| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167558109 by nevw @ 2025-06-13 04:41 | 1 | 2025-06-13 04:45 | nevw | Also added a few driveways to clarify property access. |
| 166721338 by nevw @ 2025-05-25 06:42 | 1 | 2025-05-29 16:45 | realEatham ♦11 | Why did you delete the roof over the netball court at mentone park in this changeset and delete 13 1-3 Southern Road? These all exist. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166721338 |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 18:52 | nevw | Apologies, it is visible on Esri imagery. I’ll fix soon by reverting part of the changeset. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-29 18:57 | realEatham ♦11 | I've already fixed it :) | |
| 4 | 2025-05-29 19:24 | nevw | Thanks Eatham | |
| 163424692 by nevw @ 2025-03-10 04:05 | 1 | 2025-03-10 04:08 | nevw | Correction...close north of Birdsville should read close north of Betoota |
| 163384425 by nevw @ 2025-03-09 01:20 | 1 | 2025-03-09 01:22 | nevw | Also used Geoscience Australia - Surface Hydrology Polygons (Regional) source |
| 162914554 by nevw @ 2025-02-25 02:43 | 1 | 2025-02-25 03:25 | nevw | The Landsborough Channel was not named correctly on the GA Surface Hydrology Lines dataset. I inquired and subsequently the Qld Spacial Help Centre determined ...The Thompson River confluence begins approximately 12 km north of Muttaburra (see survey plan PL44).At this point, it meets Land... |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 04:00 | nevw | These changes will be reflected on the Qld Globe soon and I guess eventually find their way into national datasets. | |
| 160660714 by nevw @ 2024-12-27 03:43 | 1 | 2024-12-27 04:57 | JJIglesias ♦1,193 | Thanks for fixing the water loops at Bolivia waterways. Best Regards |
| 2 | 2024-12-27 09:11 | nevw | Thanks, your welcome…I left plenty in South America for others :) | |
| 159942666 by nevw @ 2024-12-05 06:03 | 1 | 2024-12-05 12:00 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Hi nevw, you have deleted existing streams while fixing a loop. This has, in turn, created new isolated waterways. Please have a second look at this. |
| 2 | 2024-12-06 02:58 | nevw | Ok, thanks. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-06 03:20 | nevw | I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159979159I will redo the waterway loop soon | |
| 4 | 2024-12-06 03:32 | nevw | I have re-edited the area to fix the waterways that overlapped and looped, deleted two building duplications, deleted duplicated rail sections.See ...https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159979263https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=159979263&zoom=8&lat=-26.81145&lon=151.... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-06 03:48 | nevw | I also fixed these https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159979502https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=159979502&zoom=8&lat=-26.81145&lon=151.6152&layers=B000000TTTFTI | |
| 6 | 2024-12-06 03:58 | nevw | I also drew the waterway through the waterbody.I noticed that Josm validator picked up 71 untagged ways.They appear to be buildings but resolutions is not good. These were in near Nana Ama Saa I Street north of the railway and south of about the waterways.Are you able to tag those as I am doi... | |
| 7 | 2024-12-06 04:02 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Thanks for reviewing the edits. The paths around the bridge are not visible in the imagery. I think it's better to delete them. Including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965684286 | |
| 8 | 2024-12-06 04:07 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | I have created a Maproulette challenge (mpr.lt/c/48876) dealing with untagged ways in Ghana so they are going to get fixed soon. | |
| 9 | 2024-12-06 04:12 | nevw | Good to fix them.I have fixed a few more things including deleted the path/bridge referred to.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159979829 | |
