| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162764409 by mvexel @ 2025-02-21 04:47 | 1 | 2025-02-21 05:14 | HashFerret ♦5 | 🌳🌲🌴treeees🌳🌲🌴 |
| 157764073 by mvexel @ 2024-10-11 16:11 | 1 | 2024-10-11 16:12 | mvexel | Sorry about the comment, it was supposed to say "many sidewalks around richfield" |
| 145348666 by mvexel @ 2023-12-20 22:25 | 1 | 2024-08-16 12:54 | diamondarmorsteve ♦50 | Hi, I have un-deleted the hamlet for Two Buttes. Please see my changeset commenthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155326480 |
| 2 | 2024-08-18 21:35 | mvexel | Fair enough. Thank you! | |
| 145503547 by mvexel @ 2023-12-25 16:07 | 1 | 2023-12-26 13:15 | emersonveenstra ♦1,457 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157999648 has quite an interesting surface :D |
| 2 | 2023-12-26 17:30 | mvexel | oops! thanks, I fixed it now. | |
| 3 | 2024-01-04 16:47 | emersonveenstra ♦1,457 | Thanks! | |
| 144332909 by mvexel @ 2023-11-22 16:26 | 1 | 2023-12-20 08:19 | Natasha_Zhovner ♦19 | Hello it seems that you removed actual road. Please take a closer look and make a revert.https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/14477003and part of https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/14477016 |
| 2 | 2023-12-23 00:57 | mvexel | That was careless of me. I re-drew the roads and did some other refinement in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145424304#map=15/32.8301/-108.0831 | |
| 143980941 by mvexel @ 2023-11-13 17:53 | 1 | 2023-11-13 18:28 | willkmis ♦173 | I commented this on the OSMUS Slack, but I do not think this edit is a good idea. The wiki only suggests tagging a road closure if the road will be closed >6 months: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction. Since many data users only pull data every once in a while, that me... |
| 2 | 2023-11-13 18:40 | mvexel | good point, I changed it back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143982486 | |
| 140814542 by mvexel @ 2023-09-04 16:36 | 1 | 2023-09-07 17:59 | Oregonian3 ♦47 | Now that 500 E is only one lane each direction south of 600 S I completely agree that it should be tertiary south of there. But I wonder if it makes sense to keep 500 E north of 600 S as secondary.State and 7th E are obvious primaries, no disputes there. Between those, we currently have 200 E, 4... |
| 2 | 2023-09-07 20:06 | mvexel | Thanks for giving this some thought. I'm fine keeping it as tertiary, you're making good points. I am waiting to see what happens with the northernmost section of 500E.Reconstruction of 200 S between 7th and State is almost done, reducing the road to two travel lanes, two dedicated bus... | |
| 3 | 2023-09-07 20:07 | mvexel | I mean keep it as secondary :) | |
| 4 | 2023-09-07 20:59 | Oregonian3 ♦47 | For sure! I'll re-upgrade that section of 500 E for now, but I completely agree that if they re-stripe the northern section to one lane in each direction then we should subsequently downgrade it to tertiary. It's certainly not a road like 1300 E or 900 W that is are obvious secondaries des... | |
| 5 | 2023-09-08 02:27 | mvexel | I agree that it is generally in very good shape and thank you for being a great steward of our shared OSM data! I don't think 2100 S should be primary, I agree it's an important E-W corridor but it just doesn't have the significance or road layout a primary should have in my opini... | |
| 6 | 2023-09-08 17:49 | Oregonian3 ♦47 | One place I differ from others is that I put absolutely zero thought into who maintains a road when I look at classification: I see it as totally irrelevant. Naturally the state-maintained roads are usually more important, but the average person has no idea and doesn't care at all.And that&... | |
| 107045458 by mvexel @ 2021-06-27 17:29 | 1 | 2023-08-23 01:38 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,040 | Are all of these bus stops added in singe edit changesets?Regardless, the bus stop street names shouldn't be abbreviated. |
| 2 | 2023-08-23 03:20 | mvexel | I added them all by hand in individual changesets based on official UTA data and aerials / survey. The names are the official names that UTA lists for the stops in their data. Since the names are rendered on most maps, I figured it'd be nicer to keep them that way. The wiki[1] doesn't ... | |
| 2 | 2023-07-18 03:17 | mvexel | Hi Krako73Technically the Bonneville Salt Flats are part of the West Desert (Great Salt Lake Desert). They could either be independent features or they could be some kind of relation, though I don't know what that would look like. Best regards,Martijn / mvexel | |
