| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 109171139 by neerdixi @ 2021-08-05 02:59 | 1 | 2021-08-09 15:41 | aachso ♦242 | This way seems to be off by about 2 meters. The aerial imagery shows a hedge or bushes where you drew this driveway, while the actual driveway is (at least partly) visible next to it. You can also see the driveway in the NRW DTM Hillshade layer. Please be careful when making edits. ---\... |
| 2 | 2021-08-11 11:43 | neerdixi | Hi, Thanks for checking my edit. The vegetation made the road partially invisible due to which the road is offset. Thanks for letting me know. I have corrected the offset as a part of changeset (109513678). I will make sure to refer to all the NRW imageries in my future edits. Happy to learn from ... | |
| 107417113 by neerdixi @ 2021-07-05 05:41 | 1 | 2021-07-05 07:18 | SafetyIng ♦349 | Hey,did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-07 14:26 | neerdixi | Hi SafetyIng,Thanks for the feedback. I have now changed the road class to driveway as per your suggestion. Please look into the changeset #: 107571055 with modifications. Regards, neerdixi | |
| 106697157 by neerdixi @ 2021-06-21 07:12 | 1 | 2021-06-21 20:14 | SafetyIng ♦349 | The way is rather a driveway |
| 2 | 2021-06-23 08:57 | neerdixi | Hello SafetyIng, Sorry for the inconvenience. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. (106824398) is the changeset with modifications. Thanks for checking my edit. Regards,neerdixi | |
| 106698053 by neerdixi @ 2021-06-21 07:27 | 1 | 2021-06-21 20:12 | SafetyIng ♦349 | The way is rather a driveway |
| 2 | 2021-06-23 08:55 | neerdixi | Hello SafetyIng,Thanks for looking into my edits. Apologies for the misinterpretation of the driveway. I have now changed the highway classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the (changeset:106824152) with modifications. Happy to learn from you. Regards,neerdixi | |
| 106315867 by neerdixi @ 2021-06-14 07:20 | 1 | 2021-06-14 10:19 | SafetyIng ♦349 | On the highway=service you forgot the service=* tag.... Here this is a service=driveway. More under: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service |
| 2 | 2021-06-15 06:40 | neerdixi | Hi, Apologies for the inconvenience. As the building was tagged as a historic building, I was skeptical about adding a driveway. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106376117) with modifications. Always happy to learn from the community.Regards,... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-15 08:40 | SafetyIng ♦349 | Ah okay,no problem. In Germany sometimes a building with heritage is marked as historic=building (confusing I know....). And also a historic building can have a driveway ;) See the Wiki: "A driveway is a minor service road leading to a specific property"Thank you for the change! | |
| 106316676 by neerdixi @ 2021-06-14 07:32 | 1 | 2021-06-14 10:19 | SafetyIng ♦349 | On the highway=service you forgot the service=* tag.... Here this is a service=driveway. More under: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service |
| 2 | 2021-06-15 06:47 | neerdixi | Hi, Thanks for looking into my edit. I have added Highway = service but not service= driveway as it was leading to a group of buildings and type of it is unknown. I have modified the tags as per your suggestion (changeset: 106376849). Regards,neerdixi | |
| 106317716 by neerdixi @ 2021-06-14 07:48 | 1 | 2021-06-14 10:20 | SafetyIng ♦349 | On the highway=service you forgot the service=* tag.... Here this is a service=driveway. More under: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service |
| 2 | 2021-06-15 06:45 | neerdixi | Hi, Thanks for looking into my edits. As the type of building is unknown I have not added the additional service=* tag. I have made the corrections as per your suggestion (changeset 106376571).Regards,neerdixi | |
| 103880525 by neerdixi @ 2021-04-30 04:53 | 1 | 2021-05-04 19:19 | map per ♦1,318 | Hello neerdixi,this is the second time that Amazon Logistics mapped roads that don't exist any more in my neighbourhood. Taking a look at the latest aerial imagery one can clearly see that the roads don't exist any more.Looking forward to hearing from youmap per |
| 2 | 2021-05-04 19:25 | map per ♦1,318 | Moreover the roads never existed in that way as there once was a guard railing that separated customer parking and delivery access | |
| 3 | 2021-05-05 08:06 | neerdixi | Hi Map per, Thanks for looking into my edit. My genuine apologies for the miss from my end. I have added the road as per Bing aerial imagery but I have missed checking the esri world imagery which is latest and over looked the construction feature added. I also apologize for the incorrect road geo... | |
