| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 115517467 by mundlk @ 2021-12-29 12:35 | 1 | 2023-12-27 10:35 | confusedbuffalo ♦333 | You may want to review the use of access:delivery=no onhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/292217732 now that I have updated the access tagging |
| 2 | 2023-12-29 12:16 | rababdul ♦26 | Hello,Thank you for looking into the change set. We have added access:delivery=no tag based on the driver feedback. We have started adding this tag based on OSM community suggestion. If you are local or going to survey this location please make the appropriate changes or let us know, we would be... | |
| 3 | 2023-12-30 11:47 | confusedbuffalo ♦333 | I have surveyed the location and added conditional access tagging, as anyone can go through at certain times, and no-one (other than emergency services and those with permits) at other times. So I think access:delivery=no is wrong | |
| 4 | 2024-01-05 07:37 | rababdul ♦26 | Hello,Thank you for your feedback. We have removed the "access:delivery=no" tag from the gate in the changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145909140).Regards,Abdul Qader | |
| 107185299 by mundlk @ 2021-06-30 06:26 | 1 | 2021-06-30 17:10 | 351293 ♦87 | Changeset has been reverted with Changeset 107220115 due to discussions on Changeset 106652698 and Note 2719245 |
| 2 | 2021-07-05 11:10 | mundlk | Hello,I have added motor_vehicle=no as per the driver feedback. I have gone through all the discussions regarding the issue. Thanks for the valuable feedback and correcting my changes. Always happy to learn from the community. Thanks and Regards,mundlk. | |
| 104043467 by mundlk @ 2021-05-03 09:33 | 1 | 2021-05-04 08:59 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo,dieser Weghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938342440ist ausschließlich eine Zufahrt zu Garagen. Da hat Euer Amazon-Fahrer nichts zu suchen.Weg bitte wieder löschen!Grüße |
| 2 | 2021-05-05 16:26 | mundlk | Hi, Thanks for looking into our edits. I have added the road as I was unsure about the type of entity. I have deleted the segment as per your suggestion (changeset: 104196938). Thanks for your valuable feedback. Always happy to learn from the Community.Thanks and Regards,mundlk. | |
| 103765273 by mundlk @ 2021-04-28 10:01 | 1 | 2021-04-29 16:46 | flohoff ♦2,368 | What do you mean by internal feedback? motorcar=no would mean there is explicit signage to prohibit usage by motorcars e.g. German StVO Zeichen 260. Flo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103765273 |
| 2 | 2021-04-30 15:09 | mundlk | Hi Flo,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the changes based on the feedback provided by our station associate who recently visited that vicinity stating that it is a hiking trail and not accessible by motor car. Hence, I have added motorcar=no as per their local survey. Please let m... | |
| 103700681 by mundlk @ 2021-04-27 11:01 | 1 | 2021-04-28 12:53 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Access=agricultural really has no legal meaning in the UK. If a track is only accessible to the landowner then it should be tagged as access=private however that is not the case for this track as it is legally a public road. You can legally drive any vehicle here, walk, ride a bike or horse.I se... |
| 2 | 2021-04-28 15:05 | mundlk | Hi Phil,We have recently received requests from our delivery associates and station associates regarding this road. They confirmed with local residents and mentioned road is only for farm/agricultural purposes. Please refer to this image (https://snipboard.io/sUYABy.jpg) for road condition. We und... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-28 15:23 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi MundikThis road is certainly a legal right of way, it is not unknown for local residents to try to deter access (especially in COVID times) and it is my job to ensure they don't succeed,Looking at the photo I would remove access=agricultural and add surface=unpaved tracktype=grade4, fo... | |
| 4 | 2021-04-29 06:55 | mundlk | Hi Phil,I have made edits according to your inputs. Please let me know if I need to further edit anything. Thanks for looking into our edits. Always happy to learn from the community. I have made the changes in the following changeset: 103819895.Thanks and Regards,mundlk. | |
| 5 | 2021-04-29 20:41 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Thank you | |
| 89559509 by mundlk @ 2020-08-18 08:03 | 1 | 2021-04-24 20:55 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, the source you have used seems very odd. Why would Cardiff City Council have a road closure here?What other evidence is there to suggest this road is closed for construction?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2021-04-27 15:13 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | I would imagine the road closure the document is referring to is hereabouts in Cardiff.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13412838#map=17/51.52815/-3.13412 | |
| 3 | 2021-04-27 16:16 | mundlk | Hi, Thanks for your review and comment. We have made the changes based on our delivery partners feedback and the one.network resource (https://snipboard.io/XOcbmB.jpg). By mistake I copied a wrong datasource link into my changeset comment. When the edit was made, there was no clear mention of the ... | |
| 4 | 2021-04-28 12:55 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Thank you however the picture you have now shared is just for roadworks and possible delays. It says nothing about a road closure.Mapping roadworks such as this in the OSM database is not a bad idea. Often they fail to be removed, as as happened in this case and therefore has been directing ever... | |
| 5 | 2021-04-28 14:23 | mundlk | Hi,Thanks Trigpoint for sharing your thoughts. Back then multiple of our delivery partners were blocked to travel through this road completely. Hence made the changes considering the local inputs. But I do find your inputs valid as we can see in the following case. Unless we have a clear road clos... | |
