| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71301468 by rmmunnan @ 2019-06-16 13:34 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,692 | Hello,You're addition of the motor_vehicle=yes tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697571076/history looks like it has the same issue as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71669010 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and rem... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rmmunnan | Hi Andy,Thanks for looking into my edit. As suggested by the community, we ran the overpass query and modified the motor_vehicle=yes tag to unspecified. Let me know in case you have any further suggestions. Apologies for a delayed response.Regards,rmmunnan | |
| 72633741 by rmmunnan @ 2019-07-25 08:51 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,621 | Hi, this should be tagged access=private. There are signs saying "Residents Only".Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rmmunnan | Hi Phil, Thanks for looking into my edit. I had not added the access tag = private due to the lack of street side imagery. However, as per your suggestions I have added the private access tag. Let me know in case you have any further suggestions. Always happy to learn from the local community.... | |
| 72079716 by rmmunnan @ 2019-07-10 06:31 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | tux67 ♦2,020 | This is a private property - any reason to add a service road here? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72079716 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | while it can be seen from aerial imageries that it obviously exists.and it can be used for deliveries, paper routes, and visitors even if irrelevant to the general public other than being a landmark for orientation.any good reason not to add it? access can be tuned to fit, but as a dead end... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | rmmunnan | Hi tux67 & freebeer,Thanks for your comments. From Satellite imagery and our delivery partners GPS traces we identified it to be a missing road so added the service road over here. We don't have a valid source to validate if it is a private road or publicly accessible road so didn'... | |
| 71669010 by rmmunnan @ 2019-06-27 11:21 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,692 | Hello,What was the source of the access tag change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rmmunnan | Hi Andy,Since the service roads with in the building had vehicles parked, added motor_vehicle tag to these roads. As per community feedback reverted my changes. Please let me know if you have any further suggestions.Changeset: 71748486 Regards,rmmunnan | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,692 | Hello rmmunnan,Thanks for that.Regards,Andy | |
| 70499908 by rmmunnan @ 2019-05-22 04:49 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | LivingWithDragons ♦55 | It is unusual for highway=service to only be accessible via highway=track. Please can you review what value the ways should actually have. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. The Un-maintained track road was drawn 2 years ago. There is no enough resource to check whether it is really a track road or not. The pavement around Dyer Engineering looks paved and it is an industrial building. So the editor drew service roads from Un-Main... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | a track road provides access to agricultural fields or forest, while it is pretty clear that this is all industry and so should be re-tagged differently here.the imagery shows the so-called track has the same surface as the added service drive, passes through a parking/loading/whatever area just... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for suggesting. We will change the track road to service road. But there are many roads drawn in this area as track roads even though it is not going through fields/forests. Actually adding unpaved to the roads will be correct fix. Once again thanks for the suggestion. We are always ... | |
| 70500138 by rmmunnan @ 2019-05-22 05:01 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | LivingWithDragons ♦55 | The wiki documentation instructs that the building and road should share nodes at the start/end points of the passage. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passagePlease could you be more specific about the imagery_used tag. It is unclear what you actually used for th... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,The building passages were added as per the ground truth. We followed the same as most of the mappers in UK are following. And yes it is mentioned in wiki that the way and building should share the nodes at entry/exit. We will edit it as per your suggestion and continue the same for the futur... |