| 135898959 by mvexel @ 2023-05-09 14:32 | 1 | 2023-05-15 20:22 | TheConductor ♦39 | Hey! Just wanted to make you aware that a lot of the track you tagged as "abandoned" is still in service at the Peterson Industrial Depot. There have been a lot of improvements made at the depot over the last few years that has rehabilitated a lot of the existing track. NAIP provides the m... |
| 2 | 2023-05-15 23:58 | mvexel | Thanks for your comments and insights! Please correct my edits where you know them to be wrong. I was going off of the most recent aerial imagery I could find, but sometimes that does not show the level of detail needed to make these calls of disused vs active vs abandoned. I probably should have be... | |
| 3 | 2023-05-15 23:58 | mvexel | (sorry I may have asked you that before.. your username certainly is familiar..) | |
| 4 | 2023-07-10 20:24 | TheConductor ♦39 | Apologies, I thought I had responded to you. I was cleaning out my inbox and found our conversation. I was able to get this cleaned up and looking good. Thanks again for your contributions. I am local. I work downtown not far from where you've traditionally had meetups. I know Wednesday... | |
| 132271988 by mvexel @ 2023-02-08 19:08 | 1 | 2023-02-12 10:41 | Frans S ♦9,801 | Hello. I review mappings at random to check the quality of mappings. I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery instead of the Maxar . I corrected them my moving all objects to their footprint on Maxar.Please keep in mind to use the correct Imagery and align already mapped objects as well.Be... |
| 131982482 by mvexel @ 2023-02-02 00:05 | 1 | 2023-02-02 00:27 | JJIglesias ♦1,194 | Thanks for your Contribution to #BoliviaBsRgdsJJ |
| 128795981 by mvexel @ 2022-11-11 22:57 | 1 | 2022-12-01 11:28 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,your plugin left 'magic_wand' tags on the objects it created. I guess these should be removed? |
| 2 | 2022-12-01 14:28 | mvexel | I guess these should be deleted. I don't know what the best practice is for indicating source on features but I agree this is probably not it. | |
| 3 | 2022-12-01 14:29 | mvexel | Removed those tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129606602 | |
| 4 | 2022-12-01 14:33 | mvexel | Looks like there were only 4 objects in the world with the `magic_wand` key and the only one I did not create seems to have been deleted in the meantime:```@id\t@timestamp\t@uid\t@user1112396011\t2022-11-11T22:48:09Z\t8909\tmvexel1112537334\t2022-11-12T18:19:20Z\t8909\tmvexel1112538818\t20... | |
| 125948703 by mvexel @ 2022-09-08 15:42 | 1 | 2022-09-08 17:44 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Just FYI, if you do ctrl+shift+B in iD it brings up the background panel which usually has the date of the imagery - Bing says Dec 2021(saw your tweet!) |
| 2 | 2022-09-10 18:47 | mvexel | Oh thanks, I did not know about that! Thanks. | |
| 121627053 by mvexel @ 2022-05-28 17:42 | 1 | 2022-05-28 19:32 | Larmax ♦267 | Hi, there seems to be an actual roof there, real objects shouldn't be deleted! |
| 2 | 2022-05-28 19:44 | mvexel | Sorry, I'll revert it, but there are some very strange looking triangle shaped building areas, perhaps you can take a look? | |
| 3 | 2022-05-28 19:48 | mvexel | Reverted in changeset 121630451See https://imgur.com/a/u8ev7wm for a visual of the features I deleted (and reverted) | |
| 4 | 2022-05-28 19:51 | Larmax ♦267 | Thanks, the smaller one is comically small but I'm not familiar enough with the building to fix it based on aerial imagery | |
| 111380191 by mvexel @ 2021-09-18 15:35 | 1 | 2021-09-18 15:35 | mvexel | this is actually adding a bus stop, selected the wrong description from JOSM drop down. |
| 111379626 by mvexel @ 2021-09-18 15:17 | 1 | 2021-09-18 15:19 | mvexel | This was actually adding a bus stop, selected the wrong description from JOSM dropdown. |
| 111379632 by mvexel @ 2021-09-18 15:18 | 1 | 2021-09-18 15:19 | mvexel | This was actually adding a bus stop, selected the wrong description from JOSM dropdown. |
| 104911252 by mvexel @ 2021-05-18 19:34 | 1 | 2021-05-18 19:59 | mvexel | Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also... |
| 102818139 by mvexel @ 2021-04-12 16:59 | 1 | 2021-04-13 13:36 | aweech ♦369 | It looks like the 21st South Freeway bore the `name` "2100 South Freeway" for the whole length before user Sagei redid the entire thing last month in 100563396. Also it looks like they changed it from motorway to trunk? That edit didn't come across my radar when it happened, but, revi... |
| 2 | 2021-04-13 13:54 | mvexel | Yes we have to keep an eye on this, and this user. I haven't driven on the western part of the 201 recently but large parts of it I would classify as motorway. They did mark it as expressway=true but I am not sure if that is a tag that has wide enough adoption that it warrants further blurring ... | |
