| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36701868 by richlv @ 2016-01-20 14:10 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | rossbates ♦1 | "Hangout" is not a recognized name for this spot along the trail is it? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | richlv | Sorry, not quite sure what is being asked - could you please clarify a bit? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | rossbates ♦1 | Sorry, this node here. What does it represent?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3534825160 | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | richlv | Oh, haha, that's... 10 years ago :)Looking at my pics from that area, I visited the place on 2016-01-17. This changeset was on 2016-01-20.In the pics, I can see an infoboard there, but I cannot find a pic with infoboard contents.I must have picked up the name somewhere - either from some ... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | rossbates ♦1 | Totally get it. I stumbled upon this while creating a map visualization of the area and kept wondering what “Hangout” referred to. It’s tagged as place=locality, but I can’t find any evidence that this is an established local name or geographic feature. It looks more like an ... | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | richlv | Maybe loc_name, until somebody can survey it?My Mapillary pictures there seem to be the only ones. | |
| 7 | ~ 3 months ago | rossbates ♦1 | Sure, was not aware of loc_name but that definitely seems more fitting. | |
| 167017213 by richlv @ 2025-05-31 15:28 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | somehundred ♦114 | Tagad sanāk tā, ka ēku sauc "Alus tirgus", jo nav noņemta "name" birka. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | richlv | Paldies, tā EveryDoor dara - tagad salabots. | |
| 134626125 by richlv @ 2023-04-07 17:19 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,565 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10793499416/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | richlv | Not quite sure - according to https://moop.lv/ , it's chemist, wine, food...Might need an in-person survey to do better than guessing. If not, I'd hit with chemist, but that absolutely leaves out other aspects that slightly hint at deli, but not really. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,565 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4761261 | |
| 162385048 by richlv @ 2025-02-11 10:38 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Te pareizs mājas numurs būtu 15 - kas ir "1", vai tas ir dzīvokļa numurs? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | somehundred ♦114 | Iekomentējāt pats savā izmaiņu kopā... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Meh, paldies - sanāca apmaldīties diezgan veikli :) | |
| 160888506 by richlv @ 2025-01-01 23:12 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HellMap ♦843 | Šim punktam https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12060930551 (vairs) nav galvenā tega. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Jā, tas ir normāli - disused paliek pārējie tagi, kuriem neko nevajadzētu ietekmēt. Tas arī ir EveryDoor darbības modelis, kad kādu vietu atzīmē kā slēgtu. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | HellMap ♦843 | Ā, ups, es nepamanīju, ka tu disused: uzliki birku zupā. Es nemaz nezināju, ka Every Door to māk.FALSE ALARM. 🔔❌ | |
| 155316461 by richlv @ 2024-08-16 08:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | perusluku ♦49 | Hello! Can you elobrate why did you mark these as access=private? They already had access:conditional and the property is part of university so accessible to public. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Oh, sorry if that's wrong - the gates at both ends were locked.Admittedly, didn't notice the conditional on the phone, but checking it now - it was during the supposedly accessible period (around 10 on a Friday).Could the access conditions have changed? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | perusluku ♦49 | No worries! It should be open, but maybe it's closed for some reason during summer. I need to check it again at some time, I will leave it as it is for now. | |
| 153910252 by richlv @ 2024-07-13 21:27 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dāvis Kļaviņš ♦15 | Uzņēmumu reģistrā gan ir ar lielajiem burtiem: https://company.lursoft.lv/lv/enhars/40003544196 |
| 154556156 by richlv @ 2024-07-29 10:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HellMap ♦843 | Do you intend to also close the note or is further surveying needed?Should we specify payment as card only per note? |
| 153869473 by richlv @ 2024-07-12 19:26 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HellMap ♦843 | Vai te arī dzīvojamā zona mainījusies vai arī klasifikācija ne tā ap https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084714523 ? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Oi, nepievērsu tam uzmanību - paskatīšos bildēs drīz. Paldies par pamanīšanu :) | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Nu, nav visas zīmes [vēl]...Šur tur saliku kā living_street, bet būs vēl jāpārbauda, kad viss būs līdz galam sabūvēts. Pieliku https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4332122 . | |