| 10 | 2024-12-06 04:18 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Great! Thanks | |
| 159481835 by nevw @ 2024-11-23 03:38 | 1 | 2024-11-23 11:03 | nevw | The parking multipolygon is probably valid as the ‘touching inner rings’ are valid under xml examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon |
| 2 | 2024-11-23 11:07 | nevw | The parking mp referred to above…https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18317038#map=16/-35.29544/149.18675&layers=D | |
| 159303825 by nevw @ 2024-11-18 22:54 | 1 | 2024-11-19 01:12 | ms_disstro ♦3 | My mistake. Thanks for rectifying it. |
| 155856677 by nevw @ 2024-08-28 02:08 | 1 | 2024-08-28 02:10 | nevw | Also left the Hinze Dam Numinbah Nature Refuge overlapping wooded areas for now. |
| 2 | 2024-08-28 06:06 | nevw | I think the mapping of the large wooded area with multiple inners forming their own inner ring within the mp and more inners within that ring triggering the osmi warning is a bit unfortunate but not an unreasonable way to map. I can’t think of a better way the complexity and feel the osmi err... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-28 06:10 | nevw | …not a false positive but more an acceptable and tolerable mapping error. | |
| 153766840 by nevw @ 2024-07-10 04:33 | 1 | 2024-08-03 07:14 | QC3 Construction ♦9 | cool |
| 153580145 by nevw @ 2024-07-05 09:43 | 1 | 2024-07-05 09:46 | nevw | Hi, these buildings should all have addr:housenumber=159A and the unit number of each should be entered in addr:unit=x for each of the units.I have fixed this and added the driveway. |
| 150731055 by nevw @ 2024-05-01 00:39 | 1 | 2024-05-01 01:28 | Dantine ♦6 | Thanks! |
| 149551541 by nevw @ 2024-04-04 04:20 | 1 | 2024-04-04 05:20 | nevw | This changeset followed this discussion on the community forum 'https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/watercourse-name-appears-incorrectly-mapped/111268/4 |
| 147919320 by nevw @ 2024-02-26 07:32 | 1 | 2024-02-26 07:59 | nevw | ...also extended Bulloo River to end using Geoscience Australia - Surface Hydrology Lines (Regional) and Esri World Imagery as sources. |
| 147200079 by nevw @ 2024-02-08 04:02 | 1 | 2024-02-08 06:21 | nevw | Correction…changeset comment should read ‘very coarse’ |
| 145060716 by nevw @ 2023-12-13 05:23 | 1 | 2023-12-27 01:16 | ika-chan! ♦242 | Hello, please consider how the creeks cross railways and roads, because your edits are causing Osmose errors that can be fixed easily.Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge for rail and road bridges, and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert for creeks. |
| 2 | 2023-12-27 02:31 | nevw | Not sure what specific errors you are referring to but there is no tag to add to the waterway if it crosses a bridge as it is implied that bridges cross above waterways. Any culverts I add, I always add the layer tag (-1) to the waterway.As I am adding waterways from a dataset and satellite imager... | |
| 3 | 2023-12-27 07:34 | nevw | Ok, I have had a further look now and see by you edits that you wanted the bridges, culverts, etc mapped. Cheers | |
| 143138780 by nevw @ 2023-10-26 00:17 | 1 | 2023-10-26 00:19 | nevw | Correction: Bing imagery used as source. |
| 143056441 by nevw @ 2023-10-24 09:49 | 1 | 2023-10-25 11:05 | Alafoss ♦6 | Thanks for fixing this! |
| 141086702 by nevw @ 2023-09-11 01:43 | 1 | 2023-09-11 01:52 | nevw | Walshpool Creek is sign posted where it crosses Eidsvold-Theodore Road. It appears incorrectly named Lower Creek in the GA dataset. A section of Lower Creek was also miss-named Springer Creek. Their were two unconnected sections named Lower Creek in the dataset. By renaming part of Springer creek I ... |
| 2 | 2023-09-11 01:56 | nevw | This changeset also uploaded the following tributaries of Lower Creek... Black Soil Gully,Brickyard Gully, Little Mallar Creek, Mallar Creek and Sawpit Gully. | |
| 140874364 by nevw @ 2023-09-06 03:17 | 1 | 2023-09-06 03:20 | nevw | Also added Bennet Creek, Castor Oil Creek, Murdering Hut Creek, Neil CreekOutlier Creek.Source: Geoscience Australia - Surface Hydrology Lines (Regional); Esri World Imagery |
