24 Changesets created by pizzaiolo have been discussed with 23 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
105496634
by pizzaiolo
@ 2021-05-28 13:58
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agoIrma IRM-ED
♦127
Hi pizzaiolo,
Thank you for contributing to osm.
Your edit looks awesome.
Would you mind helping me to fix this issue?
Way ID 609332359, 609332356, 609332360, 609332369, 609332372, 609332380, 609332381 become crossing waterbody because there is natural water multipolygon. what if https://pewu.g...
27235074
by pizzaiolo
@ 2014-12-04 13:29
~ 11 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agocartogravy
♦10
Hi pizzaiolo,
I noticed in multiple changesets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27636025), (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26959206), (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27419236), that you added highway=footway and footway=sidewalk tags to addr:inclusion=potential and addr:in...
2 ~ 4 years agopizzaiolo Hi there! Feel free to revert it you think it makes sense. I made these edits back when I was a newcomer and they might not have been the best quality, I'm afraid.
3 ~ 4 years agocartogravy
♦10
Thanks for taking a look! Sounds good, I am going to remove the footway tags.
71557355
by pizzaiolo
@ 2019-06-24 11:11
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agoCarlos Eduardo Rodríguez
♦22
Hola que tal, quiero preguntarte acerca de ese límite que colocaste de Canto del Llano, Corregimiento de Canto del Llano, en el Distrito de Veraguas en qué te basaste?.
2 ~ 4 years agoCarlos Eduardo Rodríguez
♦22
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8906430#map=15/8.1196/-80.9661&layers=N
108220179
by pizzaiolo
@ 2021-07-19 05:43
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agoJyunhou
♦132
Please, do NOT delete the place node, now the whole place doesn't appear on the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108220179
108211938
by pizzaiolo
@ 2021-07-19 01:40
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agoSupaplex
♦11,285
Could you check the local situation. The Taiyuan Asian puppet theater museum is closed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973827922/history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108211938
2 ~ 4 years agopizzaiolo Hi Supaplex. Thanks for reaching out. I don't see what the issue is as I simply linked it to Wikidata.
3 ~ 4 years agoSupaplex
♦11,285
It is already closed, and added with disused:wikidata tag. So maybe should mapped more careful when you are doing some mechanic edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108211938
4 ~ 4 years agopizzaiolo I appreciate you looking out for potential bad edits, but I think this one was perfectly fine. Closed or not, that doesn't change the fact that Wikidata has more information on this venue. I'm not really sure what 'disused:wikidata' means, because the Wikidata link is not depreca...
5 ~ 4 years agoSupaplex
♦11,285
OK, I can accept it. If there is new prosperity at that location, the the Wikidata link will be remove
6 ~ 4 years agopizzaiolo Fair enough. Thanks again for patrolling this area for bad edits. We need more folks like you.
91962390
by pizzaiolo
@ 2020-10-05 06:46
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoMike Raust
♦81
Hi pizzaiolo,

if you think that the whole world should be "iD autovalidated", please apply for an automated edit (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct). Your current procedure is very inefficient and I severely doubt that you would notice a closed or chang...
2 ~ 5 years agopizzaiolo Hi Mike. Was there a specific problem with the changeset?
89939237
by pizzaiolo
@ 2020-08-26 00:49
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoRichū
♦8
Usually Wikidata is not getting added to a riverbank relation. Or not?
2 ~ 5 years agopizzaiolo Why wouldn't it be?
64278938
by pizzaiolo
@ 2018-11-08 02:13
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agodieterdreist
♦898
Hi Pizzaiolo, I have noticed you have confirmed the phantom obelisk here. Can you please explain what your edit refers to? At first glance it seems someone was adding wikidata tags without any verification to phantom objects which really are already mapped at their actual location.
2 ~ 5 years agopizzaiolo Hi! Feel free to undo my edits if you see fit!
3 ~ 5 years agodieterdreist
♦898
I did not check "your edits" of course, I just noticed you have added wikidata tags to a supposed phantom obelisk, where the actual obelisk is already mapped 200 meters to the east at its actual position. There is no point in doing "manual verification" of automatically adding wi...
65523580
by pizzaiolo
@ 2018-12-16 14:20
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoMateusz Konieczny
♦9,816
Why for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69774016/history you deleted wikipedia tag and replaced it by wikidata?

