| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111180330 by payelgh @ 2021-09-14 08:01 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | nmombo12 ♦66 | In iD editor, you can use the keyboard shortcut "q" to square the corners of a building or way after once it is closed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111180330 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and making the necessary changes. I really appreciate the feedback shared regarding mapping buildings.Going ahead, I'll ensure to square the buildings while mapping them.Thanks again, Looking forward to learn more from you!Regards,payelgh | |
| 109791410 by payelgh @ 2021-08-17 07:25 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | payelgh | Hi,I have made the edits in this changeset : 109791410 based on Driver feedback.Regards,payelgh |
| 109022686 by payelgh @ 2021-08-02 10:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | tekim ♦697 | Hi, Thanks for the edits. In the future, please keep the geographic extent of your changesets to a reasonable size, such as the size of a small city. This changeset spans much of the continental US. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue. Going ahead, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thanks again, I'm looking forwar... | |
| 107838914 by payelgh @ 2021-07-12 12:20 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ZeLonewolf ♦576 | Hi, you tagged this as a track road, however, it looks like there are houses on this road, therefore it should probably be highway=residential with the appropriate surface tags for unpaved roads. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | payelgh | Hi, I have changed the small part of the road to track as there are no permanent buildings on either side of that strip and also based on driver feedback which says road is a track road leading into woods. Kindly, let me know if there are any further concerns or suggestions regarding this edit.\... | |
| 94290636 by payelgh @ 2020-11-17 16:08 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | DUGA ♦551 | Who told you to modify them to track road? It is a serious problem to mess with the map.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12364428/history#map=18/40.22235/-77.53036 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.Apologies for the incorrect road classification, I will be extra cautious going forward.Looking forward to learn more from you!Regards,payelgh | |
| 105958393 by payelgh @ 2021-06-07 09:08 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | jleedev ♦305 | I find this change unlikely. While it's common in certain areas for street signs to omit the name's suffix, TIGER, USPS, and Allegheny County GIS are all in agreement that the street's proper name includes the suffix here. I've added it back. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit.I've edited the suffix of the Road name based on Driver feedback and streetsign imagery available on OSM.But going forward I'll keep the learning and add suffix as per Tiger data.Looking forward to learn more from... | |
| 84343453 by payelgh @ 2020-04-29 13:43 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Allison P ♦1,146 | This is a foot path. It is definitely not suitable for any sort of vehicle. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | payelgh | Hi, Thank you for reviewing the changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect road classification, I'll make sure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you. Regards, payelgh | |
| 90444439 by payelgh @ 2020-09-05 08:25 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Apologies for mistakenly adding a different comment. The correct comment is added a gate near Upland lane. #Changeset: 90444439Thanks and Regards,payelgh |
| 79468306 by payelgh @ 2020-01-12 06:57 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Adamant1 ♦222 | Hi there. If the Bing images are accurate and this isn't a parking lot anymore it might be worth deleting it altogether and mapping the building that's there now. Otherwise, someone will probably just come along and re-map the parking aisles. Plus, its more accurate that way.Thanks |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Hi Adamant1,Thanks for your comment. Apologies for the delay in response. As per your suggestion, I've deleted the entire data in the area and mapped it to the current building under changeset#80849482Looking forward to learning from you.Thanks,Payelgh | |
| 77322851 by payelgh @ 2019-11-20 12:26 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). See https://www.osm.org/relation/4065417 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Thanks for your comment. Apologies for the delay caused in responding. As per your suggestion, I've corrected the edit under changeset# 80849199Thanks, | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Thanks for your comment. Apologies for the delay caused in responding. As per your suggestion, I've corrected the edit under changeset# 80849199Thanks,payelgh | |
| 74656815 by payelgh @ 2019-09-19 07:31 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please check the restriction relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10047874. Role are missing. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Apologies for the delay caused in responding. I missed to delete the turn restriction while splitting the road, I'll ensure to avoid such errors in my future edits. I see the same has been fixed under Changeset #78872434.Thanks,payelgh | |
| 73720563 by payelgh @ 2019-08-25 15:48 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | MikeN ♦357 | Hi, Why were these turn restrictions added? I don't see any concrete divider. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Hi MikeN,I added the restriction based on the pair of double solid line which is a legal/painted median. If this is not a valid call, please let us know your suggestion. Eager to learn from you.Regards,payelgh | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | MikeN ♦357 | Hi, South Carolina is different from some other states and Double Yellow lines here only indicate divided traffic flow and passing is not allowed. They are not prohibited to cross when turning. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Hi MikeN,Thanks for your update. I have reverted the Restriction – Chageset # - “ 73844746“. I will also pass on this input to my team regarding adding restrictions in South Carolina based on double solid yellow lines. Please let us know any other suggestions you have.Regar... | |
| 72562988 by payelgh @ 2019-07-23 14:47 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Apologies for using internal terminologies in OSM. I am new to OSM and We have been advised by senior team members to follow OSM standards while commenting. Please find below the comment for the actual edit –Modified Residential Road: India Avenue added directions |
| 71362387 by payelgh @ 2019-06-18 11:34 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | jmapb ♦421 | Hi payelgh -- any particular reason for adding this node and bending Eastern Parkway? Is there a new road geometry that's not indicated by aerial imagery? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. The editor added turn-restriction which was the main edit. The node might have got added/modified mistakenly while dragging the map. We will take care of these kind of edits and make sure of not changing the alignment of the existing road segments going forw... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | jmapb ♦421 | Thanks yaswap. Consider in the future using a more descriptive changeset comment so we know what the intent is. In this case, something like "Add turn restrictions at intersections of Utica Ave with Eastern Parkway and Eastern Parkway service roads." Also please add a "source"... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for the updates jmapb. We will follow your suggestion.Regards,yaswap | |
| 62233361 by payelgh @ 2018-09-03 02:32 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Chris Fleming ♦382 | What is going on, you added and road and then later delete is? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Thanks for looking into the changeset. Same like the previous changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62231993) Due to some miscommunication I deleted the road segments that were created. Going forward we will make sure that these kind of errors won’t occur.Regards,Pay... | |
| 61818193 by payelgh @ 2018-08-20 10:16 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Madeline Steele ♦20 | Hello! The access tagging and oneway tagging were inconsistent in this lot after this changeset, which can create issues for routing engines. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61818193 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | payelgh | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit and apologies for the delayed response. I am reverting the changes that were made (adding directions to the whole loop). Thanks for the review again.Regards,Payelgh | |
| 65542263 by payelgh @ 2018-12-17 08:42 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | In bing the service road looks like it's drawn through parking spaces. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | pattamaa ♦15 | Thanks for the update @ndm, we have corrected the alignment of the segments as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from... | |
| 62939263 by payelgh @ 2018-09-26 08:55 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | jgon6 ♦121 | Can I ask what your source for this edit was. It's been a while since I've been to this post office, but I'm pretty sure you can't drive behind it. Also I don't think it's parking lot connects to the stores facing Cresent Ave. --- ... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | pattamaa ♦15 | Thanks for the update jhon6, we have deleted the connection between the two parking lots as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and ... |