| 140257757 by nevw @ 2023-08-23 06:15 | 1 | 2023-08-24 09:03 | theranmann ♦1 | This has removed a number of correct features and/or changed them inaccurately. Look at Castle Drive. Removed residential area. inaccurately mapped grass near Blue Seas Parade. Difference between removing duplicates and just deleting/inaccurately removing items. |
| 2 | 2023-08-24 09:54 | nevw | Yes, I admit defeat in the attempt to fix osmi and Josm validator errors in the area. Almost every way that joins another use area has duplicated ways. There appears to be no attempt to use relations to reduce duplicated ways. As I dug myself deeper in to the mire, I ended up with close to a 100 c... | |
| 140115945 by nevw @ 2023-08-20 02:51 | 1 | 2023-08-20 03:01 | nevw | Also added name The Letter A as place=locality at the junction of George Downes Drive and Walkers Ridge Road. |
| 139196671 by nevw @ 2023-07-30 06:29 | 1 | 2023-07-30 06:33 | nevw | Hi, I disconnected your new cycleway from an underground powerline. Are you able to check if for cycle lanes on West St between Church St and the Pacific Hwy as the new cycleway you added probably links to the cycleway or lanes on the Pacific Hwy here. |
| 138416106 by nevw @ 2023-07-12 10:21 | 1 | 2023-07-12 10:29 | nevw | Will simplify ways when remainder of Great Sandy National Park updated. |
| 2 | 2023-07-13 02:43 | nevw | completed updating the NP and applied Josm simplify (2m) to ways in my next changesets. | |
| 138016450 by nevw @ 2023-07-02 09:41 | 1 | 2023-07-02 09:55 | nevw | HiI removed the tags on the outer way of the Pine Lake multipolygon and left those tags on the multipolygon only and this allowed the area to render correctly.The inner of the Pine Lake multipolygon, the islet "The Island", has some tags. |
| 2 | 2023-07-02 09:59 | nevw | Use a new circuit with a Tor browser to see the updated map or you can first try clearing the cache on your usual browser and see if it shows the latest. | |
| 71387285 by nevw @ 2019-06-19 05:08 | 1 | 2023-01-20 21:44 | bob3bob3 ♦52 | Wonder if you area aware of current status https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5636754527 I was in Minnivale a day ago updating a few things and neglected to check! |
| 127823685 by nevw @ 2022-10-20 07:43 | 1 | 2022-10-20 07:54 | nevw | correction: added motor_vehicle=private to all highway=track in Mt Coot-tha Reserve, se Qld |
| 126442748 by nevw @ 2022-09-21 00:34 | 1 | 2022-09-21 00:36 | nevw | ...also updated tags for Beerburrum West State Forest |
| 126350331 by nevw @ 2022-09-19 02:40 | 1 | 2022-09-19 02:41 | nevw | also updated geometry using Protected areas of Queensland - boundaries - 2022 |
| 126350288 by nevw @ 2022-09-19 02:35 | 1 | 2022-09-19 02:36 | nevw | also updated geometry using source \tProtected areas of Queensland - boundaries - 2022 |
| 123827724 by nevw @ 2022-07-20 00:33 | 1 | 2022-07-24 11:04 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | Thanks @Nevw, I noticed this today in a 3rd party app and was going to remove them but you beat me to it. |
| 121510024 by nevw @ 2022-05-26 08:43 | 1 | 2022-05-26 10:42 | TheSwavu ♦543 | Lolz.... you beat me by two hours. |
| 2 | 2022-05-26 11:44 | nevw | :) | |
| 119052137 by nevw @ 2022-03-29 06:37 | 1 | 2022-03-30 07:16 | QC3 Construction ♦9 | Shops to be made here include Better Pets and Gardens, Mitre 10 and Supercheep Auto |
| 118507566 by nevw @ 2022-03-15 11:30 | 1 | 2022-03-21 00:50 | tastrax ♦1,144 | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_G... |
| 118005191 by nevw @ 2022-03-02 06:49 | 1 | 2022-03-02 21:50 | TheSwavu ♦543 | OMG. They must be the worst IT business in the country. I spent ages trying to find any online presence for this place that was less than two years old and couldn't find any.By the way I would have tagged this a private company office rather than a shop because it is in a private home: http... |