It is OK to add Wikidata tag, but removing Wikipedia tag and replacing it by WIkidata tag is rather a bad idea.
69694852
by pizzaiolo
@ 2019-04-29 12:49
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agocxc
♦40
Hi,
are you shure?
This is private house.
Please check it!
ciao
2 ~ 7 years agopizzaiolo Oops, you're right! Fixing it.
69694333
by pizzaiolo
@ 2019-04-29 12:37
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agoralley
♦645
Shouldn't this be Q143?
2 ~ 7 years agopizzaiolo It should! Thank you for spotting that.
46964289
by pizzaiolo
@ 2017-03-18 19:16
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agok127
♦97
Hi pizzaiolo,

while having a quick look on osm areas in this region, I noticed a bunch of overlapping and thus contradicting shapes, i.e. there's wood over scrub, etc.

Looks like you've added `natural=wood` to a multipolygon area named _Área de Proteção Ambiental...
2 ~ 7 years agopizzaiolo Hi Klaus! No worries, feel free to undo it if you see fit. Cheers!
3 ~ 7 years agok127
♦97
Ok great, and thanks for the quick reply.

I'll remove `natural=wood`.

Regarding those two leisure multipolygons [1] and [2], where [1] is a geometrical subset of [2], do we want to keep both? Both of them denote a nature reserve, while only the outer one is a protected area boundary.

-...
4 ~ 7 years agopizzaiolo Either way is fine be me. Be bold!
5 ~ 7 years agok127
♦97
My idea was that you might be more familiar with this particular situation. Somebody probably has spent a lot of time in that.
It won't hurt to be transparent about the rationale, especially when it comes to deletions.

No worries though, I'm going to just act :)
64176434
by pizzaiolo
@ 2018-11-04 19:48
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agoWillywilllee
♦1
good
52681606
by pizzaiolo
@ 2017-10-06 12:10
~ 8 years ago
1 ~ 8 years agodgitto
♦934
Hi. How do you know the range of the lighthouse is 25.92 miles?
It's a strange value :-)
2 ~ 8 years agopizzaiolo From https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farol_do_Cabo_da_Roca
3 ~ 8 years agodgitto
♦934
It's a small problem, but clearly is a mistake of the Wikipedia page. It is a nosense the 2-digits of resolution. You should follow the link to NGA database or other sources. (Wikipedia is just a tertiary source of information) it's 26 nautical miles. Cheers
4 ~ 8 years agopizzaiolo Sorry for the mishap, and thanks for reviewing my edit!
46525378
by pizzaiolo
@ 2017-03-02 15:46
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 8 years agonammala
♦517
Hi pizzaiolo,

May I know the reason behind adding this feature in the changesets which has irregular tagging combinations.

Regards,
nammala
2 ~ 8 years agopizzaiolo Hi nammala, thanks for reviewing the changes. I'm generally following the conventions at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Esperanto

