2 changesets created by patadivy have been discussed with 3 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
76502589
by patadivy
@ 2019-11-01 15:10
12019-11-04 02:20gpserror
♦227
Might be better to use "Parking Aisle" instead of "Service Road" where the road doesn't really lead anywhere except to a row of parking spots, at least that's what I'd do.
22019-11-04 09:52patadivy Hi,
Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #76580345 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter. Regards,
patadivy.
32019-11-04 19:19gpserror
♦227
Cool, thanks for updating. I just think it looks a bit better when roads that aren't used for getting from point A to point B (like if A or B is just a one car parking spot) should be a thin road that can be easily dropped when zoomed out without needing some algorithm to guess.
42019-11-05 13:51patadivy Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion, this completely make sense. We will ensure to follow your suggestion.
Regards,
patadivy.
52019-11-10 11:33freebeer
♦1,598
moin gpserror,

i find your interpretation of service v. parking aisle interesting, where you would use service to get from point a to b.

i've used parking aisle for sections of service drives where at any point one can turn off into a parking spot, even if it is possible to pass through t...
62019-11-12 17:20gpserror
♦227
I guess my main reason for making the distinction is I'd like the map to stand on its own if suddenly all the parking aisles were deleted from the map. What troubles me is there would be a lot of dangling roads now if parking aisles were removed, and IMHO this should not be the case! The main...
72019-11-14 02:44freebeer
♦1,598
ciao gpserror,

i suspect that i view parking aisles as an enhancement on the service drive concept, with the additional info that in theory it would be possible to turn off into a parking space pretty much anywhere, taking into account granularity, but then with facepalm moments of the last week ...
74341269
by patadivy
@ 2019-09-11 08:21
12019-09-11 18:02user_5359
♦20,423
Hello,

please check the restriction relation https://www.osm.org/relation/10026398, https://www.osm.org/relation/10026399
22019-09-12 12:12patadivy Hi,

Apologies for the incorrect edit. I've corrected the edit under changeset#74389684

Regards,
patadivy