| 47870537 by richlv @ 2017-04-17 13:08 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HellMap ♦843 | A kas tas tāds ir/bija te? 2017 Mapillary tikai stāvvieta. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | ĀĀĀ, droši vien barrier=chain, tajā laikā maps.me bija praktiski vienīgā mobilā appa, un tur bija ļoti ierobežoti POI tipi :) | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | somehundred ♦114 | Var šo dzēst ārā, ja? | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Derētu kādas svaigas bildes un pārbaudīt, kas tajā stūrī tagad ir sazīmējams, ja jau sākām skatīties :) | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Ķēde redzama apakšējā kreisajā stūrī te - bet bildei jau 7 gadi.https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=550282825959539 | |
| 148382505 by richlv @ 2024-03-08 12:37 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HellMap ♦843 | Tur tiešām abi Itella? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Cik atceros, tur bija jocīgi, ka blakus divi viena uzņēmuma pakomāti, jā. | |
| 9516384 by richlv @ 2011-10-09 19:32 ~ 14 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | somehundred ♦114 | Sveiki! Ko bijāt domājis, atzīmējot kartē https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1460453428? Es satelītattēlā neredzu neko, kas atbilstu tourism=attraction tagam. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Ļoti labs jautājums. Pirms 12 gadiem, JOSM... šis izskatās pēc netīša punkta, dzēšam ārā :) | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | somehundred ♦114 | Izdzēsu! | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Super, liels paldies par pamanīšanu un uzlabošanu. | |
| 150345836 by richlv @ 2024-04-22 12:56 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HellMap ♦843 | Tu nosaukumu izlaboji, bet te palika vēl 2 punkti ar "nosaukumiem" [1], [2], adrese kafejnīcai bija salūzusi [3] kā arī "stāvvieta" ar šķībiem tegiem [4]. Es to visu arī izlaboju, bet te gan varēja revertu vispirms uztaisīt un tikai pareizo pielikt.[1] https... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Liels paldies par pamanīšanu.Varēja pat droši revertēt manu un tad oriģinālo changesetu, ja tā būtu bijis vieglāk. | |
| 149835696 by richlv @ 2024-04-10 19:16 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HellMap ♦843 | Vai tu esi pārliecināts, ka visa [1] iela ir ciet ar būvniecību? No [2] izskatās tā pat kā marta vidū - atļauts tikai taksometriem un pa vidu šur tur kaut kāda būvniecība, bet izbraukt var (un līdzīga situācija principā uz daudziem ceļiem un ietvēm). Mans Mapillary vēl nav ... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Paldies par pamanīšanu, slēgts tiešām ir no plānotās Parka ielas - atjaunināju. | |
| 149795546 by richlv @ 2024-04-09 21:31 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Sveiki, vai te ir tikai šūpoles, vai arī rotaļu laukums?Noņēmu nosaukumu "šūpoles", jo OSM neliekam "aprakstošus nosaukumus" - t.i., kā nosaukumu parasti norādām tikai reālu vārdu. Piemēram, "Latvija", ne "Viesnīca Latvija"... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | AmOosm ♦4 | Man šķiet, ka tu nokomentēji uz nepareizā changeset :D | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | richlv | Oi, tiešām. Liels paldies par pamanīšanu :) | |
| 140713047 by richlv @ 2023-09-02 10:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | Note that this area now has both `highway=service` + `area=yes` AND `area:highway=yes`. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | richlv | Duh, indeed. Thanks, fixed now. | |
| 140562735 by richlv @ 2023-08-29 23:31 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | Just a note that these footways need indoor tagging scheme rather than covered=yes or similar. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | richlv | Probably, I was following the simpler approach that's feasible in a mobile editor for me - hopefully that's easier to update once the approximate layout is there :) | |
| 138275330 by richlv @ 2023-07-08 19:37 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | The boardwalk way still has smoothness=bad and surface=dirt left from before. These are probably not correct anymore. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | richlv | Thank you for spotting, fixed now. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | richlv | I had messed up the extent of the boardwalk (failed split?).Fixed now - the boardwalk is actually very short. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | I saw the long boardwalk and I assumed that was correct. The one NE is pretty long, so it seemed reasonable. I only saw it flooded/below water so I had no idea how far it goes. | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | richlv | Yeah, sorry about the confusion :) | |
| 135163685 by richlv @ 2023-04-20 18:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | Hey! I shrunk the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164141365 construction area. You mapped it across the entire location, but it's currently only a portion of it. It looks like it matches the cadaster plot, so that's what I retraced it to. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | richlv | Thanks, looking at these images, construction seems to be ongoing to the left pretty much up to the roundabout - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1277585273166386 , https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=952713332430452 .Also, along Lubānas iela, it's ongoing right up to the edge of the st... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | I see what you mean. But I think you are confusing the Reinvaldu to Lubānas section with the Lubānas to roundabout section. It does indeed go almost all the way to R/L intersection in a sort of triangle shape but not all the way to roundabout - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=759671655623268 ,... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | richlv | Oh, I see - thank you for checking it, that makes sense. | |
