relations were being flagged as incorrect but I cleaned them up now and removed the part to Moscou.Thanks for this. | |
| 134737414 by multimob @ 2023-04-10 15:39 | 1 | 2023-05-13 12:34 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, could you indicate the source where you got this information from? delijn indicates it is Moeskroen Gerechtsplein. https://www.delijn.be/nl/haltes/504305/I can't find it on tec.Thank you! |
| 2 | 2023-05-13 17:46 | multimob | De Lijn calls it "Moeskroen Gerechtsplein"https://www.delijn.be/nl/haltes/504305/TEC calls it "Mouscron/Moeskroen Place de la Justice/Justitiepl."https://www.letec.be/Planning/Details/Stop/MOUSCRON__MOESKROEN%2520Place%2520de%2520la%2520Justice__Justitiepl./H4mo161aYo... | |
| 131476454 by multimob @ 2023-01-19 17:31 | 1 | 2023-02-15 12:41 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi, could you show me where De Lijn has this name displayed? From what I can see it is only 'Komen Vijfwegen'.Thank you. |
| 2 | 2023-02-15 20:54 | multimob | Hi!Most stops here are operated by both TEC and De Lijn. This is one of the cases where naming bus stops properly is difficult when each operator has a different name for it.To make it even more challenging, this part is Wallonia but it is one on the Belgian municipalities with facilities, ma... | |
| 3 | 2023-02-17 07:24 | VLD549 ♦282 | Hi,Thank you for the reply. Rather complex indeed. | |
| 131341404 by multimob @ 2023-01-16 14:48 | 1 | 2023-01-16 15:35 | Gpoilvet ♦58 | I have honestly no experience with route relations. So i did just the redrawing of the roads. Thanks for the corrections :)! |
| 2 | 2023-01-16 15:43 | multimob | No problem, the solution was not too difficult and now it will show beautifully on the map.Is it a true roundabout with D7 signs (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Belgian_road_sign_D05.svg)?If yes, we can put junction=roundabout instead of oneway=yes. | |
| 3 | 2023-01-16 18:11 | Gpoilvet ♦58 | Yes it is. I will switch the tags. | |
| 130543728 by multimob @ 2022-12-27 07:51 | 1 | 2022-12-30 23:10 | Jhowie_Nitnek ♦180 | Why did you remove the proper name of the line? L161 is just the ref of the line and not the and not the name, could you please add them back |
| 2 | 2022-12-30 23:10 | Jhowie_Nitnek ♦180 | I also saw you did it with other tracks, could you please add all names you removed | |
| 3 | 2022-12-31 09:39 | multimob | Don't worry, the name has not been deleted from the database, it belongs to the relation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/57639 The relation is okay.Ordinary railway tracks do not have names. If you see "L161" on the list of ways on this changeset page, it is only be... | |
| 4 | 2022-12-31 09:41 | Jhowie_Nitnek ♦180 | I know but ordinary railway tracks do have names that is my whole point. In other countries the tracks have names bv #736614100 in Nederland | |
| 5 | 2023-01-04 12:39 | RaphaelPasloin ♦122 | Where do you see name in tracks @Jhowie ? The name is on the relation as "meta" information , you can see signs with L161 when you take the line but no signs with "ligne du Luxembourg" at all. This changeset is correct. | |
| 130543773 by multimob @ 2022-12-27 07:53 | 1 | 2022-12-30 18:32 | Jhowie_Nitnek ♦180 | Why did you remove the name from the line? It is the propper name of the line and not just the relation |
| 2 | 2022-12-31 09:42 | multimob | This comment is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130543728 | |
| 121407675 by multimob @ 2022-05-24 07:58 | 1 | 2022-05-24 08:05 | multimob | Apologies to everyone about this unusually large bounding box.It wasn’t intended: I inadvertently re-used an existing object instead of duplicating it, as I thought I did. |
| 2 | 2022-12-10 23:13 | multimob | . | |
| 125222151 by multimob @ 2022-08-22 11:18 | 1 | 2022-08-23 07:24 | Pol Dellaiera ♦29 | Hello,This commit introduced this issue in Osmose: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=xxxx&level=2&tags=&fixable=&bbox=4.245807%2C50.543224%2C4.406652%2C50.635239&zoom=16&lat=50.60112&lon=4.33475&issue_uuid=2a7dd696-18b3-a8c7-107f-030bfbab297cShould we w... |
| 2 | 2022-08-23 07:53 | multimob | Hi.stop_area_group relations are mostly a deprecated scheme. Apart from very specific mobility hubs such as interchange stations between two subway lines no-one uses them anymore.In case somebody wants to use them (properly), they must contain all the stop_area relations of multiple stops. ... | |
| 3 | 2022-08-23 07:54 | Pol Dellaiera ♦29 | Okay, merci :) | |
| 123804492 by multimob @ 2022-07-19 11:51 | 1 | 2022-07-20 09:36 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Ik had de moed niet om er zelf aan te beginnen. Er zijn nog wel "enkele" meer buslijnen die de nu gesloten Bospoortbrug gebruiken, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27259315Overigens gaat de Bospoortbrug herbouwd worden, en gaan dan de bussen opnieuw langs daar rijden. Dat zal nog we... |