| 2 | 2022-03-03 05:30 | nevw | I have re-tagged as office=computer and abused the name to include description to Tier1 Repairs computer repair service.Feel free to correct if you prefer other. | |
| 111897688 by nevw @ 2021-09-30 05:47 | 1 | 2021-11-06 21:42 | emvee ♦366 | Hi,After you adding the cycle lanes, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112988036 added bicycle=no to some of these ways, see http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?source=16390&item=3032&class=30329As you are knowledge in here it seems can you have a look at these two ro... |
| 2 | 2021-11-07 03:29 | nevw | Thanks for that-all fixed now as far as I can spot. | |
| 111117963 by nevw @ 2021-09-13 03:21 | 1 | 2021-09-13 04:00 | Ds5rUy ♦28 | Hi, just want to understand your reasoning for removing the kerbs. What does "not specific in tagging" mean?And I guess with the new construction in the area, the kerbs are changing a lot, or where is there any need to "maintain" mapped kerbs at all?(This is not meant... |
| 2 | 2021-09-13 06:07 | nevw | Hi Ds5rUyI have mapped them without enough detail.I think they need to be mapped as you have done and split where the profile changes where they intersect with other ways as specified by the wikihttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerbI haven't done that in my mapping and it is requ... | |
| 3 | 2021-09-13 06:34 | Ds5rUy ♦28 | When the type of kerb changes for longer distances between e.g. rolled and raised, I split and tag them appropriately. But I have to confess that I've taken often shortcuts in places where the kerb is lowered in one spot because of e.g. a footpath or driveway and in that case I've not ... | |
| 4 | 2021-09-13 06:47 | Ds5rUy ♦28 | Oh, one thing that makes kerb mapping a lot easier in JOSM is to the Colored Kerbs map style I created. I think it should be available for everyone in the map styles list in Preferences. | |
| 5 | 2021-09-13 07:26 | nevw | Thanks, that would be helpful and like the way Josm can be used in that way. The filters are often very useful too. | |
| 6 | 2021-09-13 09:49 | Ds5rUy ♦28 | I had a quick look right now. Using the latest Bing imagery, it seems that most of your kerbs seem fine, with the generally the right kerb type (it takes some experience to recognize the difference between a rolled and a raised kerb in imagery, but with the new bing and high quality esri imagery... | |
| 7 | 2021-09-13 10:09 | nevw | Thanks, I’ll defer to your expertise and skill and leave you to it. I was fixing the geometry while you were editing just now and got a heap of conflicts on trying to upload so I exited the session and it should be fine. | |
| 105257891 by nevw @ 2021-05-25 03:58 | 1 | 2021-05-25 05:59 | nevw | Changeset comment should read from A2 to Alt A2 as sign posted on road. |
| 46919709 by nevw @ 2017-03-17 07:47 | 1 | 2020-03-13 22:51 | Paul_012 ♦112 | This edit destroyed the building outline of Siam Paragon, and has been reverted. |
| 37916471 by nevw @ 2016-03-18 11:01 | 1 | 2020-01-23 05:32 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,The whole of this nature reserve I don't think is a swamp. So I have removed that tagging.Way 40431925 - tagged as wetland. According to the LPI Base map .. this is the wet land. So I have left that. |
| 75873103 by nevw @ 2019-10-18 06:26 | 1 | 2019-10-18 06:37 | nevw | correction to changeset comment:"appears to be new route to" should read "appears to be unmapped route to" |
| 75312463 by nevw @ 2019-10-05 09:08 | 1 | 2019-10-05 09:12 | nevw | Also added Edward Corbould Reserve and Retreat No.2 Nature Refuge |
| 75172736 by nevw @ 2019-10-01 22:13 | 1 | 2019-10-03 13:32 | jonorossi ♦93 | Hi, I'm surprised to see the Coolnwynpin Creek name removed from the section along Barber Dr, through Coolnwynpin Nature Refuge, through to Lyndon Road (but not along Tipuana Dr).This is all Coolnwynpin Creek, the primary school and nature refuge were named after the creek. This forms part ... |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 20:27 | nevw | Hi Jonoyes I named as per the Geoscience Australia dataset. I have reverted this changeset now.I will do again later and include the names as you have mapped and informed.Thanks for pointing this out.CheersNev | |
