Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
10 changesets created by pddondet have been discussed with 7 replies of this contributor
Participated changeset discussions | More details | Discussions (Include blocked users) | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
70812247
by pddondet
@ 2019-05-31 15:00		12019-08-08 11:58whb
♦636		 Offensichtlich Unsinn.
22019-08-08 13:20ma-rt-in
♦1,758		 Dann mal schnell weg damit, weil das ist echt kappes.
32019-08-13 11:12anilredd
♦9		 Hi,

Thanks for bringing this up. pddondet has left the organization, hence I am responding on this changeset on his behalf.
We agree that the highway tag should be given as foot path rather than pedestrian.
As the road represents a footway, the editor wrongly assumed it to be a pedestrian (as ...
42019-08-13 12:13anilredd
♦9		 Hi,

Thanks for the bringing this up. pddondet has left the organization, hence I am responding on this changeset on his behalf.
The editor has seen a board with no motor vehicle access at the entrance and changed mv access = no. He missed on checking the access to residence.
Its a miss from ou...
70803893
by pddondet
@ 2019-05-31 10:41		12019-08-08 11:59whb
♦636		 Das macht so wenig Sinn.
22019-08-08 13:20ma-rt-in
♦1,758		 Dann mal schnell weg damit, weil das ist echt kappes.
71281400
by pddondet
@ 2019-06-15 14:38		12019-07-05 16:20SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 Hello,
It looks like the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603158186/history here has the same issue as previously described at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71674971 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?
B...
22019-07-05 17:29pddondet Hi,

Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.

Changeset: 71940213

Regards,
pddondet
32019-07-05 19:42SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 Thanks. There are a few others that you were the last editor of - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/KvC .
71677946
by pddondet
@ 2019-06-27 15:55		12019-06-27 16:08SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 Before continuing to edit, could you answer the question on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71674971 first please?
Best Regards,
Andy
22019-06-27 16:10SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 I am particularly surprised that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114395509 is permissive access for foot traffic but "yes" for motor vehicle traffic. This seems a very unlikely combination, and will need to be reverted if it turns out not to be accurate.
32019-06-28 11:25jguthula
♦65		 Hi SomeoneElse,

Thanks for looking into this edit. This edit was saved in iD just before blocking the user, so it got uploaded automatically once his account was unblocked. That is why the editors previous changeset was not answered before this edit. I personally had responded in the editors prev...
42019-06-28 11:27jguthula
♦65		 Also corrected the wrong edit in this case: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71704269
52019-06-28 11:31SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 @jguthula Why are you answering questions that I am asking another mapper? Your answers so far have been verbose, but unhelpful. I would suggest that you let the conversation continue between the mappers creating the edits and the local community, so that we can help them understand how access rig...
62019-06-28 12:01jguthula
♦65		 Hi SomeoneElse,

Thanks for your inputs. I will definitely love to implement your suggestion. Will have a larger discussion with the team and get back to you with inputs.

This editor is working in my team so I am taking the responsibility for his edits and responding accordingly. The reason wh...
72019-06-28 12:19SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 @Jothirnadh Following the organised editing guidelines doesn't absolve any mapper from the responsibility of responding to the rest of the community.
82019-07-02 11:07pddondet Hi Andy,


Thanks for looking into my edit and requesting for my response. During the whole conversation I was looped in by my team and the comments were posted only after communicating to me. Sorry for a bit of mis-communication earlier. Going forward I will directly communicate with the changes...
92019-07-02 12:03SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 Thanks.
I'm not familiar with the area so I can't say that (say) the permissive tags on all of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700166782/history are correct. Maybe if you ask someone who added one of the original nodes they'll be able to help?
Best Regards,
Andy
102019-07-02 12:53pddondet Thanks for you inputs Andy, I will definitely do that. Will closely verify the area once again and then action upon accordingly.

