| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106690301 by pjij @ 2021-06-21 05:10 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | The way is rather a driveway |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pjij | Hi SafetyIng, I have modified the highway to driveway now. Please find the changeset (106808177) with the changes made. Thanks for looking into my edit. Always happy to learn from the community. Regards,pjij | |
| 93832383 by pjij @ 2020-11-10 05:04 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Just wondering why you made this change?What source are you using? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | pjij | Hi trigpoint,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the changes to adjust the geometry. Apologies, if it is contradicting with the ground reality. Please let me know if it needs to be reverted. Always happy to learn from the community.Regardspjij | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Hi pjijThe reason I was asking is that you moved the start of the oneway back to the junction with Park Avenue. When I surveyed it, it started further along allowing cars to turn from the driveway of the first house to turn left along Porthill Road.Cheers Phil | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | pjij | Hi trigpoint,Thanks for the confirmation. please find the changeset 94335746 for the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community.Regardspjij | |
| 89226389 by pjij @ 2020-08-11 04:47 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Did you really use all of these imagery sources, it looks rather odd as Bing streetside is very urbancentric and certainly not available here.Sources should only include what is actually used.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | pjij | Hi trigpoint,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have enabled all the imagery to check its availability in the osm and make necessary changes. All the enabled sources are auto populated while saving the edits. Apologies, I have not modified the sources before saving the edits. thanks for the s... | |
| 87390401 by pjij @ 2020-07-01 09:22 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | aachso ♦242 | Why did you delete the buildings? Also, can you please state such significant modifications in changeset comments? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | pjij | Hi aachso,Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the imagery and deleted the building feature. After your suggestion, I cross verified my edits and corrected it. Please find the changeset(87441648) for modifications. Once again, thanks for the quick suggestion. Al... | |
| 86928359 by pjij @ 2020-06-21 08:11 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Rainero ♦799 | Hallo pjij,please map such hw=service also with service=driveway, if they are such as described in the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3DdrivewayPlease check also your recent edits and don't leave that work to the community.Regards,Rainer |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | pjij | Hi Rainero,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have created the service road as we are unsure of the entity it is leading to. Thanks for your suggestions. We are working to incorporate your inputs into our work flow.Always happy to learn from the community.Regards,pjij | |
| 85760894 by pjij @ 2020-05-26 09:44 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | gurglypipe ♦1,033 | This site is a nuclear power station. Please tag any new roads you add in it as access=private. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | pjij | Hi gurglypipe,Thanks for looking into our edits. I have made this edits based on the driver feedback and available resources. I have not added the access tags since there was no valid proof from our end to make the changes. It was good to see that community making our edits better. I will take ... | |
| 80931080 by pjij @ 2020-02-13 03:17 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | tux67 ♦2,028 | With this Changeset you connected 2 public roads via a potentially private property. This may lead to routing software sending cars this way. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80931080 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | pjij | Hi tux67,Thanks for looking into my edit. Didn't change the access tag of the road as there were no gates, street side or point/building data to determine the road access. Currently, we are in slight ambiguity of adding customer and private access, however we continuously thrives to improve... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | tux67 ♦2,028 | Hi - as a general rule of the thumb I would say that whenever you connect with a service road 2 major (named) roads, there is a significant probability (in scenarios like we see here) that you are crossing private Ground. In Germany the owner usually allows access to clients and delivery service ,... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | pjij | Hi tux67 ,We understand that there is a significant possibility of missing the private roads, like this case. We previously received feedback from community in form of comments for adding private roads in the situation like this (Linkage of 2 or more major roads). However, in most of scenarios whe... | |
| 5 | ~ 6 years ago | tux67 ♦2,028 | In this case and in general, where you are in doubt vehicle=destination might be an option to at least avoid unwanted traffic on the added segment. | |
| 6 | ~ 6 years ago | pjij | Hi tux67 ,Thanks for your time for checking back my edit. Please find the changeset (81150983) for the suggested modifications. We will take this as a feedback to improve our editing etiquette.Regardspjij | |
| 74677321 by pjij @ 2019-09-19 14:35 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please check the access value of https://www.osm.org/way/726166207 |