| 3 | 2019-10-04 01:52 | jonorossi ♦93 | Thanks | |
| 74738344 by nevw @ 2019-09-21 02:30 | 1 | 2019-09-21 10:38 | nevw | Correction: source should be...Geoscience Australia Surface Hydrology Polygon (Regional); Josm simplify not applied to lake; Esri World Imagery |
| 73780837 by nevw @ 2019-08-27 07:14 | 1 | 2019-09-07 10:21 | TheSwavu ♦543 | Err,I'm pretty sure there is no taxi rank here. |
| 2 | 2019-09-07 14:08 | nevw | YesTagged as amenity=taxi is incorrecthttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3DtaxiIf a taxi business is operating from the address I expect office=company may be sufficient. | |
| 73903423 by nevw @ 2019-08-30 02:57 | 1 | 2019-08-30 03:05 | nevw | Also added/replaced/extended sections of Beerburrum Creek in this changeset. |
| 73788448 by nevw @ 2019-08-27 10:08 | 1 | 2019-08-27 10:11 | nevw | Corrected changeset comment: in the region of Great Sandy Strait |
| 72247414 by nevw @ 2019-07-15 04:18 | 1 | 2019-07-15 06:30 | nevw | This changeset was reverted by the next changeset.Reverted Changeset 72247414 due to failure at upload. |
| 18312355 by nevw @ 2013-10-12 10:43 | 1 | 2019-06-24 05:26 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Back here you add the tag landuse=conservation and later changed that to boundard protected area for the relation 1555083.It is tagged natural=tree before this and remains with this tag. I think this multipolygon is trees. Any protected area would include the water areas - that are excl... |
| 2 | 2019-06-24 07:01 | nevw | There are many like this. Feel free to make the changes. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-24 07:35 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | From here ... I can see the trees. I cannot see the protected area boundary. | |
| 4 | 2019-06-24 07:53 | nevw | I'll have a look in the next few days. | |
| 5 | 2019-06-25 06:36 | nevw | This one I have deleted the protected area and changed to a park, in common with nearby areas and the ponds/lakes/water areas are not for recreation. Another large area, the North Lakes Environmental Reserve, I have created a separate multipolygon relation that includes the land and lakes to take th... | |
| 62476651 by nevw @ 2018-09-11 07:05 | 1 | 2019-05-25 04:11 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,I don't think Lawn Hill Resources Reserve has enough trees to be used for forestry??? Certainly teh plan of management would suggest forestry is off. |
| 2 | 2019-05-25 06:14 | nevw | Hi WarinFeel free to fix as I have had an op and not able to do mapping for quite a while. | |
| 68461710 by nevw @ 2019-03-24 06:07 | 1 | 2019-03-24 06:11 | nevw | Hithe addr:street tag should include the street name only. I added addr:suburb for the North Bondi part.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr |
| 67245977 by nevw @ 2019-02-16 06:19 | 1 | 2019-02-17 22:15 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,This has placed the same tags on the outer way as there is in the relation ...not allowed.---------------------I would also add the tag landcover=grass as well as that ridiculous tag landuse=grass. |
| 2 | 2019-02-18 04:30 | nevw | I think these outer way tags are fixed now. Will check later.--------------------I am not a big fan of landuse=grass.I will add the landcover tags too and later when it renders I will delete the landuse=grass tags. | |
| 66762232 by nevw @ 2019-01-30 08:14 | 1 | 2019-01-31 13:14 | nevw | This may helphttps://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700https://www.onosm.org/# |
| 66790366 by nevw @ 2019-01-31 04:41 | 1 | 2019-01-31 13:13 | nevw | This may helphttps://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700https://www.onosm.org/# |
| 66790512 by nevw @ 2019-01-31 04:55 | 1 | 2019-01-31 13:13 | nevw | This may helphttps://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700https://www.onosm.org/# |
