Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
133165828 by rekulc1 @ 2023-03-01 10:40 | 1 | 2023-03-01 16:55 | map per ♦1,305 | Hello rekulc1,this road (1) is overlapping with the secondary highway.Best regardsmap per(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150401776 |
2 | 2023-03-02 07:46 | rekulc1 | Hello map per,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and flagging out the issue. I apologize for the incorrect edits. I've made the necessary changes in changeset 133199809. Thanks once again, looking forward to learn more from you. Regards,rekulc1 | |
118891858 by rekulc1 @ 2022-03-25 05:37 | 1 | 2022-03-25 18:08 | ZLima12 ♦258 | Good changeset, just a couple things:First of all, please try to break up your changesets into more localized areas. For example, this could have been two changesets, one for each place you added service roads. This helps people who are reviewing changesets.Also, some satellite imagery still... |
2 | 2022-03-28 08:34 | rekulc1 | Hi, Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. However, i will ensure to stick to one location for one changeset so that it helps other mappers.Also, thank you for sharing insights on the new tags that can be added wh... | |
109033543 by rekulc1 @ 2021-08-02 13:01 | 1 | 2021-08-02 16:43 | jmapb ♦412 | Hi there... I've reverted this change. The protrusions you added to this building are floating balconies, not part of the building footprint. Also, the imagery you're referencing is not well aligned. Consider using the NY Orthos imagery for fine detail work in NYC, since it has the bes... |
2 | 2021-08-03 09:34 | rekulc1 | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and making the necessary changes.I really appreciate the information provided.Going forward,I'll ensure to use the best available aerial imagery while mapping buildings.Thanks again, Looking forward to learn more from you!Regards,rekulc1 | |
3 | 2021-08-04 02:57 | MxxCon ♦3,360 | Even if you are mapping from imagery taken at oblique angles, you just need to make sure to align it to the building's footprint rather than its roof line. 👍 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109033543 | |
4 | 2021-08-04 10:27 | rekulc1 | Hi,Thank you for sharing more information about mapping buildings.Going ahead, I'll definitely keep in mind the information shared.Always happy to learn more from the community.Regards,rekulc1 | |
93419786 by rekulc1 @ 2020-11-02 12:18 | 1 | 2020-11-03 07:04 | Carnildo ♦905 | Is there a reason why you deleted the road? |
2 | 2020-11-03 10:37 | rekulc1 | Hi Carnildo,I have deleted the road based on street side in which it looked like a water tunnel, is it a golf cart path? please give your suggestions about the area, I will edit them accordingly. Thanks,rekulc1. | |
3 | 2020-11-03 18:19 | Carnildo ♦905 | In my survey notes, I described it as "a bridge or tunnel" in the area of a golf course. Judging from the aerial imagery, it's a culvert-style tunnel containing either a service road or a golf cart path connecting two halves of a golf course.In the western United States, a common... | |
4 | 2020-11-05 06:16 | rekulc1 | "Hi,Thanks for the suggestions, I've made the necessary changes under the changeset(#93577607). Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,rekulc1." | |
93577607 by rekulc1 @ 2020-11-05 05:48 | 1 | 2020-11-05 05:57 | rekulc1 | "Hi,Thanks for the suggestions, I've made the necessary changes under the changeset(#93577607). Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,rekulc1." |
91427614 by rekulc1 @ 2020-09-24 10:39 | 1 | 2020-09-25 12:16 | rekulc1 | Hi,Please find the appropriate comment for the changeset:91427614, modified geometry and added service road.Regards,rekulc1. |
82481613 by rekulc1 @ 2020-03-22 12:20 | 1 | 2020-03-22 19:02 | Glassman ♦5,275 | A couple of the driveways crossed streams. I've added tunnel=culvert + layer=-1 to the driveways. |
2 | 2020-03-23 05:41 | rekulc1 | Hi,Thanks for correcting the incomplete edit. Apologies that I missed to add them.Looking forward to learning from the community.Thanks, rekulc1. | |
76296959 by rekulc1 @ 2019-10-28 12:11 | 1 | 2019-10-28 19:00 | user_5359 ♦19,606 | Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). Please have a look on your relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8277968 |
2 | 2019-10-29 07:18 | rekulc1 | Hi,Thanks for looking into my edit. I have mistakenly left it while modifying geometry of intersection. Apologies for the error, rectified it already. Thanks again, rekulc1. |