| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79328734 by rababdul @ 2020-01-08 08:10 | 1 | 2021-07-08 06:41 | salix01 ♦11 | Zu einem der eingefügten Wege gibt es einen Hinweis, ich vermute von einem Anwohner: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2745251Den Weg habe ich auf access=private gesetzt. |
| 2 | 2021-07-09 10:59 | rababdul | Hello, Thanks for the valuable feedback. I have added the road based on available resources. Thanks for correcting my edit. Regards,rababdul | |
| 107311426 by rababdul @ 2021-07-02 12:39 | 1 | 2021-07-03 09:56 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 10:46 | rababdul | Hi, Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I have edited the highway classification to driveway now. Please look into the changeset (107491058) with modifications. Thanks for the valuable feedback. Regards,rababdul | |
| 90694545 by rababdul @ 2020-09-10 10:20 | 1 | 2020-09-16 02:07 | naveenpf ♦714 | Welcome to OSM India.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IndiaTo join OSM India Telegram click on.https://t.me/OSMIndia --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90694545 |
| 90311919 by rababdul @ 2020-09-02 15:14 | 1 | 2020-09-03 11:34 | skyper ♦871 | HiWhere is the identification that this is a Amazon logistic Edit?Where is the #hashtag of the task?Where is the ground source as stated in the wiki?How about access tags or at least a fixme?Who did instruct you?Reviewer?Cheers skyper |
| 2 | 2020-09-03 12:36 | rababdul | Hi Skyper,Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. I have not added any access tags as there are as no resources supporting it. As mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935, our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can yo... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-03 12:56 | skyper ♦871 | So the #hashtag is one of several issues regarding:https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_GuidelinesAll of you stop editing until all issues are solved and tell your fellows and read the wiki mean-time.Just take a look at your wiki page:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-04 15:42 | rababdul | Thanks for your response. Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs. | |
| 5 | 2020-09-05 09:48 | skyper ♦871 | Wann bekomme ich eine persönliche Antwort zu meine konkreten Fragen?Bitte stelle richtig wer hier die Diskussion eingeleitet hat und dass darauf nur nach Einladung und viel zu spät reagiert wurde. Bitte in eigenen Worten formulieren! | |
| 6 | 2020-09-15 16:18 | rababdul | Hi skyper,thanks for the response, apologies for the delayed reply. we are already working on updating hashtags in our edits, please give us some time to get back on it.we are talking with DWG to take a long term decision. We will be happy to implement the changes whatever that benefits the large... | |
| 90445518 by rababdul @ 2020-09-05 09:06 | 1 | 2020-09-05 09:19 | skyper ♦871 | Salli rababdulWo ist die Quelle für den Boden? Finde nur Luftbilder?Ohne Zugangsbestimmungen wird hier das Routing zerstört! Bitte sofort anpassen!Was sind Deine direkten Konsequenzen auf dein Verhalten aus dieser Erkenntnis?Bitte persönliche Antworten und nicht den St... |
| 2 | 2020-09-07 06:56 | torstiohneh ♦2 | Hallo zusammen,der Weg führt über ein Privatgrundstück. Das sollte angepasst werden.Beste Grüßetorstiohneh | |
| 3 | 2020-09-09 10:06 | rababdul | appreciating your time for checking into our edits. I have not added any private access since the gate is present only at the one side of the entity and I am not sure of the access tags of the entity. Adding the private access as confirmed by the community member. please find the changeset() for the... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-10 12:16 | skyper ♦871 | Hallo rababdulHier hat keine Person behauptet dass es direkte Zugangsbestimmungen gibt. Nun hast Du sämtliche Verkehrsmittel einschließlich Menschen "per pedes" ausgeschlossen.Warum hast Du das Tor nicht eingetragen?Vielleicht eher ein "motor_vehicle=private"... | |
| 5 | 2020-09-11 16:43 | rababdul | Hi Skyper,We add Segments based on available OSM resources. As already informed in case of ambiguity(without proper confirmation) we do not add access to restrain from vandalism. I have added access = private based on the Information provided by "torstiohneh" saying it is "Private... | |
| 90306793 by rababdul @ 2020-09-02 13:15 | 1 | 2020-09-05 15:22 | skyper ♦871 | HalloKannst Du mir bitte erklären, wie Du Durchgangsbeschränkungen nur mit Luftbildern als Quelle eintragen kannst?Welche Person hat den wann genau diese Änderungen überprüft?Da dies nicht der einzige Fall ist, bin ich daran interessiert was ihr dagegen unternehm... |
