Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
4 changesets created by ntanniru have been discussed with 3 replies of this contributor
Participated changeset discussions | More details | Discussions (Include blocked users) | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
92089216
by ntanniru
@ 2020-10-07 07:06		12020-12-05 18:23eczajk1
♦2		 This road does not exist anymore
22020-12-07 04:48naaitha
♦18		 Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit and providing update about the area. I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#95391858). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
naaitha
76137539
by ntanniru
@ 2019-10-24 07:32		12019-10-24 16:01user_5359
♦20,423		 Hello! Please remember the access value (see see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access). I have correct your mistake.
22019-10-25 10:58ntanniru Hi,

Thanks for correcting the edit. Apologies for the mistake. I Will ensure not to repeat the error again.Looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
ntanniru.
74133299
by ntanniru
@ 2019-09-05 13:01		12019-09-05 19:06user_5359
♦20,423		 Hello! I delete your access key, because you use ALL als value, I assumed, that means the same like access=yes, and this the default value. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
22019-09-06 10:15ntanniru Hi George,

Thanks for correcting the edit. Apologies for the mistake made. Will ensure to follow the appropriate tags hereafter.

Regards,
ntanniru
70377648
by ntanniru
@ 2019-05-18 02:24		12019-05-19 00:11DavidKewley
♦195		 This edit is incorrect. It's based on Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta and Bing Roadside, which are both outdated in this case. There is new building where these (older) roads were re-drawn. Preferably you would have noticed that the building was drawn here and looked more carefully at other ...
22019-07-11 06:48ntanniru Hi DavidKewley,

Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Its a mistake from my side for not checking the latest imagery. Thanks for reverting the changes. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community and will make sure not to commit these errors in future.
\...