| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70632193 by riteshaw @ 2019-05-26 13:01 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Hello,It looks like your addition of the tag motor_vehicle=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692581495/history has the same issue as previously discussed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71676441 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | riteshaw | Hi Andy,As per your suggestion the motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads have been reverted. I checked all these type of edits and reverted wherever necessary. Thanks for your insights. Changeset: #72006639 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Hello riteshaw,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 71863944 by riteshaw @ 2019-07-03 14:56 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Himanshu Galyan ♦6 | Test --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71863944 |
| 62921828 by riteshaw @ 2018-09-25 17:41 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | oba510 ♦274 | Please don't delete the service=* tags from service ways. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | riteshaw | Hi,We apologize for the late response. The edit was made as per the OSM wiki. Please check wiki link (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle) It was mentioned "A driveway onto a residential or commercial property, even if there are a small number of parking spots, ... | |
| 70508061 by riteshaw @ 2019-05-22 09:55 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | LivingWithDragons ♦55 | Please can you be more specific in declaring your imagery_used rather than using the same value for every change.I cannot see how you know that Fore Bondgate is one way. It would also be helpful to add access tags to this road. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | riteshaw | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit and we apologize for the delayed response. The image used here was BING AERIAL. The whole road segment was given one way except a small part at this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3817150656). So I just aligned the node onto the next node making the who... | |
| 71676441 by riteshaw @ 2019-06-27 15:09 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Hello,What was the source of the access change on here please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | riteshaw | Hi Andy,With reference to the motor vehicles parked in the satellite imagery, added motor_vehicle access tags to these roads. But as per community request reverting my changes. Do let me know if you have any further questions.Changeset #71750627Regards,riteshaw | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Hi Riteshaw,Thanks for that.Regards,Andy | |
| 71667341 by riteshaw @ 2019-06-27 10:29 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | What evidence do you have that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164374734 is a public right of way for motor vehicles. Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | riteshaw | Hi trigpoint,As per the vehicles parked in the building associated with this road the motor_vehicle tag was added. But as per the request from the community members, removing the motor vehicle tag to this road.changeset: 71749130Regards,riteshaw | |
| 70486868 by riteshaw @ 2019-05-21 17:14 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | LivingWithDragons ♦55 | This looks like it would be more appropriate as a parking aisle. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70486868 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. In the same wiki it states that "A driveway onto a residential or commercial property, even if there are a small number of parking spots, should still be tagged highway=service and service=driveway, and not as parking_aisle" in (Disambiguation) so i... | |
| 68177357 by riteshaw @ 2019-03-15 14:42 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | canfe ♦1,163 | why did you recreate a road that already existed?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/452407089 |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi canfe,Thanks for looking into this edit. The editor didn't recreate the road over here. He added a no_left_turn and a no_u_turn restriction at this node to which iD editor split the old way into two ways. During this process one way segment got assigned version 1 and the other half segme... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | canfe ♦1,163 | OK, now I understand | |
| 64047506 by riteshaw @ 2018-10-31 13:56 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Hi, please could you explain why you have removed the private tag from this way. Are you saying that it is now a public highway?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Phil,We had got an update from OSM community to avoid adding access tags where we cannot find any evidence. So we have tracked our edits and removed the access tags.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and ... | |
| 62874368 by riteshaw @ 2018-09-24 10:04 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | riteshaw | The comment was supposed to be 'Changed highway tag to Un-maintained tack road'. |