| 66793673 by nevw @ 2019-01-31 08:08 | 1 | 2019-01-31 13:12 | nevw | This may helphttps://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700https://www.onosm.org/# |
| 66798293 by nevw @ 2019-01-31 11:13 | 1 | 2019-01-31 13:12 | nevw | This may helphttps://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700https://www.onosm.org/# |
| 66799336 by nevw @ 2019-01-31 11:54 | 1 | 2019-01-31 13:11 | nevw | This may helphttps://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700https://www.onosm.org/# |
| 66800335 by nevw @ 2019-01-31 12:32 | 1 | 2019-01-31 13:11 | nevw | This may helphttps://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700https://www.onosm.org/# |
| 66800537 by nevw @ 2019-01-31 12:37 | 1 | 2019-01-31 13:10 | nevw | This may helphttps://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700https://www.onosm.org/# |
| 65489614 by nevw @ 2018-12-15 02:19 | 1 | 2018-12-15 02:26 | nevw | JOSM simplify to 2m applied to streams |
| 65033078 by nevw @ 2018-11-30 05:58 | 1 | 2018-11-30 06:00 | nevw | JOSM simplify way 2m applied |
| 63920646 by nevw @ 2018-10-27 07:05 | 1 | 2018-10-28 05:06 | nevw | Josm simplify (2m) applied to streams. |
| 63892360 by nevw @ 2018-10-26 08:36 | 1 | 2018-10-26 08:40 | SimonPoole ♦339 | You were a couple of seconds faster in reverting than I was :-). Can you add a changeset comment pointing out the revert to the offending changeset? Thanks |
| 2 | 2018-10-26 08:58 | nevw | I have reverted your edit, so feel free to begin again by mapping your business details to a real physical site you operate from. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-26 09:03 | nevw | Ok, done. I've added the above and another comment to the changeset now. | |
| 62625645 by nevw @ 2018-09-16 03:04 | 1 | 2018-09-16 13:35 | Ds5rUy ♦28 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625864666 should probably be access=destination to prevent routing software from using that as a regular shortcut from Anzac Av to Joyner Circuit... |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 14:48 | nevw | Thanksnow fixed with access=destination | |
| 23811453 by nevw @ 2014-07-03 14:02 | 1 | 2018-08-15 07:24 | joel7 ♦20 | digitalglobe premium shows the construction area as completed, do you know if this is true? |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 09:19 | nevw | Hi JoelI expect you are right. There was a lot of work being carried out in the area when I was last there and that was quite a while ago. Feel free to update to the current situation as I don’t expect to be in the area in the near future. Thanks. | |
| 61193239 by nevw @ 2018-07-30 12:10 | 1 | 2018-08-02 02:52 | TheSwavu ♦543 | Hi,If you do try to save these could you please mark the changeset as good on OSMCha. Otherwise I'm just going to revert them.Thanks.(https://osmcha.mapbox.com/). |
| 2 | 2018-08-02 11:31 | nevw | Feel free to delete them as I don’t mind you reverting spam. | |
| 59238123 by nevw @ 2018-05-24 11:01 | 1 | 2018-06-06 11:33 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,these two tags look like a mistake, could you check this?Resources =ReserveWrattens \t=2https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1506573Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-06 11:41 | nevw | Thanks Janyes that looks like a mistake.I will have a look and fix in the morning.Nev | |
| 3 | 2018-06-06 23:24 | nevw | Wrattens Resources Reserve 2 tags fixed now. | |
| 59008758 by nevw @ 2018-05-16 08:24 | 1 | 2018-05-16 10:20 | TheSwavu ♦543 | I've deleted this one. According to their website this is not where their office is. |
| 59010988 by nevw @ 2018-05-16 09:32 | 1 | 2018-05-16 10:05 | TheSwavu ♦543 | I've deleted this one. There's no evidence on their website that this is a real address. |
| 58845623 by nevw @ 2018-05-10 10:29 | 1 | 2018-05-10 10:32 | nevw | I have attempted to fix your multiple additional entries for the one business, adding office=company plus fixing usual seo spam edit errors but left the spam description of your business against my better judgement. |