| 11694366 by mvexel @ 2012-05-24 22:59 | 1 | 2021-03-08 04:25 | DUGA ♦548 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95999436 |
| 92498789 by mvexel @ 2020-10-15 03:05 | 1 | 2020-10-15 14:08 | TravGW ♦355 | Welcome to "Colonia" County. Colonias are at minimum neighborhoods. Others in the countryside could be hamlets or, more rarely, villages. |
| 2 | 2020-10-15 14:44 | mvexel | Interesting, I had no idea! After discussing on Slack I came to the conclusion that this Challenge needs Local Knowledge in many places, so I am setting the flag to make it so. Here it is in case you want to work on it, but it won't show up in MapRoulette search any longer: https://maproule... | |
| 91318740 by mvexel @ 2020-09-22 20:40 | 1 | 2020-09-24 13:30 | naveenpf ♦714 | Welcome to OSM India.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IndiaTo join OSM India Telegram click on.https://t.me/OSMIndia --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91318740 |
| 87056003 by mvexel @ 2020-06-24 02:11 | 1 | 2020-08-06 05:42 | qvvmrkungqcjahptkm ♦2 | according to AGRC the transmission line is there. OSM just doesn't have the complete data. https://opendata.gis.utah.gov/datasets/utah-transmission-lines?geometry=-111.247%2C41.726%2C-110.876%2C41.801&selectedAttribute=LAYER |
| 78544216 by mvexel @ 2019-12-17 20:11 | 1 | 2019-12-17 20:53 | zzptichka ♦97 | Hi, you assigned `drive-through=yes` tag to one of the corners of Burger King building instead of the building itself. |
| 2 | 2019-12-17 22:52 | mvexel | Yes, that is a mistake. I apologize. I created a MapRoulette challenge to review all Burger King restaurants and I was testing it. I made a mistake of including the nodes of each Burger King building as Tasks. I will revert it, review the other test tasks I'd submitted, and refresh the challeng... | |
| 70209639 by mvexel @ 2019-05-13 21:19 | 1 | 2019-05-13 21:28 | mvexel |  |
| 2 | 2019-05-13 21:29 | mvexel | [a link](https://example.com) | |
| 58037698 by mvexel @ 2018-04-12 14:27 | 1 | 2018-04-15 04:19 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | Are we mapping unpaved roads as track again? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58037698 |
| 57612136 by mvexel @ 2018-03-28 19:51 | 1 | 2018-04-09 05:42 | Minh Nguyen ♦562 | Remember to split the off-ramp from the on-ramp. Otherwise, routers will say the wrong destination for the on-ramp. Also, the ref prefix for state routes in Ohio is “SR”, not “OH”. (Fixed in changeset 57929510.) |
| 43814028 by mvexel @ 2016-11-20 03:16 | 1 | 2016-11-21 16:52 | Constable ♦1,294 | Hi, someone has opened a note saying that the park is public and then shouldn't be tagged as access=private; could you please have a look at this note [1]?Thanks[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/790607 |
| 2 | 2018-01-11 07:49 | Constable ♦1,294 | would you please have a look at that note?thanks | |
| 53638943 by mvexel @ 2017-11-09 13:13 | 1 | 2017-11-10 10:05 | Minh Nguyen ♦562 | Thanks for this edit! I followed up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53662264 with a couple corrections. Let me know if you have any questions. |
| 52903464 by mvexel @ 2017-10-13 17:37 | 1 | 2017-10-13 17:40 | mvexel | Following the discussion on talk-us (ongoing) I decided to downgrade this road to `highway=primary` (it was trunk). The main argument is that this highway, while clearly major, has many abutters and related parking and driveways entrances. It also has a bike lane for some segments. Secondary arg... |
| 51559659 by mvexel @ 2017-08-29 23:46 | 1 | 2017-08-30 12:32 | Spanholz ♦398 | Why did you add those unconnected sidewalks here? They can't be used by routing engines. Wouldn't it be better to go the other way around and tag roads were pedestrians are not allowed? |
| 2 | 2017-08-30 14:27 | mvexel | Hi Spanholz. I map what's there on the ground, not for any specific application / service. People looking at the map can see at a glance that there are sidewalks they can use, something I think is valuable. Where connections to the road network exist, I will map them as such. | |
| 44015206 by mvexel @ 2016-11-28 19:08 | 1 | 2017-07-15 11:27 | ligfietser ♦122 | Please do not tag access=no for highways that are only closed during winter. Better use access:conditional=no @ (Nov-May) |
| 47275182 by mvexel @ 2017-03-29 21:42 | 1 | 2017-04-08 17:30 | mvexel | testing Neis feed on my own changeset |
| 45750999 by mvexel @ 2017-02-02 15:56 | 1 | 2017-02-02 16:20 | Bootprint ♦36 | Shouldn't turning_circle be a node only? |
| 2 | 2017-02-02 16:34 | mvexel | Good 'point' (pun intended). Perhaps we need to update the task description in MapRoulette. | |
| 37736991 by mvexel @ 2016-03-10 15:30 | 1 | 2016-03-12 06:38 | gwapo22 ♦1 | [Click here](javascript:alert(document.domain)) test |