9 changesets created by napo have been discussed with 5 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
169879535
by napo
@ 2025-08-02 20:23
12025-08-03 12:24totera
♦298
Ciao napo, non so perché iD ritiene che per le linee di autobus abbia qualche utilità che il tag network sia un doppione di operator, quando invece è un'informazione fondamentale distinguere tra reti urbane ed extraurbane della stessa azienda, vista la diversa validit&agrav...
22025-08-03 12:42ivanbranco
♦2,772
Per essere precisi non è proprio iD ma NSI: https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=transit&k=route&v=bus&tt=start%20plus

Se questi valori sono errati bisognerebbe aprire una issue nel loro GitHub per correggerli/eliminarli. Io non me ne intendo.
32025-08-03 13:54napo Grazie
ID Editor ha fatto tutto da se
La zona fra Ascoli Piceno e Teramo ha bisogno di tanto amore: mancano tantissimi edifici
132363162
by napo
@ 2023-02-10 14:34
12023-03-11 13:07mosis99
♦8
Please verify your changes on site, you deleted an important junction in Nave San Rocco
22023-03-11 13:49napo Thanks for the message.
I see that you fixed it.
I added some buildings and add some private roads.
132314541
by napo
@ 2023-02-09 15:49
12023-02-09 19:25martien-176
♦352
Hi, thanks for mapping. I am validating this project.

Unfortunately i found a few issues here.

Please avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately.

Also please avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping

This area contains several tall ...
93732811
by napo
@ 2020-11-08 09:55
12020-11-09 18:46user_5359
♦19,912
Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set.
diam_tronc=20.0
diameter_crown=2
stato=Pianta viva
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
22020-11-09 21:38napo I collect the data myself for my job.
If you look there are only a specie of tree.
Sorry for the wrong tag.
i'll fix it
69733371
by napo
@ 2019-04-30 12:58
12019-07-24 17:45marczoutendijk
♦2,804
Hi napo,
You have used a very weird value for landuse!
Did you mean to use:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreligious
Marc.
22019-07-25 11:41Gh0stz0x
♦349
I agree with you, Marc. 🤔
32019-07-25 12:39napo You are right.
Anyway the mistake of the landuse isn't mine.
Look the history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84309625/history
The user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Orlandi_IT_EmiliaRomagna introduced the bad attribute.

My goal was to remove also the landuse and use only the tag ...
42019-07-25 13:17Gh0stz0x
♦349
quite right! 😁
52019-07-25 14:02marczoutendijk
♦2,804
napo, you're right, it wasn't you. Sorry.
Anyway, it's fixed now! :)
47070387
by napo
@ 2017-03-22 14:41
12017-08-23 07:29GerdP
♦2,768
Hi!
Please check:
You changed 3 roads to highway="Largo della Spiazzola"
What was intended?
22017-08-23 08:11napo thanks a lot for the suggestion.
I have confused the name with highway.
now it's ok
35114564
by napo
@ 2015-11-05 23:04
12015-12-06 13:12tyr_asd
♦443
There are a couple of ways that appear to have been uploaded by mistake (for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378574330), right?

See http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/478677
31440393
by napo
@ 2015-05-25 09:57
12015-10-21 19:59GerdP
♦2,768
please review:
I've changed the rarely used tag highway=private to
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private
31449602
by napo
@ 2015-05-25 16:02
12015-10-17 16:30GerdP
♦2,768
please review:
unusual tag highway=private on node 3544890610.
Is that a barrier or maybe the way has
access=private ?