| 128453848 by richlv @ 2022-11-03 20:00 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | Is there a new a bridge here? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | richlv | Yeah, so I was told, and shown a photo of a wooden bridge :) | |
| 127904968 by richlv @ 2022-10-21 22:58 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | Hey! I think this changeset broke something about the forest multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13480473. I can't tell exactly what and why (and I'm not even 100% sure it's this edit). If I had to guess, the lake https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112309345/history now... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | richlv | Thank you so much for spotting this.The overlap causing this seems weird, as the residential area isn't a member of the multipolygon.I've removed the overlap anyway, let's see whether it helps any. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | richlv | Seems to be rendered as expected even before my latest changes, though.The multipolygon is crazy, not seeing anything obvious that could have affected this. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | Yeah, it has re-rendered correctly now, so I suspect the crossing ways was indeed what caused it. They were one outer and one inner, which probably confused the default renderer.Oh whoops, yeah, the residential is drawn as separate way. I was selecting the main/big forest way going down the same... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | richlv | I doubt my residential area change made a difference here - it actually had started rendering as expected before the change, I just had not refreshed it all.Given the complexity of that multipolygon (just look at the number of inner ways), I'll just be glad it looks mostly OK now :) | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | Weird. I don't see any other edits or changes here, so it may have been the renderer bugging out initially or later. Oh well. | |
| 124396404 by richlv @ 2022-08-02 15:05 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | Is there (now) a living zone here around [1]? From your Mapillary and my earlier visit, it doesn't look like it, but wanted to double check.[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083248667 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | richlv | As far as I recall, it's not market as living street (yet?). | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | richlv | I guess I kept living_street classification from this original way when I was splitting it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989378384/history .As it's all work-in-progress there, I'm fine with either classification :) | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | HellMap ♦843 | I guess I'll change it to residential until and if this actually gets designated as a living zone. Someone might end up converting these to living streets assuming that's what they are once they are built. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | richlv | Sounds good, thanks. | |
| 123311700 by richlv @ 2022-07-07 10:13 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Hufkratzer ♦876 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076536540 looks like a riding arena to me in the aerial view, but you tagged it with leisure=horse_riding. Please have a look at the wiki page for this tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding) and check if this is really the right tag for... |
| 118483859 by richlv @ 2022-03-14 19:46 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040341399. What ist the meaning of the tag landusend = cons? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | richlv | Haha, when my computer is slowish, I get all kinds of weird content in dialogs. Usually I spot it before uploading, but missed this time.Thank you for noticing, fixed now. | |
| 109016907 by richlv @ 2021-08-02 09:14 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | danieldegroot2 ♦705 | Hey richlv,I noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/969742117/history is marked as service way. I think this should be marked as residential, similar to the way to the north of it.(It's possible there were access restrictions on this way segment. If so, tag them with the relevant acces... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | richlv | Heya, thank you for checking.If these were separate, named streets, "residential" would be a good fit indeed - otherwise, I'd stick with "service".In our recent mapping party here we didn't get to these streets - will check with locals :) | |
| 101008529 by richlv @ 2021-03-14 21:31 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦6,972 | Could you check this bus stop? It got a strange 'sheln' tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8518899452 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | richlv | Ah, thanks - was tabbing too quickly through the input fields.Fixed now. | |
| 98045495 by richlv @ 2021-01-24 07:56 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Colbertson ♦141 | "sat tracing" but what imagery? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | richlv | Heya, usually I start with LĢIA ortophoto (recently also added in iD index, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2021-January/006198.html ), and compare with Maxar layers (usually more recent imagery but needs manual alignment), sometimes also with the LIDAR surface model, available at... | |
