| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167017213 by richlv @ 2025-05-31 15:28 | 1 | 2025-05-31 17:21 | somehundred ♦98 | Tagad sanāk tā, ka ēku sauc "Alus tirgus", jo nav noņemta "name" birka. |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 12:13 | richlv | Paldies, tā EveryDoor dara - tagad salabots. | |
| 134626125 by richlv @ 2023-04-07 17:19 | 1 | 2025-04-16 07:59 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10793499416/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | 2025-04-18 09:22 | richlv | Not quite sure - according to https://moop.lv/ , it's chemist, wine, food...Might need an in-person survey to do better than guessing. If not, I'd hit with chemist, but that absolutely leaves out other aspects that slightly hint at deli, but not really. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:26 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4761261 | |
| 162385048 by richlv @ 2025-02-11 10:38 | 1 | 2025-02-11 10:38 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Te pareizs mājas numurs būtu 15 - kas ir "1", vai tas ir dzīvokļa numurs? |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 10:45 | somehundred ♦98 | Iekomentējāt pats savā izmaiņu kopā... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-11 11:48 | richlv | Meh, paldies - sanāca apmaldīties diezgan veikli :) | |
| 160888506 by richlv @ 2025-01-01 23:12 | 1 | 2025-01-02 18:38 | HellMap ♦674 | Šim punktam https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12060930551 (vairs) nav galvenā tega. |
| 2 | 2025-01-02 19:20 | richlv | Jā, tas ir normāli - disused paliek pārējie tagi, kuriem neko nevajadzētu ietekmēt. Tas arī ir EveryDoor darbības modelis, kad kādu vietu atzīmē kā slēgtu. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-02 19:40 | HellMap ♦674 | Ā, ups, es nepamanīju, ka tu disused: uzliki birku zupā. Es nemaz nezināju, ka Every Door to māk.FALSE ALARM. 🔔❌ | |
| 155316461 by richlv @ 2024-08-16 08:52 | 1 | 2024-08-16 10:44 | thautal ♦34 | Hello! Can you elobrate why did you mark these as access=private? They already had access:conditional and the property is part of university so accessible to public. |
| 2 | 2024-08-17 09:40 | richlv | Oh, sorry if that's wrong - the gates at both ends were locked.Admittedly, didn't notice the conditional on the phone, but checking it now - it was during the supposedly accessible period (around 10 on a Friday).Could the access conditions have changed? | |
| 3 | 2024-08-19 08:17 | thautal ♦34 | No worries! It should be open, but maybe it's closed for some reason during summer. I need to check it again at some time, I will leave it as it is for now. | |
| 153910252 by richlv @ 2024-07-13 21:27 | 1 | 2024-07-30 20:05 | Dāvis Kļaviņš ♦15 | Uzņēmumu reģistrā gan ir ar lielajiem burtiem: https://company.lursoft.lv/lv/enhars/40003544196 |
| 154556156 by richlv @ 2024-07-29 10:35 | 1 | 2024-07-30 12:37 | HellMap ♦674 | Do you intend to also close the note or is further surveying needed?Should we specify payment as card only per note? |
| 153869473 by richlv @ 2024-07-12 19:26 | 1 | 2024-07-13 08:23 | HellMap ♦674 | Vai te arī dzīvojamā zona mainījusies vai arī klasifikācija ne tā ap https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084714523 ? |
| 2 | 2024-07-13 10:04 | richlv | Oi, nepievērsu tam uzmanību - paskatīšos bildēs drīz. Paldies par pamanīšanu :) | |
| 3 | 2024-07-13 20:52 | richlv | Nu, nav visas zīmes [vēl]...Šur tur saliku kā living_street, bet būs vēl jāpārbauda, kad viss būs līdz galam sabūvēts. Pieliku https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4332122 . | |
| 47870537 by richlv @ 2017-04-17 13:08 | 1 | 2024-05-11 16:00 | HellMap ♦674 | A kas tas tāds ir/bija te? 2017 Mapillary tikai stāvvieta. |