| 58551015 by nevw @ 2018-04-30 10:49 | 1 | 2018-05-01 21:30 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,The Gondwana Rainforests of Australia World Heritage Area relation is now not closed... Secondly .. are you certain that the additions are part of the world heritage listing? I'm not doing CAPAD ... leaving it to others. |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 22:18 | nevw | Thanks WarinI have fixed now. I have not intentionally added any new Gondwana parts, just fixed the overlapping ways and duplicated nodes through JOSM from Capad updates. I will check against the Gondwana data for this area. | |
| 58308032 by nevw @ 2018-04-22 11:39 | 1 | 2018-04-23 20:05 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,388 | thx for reverting https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58306079 |
| 57787900 by nevw @ 2018-04-04 00:08 | 1 | 2018-04-04 00:23 | nevw | I reversed my change and left as two one member MPs but would be ideally mapped by sharing common segments as MPs instead of single polygon with overlapping ways. ...but their is differing opinion on this so have left alone.Should be either shared ways in MP or single polygon but not single memb... |
| 2 | 2018-04-05 13:29 | Keith ♦8 | What is MP ways? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-05 14:02 | nevw | Hi KeithMultipolygon (MP) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonSorry, I dislike unexplained acronyms too.Nev | |
| 55229788 by nevw @ 2018-01-07 08:43 | 1 | 2018-01-13 03:06 | nevw | no response from Elegant Smiles to shift tags from roadway to correct building location and is now deleted. |
| 47113518 by nevw @ 2017-03-24 03:47 | 1 | 2017-12-19 23:34 | Benny Goodman ♦19 | Hi nevw,I'm wondering how it's possible to create a new, extremely wrong farm multipolygon while doing a maproulette cleanup task?Just kidding,but I'm still interested in the reason.Greetings,Benny |
| 2 | 2017-12-20 06:30 | nevw | Mate, that's too long ago for me to remember. You can put them duplicate segments back if you wish :)Greetings for Christmas and New Year. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-20 09:00 | nevw | Hi BennyI had a look in Josm, then reverted the changeset, then used the JOSM Validator on the polygon and found the problem was at this position…https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kbk3wkhox14hzz/self%20intersect.png?dl=0I then un-did the revert (back to what Map Roulette did to it) and saw... | |
| 50995490 by nevw @ 2017-08-10 09:32 | 1 | 2017-10-09 12:21 | SDavies ♦5 | Impressive work! I must check out scanaerial. |
| 51503811 by nevw @ 2017-08-28 10:20 | 1 | 2017-08-29 12:24 | aharvey ♦1,687 | even if it translated, it's common in OSM not to add translations but only name:<lg> if the feature is known by that foreign language name. Although I'm not strongly one way or the other. |
| 2 | 2017-08-29 12:55 | nevw | Yes, I agree.This one was a bit unusual and... name=Manly Wharf\twas changed to name=Manly Wharf 玛丽海滩So normally I would correct to... name=Manly Wharf\t and addname:zh=玛丽海滩But though it may be correct, Google translated to "Mary Beach" so I just left it as...... | |
| 50196723 by nevw @ 2017-07-11 09:34 | 1 | 2017-07-12 12:46 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | This is actually Beech Avenue according to http://maps.sa.gov.au/plb/ (that is powered by the same data as is on data.sa.gov.au; which we have explicit permission to use) |
| 2 | 2017-07-12 13:05 | nevw | Well spotted. | |
| 49151324 by nevw @ 2017-06-01 02:02 | 1 | 2017-06-10 15:05 | Togfox ♦1 | Thanks! =) |
| 48591902 by nevw @ 2017-05-11 13:09 | 1 | 2017-05-11 21:22 | TheSwavu ♦543 | I've reverted this and the original changeset.They had doodled onto the map some sort of random walk around the middle of Canberra. The ACT Honour Walk was already mapped. |
| 2 | 2017-05-12 02:17 | nevw | Thanks | |
| 47991597 by nevw @ 2017-04-21 05:54 | 1 | 2017-04-21 06:00 | nevw | corr..source: LPI NSW imagery |
