| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87819918 by priymose @ 2020-07-10 13:33 | 1 | 2022-04-22 11:06 | SK53 ♦864 | In this changeset you added a service road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824880656) between Pettingale Road & Llanthewy Close. A more detailed look showed that the connection at Llanthewy Close was a private driveway. In addition this type of alley service road is very unusual in post-WWII ... |
| 2 | 2022-04-25 08:13 | priymose | Hi Jerry,Thanks for bringing this up. Apologies for the genuine mistake from my side and I will make sure that this will not be repeated going forward. I have added segment based on latest aerial imagery i.e. Esri clarity beta. i have delete the segment based on your suggestion. Here is the change... | |
| 107480394 by priymose @ 2021-07-06 08:10 | 1 | 2021-07-12 19:45 | ndm ♦889 | Redrawn slightly - service road was going through a pitch/playground. |
| 2 | 2021-07-14 14:06 | priymose | Hi ndm, I have used Bing aerial imagery to make the edit as it was the most aligned imagery. Thanks for correcting the geometry. Regards,priymose. | |
| 107295871 by priymose @ 2021-07-02 07:36 | 1 | 2021-07-02 09:14 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 07:00 | priymose | Hello, Sorry for the inconvenience. I have now changed the highway classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107475798) with changes made. Regards,priymose. | |
| 107292644 by priymose @ 2021-07-02 06:36 | 1 | 2021-07-02 08:55 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 06:58 | priymose | Hi SafetyIng,Thanks for the feedback. I have now changed the road class to driveway as per your suggestion. Please look into the changeset (107475676) with modifications.Regards, priymose. | |
| 107313637 by priymose @ 2021-07-02 13:34 | 1 | 2021-07-03 09:58 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 06:56 | priymose | Hello SafetyIng, Thanks for the feedback. I have tagged the driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset(107475525) for the changes made.Regards,priymose. | |
| 107311957 by priymose @ 2021-07-02 12:52 | 1 | 2021-07-03 09:56 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 06:53 | priymose | Hello SafetyIng, I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107475402) with suggested modifications. Good day! Regards,priymose. | |
| 107311492 by priymose @ 2021-07-02 12:41 | 1 | 2021-07-03 09:56 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 06:42 | priymose | Hello SafetyIng, Thanks for checking into my edits. Apologies for the genuine miss from my end. I have now changed the classification to driveway. Happy to learn from you! Regards,priymose. | |
| 107311809 by priymose @ 2021-07-02 12:48 | 1 | 2021-07-03 09:56 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 06:39 | priymose | Hello SafetyIng, Apologies for misinterpreting the driveway. I have made the changes as per your suggestion. Happy to learn from you! Regards,priymose. | |
| 107309422 by priymose @ 2021-07-02 11:55 | 1 | 2021-07-02 13:11 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-05 07:57 | priymose | Hello SafetyIng, I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107424375) with suggested modifications. Good day! Regards,priymose. | |
| 106945894 by priymose @ 2021-06-25 08:14 | 1 | 2021-06-25 14:35 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Hey, sorry, but here you made a big problem.First: Are you shure, that way 958122450 is a service-road?Why do you not marked the parking space with service=parking_aisle ? ( 958122449 ; 958122448 ; 958122447 ; 958122446 ; 958122445 ; 958122444) ? |
| 2 | 2021-06-29 14:54 | priymose | Hello SafetyIng,Apologies for this genuine miss from my end. I have now added service=parking_aisle as per your suggestion. Thanks for looking into my edits. Happy to learn from you. Regards,priymose | |
| 106882879 by priymose @ 2021-06-24 08:03 | 1 | 2021-06-24 13:17 | SafetyIng ♦348 | 957781176 , 957781172 and 957781171 are driveways...... |
| 2 | 2021-06-28 14:06 | priymose | Hi,Apologies for the misinterpretation. I have modified the tags as per your suggestion. Regards, priymose | |
| 104967286 by priymose @ 2021-05-19 13:59 | 1 | 2021-05-20 01:28 | aachso ♦242 | These garages quite obviously have a rectangular shape. Why did you make them asymmetrical? That doesn't match with any of the available aerial imagery. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104967286 |
| 2 | 2021-05-20 01:33 | aachso ♦242 | Also, while these garages were a bit off before your edit, I don't understand why you moved them too far to the south when editing them.Please have a look at the NRW Orthophoto imagery. | |
| 3 | 2021-05-21 07:56 | priymose | Hi, Thanks for checking my edits.I have adjusted the building feature based on Esri world imagery as the neighboring features look aligned as per the same. Apologies for the miss from my end on adjustment of the symmetry. I have made the modifications as per your suggestion by using the Offset of ... | |
| 88921969 by priymose @ 2020-08-04 10:10 | 1 | 2021-05-18 15:09 | skyper ♦871 | Hallo priymoseDas ist ja wohl recht dürftig eingetragen und stimmt so nicht. Die Zufahrt geht nicht von der Kreuzung ab.Wie sieht das mit den Zugangsbestimmungen am Tor aus und ist da wirklich nur privater Zutritt erlaubt?Fragende Grüße,skyper |
| 2 | 2021-05-19 15:38 | priymose | Hi Skyper,Thanks for checking my edit and providing your valuable feedback. I have misinterpreted the segment and gate based on obstruction visible on Maxar imagery. I genuinely apologize for the miss from our end. I have modified the geometry as per Bing aerial imagery, removed gate and private ... | |
| 95404996 by priymose @ 2020-12-07 08:25 | 1 | 2021-02-21 19:38 | !bm ♦897 | seems wrong, thus removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99695879 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95404996 |
| 2 | 2021-02-23 06:37 | priymose | thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, i have misinterpreted and created a service road. thanks for the quick correction. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to avoid such edits in future. always happy to learn from the community | |