| 2 | 2024-05-11 18:46 | richlv | ĀĀĀ, droši vien barrier=chain, tajā laikā maps.me bija praktiski vienīgā mobilā appa, un tur bija ļoti ierobežoti POI tipi :) | |
| 3 | 2024-05-26 14:35 | somehundred ♦98 | Var šo dzēst ārā, ja? | |
| 4 | 2024-05-26 20:39 | richlv | Derētu kādas svaigas bildes un pārbaudīt, kas tajā stūrī tagad ir sazīmējams, ja jau sākām skatīties :) | |
| 5 | 2024-06-07 09:36 | richlv | Ķēde redzama apakšējā kreisajā stūrī te - bet bildei jau 7 gadi.https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=550282825959539 | |
| 148382505 by richlv @ 2024-03-08 12:37 | 1 | 2024-06-03 11:49 | HellMap ♦674 | Tur tiešām abi Itella? |
| 2 | 2024-06-03 12:03 | richlv | Cik atceros, tur bija jocīgi, ka blakus divi viena uzņēmuma pakomāti, jā. | |
| 9516384 by richlv @ 2011-10-09 19:32 | 1 | 2024-05-21 11:26 | somehundred ♦98 | Sveiki! Ko bijāt domājis, atzīmējot kartē https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1460453428? Es satelītattēlā neredzu neko, kas atbilstu tourism=attraction tagam. |
| 2 | 2024-05-21 11:30 | richlv | Ļoti labs jautājums. Pirms 12 gadiem, JOSM... šis izskatās pēc netīša punkta, dzēšam ārā :) | |
| 3 | 2024-05-21 12:58 | somehundred ♦98 | Izdzēsu! | |
| 4 | 2024-05-21 19:31 | richlv | Super, liels paldies par pamanīšanu un uzlabošanu. | |
| 150345836 by richlv @ 2024-04-22 12:56 | 1 | 2024-04-22 13:16 | HellMap ♦674 | Tu nosaukumu izlaboji, bet te palika vēl 2 punkti ar "nosaukumiem" [1], [2], adrese kafejnīcai bija salūzusi [3] kā arī "stāvvieta" ar šķībiem tegiem [4]. Es to visu arī izlaboju, bet te gan varēja revertu vispirms uztaisīt un tikai pareizo pielikt.[1] https... |
| 2 | 2024-04-22 16:07 | richlv | Liels paldies par pamanīšanu.Varēja pat droši revertēt manu un tad oriģinālo changesetu, ja tā būtu bijis vieglāk. | |
| 149835696 by richlv @ 2024-04-10 19:16 | 1 | 2024-04-13 09:39 | HellMap ♦674 | Vai tu esi pārliecināts, ka visa [1] iela ir ciet ar būvniecību? No [2] izskatās tā pat kā marta vidū - atļauts tikai taksometriem un pa vidu šur tur kaut kāda būvniecība, bet izbraukt var (un līdzīga situācija principā uz daudziem ceļiem un ietvēm). Mans Mapillary vēl nav ... |
| 2 | 2024-04-13 10:03 | richlv | Paldies par pamanīšanu, slēgts tiešām ir no plānotās Parka ielas - atjaunināju. | |
| 149795546 by richlv @ 2024-04-09 21:31 | 1 | 2024-04-09 21:34 | richlv | Sveiki, vai te ir tikai šūpoles, vai arī rotaļu laukums?Noņēmu nosaukumu "šūpoles", jo OSM neliekam "aprakstošus nosaukumus" - t.i., kā nosaukumu parasti norādām tikai reālu vārdu. Piemēram, "Latvija", ne "Viesnīca Latvija"... |
| 2 | 2024-04-10 11:45 | AmOosm ♦3 | Man šķiet, ka tu nokomentēji uz nepareizā changeset :D | |
| 3 | 2024-04-10 21:43 | richlv | Oi, tiešām. Liels paldies par pamanīšanu :) | |
| 140713047 by richlv @ 2023-09-02 10:44 | 1 | 2023-09-03 18:03 | HellMap ♦674 | Note that this area now has both `highway=service` + `area=yes` AND `area:highway=yes`. |
| 2 | 2023-09-04 10:00 | richlv | Duh, indeed. Thanks, fixed now. | |
| 140562735 by richlv @ 2023-08-29 23:31 | 1 | 2023-08-30 09:40 | HellMap ♦674 | Just a note that these footways need indoor tagging scheme rather than covered=yes or similar. |
| 2 | 2023-08-30 10:47 | richlv | Probably, I was following the simpler approach that's feasible in a mobile editor for me - hopefully that's easier to update once the approximate layout is there :) | |
| 138275330 by richlv @ 2023-07-08 19:37 | 1 | 2023-07-08 19:44 | HellMap ♦674 | The boardwalk way still has smoothness=bad and surface=dirt left from before. These are probably not correct anymore. |
| 2 | 2023-07-08 19:55 | richlv | Thank you for spotting, fixed now. | |
| 3 | 2023-07-11 11:23 | richlv | I had messed up the extent of the boardwalk (failed split?).Fixed now - the boardwalk is actually very short. | |
| 4 | 2023-07-11 11:35 | HellMap ♦674 | I saw the long boardwalk and I assumed that was correct. The one NE is pretty long, so it seemed reasonable. I only saw it flooded/below water so I had no idea how far it goes. | |