| 47991362 by nevw @ 2017-04-21 05:41 | 1 | 2017-04-21 05:59 | nevw | corr..source: LPI NSW imagery |
| 46099806 by nevw @ 2017-02-15 08:30 | 1 | 2017-04-10 02:14 | TheSwavu ♦543 | You might want to take a look at :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47606103 |
| 46736378 by nevw @ 2017-03-10 11:52 | 1 | 2017-03-10 16:53 | Lee Drury ♦2 | Sorry, new to this. I came back to redo them |
| 2 | 2017-03-11 06:04 | nevw | My comment was for no one in particular, but thanks for tidying up. | |
| 45580232 by nevw @ 2017-01-28 02:24 | 1 | 2017-01-28 22:16 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Talk to 'em. Otherwise you may get into edit wars. |
| 45583939 by nevw @ 2017-01-28 07:11 | 1 | 2017-01-28 21:53 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Not very polite to delete stuff without contacting the original mapper? |
| 40293030 by nevw @ 2016-06-26 03:30 | 1 | 2016-10-17 20:59 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Relation (361693) is not closed.. |
| 2 | 2016-10-18 01:23 | nevw | Thanks Warin61.I will fix it in next day or so. | |
| 3 | 2016-10-18 11:05 | nevw | Relation now closed. | |
| 4 | 2016-10-23 04:25 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Goodo.While adding new stuff is what motivates me, 'housekeeping' makes the map work better. I have a few of my own things to 'fix up' too. | |
| 37811312 by nevw @ 2016-03-14 02:27 | 1 | 2016-09-12 23:50 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | The Styx River is not the boundary of the Styx River State Forest .. nor do I think it is the boundary of the Cunnawarra NP... I have separated it off the Styx River State Forest. Will 'look at' the NP boundary later. |
| 2 | 2016-09-17 09:01 | nevw | Yes, looks ok. | |
| 40147307 by nevw @ 2016-06-20 02:27 | 1 | 2016-06-20 02:31 | nevw | Changeset comment should have read: Fixed overlapping ways of Kinchega National Park. |
| 38992355 by nevw @ 2016-04-30 02:16 | 1 | 2016-06-12 04:30 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | Ah neat, she (Sarnya) used to be my landlord. |
| 39920717 by nevw @ 2016-06-10 01:41 | 1 | 2016-06-10 01:46 | nevw | New relation for Olney State Forest is 6301813 |
| 39919898 by nevw @ 2016-06-09 23:32 | 1 | 2016-06-09 23:35 | nevw | This changeset was to delete overlapping ways. |
| 38164707 by nevw @ 2016-03-30 11:38 | 1 | 2016-03-30 22:43 | TheSwavu ♦543 | Hi, it would appear that this was broken at:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38131822But your fix has now broken Glen Davis and Glen Alice still needs to go back into the correct location. |
| 2 | 2016-03-31 05:05 | TheSwavu ♦543 | I reverted 38131822 at:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38187799 | |
| 3 | 2016-03-31 06:17 | nevw | Thanks, Wollemi National Park, Glen Davis and Glen Alice appear complete now. | |
| 37867512 by nevw @ 2016-03-16 10:24 | 1 | 2016-03-16 10:27 | nevw | ...correction: Wallaroo NP was already mapped. I changed it to share the boundary with the SF on the east side.and added swamps in area. |
| 29084790 by nevw @ 2015-02-25 05:57 | 1 | 2015-02-25 06:00 | nevw | Sourced road name changes from Morton Bay Regional Council |
| 28834070 by nevw @ 2015-02-14 03:44 | 1 | 2015-02-17 00:00 | zool ♦50 | dear Nev,One of my DWG colleagues had the following suggestion about footpath mapping: "In reality I suspect it's not really a separate footpath at all but just a roadside sidewalk, so I'd have thought that sidewalk=left/right/both on the road itself would be the best represen... |
| 2 | 2015-02-17 01:27 | nevw | Thanks JoI will make my changesets smaller and save more often with more descriptive text. I do like this method "A different approach is to map each sidewalk as separate ways using highway=footway and an associated footway=sidewalk" as we have many streets without sidewalks, and some ... | |
| 3 | 2015-02-17 02:25 | zool ♦50 | I appreciate the response, Nev!In my personal capacity, i think "tagging for the router / tagging for the renderer" is a trend with long legs... | |
| 4 | 2015-02-17 02:31 | nevw | :) |