| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105496634 by pizzaiolo @ 2021-05-28 13:58 | 1 | 2023-04-18 02:12 | Irma IRM-ED ♦127 | Hi pizzaiolo,Thank you for contributing to osm.Your edit looks awesome.Would you mind helping me to fix this issue? Way ID 609332359, 609332356, 609332360, 609332369, 609332372, 609332380, 609332381 become crossing waterbody because there is natural water multipolygon. what if https://pewu.g... |
| 27235074 by pizzaiolo @ 2014-12-04 13:29 | 1 | 2022-01-12 00:32 | cartogravy ♦9 | Hi pizzaiolo,I noticed in multiple changesets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27636025), (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26959206), (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27419236), that you added highway=footway and footway=sidewalk tags to addr:inclusion=potential and addr:in... |
| 2 | 2022-01-12 02:45 | pizzaiolo | Hi there! Feel free to revert it you think it makes sense. I made these edits back when I was a newcomer and they might not have been the best quality, I'm afraid. | |
| 3 | 2022-01-12 22:06 | cartogravy ♦9 | Thanks for taking a look! Sounds good, I am going to remove the footway tags. | |
| 71557355 by pizzaiolo @ 2019-06-24 11:11 | 1 | 2021-08-25 01:55 | Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez ♦22 | Hola que tal, quiero preguntarte acerca de ese límite que colocaste de Canto del Llano, Corregimiento de Canto del Llano, en el Distrito de Veraguas en qué te basaste?. |
| 2 | 2021-08-25 01:55 | Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez ♦22 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8906430#map=15/8.1196/-80.9661&layers=N | |
| 108220179 by pizzaiolo @ 2021-07-19 05:43 | 1 | 2021-08-05 11:40 | Jyunhou ♦130 | Please, do NOT delete the place node, now the whole place doesn't appear on the map. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108220179 |
| 108211938 by pizzaiolo @ 2021-07-19 01:40 | 1 | 2021-07-19 03:05 | Supaplex ♦10,426 | Could you check the local situation. The Taiyuan Asian puppet theater museum is closedhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973827922/history --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108211938 |
| 2 | 2021-07-19 03:22 | pizzaiolo | Hi Supaplex. Thanks for reaching out. I don't see what the issue is as I simply linked it to Wikidata. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-19 04:19 | Supaplex ♦10,426 | It is already closed, and added with disused:wikidata tag. So maybe should mapped more careful when you are doing some mechanic edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108211938 | |
| 4 | 2021-07-19 04:32 | pizzaiolo | I appreciate you looking out for potential bad edits, but I think this one was perfectly fine. Closed or not, that doesn't change the fact that Wikidata has more information on this venue. I'm not really sure what 'disused:wikidata' means, because the Wikidata link is not depreca... | |
| 5 | 2021-07-19 05:54 | Supaplex ♦10,426 | OK, I can accept it. If there is new prosperity at that location, the the Wikidata link will be remove | |
| 6 | 2021-07-19 07:21 | pizzaiolo | Fair enough. Thanks again for patrolling this area for bad edits. We need more folks like you. | |
| 91962390 by pizzaiolo @ 2020-10-05 06:46 | 1 | 2020-10-10 08:33 | Mike Raust ♦81 | Hi pizzaiolo,if you think that the whole world should be "iD autovalidated", please apply for an automated edit (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct). Your current procedure is very inefficient and I severely doubt that you would notice a closed or chang... |
| 2 | 2020-10-11 00:06 | pizzaiolo | Hi Mike. Was there a specific problem with the changeset? | |
| 89939237 by pizzaiolo @ 2020-08-26 00:49 | 1 | 2020-10-07 15:24 | Richū ♦8 | Usually Wikidata is not getting added to a riverbank relation. Or not? |
| 2 | 2020-10-07 23:31 | pizzaiolo | Why wouldn't it be? | |