| 5 | 2023-07-11 12:10 | richlv | Yeah, sorry about the confusion :) | |
| 135163685 by richlv @ 2023-04-20 18:44 | 1 | 2023-05-08 21:37 | HellMap ♦674 | Hey! I shrunk the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164141365 construction area. You mapped it across the entire location, but it's currently only a portion of it. It looks like it matches the cadaster plot, so that's what I retraced it to. |
| 2 | 2023-05-09 09:05 | richlv | Thanks, looking at these images, construction seems to be ongoing to the left pretty much up to the roundabout - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1277585273166386 , https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=952713332430452 .Also, along Lubānas iela, it's ongoing right up to the edge of the st... | |
| 3 | 2023-05-09 10:20 | HellMap ♦674 | I see what you mean. But I think you are confusing the Reinvaldu to Lubānas section with the Lubānas to roundabout section. It does indeed go almost all the way to R/L intersection in a sort of triangle shape but not all the way to roundabout - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=759671655623268 ,... | |
| 4 | 2023-05-09 11:09 | richlv | Oh, I see - thank you for checking it, that makes sense. | |
| 128453848 by richlv @ 2022-11-03 20:00 | 1 | 2022-11-03 22:39 | HellMap ♦674 | Is there a new a bridge here? |
| 2 | 2022-11-03 22:59 | richlv | Yeah, so I was told, and shown a photo of a wooden bridge :) | |
| 127904968 by richlv @ 2022-10-21 22:58 | 1 | 2022-10-22 10:25 | HellMap ♦674 | Hey! I think this changeset broke something about the forest multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13480473. I can't tell exactly what and why (and I'm not even 100% sure it's this edit). If I had to guess, the lake https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112309345/history now... |
| 2 | 2022-10-23 13:38 | richlv | Thank you so much for spotting this.The overlap causing this seems weird, as the residential area isn't a member of the multipolygon.I've removed the overlap anyway, let's see whether it helps any. | |
| 3 | 2022-10-23 13:40 | richlv | Seems to be rendered as expected even before my latest changes, though.The multipolygon is crazy, not seeing anything obvious that could have affected this. | |
| 4 | 2022-10-23 14:17 | HellMap ♦674 | Yeah, it has re-rendered correctly now, so I suspect the crossing ways was indeed what caused it. They were one outer and one inner, which probably confused the default renderer.Oh whoops, yeah, the residential is drawn as separate way. I was selecting the main/big forest way going down the same... | |
| 5 | 2022-10-23 20:24 | richlv | I doubt my residential area change made a difference here - it actually had started rendering as expected before the change, I just had not refreshed it all.Given the complexity of that multipolygon (just look at the number of inner ways), I'll just be glad it looks mostly OK now :) | |
| 6 | 2022-10-23 20:37 | HellMap ♦674 | Weird. I don't see any other edits or changes here, so it may have been the renderer bugging out initially or later. Oh well. | |
| 124396404 by richlv @ 2022-08-02 15:05 | 1 | 2022-09-19 19:05 | HellMap ♦674 | Is there (now) a living zone here around [1]? From your Mapillary and my earlier visit, it doesn't look like it, but wanted to double check.[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083248667 |
| 2 | 2022-09-21 10:42 | richlv | As far as I recall, it's not market as living street (yet?). | |
| 3 | 2022-09-21 10:44 | richlv | I guess I kept living_street classification from this original way when I was splitting it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989378384/history .As it's all work-in-progress there, I'm fine with either classification :) | |