| 2 | 2020-09-09 10:05 | rababdul | thanks for looking into our edits. Apologies, I have mistakenly added the private tag to the driveways. Please find the changeset() for the suggested modifications. After the feedback from the community, we have made the appropriate changes in the addition of private tags to driveways. we have a sec... | |
| 90368246 by rababdul @ 2020-09-03 14:35 | 1 | 2020-09-03 14:42 | skyper ♦871 | Why are you still editing and not responding to my comment ? |
| 2 | 2020-09-03 15:15 | DD1GJ ♦2,302 | @sykyper: Hast Du schon an osm-edit-escalations@amazon.com geschrieben? | |
| 3 | 2020-09-03 16:07 | skyper ♦871 | Warum sollte ich. Das ist keine öffentliche Plattform noch kann ich da ins Archiv schauen.Die DWG ist eigentlich schon informiert und ich schaue das mir noch ein paar Stunden an bevor ich die ganze Firma anzeige und mich nicht nur beschwere.Hier fehlt es überall an Transparenz und ... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-03 16:54 | skyper ♦871 | Eine öffentliche Plattform ist z.B. das Forum. Dort erwarte ich ja schon eine offizielle Reaktion. Das Forum nach Amazon zu durchsuchen ist ja wohl nicht schwer. Dann sollte ja in spätestens ein paar Stunden eine Stellungsnahme auf meine Vorwürfe kommen:https://forum.openstreetmap... | |
| 5 | 2020-09-04 06:32 | rababdul | thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. as mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935.our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 6 | 2020-09-04 10:18 | skyper ♦871 | How am I informed about the progress?Why don`t you solve all problems first and shutdown your mapping action until that? | |
| 7 | 2020-09-04 13:47 | rababdul | Thanks for your response. Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs. | |
| 8 | 2020-09-05 09:13 | skyper ♦871 | Wer hat die Diskussion gestartet?Warum schreibst nicht die Wahrheit?Wie lang wirst Du Du die Regel Deiner Firma brechen können ohne gefeuert zu werden?Warum folgt Ihr dann immer noch nicht Euren eigenen Regel im Wiki? Wie soll ich da Euren Worten vertrauen können? Wie kann es sei... | |
| 87199729 by rababdul @ 2020-06-26 14:08 | 1 | 2020-06-27 20:15 | limes11 ♦900 | Hello Rababdul,This is the third time I have to correct access tags of a service road/track road added by Amazon Logistics staff in this region. I have seen other mappers doing this as well. I do not know your motivation for adding such roads which are entirely on private ground, in this cas... |
| 2 | 2020-06-30 10:16 | rababdul | Hi Limes,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have not added the barrier as we don’t have enough resources(street side) to validate it. we are keeping our best efforts to add the quality data into the osm. I am glad to see that the local knowledge is improvising our edits. thanks and appre... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-30 15:09 | limes11 ♦900 | Hello again, Thank your for your response. Of course, you can't see the gate on aerial images, and I don't really mind that you did not map the gate. But your primary source, as far as I understand Amazon Logistics' work on osm, is the report of a driver whose report should indica... | |
| 85770242 by rababdul @ 2020-05-26 12:22 | 1 | 2020-05-27 23:51 | aachso ♦242 | Hello, this seems slightly off from where it should be. It's clearly visible when you select Esri World Imagery in iD and zoom in closely. Currently the service road crosses a hedge next to the actual service road.It should be moved 2-3 meters to south. |
| 2 | 2020-05-28 06:57 | rababdul | Hi, Thanks for looking into our edits. I have missed the geometry as I had created the road from a different zoom level. It is a mistake from our end. Please find the changeset(85870102) for the suggested modifications. I will make sure all my future edits will will reflect the upmost quality. thank... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-28 09:17 | aachso ♦242 | Looks good now, thanks for fixing. | |
| 74428859 by rababdul @ 2019-09-13 10:05 | 1 | 2019-09-13 14:27 | user_5359 ♦19,605 | Hello! Done forget to add the key layer=1 to the brige (if the waterway has no layer key (means layer=0)). |
| 2 | 2019-09-13 14:38 | rababdul | Hi User_5359,Thank you for looking into this and correcting the edit. i will take this as a learning for my future edits. Looking forward to adding meaningful data.Regardsrababdul | |
| 71677252 by rababdul @ 2019-06-27 15:34 | 1 | 2019-06-28 15:19 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,What was the source of the access tag change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-06-30 10:27 | rababdul | Hi Andy,I didn't add any motor vehicle tag in this case, but by mistake added a wrong changeset comment. I added a missing service road in this case and there is nothing related to motor vehicle tag. Will try not to repeat this mistake again.Regards,rababdul | |
| 3 | 2019-06-30 20:07 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,Thanks for that,Best Regards,Andy |