| 64278938 by pizzaiolo @ 2018-11-08 02:13 | 1 | 2020-07-13 07:26 | dieterdreist ♦836 | Hi Pizzaiolo, I have noticed you have confirmed the phantom obelisk here. Can you please explain what your edit refers to? At first glance it seems someone was adding wikidata tags without any verification to phantom objects which really are already mapped at their actual location. |
| 2 | 2020-07-14 00:30 | pizzaiolo | Hi! Feel free to undo my edits if you see fit! | |
| 3 | 2020-07-14 08:10 | dieterdreist ♦836 | I did not check "your edits" of course, I just noticed you have added wikidata tags to a supposed phantom obelisk, where the actual obelisk is already mapped 200 meters to the east at its actual position. There is no point in doing "manual verification" of automatically adding wi... | |
| 65523580 by pizzaiolo @ 2018-12-16 14:20 | 1 | 2020-06-23 12:02 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,594 | Why for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69774016/history you deleted wikipedia tag and replaced it by wikidata?It is OK to add Wikidata tag, but removing Wikipedia tag and replacing it by WIkidata tag is rather a bad idea. |
| 69694852 by pizzaiolo @ 2019-04-29 12:49 | 1 | 2019-04-29 16:44 | cxc ♦37 | Hi,are you shure?This is private house.Please check it!ciao |
| 2 | 2019-04-29 22:36 | pizzaiolo | Oops, you're right! Fixing it. | |
| 69694333 by pizzaiolo @ 2019-04-29 12:37 | 1 | 2019-04-29 18:56 | ralley ♦604 | Shouldn't this be Q143? |
| 2 | 2019-04-29 22:33 | pizzaiolo | It should! Thank you for spotting that. | |
| 46964289 by pizzaiolo @ 2017-03-18 19:16 | 1 | 2019-01-11 01:04 | k127 ♦95 | Hi pizzaiolo,while having a quick look on osm areas in this region, I noticed a bunch of overlapping and thus contradicting shapes, i.e. there's wood over scrub, etc.Looks like you've added `natural=wood` to a multipolygon area named _Área de Proteção Ambiental... |
| 2 | 2019-01-11 01:06 | pizzaiolo | Hi Klaus! No worries, feel free to undo it if you see fit. Cheers! | |
| 3 | 2019-01-11 01:31 | k127 ♦95 | Ok great, and thanks for the quick reply.I'll remove `natural=wood`.Regarding those two leisure multipolygons [1] and [2], where [1] is a geometrical subset of [2], do we want to keep both? Both of them denote a nature reserve, while only the outer one is a protected area boundary.-... | |
| 4 | 2019-01-11 01:33 | pizzaiolo | Either way is fine be me. Be bold! | |
| 5 | 2019-01-11 01:39 | k127 ♦95 | My idea was that you might be more familiar with this particular situation. Somebody probably has spent a lot of time in that.It won't hurt to be transparent about the rationale, especially when it comes to deletions.No worries though, I'm going to just act :) | |
| 64176434 by pizzaiolo @ 2018-11-04 19:48 | 1 | 2018-11-05 04:57 | Willywilllee ♦1 | good |
| 52681606 by pizzaiolo @ 2017-10-06 12:10 | 1 | 2017-10-08 05:58 | dgitto ♦934 | Hi. How do you know the range of the lighthouse is 25.92 miles?It's a strange value :-) |
| 2 | 2017-10-08 15:32 | pizzaiolo | From https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farol_do_Cabo_da_Roca | |
| 3 | 2017-10-09 06:23 | dgitto ♦934 | It's a small problem, but clearly is a mistake of the Wikipedia page. It is a nosense the 2-digits of resolution. You should follow the link to NGA database or other sources. (Wikipedia is just a tertiary source of information) it's 26 nautical miles. Cheers | |
| 4 | 2017-10-09 17:17 | pizzaiolo | Sorry for the mishap, and thanks for reviewing my edit! | |
| 46525378 by pizzaiolo @ 2017-03-02 15:46 | 1 | 2017-07-17 08:35 | nammala ♦517 | Hi pizzaiolo,May I know the reason behind adding this feature in the changesets which has irregular tagging combinations.Regards,nammala |
| 2 | 2017-07-17 10:59 | pizzaiolo | Hi nammala, thanks for reviewing the changes. I'm generally following the conventions at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_EsperantoIs there any specific tag that you'd like to discuss? | |
| 3 | 2017-07-17 12:44 | nammala ♦517 | I am concerned about the admin tag where the small area is being tagged as admin tagged and also the place tag which you have been added | |