| 4 | 2022-09-21 11:08 | HellMap ♦674 | I guess I'll change it to residential until and if this actually gets designated as a living zone. Someone might end up converting these to living streets assuming that's what they are once they are built. | |
| 5 | 2022-09-21 11:57 | richlv | Sounds good, thanks. | |
| 123311700 by richlv @ 2022-07-07 10:13 | 1 | 2022-07-07 21:18 | Hufkratzer ♦746 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076536540 looks like a riding arena to me in the aerial view, but you tagged it with leisure=horse_riding. Please have a look at the wiki page for this tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding) and check if this is really the right tag for... |
| 118483859 by richlv @ 2022-03-14 19:46 | 1 | 2022-03-15 13:49 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040341399. What ist the meaning of the tag landusend = cons? |
| 2 | 2022-03-15 17:38 | richlv | Haha, when my computer is slowish, I get all kinds of weird content in dialogs. Usually I spot it before uploading, but missed this time.Thank you for noticing, fixed now. | |
| 109016907 by richlv @ 2021-08-02 09:14 | 1 | 2021-08-08 14:15 | danieldegroot2 ♦673 | Hey richlv,I noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/969742117/history is marked as service way. I think this should be marked as residential, similar to the way to the north of it.(It's possible there were access restrictions on this way segment. If so, tag them with the relevant acces... |
| 2 | 2021-08-08 15:59 | richlv | Heya, thank you for checking.If these were separate, named streets, "residential" would be a good fit indeed - otherwise, I'd stick with "service".In our recent mapping party here we didn't get to these streets - will check with locals :) | |
| 101008529 by richlv @ 2021-03-14 21:31 | 1 | 2021-03-19 09:52 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Could you check this bus stop? It got a strange 'sheln' tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8518899452 |
| 2 | 2021-03-19 13:58 | richlv | Ah, thanks - was tabbing too quickly through the input fields.Fixed now. | |
| 98045495 by richlv @ 2021-01-24 07:56 | 1 | 2021-01-24 14:08 | Colbertson ♦104 | "sat tracing" but what imagery? |
| 2 | 2021-01-24 18:46 | richlv | Heya, usually I start with LĢIA ortophoto (recently also added in iD index, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2021-January/006198.html ), and compare with Maxar layers (usually more recent imagery but needs manual alignment), sometimes also with the LIDAR surface model, available at... | |
| 11870543 by richlv @ 2012-06-12 02:35 | 1 | 2020-09-22 01:52 | Mashin ♦556 | I thought you would appreciate to know that the position and the shape of your Troll House from 2012 was finally fixed. :D |
| 2 | 2020-09-23 11:03 | richlv | Haha, that's wonderful - and you kept all the object history, that's one well done import :)Thank you so much for the map improvements and this notice. | |
| 6482348 by richlv @ 2010-11-28 21:31 | 1 | 2020-09-03 02:27 | Aglis IRM-ED ♦109 | Hi richlv, i changed geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/86962626). I also made change around this way. Thankyou |
| 2 | 2020-09-15 08:56 | richlv | Great, thank you for the map improvements :) | |
| 82403548 by richlv @ 2020-03-19 19:06 | 1 | 2020-03-20 18:40 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | Hello! Please the tags of node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070668, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070670, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070672. I assumed you mean addr:housenumber. |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 20:15 | richlv | Oops, they were supposed to be addr:flats.Fixed now.Thank you for spotting that. | |
