| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70632193 by riteshaw @ 2019-05-26 13:01 | 1 | 2019-07-05 16:26 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,It looks like your addition of the tag motor_vehicle=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692581495/history has the same issue as previously discussed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71676441 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without... |
| 2 | 2019-07-09 10:42 | riteshaw | Hi Andy,As per your suggestion the motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads have been reverted. I checked all these type of edits and reverted wherever necessary. Thanks for your insights. Changeset: #72006639 | |
| 3 | 2019-07-09 11:42 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello riteshaw,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 71863944 by riteshaw @ 2019-07-03 14:56 | 1 | 2019-07-04 11:16 | Himanshu Galyan ♦6 | Test --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71863944 |
| 62921828 by riteshaw @ 2018-09-25 17:41 | 1 | 2018-09-26 07:56 | oba510 ♦271 | Please don't delete the service=* tags from service ways. |
| 2 | 2019-07-03 10:23 | riteshaw | Hi,We apologize for the late response. The edit was made as per the OSM wiki. Please check wiki link (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle) It was mentioned "A driveway onto a residential or commercial property, even if there are a small number of parking spots, ... | |
| 70508061 by riteshaw @ 2019-05-22 09:55 | 1 | 2019-05-22 12:42 | LivingWithDragons ♦55 | Please can you be more specific in declaring your imagery_used rather than using the same value for every change.I cannot see how you know that Fore Bondgate is one way. It would also be helpful to add access tags to this road. |
| 2 | 2019-07-03 10:19 | riteshaw | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit and we apologize for the delayed response. The image used here was BING AERIAL. The whole road segment was given one way except a small part at this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3817150656). So I just aligned the node onto the next node making the who... | |
| 71676441 by riteshaw @ 2019-06-27 15:09 | 1 | 2019-06-28 13:52 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hello,What was the source of the access change on here please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-06-30 08:22 | riteshaw | Hi Andy,With reference to the motor vehicles parked in the satellite imagery, added motor_vehicle access tags to these roads. But as per community request reverting my changes. Do let me know if you have any further questions.Changeset #71750627Regards,riteshaw | |
| 3 | 2019-06-30 08:33 | SomeoneElse ♦13,568 | Hi Riteshaw,Thanks for that.Regards,Andy | |
| 71667341 by riteshaw @ 2019-06-27 10:29 | 1 | 2019-06-27 22:11 | trigpoint ♦2,503 | What evidence do you have that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164374734 is a public right of way for motor vehicles. Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2019-06-30 06:36 | riteshaw | Hi trigpoint,As per the vehicles parked in the building associated with this road the motor_vehicle tag was added. But as per the request from the community members, removing the motor vehicle tag to this road.changeset: 71749130Regards,riteshaw | |
| 70486868 by riteshaw @ 2019-05-21 17:14 | 1 | 2019-05-22 13:24 | LivingWithDragons ♦55 | This looks like it would be more appropriate as a parking aisle. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70486868 |
| 2 | 2019-05-24 06:45 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. In the same wiki it states that "A driveway onto a residential or commercial property, even if there are a small number of parking spots, should still be tagged highway=service and service=driveway, and not as parking_aisle" in (Disambiguation) so i... | |
| 68177357 by riteshaw @ 2019-03-15 14:42 | 1 | 2019-03-18 08:42 | canfe ♦1,138 | why did you recreate a road that already existed?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/452407089 |
| 2 | 2019-03-19 11:49 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi canfe,Thanks for looking into this edit. The editor didn't recreate the road over here. He added a no_left_turn and a no_u_turn restriction at this node to which iD editor split the old way into two ways. During this process one way segment got assigned version 1 and the other half segme... | |
| 3 | 2019-03-20 16:42 | canfe ♦1,138 | OK, now I understand | |
| 64047506 by riteshaw @ 2018-10-31 13:56 | 1 | 2018-11-01 12:51 | trigpoint ♦2,503 | Hi, please could you explain why you have removed the private tag from this way. Are you saying that it is now a public highway?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-11-01 13:34 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Phil,We had got an update from OSM community to avoid adding access tags where we cannot find any evidence. So we have tracked our edits and removed the access tags.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and ... | |
| 62874368 by riteshaw @ 2018-09-24 10:04 | 1 | 2018-09-24 10:08 | riteshaw | The comment was supposed to be 'Changed highway tag to Un-maintained tack road'. |