| 11870543 by richlv @ 2012-06-12 02:35 ~ 13 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Mashin ♦599 | I thought you would appreciate to know that the position and the shape of your Troll House from 2012 was finally fixed. :D |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | richlv | Haha, that's wonderful - and you kept all the object history, that's one well done import :)Thank you so much for the map improvements and this notice. | |
| 6482348 by richlv @ 2010-11-28 21:31 ~ 15 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Aglis IRM-ED ♦109 | Hi richlv, i changed geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/86962626). I also made change around this way. Thankyou |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | richlv | Great, thank you for the map improvements :) | |
| 82403548 by richlv @ 2020-03-19 19:06 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please the tags of node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070668, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070670, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070672. I assumed you mean addr:housenumber. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | richlv | Oops, they were supposed to be addr:flats.Fixed now.Thank you for spotting that. | |
| 79476983 by richlv @ 2020-01-12 14:14 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | richlv | The note on addr:steet missing acknowledged, couldn't easily figure it out on the ground (the number plate did not specify the street). Looking at it now, made a guess and added addr:street.There's a popular opinion that addr:city should be inferred, thus skipping that one. | |
| 79081415 by richlv @ 2020-01-01 13:36 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | RicoElectrico ♦1,798 | I found information on the various real estate sited that construction of Gołębia 33 was also done. Removed landuse=construction from there as well. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | richlv | Great, thank you for checking that :) | |
| 70493213 by richlv @ 2019-05-21 21:11 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | 4004 ♦1,939 | thanks! |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | 4004 ♦1,939 | just to check, did you revert all of his changesets not reverted by Tomas Straupis? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | richlv | I reverted all cemetery import changesets except one, where the revert had conflicts with changes by Tomas. Perhaps Tomas did manual deletes which caused that. | |
| 68689833 by richlv @ 2019-03-30 08:22 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arcth ♦35 | These buildings were demolished around year 2016. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | richlv | Dang, thank you - they looked fairly fresh on the sat layer ;)Perhaps a "note" tag around here could help future mappers. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | richlv | Noticed in #osm that for another location it was suggested to leave the outlines in place, prefixing them with demolished: - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished: .Does that sound good? | |
| 67496578 by richlv @ 2019-02-23 15:38 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,035 | What is it? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | richlv | Ha - thank you for the quick catch :)This had to wait for me checking the images (also coming up on Mapillary). This is http://www.skrastas.lt/?data=2009-09-22&rub=1065924831&id=1253544039 - but checking spelling and capitalisation would be appreciated. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,035 | Thank you. Spelling seems correct :-) | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | richlv | Yay, thank you. And for the record, here's a Mapillary image: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/7bLLuAWEUpmdkUW7rhbgzw | |
| 40474923 by richlv @ 2016-07-04 09:57 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ElliottPlack ♦934 | Wahoo! Now in Lavian |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | richlv | Latvian ;) | |
| 39634267 by richlv @ 2016-05-29 01:33 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | altim59 ♦2 | The point of Verners DE is not correct. It showed in the house #34, but really the shop placed near, into the house #32. |
| 39550900 by richlv @ 2016-05-25 08:11 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | AkageMuk ♦30 | Sveiks! Vai nav tā, ka koledžai ir jābūt amenity=college ? |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | richlv | jā, paldies - izlaboju.maps.me tāda nebija, un es vēl nepaspēju no kompja salabot :) | |
| 35441954 by richlv @ 2015-11-19 17:57 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | PlaneMad ♦454 | The note mentioned `temporarily converted to two-way due to Central Subway construction` which was the reason to remove the oneway. Do check the other ways in the area as they might now be accessible if the construction is complete. |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | richlv | ah, thanks for the info. that change has been reversed by now and should be reflected in the map then. unfortunately, won't be able to survey this region anytime soon, will have to involve locals :) | |
| 10171198 by richlv @ 2011-12-21 12:44 ~ 14 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,819 | please review way 82241230:the tag highway=lift is rarely used, is it okay to change it to highway=elevator ? |