| 79476983 by richlv @ 2020-01-12 14:14 | 1 | 2020-01-12 23:30 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
| 2 | 2020-01-13 11:09 | richlv | The note on addr:steet missing acknowledged, couldn't easily figure it out on the ground (the number plate did not specify the street). Looking at it now, made a guess and added addr:street.There's a popular opinion that addr:city should be inferred, thus skipping that one. | |
| 79081415 by richlv @ 2020-01-01 13:36 | 1 | 2020-01-01 20:37 | RicoElectrico ♦1,770 | I found information on the various real estate sited that construction of Gołębia 33 was also done. Removed landuse=construction from there as well. |
| 2 | 2020-01-01 20:40 | richlv | Great, thank you for checking that :) | |
| 70493213 by richlv @ 2019-05-21 21:11 | 1 | 2019-05-25 18:45 | 4004 ♦1,882 | thanks! |
| 2 | 2019-05-25 18:46 | 4004 ♦1,882 | just to check, did you revert all of his changesets not reverted by Tomas Straupis? | |
| 3 | 2019-05-25 19:13 | richlv | I reverted all cemetery import changesets except one, where the revert had conflicts with changes by Tomas. Perhaps Tomas did manual deletes which caused that. | |
| 68689833 by richlv @ 2019-03-30 08:22 | 1 | 2019-03-31 22:59 | arcth ♦35 | These buildings were demolished around year 2016. |
| 2 | 2019-04-01 09:35 | richlv | Dang, thank you - they looked fairly fresh on the sat layer ;)Perhaps a "note" tag around here could help future mappers. | |
| 3 | 2019-04-04 09:34 | richlv | Noticed in #osm that for another location it was suggested to leave the outlines in place, prefixing them with demolished: - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished: .Does that sound good? | |
| 67496578 by richlv @ 2019-02-23 15:38 | 1 | 2019-02-23 16:49 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,950 | What is it? |
| 2 | 2019-02-23 22:23 | richlv | Ha - thank you for the quick catch :)This had to wait for me checking the images (also coming up on Mapillary). This is http://www.skrastas.lt/?data=2009-09-22&rub=1065924831&id=1253544039 - but checking spelling and capitalisation would be appreciated. | |
| 3 | 2019-02-24 06:37 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,950 | Thank you. Spelling seems correct :-) | |
| 4 | 2019-02-24 18:45 | richlv | Yay, thank you. And for the record, here's a Mapillary image: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/7bLLuAWEUpmdkUW7rhbgzw | |
| 40474923 by richlv @ 2016-07-04 09:57 | 1 | 2016-10-28 16:28 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Wahoo! Now in Lavian |
| 2 | 2016-10-28 16:36 | richlv | Latvian ;) | |
| 39634267 by richlv @ 2016-05-29 01:33 | 1 | 2016-05-29 18:22 | altim59 ♦2 | The point of Verners DE is not correct. It showed in the house #34, but really the shop placed near, into the house #32. |
| 39550900 by richlv @ 2016-05-25 08:11 | 1 | 2016-05-26 11:13 | AkageMuk ♦30 | Sveiks! Vai nav tā, ka koledžai ir jābūt amenity=college ? |
| 2 | 2016-05-26 11:37 | richlv | jā, paldies - izlaboju.maps.me tāda nebija, un es vēl nepaspēju no kompja salabot :) | |
| 35441954 by richlv @ 2015-11-19 17:57 | 1 | 2015-11-19 18:22 | PlaneMad ♦449 | The note mentioned `temporarily converted to two-way due to Central Subway construction` which was the reason to remove the oneway. Do check the other ways in the area as they might now be accessible if the construction is complete. |
| 2 | 2015-11-19 23:17 | richlv | ah, thanks for the info. that change has been reversed by now and should be reflected in the map then. unfortunately, won't be able to survey this region anytime soon, will have to involve locals :) | |
| 10171198 by richlv @ 2011-12-21 12:44 | 1 | 2015-10-31 14:42 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review way 82241230:the tag highway=lift is rarely used, is it okay to change it to highway=elevator ? |