| 80016738 by neerdixi @ 2020-01-24 07:59 | 1 | 2020-01-24 10:10 | tux67 ♦1,998 | Not necessarily a way required for Amazon delivery, I assume - but this way we detected a Car Wash ;-)Now added as well. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80016738 |
| 2 | 2020-01-24 10:46 | neerdixi | Hi tux67,Thanks for looking into edit. Got a GPS trace nearby where the roads already existed and found a missing road nearby so added a road accordingly to improve the maps quality. Please let me know if anythings needs to be changed. Thanks for making necessary modifications.Regards,neer... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-24 14:37 | tux67 ♦1,998 | No actions needed - all good. This way I recognzed the Car wash, and I was able to add it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80016738 | |
| 79958478 by neerdixi @ 2020-01-23 07:29 | 1 | 2020-01-23 12:49 | tux67 ♦1,998 | highway=crossing is for pedestrians to cross the street .. not a tag to be used when a cycleway crosses the street --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79958478 |
| 2 | 2020-01-24 06:21 | neerdixi | Hi tux67,Thanks for reviewing my edit and making the necessary changes that are required. Will take this as learning and make sure to follow in the future edits.Please let me know if any further changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.Regards,neerdixi. | |
| 79834299 by neerdixi @ 2020-01-21 06:29 | 1 | 2020-01-21 13:11 | tux67 ♦1,998 | As the SAT image already indicates .. this is not for public access https://www.scheidt-bachmann.de/en/contact/directions/ --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79834299 |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 13:58 | neerdixi | Hi tux67,Thanks for reviewing my edit.It was an honest mistake. I have reverted all the changes made by me. Refer the changeset(79859579) for the modifications done.Please let me know if anything else needs to be modified.Always happy to learn from community.Regards,neerdixi. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-21 14:13 | tux67 ♦1,998 | oh - adding access right accordingly might have been sufficient as well .. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79834299 | |
| 4 | 2020-01-24 06:18 | neerdixi | Hi tux67,As the entity is completely a private sector so thought reverting the changeset would be better.Please let me know if the road can be added with a private access tag would be better in these situations.Thanks in advance,neerdixi. | |
| 78670856 by neerdixi @ 2019-12-20 07:24 | 1 | 2019-12-20 10:34 | tux67 ♦1,998 | This is an old military area, where all of the surrounding streets are flagges with access=private and the surrounding landuse is brownfield.The Buildings and Streets here should not be flagged for public access --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.map... |
| 2 | 2019-12-20 12:33 | neerdixi | Hi tux67,Thanks for reviewing my edit.It was an honest mistake. Changed the access tag to private. Refer the changeset(78682768) for the modifications done. Will take this has learning for further edits.Please let me know if anything needs to be changed.Always happy to learn from community.R... | |
| 73607664 by neerdixi @ 2019-08-22 07:14 | 1 | 2019-08-22 19:28 | ndm ♦889 | Dear Amazon Mapping Team,Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .This is documented in the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bristol)Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar ... |
| 2 | 2019-08-23 12:31 | neerdixi | Hey Neil, Thank you for looking into my edit. I have understood the problem associated with the parallax in Maxar imagery. The team has been appropriately informed about the risk you have pointed out and have been advised to use the offset imagery tool in OSM to avoid making this mistake. I have... | |
| 72595199 by neerdixi @ 2019-07-24 10:41 | 1 | 2019-07-24 11:55 | trigpoint ♦2,503 | Hi, this edit has gone very wrong.You have created a routeable link through what is very clearly a private roads. The bit through farm buildings should give a hint of this. This and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698314468 should be tagged as access=private. Remember the act of ordering som... |
| 2 | 2019-07-25 10:04 | neerdixi | Hi Phil, Thanks for looking into my edit. I have changed the access tag as private as suggested by you. I am aligned with your view and will use this as a learning for my future edits. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion. Always happy to learn from local community. Regardsn... |