7 changesets created by panchis1 have been discussed with 5 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
89959447
by panchis1
@ 2020-08-26 08:54
12021-02-12 18:09Allison P
♦1,141
Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to CUSTOMERS. This is not recognized by most data consumers. Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
22021-02-15 09:43panchis1 Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of access tag, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#99297210). Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy Mapping!

Regards,
panchis1.
81249163
by panchis1
@ 2020-02-20 04:04
12021-02-12 18:09Allison P
♦1,141
Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to CUSTOMERS. This is not recognized by most data consumers. Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
22021-02-15 09:35panchis1 Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of access tag, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#99296684). Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy Mapping!

Regards,
panchis1.
81846356
by panchis1
@ 2020-03-06 03:03
12021-02-12 18:10Allison P
♦1,141
Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to CUSTOMERS. This is not recognized by most data consumers. Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
22021-02-15 09:32panchis1 Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of access tag, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#99296476). Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy Mapping!

Regards,
panchis1.
90562121
by panchis1
@ 2020-09-08 06:00
12021-02-12 18:09Allison P
♦1,141
Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to CUSTOMERS. This is not recognized by most data consumers. Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
22021-02-15 09:25panchis1 Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of access tag, I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#99295874). Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy Mapping!

Regards,
panchis1.
83126499
by panchis1
@ 2020-04-06 07:02
12020-04-28 22:08Allison P
♦1,141
Why did you mark a feature as a ford? Looking at the satellite imagery it's clear that the canal goes underneath the road in a culvert.
22020-04-29 06:25panchis1 Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the mistake. Will ensure not to repeat such errors going forward. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
panchis1.
76157612
by panchis1
@ 2019-10-24 14:01
12019-10-24 15:59TravGW
♦355
Minor correction needed on this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738255255

When a road goes underneath a building you put the normal highway tag and add covered=yes or use tunnel=yes if there is a tunnel. In this case the tags should be highway=service, covered=yes.

https://wiki.openstree...
75664023
by panchis1
@ 2019-10-14 12:26
12019-10-16 17:02user_5359
♦20,423
Hello! Please notice the correct access value of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734448776 is access=yes instead access=all.