Regards,
pddondet
112019-07-04 09:39freebeer
♦1,598		 hola andy,

totally off-topic for this changeset, but i see you have achieved results in a flood of original mapper comments in the last days, that do not really add much value i can see.

given the team nature of these edits (so far hidden from the casual outsider like me) i would posit it enti...
71674971
by pddondet
@ 2019-06-27 14:24		12019-06-27 14:47SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 Hello,
What was the source of the access tag change here?
Best Regards,
Andy
22019-06-27 17:54jguthula
♦65		 Hi SomeoneElse,

Thanks for looking into this edit. This edit was made based on our delivery agent GPS traces. In general there are two types of track roads we come across everyday:
1. The track roads which cannot be used for motor vehicles transportation and
2. The roads that are actually trac...
32019-06-27 17:58SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 What was the source of the access change in this particular case?
42019-06-27 18:05jguthula
♦65		 Hi SomeoneElse,

In Esri World Imagery Clarity Beta the parked vehicles were identified inside the building at the middle of the Farthing Drove and our delivery agent GPS traces also helped in deciding if motor_vehicles were allowed to this road or not.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
52019-06-27 19:11SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 That there are vehicles there identifies that it is physically accessible to motor vehicles, but "highway=track" implies that. How do you know what the legal access rights are here?
62019-06-28 11:03jguthula
♦65		 Yes SomeoneElse, exactly because of this reason we decided not to convert the track road to a service road and instead we decided to add motor_vehicle=yes for these track roads. Since there is no street level imagery assigned for this road, we didn't add any of the legal access tags. If we have...
72019-06-28 11:19SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 To be clear, "motor_vehicle=yes" IS a legal access tag. If you've added that here without assessing the legal access situation, that's not correct and will need to be reverted.
82019-07-02 13:07pddondet Hi Andy,


Thanks for your suggestion. As per your request one of my team member has reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.

Changeset #71780369

Regards,
pddondet
71703908
by pddondet
@ 2019-06-28 11:15		12019-06-28 11:24SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 (echoing the question in previous changesets to which no answer was received) what evidence do you have that there is legal motor vehicle access along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96887218 ?
For the avoidance of doubt, "motor_vehicle=yes" implies that anyone can drive up and down her...
22019-07-02 11:14pddondet Hi Andy,


Sorry for the late response. As similar discussion was happening in the other changesets, I waited for a proper resolution to comment back here. I verified our delivery partners GPS traces with the motor vehicles visible in the satellite imagery for these roads and added the motor_veh...
32019-07-02 11:53SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 Hello,
Thanks for that.
Best Regards,
Andy
70472411
by pddondet
@ 2019-05-21 10:22		12019-05-26 12:18trigpoint
♦2,503		 Maybe do more than the absolute minimum and extend the residential area?

Cheers Phil
22019-07-02 11:20pddondet Hi Phil,

Thanks for looking into my edit and making the changes.Please let me know if you have any further suggestions.

Regards,
pddondet
71678149
by pddondet
@ 2019-06-27 16:01		12019-06-27 18:15trigpoint
♦2,503		 Please take your time when mapping and take into account the existing mapping. If you don't understand something look in the wiki or ask.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368889024 is tagged as a public bridleway which says there is certainly not publicly accessible by motor vehicle.

The...
22019-07-02 10:52pddondet Hi Phil,


Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.

Changeset #71816520
Regards,
pddondet
71135704
by pddondet
@ 2019-06-11 10:48		12019-06-12 18:30trigpoint
♦2,503		 Hi, a mini roundabout is a bit of an odd thing to map at the end of a private driveway?

Cheers Phil
22019-06-13 10:27yaswap
♦68		 Hi Phil,

Thanks for looking into the edit. The editor might have got confused between the mini roundabout and turning loop/island. The OSM wiki states that if there is any non-traversable feature at the center of the turning loop we may add turning island if it is a not connecting highways and ro...
32019-06-13 10:41trigpoint
♦2,503		 Hi, yes simply add the turning loop although as its private there will not be any oneway needed.

Cheers Phil
42019-06-13 10:51yaswap
♦68		 Hi,

We modified the edit as per your suggestion. Thanks for reviewing.

Regards,
yaswap.
52019-06-13 10:58yaswap
♦68		 Hi Phil,

Can't we just add a highway=turning_loop at the point/at the end of the road? Instead of adding a road segment (loop)?

Regards,
yaswap.
62019-06-13 11:22trigpoint
♦2,503		 I would just draw the loop, it is private land so there is no formal turning loop.
Cheers Phil
70616442
by pddondet
@ 2019-05-25 18:06		12019-05-26 11:43trigpoint
♦2,503		 Again this is a bridleway, it does not have public motor vehicle access. Setting to private.
22019-05-28 10:50yaswap
♦68		 Hi Phil,

Thanks for revewing the edit. The editor might have set the access as YES by seeing the motorvehicles from the aerial view and we do have feedback from delivery that the road is accessible. But adding private/designated makes more sense as the remaining tags were added as designated.
\...