| 4 | 2017-07-17 12:46 | pizzaiolo | I don't think it was my intention back then to mess with admin-related tags, so feel free to change back any mistakes you found there, if you wish. | |
| 5 | 2017-07-17 12:50 | nammala ♦517 | I am not much familiar about the admin boundaries so can you please cross check and take necessary action on this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33120283 | |
| 6 | 2017-07-17 14:01 | pizzaiolo | How can I check with iD? I can't really use JOSM. | |
| 7 | 2017-07-17 14:07 | nammala ♦517 | you can check the tags , and deleted the unnecessary tags. | |
| 50034584 by pizzaiolo @ 2017-07-04 13:15 | 1 | 2017-07-14 21:37 | capiscuas ♦1 | Dankegon pro tiu rapidega ĝisdatigo.http://diariodeteruel.es/2017/06/25/teruel-ya-glorieta-del-esperanto-junto-al-ascensor-del-barrio-san-julian/ |
| 2 | 2017-07-14 22:59 | pizzaiolo | Senprobleme ;) | |
| 46936247 by pizzaiolo @ 2017-03-17 17:31 | 1 | 2017-03-20 12:39 | joost schouppe ♦1,148 | are there really two libraries? |
| 2 | 2017-03-20 15:46 | pizzaiolo | It's more like a specific section inside the library, so, for the lack of a better tag, library does it. Relevant Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto_library | |
| 46537604 by pizzaiolo @ 2017-03-03 02:12 | 1 | 2017-03-03 19:03 | thuukena ♦1 | Iaorana est-ce que tes modifications sont visible sur le calque principal ? |
| 2 | 2017-03-03 21:46 | pizzaiolo | Sorry, my French is awful. Do you mean to ask if my changes are visible in the main map? Yes, but only for Esperanto-speakers and Portuguese speakers. For anyone else, it makes no difference. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-03 22:11 | thuukena ♦1 | Oh i'm sorry,thx for your answer ok ok thing is my changes aren't visible in the main map but when i share in svg format they are in .. it's weard .. | |
| 45818400 by pizzaiolo @ 2017-02-05 00:16 | 1 | 2017-02-06 11:32 | wambacher ♦435 | please do not remove any boundary tags. otherwise the boundary is "gone". |
| 2 | 2017-02-26 07:14 | nyuriks ♦145 | please do not remove the wikidata tag - they are critical for data validation and cross-referencing with external data for wikipedia | |
| 28978031 by pizzaiolo @ 2015-02-20 13:58 | 1 | 2016-01-29 07:05 | Geaquinto ♦25 | Oi, tudo bom? Notei que você adicionou a tag natural=wood não só aqui no Parque da Pedra Branca, mas na Serra do Engenho Novo. Você poderia não fazer isso novamente? Isso é um pouco prejudicial para monitorar onde há necessidade de mapeamento de cob... |
| 2 | 2016-01-29 11:38 | pizzaiolo | Ok, sem problemas! :) | |
| 27790387 by pizzaiolo @ 2014-12-30 00:22 | 1 | 2014-12-31 12:17 | chillly ♦819 | This edit has added alleys (known locally as ten foots) as residential roads. Was this surveyed or added from aerial imagery alone? A survey would have shown how wrong this is. I'm tempted to revert this edit, as the quality is too poor. |
| 2 | 2015-01-05 20:19 | pizzaiolo | Hi there! This was based on aerial imagery and a comparison with Google Maps. Feel free to revert it if you wish. Cheers. | |
| 3 | 2015-01-05 20:34 | chillly ♦819 | Any use of Google maps breaks their terms of use. Comparing with G maps tempts you into copying from it if you see more detail. This is, of course, forbidden. I suggest to leave G maps completely alone when editing OSM. I reverted your edit and replaced it with a more accurate edit based on aerials ... | |
| 27642726 by pizzaiolo @ 2014-12-23 02:08 | 1 | 2014-12-23 11:27 | Skippern ♦280 | Favor adicionar comentario no seu conjuntos de edicao, e difícil verificar o que fui alterado se não ha. |
| 27474279 by pizzaiolo @ 2014-12-15 05:10 | 1 | 2014-12-15 05:12 | pizzaiolo | Mistakenly tagged as hotosm |
| 27169716 by pizzaiolo @ 2014-12-02 00:35 | 1 | 2014-12-02 10:54 | tomlee721 ♦2 | Why "大潭山" be a circle now? |
| 2 | 2014-12-03 19:03 | pizzaiolo | I'm sorry, this was an accident. How can I revert it? | |
| 3 | 2014-12-04 09:01 | tomlee721 ♦2 | I have been fixed. But need a few day to let the map process to the original. | |
| 4 | 2014-12-04 11:54 | pizzaiolo | Thank you. Again, I'm sorry! |