| 95222856 by priymose @ 2020-12-03 11:43 | 1 | 2020-12-04 15:13 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.The already mapped roads to reach this way are private, yet for some reason you have not mapped this as private as one would expect it to be?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2020-12-07 13:28 | priymose | Hi Phil, I have added the service road but did not add any access as there is no overlays or gate present to confirm the access. But, yes as rightly said by you it is leading to school and also all the other roads added are tagged private. Hence, it makes complete sense to add private access. I ha... | |
| 95293038 by priymose @ 2020-12-04 12:02 | 1 | 2020-12-04 13:38 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦727 | Hi priymose,the service road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880981816) you added, seems to be a track. I added the correct service road to the buildings: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881005430Can you confirm?Regards, Holger |
| 2 | 2020-12-07 07:22 | priymose | Hi Holger,Thanks for looking into our edits. I Apologise for the miss from my end. I have added the service road as it is leading to multiple entities but missed verifying the pavement and the type. Thanks for the correcting my edits. Yes, as you have mention the right entry should be through the ... | |
| 78184388 by priymose @ 2019-12-10 05:03 | 1 | 2020-10-17 13:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | I've nudged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754159944 slightly as I think that the imagery that you used here was unaligned. Bing compares well with OS OpenData here |
| 2 | 2020-10-19 16:12 | priymose | Hi SomeoneElse,looks like i have used offset feature to trace the road but missed checking the vicinity and setting the offset perfectly. Thanks for looking into my edit. will implement this learning in my future edits. | |
| 91364486 by priymose @ 2020-09-23 11:49 | 1 | 2020-09-23 13:04 | gurglypipe ♦898 | Hi, this edit doesn’t look correct based on my memory of the area; I think this is a private driveway. But I could be misremembering. What sources is this edit based on? :) |
| 2 | 2020-09-24 06:17 | priymose | thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have mistakenly modified the access tag. thanks for the heads-up, please find the changeset 714999114 for the reverted edits. going forward, i will make sure to perform the edits much more carefully. always happy to learn from the community" | |
| 3 | 2020-09-24 08:51 | gurglypipe ♦898 | Thanks a lot :) | |
| 90695336 by priymose @ 2020-09-10 10:31 | 1 | 2020-09-16 02:06 | naveenpf ♦714 | Welcome to OSM India.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IndiaTo join OSM India Telegram click on.https://t.me/OSMIndia --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90695336 |
| 84339220 by priymose @ 2020-04-29 12:30 | 1 | 2020-05-03 10:26 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, thank you for your edit however please slow down and take care with existing features when mapping. In this edit you have crossed a stream without creating a bridge. This should have been a warning in iD which you should have fixed before continuing.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2020-05-05 09:45 | priymose | Thanks for your time for checking into our edits. We have created the service road based on the available resources and unable to validate the stream with our resources. We are not sure of making edits without supporting ground data. Please find the changest() for the suggested modifications. Do le... | |
| 81968555 by priymose @ 2020-03-09 14:30 | 1 | 2020-03-09 20:10 | ndm ♦889 | Modified using Maxar (offset). |
| 2 | 2020-03-11 06:50 | priymose | Hi ndm,Thanks for making changes to the edit. I have used a different imagery while making the edit. I will consider this and will follow the same going forward while making such edit. Always happy to learn from the community.Regards,priymose. | |
| 78806828 by priymose @ 2019-12-24 07:54 | 1 | 2019-12-24 13:38 | ACarlotti ♦158 | In the imagery this looks like a vehicle routes within a temporary A14 works compound. Since the works at this location are complete, have you got any evidence that there is still a compound there, and that the vehicle routes match this layout? I would expect that it is already being restored to far... |
| 2 | 2019-12-24 21:56 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | This one I can confirm is still accessible for construction vehicles, however attached to the southern roundabout of intercahnge | |
| 3 | 2019-12-31 08:05 | priymose | Hi Acarlotti & Thomas Jarvis,Thanks for looking into my edit. Please let me know if any changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.Regards,priymose. | |
| 78800735 by priymose @ 2019-12-24 05:05 | 1 | 2019-12-24 13:36 | ACarlotti ♦158 | This is almost certainly not the current layout - since the A14 opened two weeks ago, I highly doubt that there is still a link onto the carriageway used by construction traffic (and if it does exist, then it won't for much longer). I think this needs reverting, unless you have more recent evid... |
| 2 | 2019-12-24 21:55 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | I agree with Acarlotti.No need for these "service" roads off the DC | |
| 3 | 2019-12-27 10:18 | priymose | Hi Acarlotti,Thanks for looking into my edit. I don't have the latest evidence as mentioned above. Hence reverted the changeset. Please refer the changeset (78919543) for the modification done. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.\... | |
| 78800033 by priymose @ 2019-12-24 04:36 | 1 | 2019-12-24 13:38 | ACarlotti ♦158 | This link probably also no longer exists (see my comment on 78800735). I think this changeset should probably also be reverted (it maps part a temporary construction related to construction that has already finished). |
| 75446959 by priymose @ 2019-10-09 08:40 | 1 | 2019-10-10 03:53 | JezCrow ♦150 | Hi priymose,I don't think this service road connects to The Viaduct - it should continue underneath. |
| 2 | 2019-10-10 11:37 | priymose | Hi JezCrow,Thanks for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I understand the mistake now and will be more careful going forward. I have made changes to the segment, refer change set #: 75508226. Please let me know for any other changes as per local knowledge. Always happy to learn fro... |