| 102545137 by mundlk @ 2021-04-08 08:54 | 1 | 2021-04-08 09:28 | ndrw6 ♦77 | Reverted in 102548471 |
| 2 | 2021-04-08 11:41 | ndrw6 ♦77 | Hi mundlk, I've got a private message from your colleague saying this is a residential road.My understanding is, this is a guided bus way under construction. Any cars parked there are doing it unofficially and once the bus way is open this will no longer be legally and physically possible.\... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-08 12:01 | ndrw6 ♦77 | As this way is not yet open (and it will not be open for a while) it may be better to tag it as highway=construction, construction=bus_guideway.Comments? | |
| 4 | 2021-04-12 05:47 | mundlk | HI,Thanks for the explanation. please let me know if anything else needs to be modified as per the latest update. Always happy to learn from the community.Thanks and Regards,mundlk. | |
| 5 | 2021-04-12 15:08 | ndrw6 ♦77 | Hi,Let's leave it as is for now. Technically, the bus way is still under construction but the default OSM style (Carto) doesn't currently render highway=construction, construction=bus_guideway. | |
| 102545490 by mundlk @ 2021-04-08 08:58 | 1 | 2021-04-08 09:29 | ndrw6 ♦77 | Reverted in 102548471 |
| 96533075 by mundlk @ 2020-12-28 11:48 | 1 | 2021-02-17 19:40 | Gino-52 ♦69 | Dass Ihr von Amazon jede Hofeinfahrt als highway=service eintragt ist ja manchmal schon übertrieben.Aber dann setzt wenigstens am Ende des highway=service noch einen noexit=yes.Viele GrüßeNorbert |
| 2 | 2021-02-18 07:42 | mundlk | Hi,Thanks for checking into our edits and making the necessary corrections. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to improve my edit quality. Thanks for the valuable feedback, always happy to learn from you.Thanks and Regards,mundlk. | |
| 90282430 by mundlk @ 2020-09-02 06:51 | 1 | 2020-09-21 13:26 | EdLoach ♦171 | Did you want to answer this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2355528 (Also looking at your source link, isn't the re-opening day midnight at the end of today, or earlier if the works are already complete?) |
| 2 | 2020-09-24 07:06 | mundlk | Hi,Thanks for checking into our edits. Based on our driver feedback and the available sources, https://www.goringparishcouncil.gov.uk/news/upcoming-road-closures/ , I have added the construction tag #90282430 and reverted back #91236690 the edit post the mentioned dead line. I will be updating th... | |
| 88090945 by mundlk @ 2020-07-16 13:10 | 1 | 2020-09-18 22:14 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Whatever imagery you used to create https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827022172/history , it was extremely inaccurate!You can use OS OpenData here to get a good idea of how good imagery alignment is here. Once you do that it's pretty obvious that where you've drawn https://www.openstreet... |
| 2 | 2020-09-18 22:14 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | I'll redraw this area based on what it looked like when I was there 2 days ago. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-21 14:38 | mundlk | Hi,Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, it is a honest mistake from our end. I have toggled all the imagery before making the edits, I was confused with the imagery as a part of the road is covered by vegetation. I will make sure to never repeat such mistakes. I have toggled all the imag... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-21 14:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Agreed - the imagery is _really_ confusing here, and because there are some many trees, GPS traces are unreliable too. | |
| 89193714 by mundlk @ 2020-08-10 10:34 | 1 | 2020-08-10 15:54 | eiskalt-glasklar ♦110 | Hallo,die von die eingetragene Baustelle ist seit gestern wieder weg und die Straße wieder frei. Ich habe deshalb die Bearbeitung wieder zurückgesetzt.Da der Link auf eine Baustelle bei Büdingen zeigt, gehe ich davon aus, dass es sich um eine Verwechslung handelt. Aber auch d... |
| 2 | 2020-08-11 13:46 | mundlk | Hello,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the construction tag based on the source " https://mobil.hessen.de/pressemitteilungen/start-der-stra%C3%9Fenbauarbeiten-zur-grundhaft-ernerung-der-l3195- between ". Thanks for updating the highway tag as per the latest resources. I r... | |
| 3 | 2020-08-11 14:10 | eiskalt-glasklar ♦110 | Hello,the construction mentioned in the link you provided is this road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161341835As it appears, the road is already currently tagged as highway=construction, but will need to be reverted back once construction is complete around September. | |
| 88243969 by mundlk @ 2020-07-20 11:38 | 1 | 2020-07-21 16:52 | ACarlotti ♦158 | This look wrong - are you sure your sources are up-to-date? The recent A14C2H works were supposed to close up all accesses like the one you just readded, with access provided from the A1307 (or other parallel routes) instead. In the unlikely event that there is still an entrance here, it certainly w... |
| 2 | 2020-07-22 06:36 | mundlk | Hi ACarlotti,Thanks for your valuable explanation. Please find the changeset(88327428) for suggested modifications. Please accept my apologies. Going forward, I will make sure to consider the attributes of parent segment before adding the roads. Thanks for your quick suggestion. Always happy to le... | |
| 73606818 by mundlk @ 2019-08-22 06:50 | 1 | 2019-08-22 19:26 | ndm ♦889 | Dear Amazon Mapping Team,Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .This is documented in the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bristol)Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar ... |
| 2 | 2019-08-23 12:37 | mundlk | Hey Neil, Thank you for looking into my edit. I have understood the problem associated with the parallax in Maxar imagery. The team has been appropriately informed about the risk you have pointed out and have been advised to use the offset imagery tool in OSM to avoid making this mistake. I have... |