Is there any specific tag that you'd like to discuss?
3 ~ 8 years agonammala
♦517
I am concerned about the admin tag where the small area is being tagged as admin tagged and also the place tag which you have been added
4 ~ 8 years agopizzaiolo I don't think it was my intention back then to mess with admin-related tags, so feel free to change back any mistakes you found there, if you wish.
5 ~ 8 years agonammala
♦517
I am not much familiar about the admin boundaries so can you please cross check and take necessary action on this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33120283
6 ~ 8 years agopizzaiolo How can I check with iD? I can't really use JOSM.
7 ~ 8 years agonammala
♦517
you can check the tags , and deleted the unnecessary tags.
50034584
by pizzaiolo
@ 2017-07-04 13:15
~ 8 years ago
1 ~ 8 years agocapiscuas
♦1
Dankegon pro tiu rapidega ĝisdatigo.
http://diariodeteruel.es/2017/06/25/teruel-ya-glorieta-del-esperanto-junto-al-ascensor-del-barrio-san-julian/
2 ~ 8 years agopizzaiolo Senprobleme ;)
46936247
by pizzaiolo
@ 2017-03-17 17:31
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agojoost schouppe
♦1,454
are there really two libraries?
2 ~ 9 years agopizzaiolo It's more like a specific section inside the library, so, for the lack of a better tag, library does it. Relevant Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto_library
46537604
by pizzaiolo
@ 2017-03-03 02:12
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agothuukena
♦1
Iaorana est-ce que tes modifications sont visible sur le calque principal ?
2 ~ 9 years agopizzaiolo Sorry, my French is awful. Do you mean to ask if my changes are visible in the main map? Yes, but only for Esperanto-speakers and Portuguese speakers. For anyone else, it makes no difference.
3 ~ 9 years agothuukena
♦1
Oh i'm sorry,thx for your answer ok ok thing is my changes aren't visible in the main map but when i share in svg format they are in .. it's weard ..
45818400
by pizzaiolo
@ 2017-02-05 00:16
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agowambacher
♦437
please do not remove any boundary tags. otherwise the boundary is "gone".
2 ~ 9 years agonyuriks
♦145
please do not remove the wikidata tag - they are critical for data validation and cross-referencing with external data for wikipedia
28978031
by pizzaiolo
@ 2015-02-20 13:58
~ 11 years ago
1 ~ 10 years agoGeaquinto
♦25
Oi, tudo bom? Notei que você adicionou a tag natural=wood não só aqui no Parque da Pedra Branca, mas na Serra do Engenho Novo.

Você poderia não fazer isso novamente? Isso é um pouco prejudicial para monitorar onde há necessidade de mapeamento de cob...
2 ~ 10 years agopizzaiolo Ok, sem problemas! :)
27790387
by pizzaiolo
@ 2014-12-30 00:22
~ 11 years ago
1 ~ 11 years agochillly
♦819
This edit has added alleys (known locally as ten foots) as residential roads. Was this surveyed or added from aerial imagery alone? A survey would have shown how wrong this is.

I'm tempted to revert this edit, as the quality is too poor.
2 ~ 11 years agopizzaiolo Hi there! This was based on aerial imagery and a comparison with Google Maps. Feel free to revert it if you wish. Cheers.
3 ~ 11 years agochillly
♦819
Any use of Google maps breaks their terms of use. Comparing with G maps tempts you into copying from it if you see more detail. This is, of course, forbidden. I suggest to leave G maps completely alone when editing OSM. I reverted your edit and replaced it with a more accurate edit based on aerials ...
27642726
by pizzaiolo
@ 2014-12-23 02:08
~ 11 years ago
1 ~ 11 years agoSkippern
♦280
Favor adicionar comentario no seu conjuntos de edicao, e difícil verificar o que fui alterado se não ha.
27474279
by pizzaiolo
@ 2014-12-15 05:10
~ 11 years ago
1 ~ 11 years agopizzaiolo Mistakenly tagged as hotosm
27169716
by pizzaiolo
@ 2014-12-02 00:35
~ 11 years ago
1 ~ 11 years agotomlee721
♦2
Why "大潭山" be a circle now?
2 ~ 11 years agopizzaiolo I'm sorry, this was an accident. How can I revert it?
3 ~ 11 years agotomlee721
♦2
I have been fixed. But need a few day to let the map process to the original.
4 ~ 11 years agopizzaiolo Thank you. Again, I'm sorry!