| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68852218 by nmotupal @ 2019-04-03 18:21 | 1 | 2023-03-10 13:48 | dieterdreist ♦877 | Hi, I noticed you added this way with access=private: way 681450489Can you confirm this is from survey, or were you just guessing? It doesn't look as if all of it is just a driveway.Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-03-13 08:09 | sanganh ♦6 | Hi Martin,Thank you for reviewing our changeset and flagging out the issue.It's an honest mistake from our end. I have made the necessary changes in the changeset.Always happy to learn from the community.Thanks once again,looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,sanganh | |
| 3 | 2023-03-13 18:43 | dieterdreist ♦877 | Hi sanganh,thank you for replying, my suggestion would be to tag only those ways with access tags where you have checked it on the ground, and otherwise you just map the driveway without adding acccess tags. | |
| 4 | 2023-03-13 18:44 | dieterdreist ♦877 | forgot, thank you for fixing the issue. Have a nice day,Cheers,Martin | |
| 98270721 by nmotupal @ 2021-01-28 06:34 | 1 | 2021-01-28 16:47 | johsin18 ♦162 | There seem to be two yards next to each other. The added road is put right on top of the wall separating them, I have the impression. The road with the gate seems to be a one-way around the building. Please improve.https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=JNXqULUsKrifxBxgLcK9oQ&l... |
| 2 | 2021-02-02 02:27 | nmotupal | Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the presence of gate on a different road .Ihave added the road based on the Esri world imagery as some of the surrounding entities are aligning with it. As per your suggestions, I have aligned the road with the Bing. Please find ... | |
| 86181296 by nmotupal @ 2020-06-04 10:00 | 1 | 2020-06-05 19:44 | ndm ♦889 | Please adjust the imagery offset before you start editing - hopefully it's ok now. |
| 2 | 2020-06-08 14:47 | nmotupal | Thanks for checking the edit. I have made the edit based on Maxar imagery as it is clear and the remaining road skeleton is matching with this imagery. Going forward, I will utilize the offset feature to improvise my edits. Thanks for the valuable suggestion. Always happy to learn from the communit... | |
| 82855666 by nmotupal @ 2020-03-31 06:14 | 1 | 2020-03-31 18:19 | limes11 ♦970 | Hello nmotupal, Thank you for your contribution. The motivation to add these short service roads here is unclear. If you bother adding these, please use correct tags. This is not a public highway=track but allows access to a farm on private property.Best wishes! |
| 2 | 2020-04-01 12:38 | nmotupal | Hi , I am very thankful for your time. I will take this as a learning from the community and assure that my future edits will be reflecting the ground reality. Thanks for your improvisation of the edits. Always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 66609073 by nmotupal @ 2019-01-24 17:34 | 1 | 2019-09-08 20:02 | Florimondable ♦127 | Please, don't change things on distant information when the previous changeset was base on survey. You've reverted a right changeset. Access to road is not small information. |
| 72095779 by nmotupal @ 2019-07-10 13:33 | 1 | 2019-07-11 11:50 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 | Outdated imagery, this complex was demolished. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72095779 |
| 2 | 2019-07-11 11:50 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 | Outdated imagery, this complex was demolished. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72095779 | |
| 3 | 2019-07-16 14:40 | nmotupal | Hi Paul Johnson,Thanks for your update. We had checked a latest satellite imagery as recent as June 2019. If you can confirm that the building is demolished, I can revert the edit.Please let me know your suggestion.Regards,nmotupal | |
| 70275843 by nmotupal @ 2019-05-15 13:24 | 1 | 2019-07-05 16:18 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,It looks like your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385981893/history has the same issue as previously described at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71671942 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?Best ... |
| 2 | 2019-07-05 17:43 | nmotupal | Hi Andy,Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71940732Regards,nmotupal | |
| 3 | 2019-07-05 19:37 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Thanks. There is at least one other that you were the last editor of - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Kvz for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 71671942 by nmotupal @ 2019-06-27 12:56 | 1 | 2019-06-28 14:21 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,What was the source of your change to the access here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 10:17 | nmotupal | Hi Andy,The edits were made based on the possibility of our delivery partner traveling through this road. But with respect to the request from the community our team decided to revert all the access tags added by our team. Do let me know if you have any further questions on this edit.Changeset... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-02 10:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy |