| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77932537 by navlay @ 2019-12-04 11:37 | 1 | 2020-05-20 17:08 | clarecorthell ♦4 | Is this closure still current? |
| 77333271 by navlay @ 2019-11-20 15:13 | 1 | 2019-11-28 09:28 | Minh Nguyen ♦591 | Hi, thanks for noticing the road closure. SR 133 was only closed for two days and reopened over a week ago.Does your team have a plan to promptly revisit these roads after tagging them as temporarily inaccessible based on a live-updating traffic website? If not, I’d recommend ignoring temp... |
| 2 | 2019-11-28 09:53 | Minh Nguyen ♦591 | More information about this closure: https://tatetownship.org/2019/11/13/s-r-133-road-closure-nov-18-20-2019/ | |
| 3 | 2019-12-02 14:20 | navlay | Thanks a lot Minh Nguyen for your updates. We do have a plan to revisit the closures and revert them once the construction is completed. This instance of it however showed as CLOSED TILL 11/20/2020 in https://www.ohgo.com/sw-ohio?lt=38.97542158400824&ln=-84.0511580911277&z=12&ls=construc... | |
| 4 | 2019-12-02 16:19 | Minh Nguyen ♦591 | I think there may have been a mistake: changeset 77826640 affects a bridge in a different county than this changeset (SR 133 versus SR 123). I’ve already reopened SR 133 in changeset 77673713. But it’s reassuring to hear that you’re revisiting these closures. | |
| 5 | 2019-12-03 13:55 | navlay | Thanks a lot for your update. We will be more careful going forward. Looking forward to working with you.Regards,navlay | |
| 76391211 by navlay @ 2019-10-30 12:15 | 1 | 2019-10-30 16:41 | user_5359 ♦20,423 | Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). Please see https://www.osm.org/relation/10135183 |
| 2 | 2019-10-31 08:55 | navlay | Hi,Thanks for your suggestion.I have fixed this 76436084Let me know if you have any other suggestions. Regards,navlay. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76391211 | |
| 67095365 by navlay @ 2019-02-11 10:27 | 1 | 2019-08-10 06:15 | Minh Nguyen ♦591 | Hi, these ways lead into a parking garage. If you were trying to resolve a validator warning about inaccessible ways, the proper fix would have been to add an amenity=parking_entrance tag to the node that connects the ways to the building.Removing the oneway tags is incorrect, because traffic is... |
| 2 | 2019-08-13 09:13 | navlay | Hi Nguyen,Thanks for sharing the knowledge. Will include this in our edits in future.Regards,navlay |