| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106687668 by pravallg @ 2021-06-21 03:55 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Christopher ♦67 | There wasn't a "serviceway". The way you added was the Rousseauallee which was drawn by inaccurate gps. I removed the service way and placed the road on correct position by several gps tracks and images. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using ... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi Christopher,Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the wrongly aligned Rousseauallee way as a service road and created the new one. thanks for looking into my edits and making the appropriate corrections. In my future edits, I will make sure to validate the existin... | |
| 106692226 by pravallg @ 2021-06-21 05:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | the way is more a driveway.... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi SafetyIng,I have added highway=service and have not added service= driveway, as the way connects multiple unknown entities of a commercial area. Kindly let me know in case the tagging is incorrect.Thanks and Regards,pravallg | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | You can see clearly that this is one site on the areal image..... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi, Thanks for the inputs. I was reluctant as it seems to be a service entity. I have made the modifications (changeset: 106867246) as per your suggestion. Regards,pravallg | |
| 106685195 by pravallg @ 2021-06-21 01:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | Way 956441975 is a driveway or? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi SafetyIng, I have added highway =service as it is leading to commercial entities which seem to be service providers . Hence, I have not added service = driveway.Regards,pravallg | |
| 106685308 by pravallg @ 2021-06-21 01:38 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | Way 956442511 is a driveway |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi SafetyIng, Apologies for the inconvenience. As the building was tagged as a community center, I was reluctant to add a driveway. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106806681) with modifications. Always happy to learn from the community. Regar... | |
| 106685526 by pravallg @ 2021-06-21 01:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | The way is a driveway.... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for looking into my edits. I have added highway=service, as the segment connected more than a single entity. However, I have now changed the tag to driveway as per your suggestion. (106806626) is the changeset with modifications. Thanks and Regards,pravallg | |
| 106686750 by pravallg @ 2021-06-21 03:12 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | Way is a driveway.... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for the feedback. I have changed the classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset with modifications (106806542). Happy to learn from you. Thanks and Regards,pravallg | |
| 106688703 by pravallg @ 2021-06-21 04:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | The way is a driveway |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi SafetyIng, Apologies for tagging the driveway incorrectly. I have now tagged service=driveway as per your feedback. Changes can be seen in the changeset (106806489). Good day! Regards,pravallg | |
| 96516774 by pravallg @ 2020-12-28 07:28 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | FraukeLeo ♦295 | Hallo pravallg, du hast hier einen highway=service zwischen der Autobahn und der Bergshäuser Straße eingezeichnet. So wie gemappt ist das eine nutzbare Auf- und Abfahrt, die von Routern auch genutzt wird: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.26425%2... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi FraukeLeo, Sorry for the delayed response and thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edit as per the roads visible from the aerial imagery. Apologies, I have ignored the road class of the adjoining roads. I completely agree that the access restriction is perfectly apt for this scen... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | FraukeLeo ♦295 | Thanks for your reply. Now you see why it is not considered best practice to just add anything looking like a road into the database as one without ground survey :) Where there’s a highly active community, as there is in Germany, you may trust them that every road of any importance has been ma... | |
| 106363381 by pravallg @ 2021-06-15 02:18 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hello PT-53, I haven't added service=driveway as the road connects more than a single entity. Thanks for looking into my edits and suggesting the changes. I have now modified the segment to driveway. Please find the changeset (106504658) with modifications. Regards,pravallg | |
| 106363806 by pravallg @ 2021-06-15 02:49 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi PT-53, I have added Highway = service but not service= driveway as it was leading to several buildings and type of it is unknown. I have modified the tags as per your suggestion (changeset: 106504500). Thanks for looking into my edit. Regards,pravallg | |
| 104799331 by pravallg @ 2021-05-17 06:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | tux67 ♦2,028 | You connected to main roads here - and the way added looks like a parking_aisle .. please ensure no routing is established between roads across private ground. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104799331 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | pravallg | Hi, Thanks for looking into our edits. I have added the missing segment as per the available OSM resources. Apologies for missing the access of the segment. I have added access=customers (w943744294,w943744295) as it leads to Gym/Fitness center and Automobile showroom respectively. Please find th... | |
| 97358503 by pravallg @ 2021-01-12 09:07 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Your edits are ignoring the buildings already on the map (that were probably drawn with ESRI clarity) -- you really, really should adjust your imagery before you start to draw features using other imagery. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | pravallg | Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have overlooked the imagery and added the road. Thanks for the quick correction. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to add the roads in correspondence to the vicinity in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the comm... | |
| 95283581 by pravallg @ 2020-12-04 09:41 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | rainerU ♦276 | Hello,You changed a way from service to track. This way is the access to a recycling amenity for green waste. This kind of way is commonly tagged as highway=service, even when it is unpaved. In the latter case you should add surface=unpaved to the way.I reverted your modification back to the p... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo rainerU,ein Service-Way der nur über einen Track-Way erreicht werden kann entspricht aber auch nicht den OSM-Regeln.Grüße | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | rainerU ♦276 | Stimmt. Das erklärt wahrscheinlich auch, warum Amazon diesen Weg geändert hat. Was wäre denn für die Zufahrtstraße zu einer Kleingartenanlage besser geeignet, service oder track? | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Service oder unclassified, je nach Größe der Kleingartenanlage.Track setzte ich nur bei "Feld- / Waldwegen". | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | rainerU ♦276 | Ok, das passt für mich. Ich habe den Weg zur Kleingartenanlage auf highway=service gesetzt. | |
| 6 | ~ 5 years ago | pravallg | Hi all,apologies for the delay in response, This is a mistake from my end where my mail box had an issue in piping up these messages. thanks for improvising my edits and providing the valuable feedback. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement in my future edits... | |
| 94422124 by pravallg @ 2020-11-19 08:49 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Nakaner ♦3,208 | Hi,why did you change highway=service to abandoned:highway=service?Best regardsMichael |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi Nakaner,Thanks for the response. Since the editor is in leave today and the changeset has not been responded for 5 days I am stepping in to respond. After reviewing this edit, I consider the edit was wrongly made. I believe these highway=service roads should be converted to highway=footpaths ... | |
| 91984829 by pravallg @ 2020-10-05 12:02 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | seewäldler ♦178 | Revertiert mit 91991500: Luftbild zeigt nicht mehr vorhandene Baustraße, jetziger Verlauf ist anders! |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | pravallg | Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, that I had made the edits in the construction area. Thanks for the quick correction. It is good to see the community improvising our edits. Going forward, I will make sure to stick to the updated imagery for my future edits. Always happy to learn from t... | |
| 82499171 by pravallg @ 2020-03-23 02:35 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | pravallg | Hi,These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.Regards,Pravallika |
| 82410410 by pravallg @ 2020-03-20 01:38 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | pravallg | Hi,These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.Regards,Pravallika |