| 2 | 2022-07-20 10:44 | multimob | Ja, bedankt voor de steun. 👍️Het is inderdaad de bedoeling om alle buslijnen langs de Misiabrug te tekenen.Een taak voor de komende dagen, hopelijk. | |
| 121140820 by multimob @ 2022-05-18 10:46 | 1 | 2022-06-30 12:24 | Thibault Rommel ♦77 | HalloEr wordt geen name=* toegevoegd aan een rotonde, tenzij deze rotonde een eigen naam heeft.GroetenThibault |
| 2 | 2022-06-30 13:25 | multimob | HalloDeze opmerking is niet verbonden aan mijn changeset (121140820) mbt. de buslijnen.De naam komt van changeset 116977402: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027477066/history | |
| 3 | 2022-06-30 14:30 | Thibault Rommel ♦77 | Oeps, dat heb ik dan over het hoofd gezien. Pardon. | |
| 121487420 by multimob @ 2022-05-25 18:05 | 1 | 2022-05-26 21:47 | Tchet ♦8 | "SAINT JOSSE"this seems completely right but 1582 does not exist in the OpenData GTFS.On the other way,2889 do exist but at "Rue Willems" which seems wrong2889,,"SAINT-JOSSE",, 50.849717, 4.375378,,,0,I'm confused :-) |
| 2 | 2022-06-03 21:25 | multimob | 1582 is the normal stop towards Bordet Station. The OpenData GTFS does not give a real image of the network, only the stops that are operated during a 14-day period, and those lists will change often.In STIB/MIVB internal carto the stop is set as 1582TMP for the moment because the buses are divert... | |
| 121525435 by multimob @ 2022-05-26 13:16 | 1 | 2022-05-26 21:41 | Tchet ♦8 | stop 1287 does not exists |
| 2 | 2022-05-27 13:44 | multimob | Hi there: what do you mean? Are you suggesting the service stop on the boulevard is no longer there? This is the stop where buses are parked between trips. Is the terminus operated differently now? | |
| 3 | 2022-06-01 01:48 | Tchet ♦8 | I will do a survey. | |
| 121522164 by multimob @ 2022-05-26 12:19 | 1 | 2022-05-26 21:26 | Tchet ♦8 | Hi,"POMMIER" is 1484/1487I found there was a duplicate using Overpass Turbo + this query:----cat patch.osm | xmlstarlet sel -t -m "/osm/*/tag[@k='ref:STIB_MIVB']" -n -c "string(@v)" | tr ';' '\' | sort | uniq -d |
| 2 | 2022-05-27 13:43 | multimob | Hi there: There was a mistake in the data import here, Bon Air/Schone Lucht and Pommier/Appelboom were mixed. I spotted the mistake too and fixed it yesterday. | |
| 121041853 by multimob @ 2022-05-16 09:14 | 1 | 2022-05-20 09:58 | Jakka ♦1,814 | Hier werd gans het gebied als bus_station gezet ? wat ook fout ishttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757851076#map=16/51.2280/2.9268 |
| 2 | 2022-05-20 10:32 | multimob | Ja, u hebt gelijk, die groot gebied met amenity=bus_station is fout, omdat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757851076 reeds bestaat en is correct.Ik heb het probleem opgelost. | |
| 120378145 by multimob @ 2022-04-30 10:01 | 1 | 2022-05-20 07:31 | Jakka ♦1,814 | Deze naam invulling maakt het verwarrend met trein station ? |
| 2 | 2022-05-20 07:32 | Jakka ♦1,814 | Nu staat er ook tweemaal Oostende Station voor de tram ? Er is maar één station ? | |
| 3 | 2022-05-20 09:20 | multimob | Ik begrijp maar "Oostende Station" is de naam die de reizigers willen/moeten zien op de tramlijn. Die twee nodes zijn de twee perrons, één per richting.Idealiter zou men de perrons als `ways` moeten tekenen, zoals in Berlijn of Brussel, om dit volledig op te lossen.Hebt ... | |
| 4 | 2022-05-20 09:55 | Jakka ♦1,814 | In trein station https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506254060#map=17/51.22731/2.92746 | |
| 116146184 by multimob @ 2022-01-14 12:40 | 1 | 2022-01-22 15:28 | azakh-world ♦282 | Hi. Why do you remote public_transport=stop_area_group relations? |
| 2 | 2022-01-22 16:07 | multimob | Hi!Most stop_area_group relations in this city were gone already, or were outdated. We couldn’t find any use that couldn’t be covered with established stop_area relations.Do you really need that? How can we help? | |
| 3 | 2022-01-23 00:39 | azakh-world ♦282 | I'm concerned about subway interchange stations. All such transfers in the world are mapped using stop_area_groups which eventually give edges in routing graph over subways. The https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4221553/history relation, the Elisabeth-Simonis interchange, was removed in ch... | |
| 4 | 2022-01-23 11:10 | bxl-forever ♦2,471 | Hello there,I agree with @multimob: there have been discussions within the community against stop_area_group relations in the past and our understanding was that it wouldn’t be really useful to maintain.* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area* https://... | |
| 5 | 2022-01-24 10:11 | azakh-world ♦282 | Thank you for restored relations and relevant links! |